Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.66951421

>>66951409
fuck you

>> No.66951424

Yet another redesign? The fuck?
Anyways, surefire way to kill brand recognition

>> No.66952270

>>66951409
system 2 but change the second row with system 1's icons

>> No.66952294

Why?
The original looked great and covered everything you needed to know just from the icon. A globe representing the internet, and a fire fox around it. Peak performance, plus nice to look at.
This is just boring shit, looks like a generic ad ridden phone app normies without standards use.
Cheap. Minimalism should go and stay go.

>> No.66952305

>>66952294
>looks like a generic ad ridden phone app normies without standards use.
Just like the browser itself, recently.
I have to admit, at least they know their Target audience.

>> No.66952312

So... it's gitlabs now?

>> No.66952324

>>66951409
I think that literally every logo redesign that every company or organization has ever done has been a waste of money, brains, and time. Once you have a recognizable and recognized logo, there's no reason to ever change it.

>> No.66952339

>>66952324
>Once you have a recognizable and recognized logo, there's no reason to ever change it.
That's what GNU/tards actually believe.
https://www.gnu.org/graphics/package-logos.html

>> No.66953160

Mozilla needs to layoff 95% of their designers.
Bunch of monkeys inventing pointless work so they keep getting paid.

>> No.66953166

>>66951409
>utm_campaign=theverge
>utm_medium=social
>utm_source=twitter
>What do you guys think?
I think, no, I'm sure your life is worthless.

>> No.66953173
File: 163 KB, 541x355, c-graph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66953173

>>66952339
What were they thinking?

>> No.66953579

>>66951409
what the fuck

>> No.66953601
File: 743 KB, 1024x1024, 7Ih60Gu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66953601

still tehbest

>> No.66953607

>>66951409
Who cares? It's shit browser for SJWs.

>> No.66953630

>>66953607
Botnet please.

>> No.66953715

>>66953607
lol

>> No.66953777

>>66951409
I hope GitLab sues them

>> No.66953785
File: 69 KB, 862x580, Phoenix_0.1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66953785

Just make the Phoenix logo more professionally executed

>> No.66953931

>>66951409
>what's important
making new logo for the project
>what's not important
making good soft so people will use it

I have a strange feeling they're browsing /g/

>> No.66953944

>>66951409
Both shit. Also are they trying to change the logo every years now?

>> No.66953970

>>66951409
I bet this has something to do with webrender being on the final stages of implementation (speed ups aren't in yet though)

>> No.66953983

>>66951409
It's trash.

>> No.66953989

>>66951409
They look pretty cool IMO

>> No.66954058

>>66951409
>“As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family,” Mozilla designers wrote

What the fuck does this even mean? Why would you not use your wildly successful, universally recognised symbol for every icon? Isn't that the whole point of an icon? You don't see Coca-Cola swapping their iconic font out when they launch a new flavour.

>> No.66954088
File: 76 KB, 702x196, history-Mozilla-Firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954088

>when your logo quality forms a bell curve

>> No.66954456
File: 119 KB, 500x628, firefox logo degeneration.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954456

>> No.66954480
File: 258 KB, 627x633, 1527917400099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954480

>if we change the logo, maybe people will use our browser!

>> No.66954483

shruggy wuggies

uwu

>> No.66954497

>>66951409
System 1 is good, but the bottom 5 icons are better on system 2. So that would be good.

>> No.66954616

>>66951409
>designed by transwomen with love

>> No.66954670
File: 462 KB, 3216x2136, 1522666319606.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954670

>>66954058
It means it's not inclusive enough, fucktard, the fuck you think it means!? Also: Marxists hate quality.

>> No.66954684

>>66954616
...and that's a good thing

>> No.66954694

>>66954058
It means they're looking for a logo for their brand as a whole, including programs that aren't Firefox. It's not really a Firefox logo, it's a Mozilla logo, but rebranding for brand awareness.

>> No.66954764
File: 84 KB, 720x548, 15316934696885185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954764

>>66953166
I always change utm_source to some pornsite.

>> No.66954775

>>66954684
You forgot the question mark

>> No.66954791

>>66951409
Well the first logo is just GitLab and the second one is just a circle.

>> No.66954810
File: 539 KB, 2000x1675, firefox-rebrand-systems.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954810

>>66951409
Why so many colors and shit?

>> No.66954838

>>66954775
umm no?

>> No.66954903

>>66954810
colours are nice

>> No.66954937

>>66951409
Did Mozilla just bought Gitlab?

>> No.66954941
File: 17 KB, 129x129, 93EC1EBD-4B74-470A-B1C2-A46C8756A1ED.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954941

>>66952339
Fucking based.

>> No.66954952

>>66954810
Colours make shit stand out if you've got the whole set there together. You see this on a lot of preinstalled app-suites on android phones, for example. Their designers act as if people are just going to have all *their* apps on one screen next to each other, either through retarded ignorance or just that it makes the set look better when you present it to your boss.

>> No.66954970

>>66954810
i don't know what anything outside of the second row is supposed to be

>> No.66954983
File: 127 KB, 411x763, testing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66954983

>>66954810
Represent alternative services offered.

>> No.66954996

>>66954810
Easier to tell icons apart. This is why monochrome icon packs and material design icons are trash, you can't properly distinguish icons.

>> No.66955012
File: 93 KB, 1692x588, 3375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66955012

Minimalism is the cancer that is killing design.

Look how nice the old logos had looked (minus the bird design of course).

>> No.66955021
File: 34 KB, 180x145, logo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66955021

>>66952339
>his software's logo isn't turtles having sex

>> No.66955027
File: 44 KB, 960x540, 1531666358691.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66955027

>>66955012
>>66954456
>>66954088
>>66953785
Classic design mind

>> No.66955029

>>66951409
Left is some gay Google PlayStore shit.

Note - we are seeing a new evolution in graphic design. Decorative gradients and texture are being reintroduced into GUIs. Blurry glass panels and decorative animations. The age of flat design is over.

>> No.66955055

>>66953173
That's a fucking sick logo. Tjere are way worse logos in that list.

>> No.66955068

>>66954810
I like it

>> No.66955077

>>66952270
This

>> No.66955080

>>66951409
the fuck, why don't they fixed memory leaks on their product instead of this shit?

>> No.66955141
File: 63 KB, 430x267, thoughts.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66955141

>>66951409
>What do you guys think?

>> No.66955154

>>66955029
> The age of flat design is over.
Thank fucking god. I hope we can return to the 2000s design of making every fucking thing glossy, I unironically loved that.

>> No.66955990

why can't this stupid flat-minimalistic-design trend die? it makes everything look cheap & poorly designed.

>> No.66956043
File: 13 KB, 480x240, gitlab-card.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956043

>>66951409
lol

>> No.66956153
File: 37 KB, 1120x988, phoenix.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956153

>>66953785
how's this look anon

>> No.66956182

>>66955012
2009 is worse than 2013 though. The tail is too dull.

>> No.66956186

>>66951409
Didn't they just redesign the logo last year?

>> No.66956187

>>66956043
delet

>> No.66956204

>>66955990
What's your idea of a good design?

>> No.66956212

>>66955012
why is that fox fucking the earth?

>> No.66956237
File: 42 KB, 231x734, IMG_20180731_082005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956237

>>66954952
I always open my camera instead of my clock on my phone because the icons are almost the same color

>> No.66956239

>>66951409
>What do you guys think?
That I was right when I ditched Firefox for Chromium after the Quantum.
Looks like they will add even more shit like pocket and chat with her event every year instead of a better browser

>> No.66956287

>>66955021
https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils/faq.html
What is the name of the turtles?

They are called Fred and George. And yes, they are both male.

>> No.66956288

>>66955990
pretty much everything designed pre-2015. the old 2013 firefox logo is still the best looking one

>> No.66956293 [DELETED] 
File: 403 KB, 1552x900, icons.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956293

>>66956237
Does your launcher support custom icon themes?

>> No.66956366

>>66954456
This is relevant and accurate

>> No.66956408

>>66956237
>I always open my camera instead of my clock on my phone because the icons are almost the same color
Are you retarded or is this bait?

>> No.66956454

>>66951424
Firefox has been bleeding users for a decade and is close to the point of irrelevance now. The only thing people seem to recognise about Firefox's branding is that they want nothing to do with it. So why NOT change it? What do they have to lose at this point?

And don't say "hurr durr their loyal fans", because If all the fetid shit that Mozilla has forced down your throat at this point hasn't made you switch, a logo change sure isn't going to do it.

>> No.66956487

>>66951409
>left is meme tier india app degsin
>right is literally what does that even mean.

>> No.66956577

>>66951409
I can't even tell what half of those icons are supposed to symbolize

>> No.66956583
File: 131 KB, 710x1000, firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956583

>>66951409
2030 logo, everyone.

>> No.66956594

>>66956408
I am retarded

(Actually, now that I look closer, they're both kind of circle-shaped, so that doesn't help)

>> No.66956660
File: 53 KB, 673x358, firefox-sobre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956660

>>66956583

>> No.66956696
File: 348 KB, 1072x1024, Firefox-logo.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956696

>>66951409
Nothing beats pic related. What's wrong with a logo that acutally represents the company, instead of shapes, swooshes, and gradients.

>> No.66956715

>>66956696
>represents the company
*the product

>> No.66956716
File: 166 KB, 512x512, 1531239627364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956716

>>66956660

>> No.66956731

>>66951409
where's the fox???

>> No.66956764

>>66954088
2004 unironically the best

>> No.66956778

>>66956696
Exactly. It has a perfect colour scheme, perfect contrast and a very recognizable shape. Overall 10/10
Why the fuck they would get rid of it is incomprehensible

>> No.66956790

>>66954694
but they already did that.. moz://a remember?

>> No.66956801
File: 91 KB, 1919x1049, mozilla.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66956801

>>66951409
Sucks balls
Anyways I don't expect anything from Mozilla's design team, they even fucked up the display of the site on a 1080p screen

>> No.66956826

>>66956801
It could've been kinda cool if they had invented a new amazing "moz" protocol, where accessing moz://a would actually lead to the mozilla website

>> No.66956828

>>66956801
>cancer

>> No.66956829

What a good use of funds and time, I'm glad Mozilla is dedicated to finding specific ways to annoy their own dwindling userbase.

>let's change things
>oh no our users are leaving and they say it's because our changes were in fact bad
>let's keep pushing on the things people openly dislike
>WHY ARE THEY LEAVING, WE'RE CHANGING THINGS! LEADER NOT MASTER!

>> No.66956849

>>66956826
Yeah, that would be actually pretty cool, but they fucking need to fix this shit, that looks like crap and I'M USING FUCKING FIREFOX

>> No.66956855

i think we're on to something here
as anon already mentioned the constant logo shifting only dilutes the brand and makes it less recognisable by confusing people, they are literally only wasting money AND killing the product

>> No.66956862

>>66953785
>Phoenix
For them, now more than ever, this would be so fitting.

>>66956829
>only use Firefox because it does things other browsers don't
>they start removing those things
>there are no alternatives besides using old versions or forks maintained by literally who or yourself
what hell is this?

>> No.66956890

>>66956801
>finally make a logo using :// right when distributed content-addressed systems are becoming all the rage
/9c2f924fb2f7004e7979ab2027ca1d65/top/kek

>> No.66956901

>>66956862
They're not even aware of their products

>> No.66958510

>>66951409
I wish they'd stop chasing fads and do their own thing. Is this what happens with your company is bloated with women?

>> No.66958524

>>66953173
Looks like the final boss in an RPG maker game

>> No.66958541

>>66954088
2005 was so comfy

>> No.66958547

>>66954456
I was looking for this to post it

>> No.66958558

>>66951409
The right one looks like the swirling water of a toilet full of bloody shit from a faggots raped anus.

>> No.66958566

>>66956826
>a new protocol JUST to link to a website
oh yes, and getting ads injected into our bloodstream is also an amazing idea!!!!

>> No.66958574
File: 202 KB, 860x722, CopyQ.BC2119.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66958574

OP's pic related is not the proposed firefox icons, it's the master brand logos.

>> No.66958579

>>66956660
>Not Firefox Rectum

>> No.66958581

>>66954456
>>66956153
kek/10

>> No.66958585
File: 1.24 MB, 229x195, cMatrix.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66958585

That means Firefox is dead.

>> No.66958592

>>66952305
>Just like the browser itself, recently.
The browser has actually improved a lot with Quantum but you're too concerned about who is using it to notice it.

>> No.66958603

How will time travellers now recognize Firefox?

Stupid. Very low iq management.

>> No.66958644

>>66958592
With quantum it lost main selling point for me (extensions wit actual functionality on any page (vimfx)) after that it's one retardation (no sandbox with ALSA) after another (pocket and ads).

>> No.66958667
File: 37 KB, 216x233, ILL literally in the name, put it down.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66958667

>Oy vey, we company now! Err, I mean, donate to our designe… erm... free world wide web initiative!

>> No.66959037

>>66954810
System 2 it's the only usable one but it's incredibly trashy
Just make a flat version of the classic logos

>> No.66959091

>>66956454
There's plenty of people who still recognize Firefox, the fox logo is recognized by pretty almost half of internet users out there who're over 25 years old
Fx had at it's peak over 40% marketshare

>> No.66959262

>>66959091
Read the post again you fucking retard. Firefox's brand means literally nothing in 2018. The past is the fucking past, you stupid fucking cocksucker. Fuck you're dumb. Fuck you.

>> No.66960277

>>66959262
All of those people still remember Fx, it's WAY easier for a brand that's still remembered to rise again than new branding braindead dumbfuck

>> No.66961054

>>66951409
look like gitlab

>> No.66962338

>relatively minor change
time for /g/ to sperg out again

>> No.66962354

>>66951409
i think it’s time to move back to chromium

>> No.66962360

>>66962338
>90° tilted C vanishes out of the logo
>minor change

Rust shill detected

>> No.66962365

>>66953173
great logo

>> No.66962377

>>66951409
BLATANT plagiarism of gitlab. The designer who did this should be fired and blacklisted, but probably won't be because they're probably a [ethnic/religious/sexual] minority

>> No.66962390

time to switch to google ultron

>> No.66962432

>>66953173
LSD time!

>> No.66962459

>>66958579
underrated post

>> No.66962482

How the fuck is Google allowed to still shill their browser through their search?
Now that EU hasn't really got a dog in the fight (Opera), it's a good time for some nice fines.

>> No.66962486

>>66962482
Microshit does the same.

>> No.66962489

>>66952312
When I saw the thumbnail I really thought this thread would be about some Firefox / GitLab collaboration

>> No.66962598
File: 83 KB, 423x185, redesigned.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66962598

I put an end to this.

>> No.66963003

>>66962486
MS doesn't have 101% of the global population using their search

>> No.66963209

>>66962598
post it pls

>> No.66963340
File: 18 KB, 587x537, firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66963340

>>66963209
Sure

>> No.66964441
File: 406 KB, 640x939, Girls-Who-Code-Book-Cover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66964441

>>66951409

>> No.66964449

>>66963340
>>66962598
delede

>> No.66965160

>>66963340
>jpg

>> No.66965200

>>66951409
THANK YOU BASED MOZILLA

>> No.66965213

>>66963340
delet :(

>> No.66965457

>>66963340
The fox needs to enter rehab.

>> No.66966045
File: 46 KB, 600x291, google-icon-free-download-png-and-vector-with-google-logo-2010.png.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66966045

Google logo peaked in 2010-2013

>> No.66966541

>>66959262
The other day I talked with a friend who doesn't even know what an addblock is. She said she was using Internet explorer and then switched to "google" but she finds it slow, so I suggested firefox to which she answered "Is that the one with a fox as a logo?"

>> No.66966557
File: 616 KB, 1102x1024, commiefox.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66966557

>> No.66966614
File: 45 KB, 826x768, dumb cunt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66966614

>>66966541
Yeah, chrome is seen as the standard alternative to IE

>> No.66966654

>>66954810
Sys1 obviously better
Sys2 looks like msoft pajeet clipart

>> No.66966690

>>66954456
I unironically wouldn't mind something like the 2021 one.

>> No.66969342

>>66962338

Discussing non-technical aspects is the only thing the majority of people on here are capable of. That's why these bike-shedding, unimportant things get so many replies.

If you had a thread about some change in the HTML rendering engine, no one would discuss it because it requires actual, useful knowledge.

>> No.66969795

>>66954810
System 1 for the actual firefox logo, system 2 for everything else.

>> No.66971072
File: 577 KB, 2000x1675, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66971072

>>66954810

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action