Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 93 KB, 705x740, AMD-Ryzen-7-2700X-Juegos-Full-HD-04-705x740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530011 No.65530011 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

INTEL BTFO

>> No.65530030

>>65530011
>goldface.jpg

Kek previous thread deleted for what reason?

>> No.65530036 [DELETED] 

3. You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images, post number GETs ("dubs"), or loli/shota pornography.

>> No.65530054

>>65530011
kek, and that's running slow ram most likely on x370 too
show it rynning some 3600 or 4000 RAM

>> No.65530077

>>65530011
>My entire identity is linked to a corporate CPU designer that I have no personal association to
Exactly what went wrong with your life?

>> No.65530086

>>65530011
A new CPU is beating an older CPU? I'm shocked.

>> No.65530095

>>65530086
(You)

>> No.65530112 [DELETED] 
File: 108 KB, 782x782, intel-operative.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530112

>>65530011
Oy vey, oy vey! WE control this site now! Janitors REMOVE this thread RIGHT AWAY!

>> No.65530121 [DELETED] 

>>65530112
3. You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images, post number GETs ("dubs"), or loli/shota pornography.

>> No.65530137 [DELETED] 

>>65530112
into the gas chamber for you

>> No.65530140 [DELETED] 

>>65530036
>>65530121
is this the new "you're not funny" ?

>> No.65530152 [DELETED] 

>>65530140
>he's been doing literally nothing else for years
>>65530077

>> No.65530153

>>65530030
Mods are intel shills

>> No.65530155 [DELETED] 

>>65530036
>>65530121
I don't know if you realise it but you're shitposting too, jewish newfriend.

>> No.65530157 [DELETED] 
File: 18 KB, 267x297, 1497883217071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530157

>>65530036

>> No.65530170 [DELETED] 

>>65530152
yeah, I'm in 4chan for a few years now, what about it?

>> No.65530178 [DELETED] 
File: 125 KB, 960x878, 1497605657417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530178

>>65530036

>> No.65530181 [DELETED] 

>>65530170
And in that time you've never questioned that your only hobby is crying about Intel on /g/?

>> No.65530194 [DELETED] 

>>65530181
>seeing people posting about it
>posting about it
pick one

>> No.65530197
File: 117 KB, 705x740, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530197

>6700k twice
>6700k on par with 8400
>8400 beating everything

yeah nah

>> No.65530212

>>65530197
wait for real benchmarks made by non spics

>> No.65530217

>gaming
Who gives a fuck, go back to /v/

>> No.65530236 [DELETED] 
File: 18 KB, 494x375, free4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530236

>>65530011
LMAO at the butthurt mods patrolling these threads for anything anti intel

>> No.65530253 [DELETED] 
File: 158 KB, 1014x840, 2018-04-13_22-13-22.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530253

Why you deleting anything anti intel mods?

>> No.65530259 [DELETED] 

>>65530253
lol, what a joke

>> No.65530260
File: 114 KB, 713x179, fag.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530260

>>65530197

>> No.65530266

>>65530260
it's clearly ranking by the dx11 scores

>> No.65530271

Mods are finally cleaning up the autistic "le Intel Jew" spammer?
I've noticed a distinct lack of daily threads crying about women in tech, too.
I could get used to this.

>> No.65530276

>>65530266
why use DX11 if DX12 gets better frames

>> No.65530282

>>65530011
>>65530157
>>65530178
>>65530236
>>65530253
>16 posts
>7 unique ids
Stop samefagging OP
>>65530271
The cunt is spamming

>> No.65530286

>>65530260

and the first 6700k has higher you dumb cunt

>> No.65530291 [DELETED] 
File: 26 KB, 200x200, Holy+i+didn+t+have+that+one+_27f4ea5616d2dbe9b98e1e04f0cfb675.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530291

>>65530271
Na goyim, just cry about it some more, then cry about how intel just lost the one advantage intel had, gaymen

>> No.65530293
File: 94 KB, 720x736, 1520876943249.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530293

>Beats intel, on a single title,
>INTLEL BTFO
Yeah...NO, whoever i am open to sell my i7 6700k if this refresh turns out to be good.

>> No.65530296 [DELETED] 
File: 154 KB, 559x556, 121213213131.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530296

>>65530291
Hey dumbass we can see you spamming

>> No.65530298

>>65530286
>discontinued cpu on a EOL platform
don't care it could be Pentium 4 for all i dont care if it isnt current

>> No.65530304 [DELETED] 
File: 343 KB, 672x794, 1502055755975.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530304

>>65530296
Im not spamming intel shill, go cry on reddit

>> No.65530313

>>65530077
Found the Intel.tm shill

>> No.65530316
File: 129 KB, 720x378, AMD-Ryzen-7-2700X-Juegos-4K-03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530316

>>65530293
Beats intel in every single game they tested

>> No.65530321 [DELETED] 

>>65530298

>eol cpu is better than cpu that isnt out yet

amd eternally btfo

>> No.65530327 [DELETED] 

>>65530236
They have to get pai-

>> No.65530333
File: 9 KB, 375x212, chrome_2018-04-13_22-23-51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530333

>>65530282
Only one is me, just calm down intel lost

>> No.65530335

>>65530011
>i5 8400 is faster than i7 8700k
>the city of intel aviv

>> No.65530340 [DELETED] 
File: 12 KB, 284x177, free3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530340

>>65530327
Until the ban me for AMD > Intel

>> No.65530343

>>65530316
Holy within-margin-of-error batman!

>> No.65530344

>>65530335
see >>65530260

>> No.65530348

>>65530316
Link of this travesty site anon sir

>> No.65530349 [DELETED] 
File: 84 KB, 653x726, 1489421658644.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530349

>>65530321

>> No.65530368

>>65530348
its some spic shit

>> No.65530372 [DELETED] 
File: 6 KB, 350x314, 1496608156512.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530372

>>65530343
i-its just margin of error

>> No.65530377

>>65530276
DX11 is the current standard that 99% of all games run with.

>> No.65530378
File: 33 KB, 243x283, 1502212241775.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530378

>>65530368
LINK IT PLEASE GOOD SIR

>> No.65530386 [DELETED] 
File: 26 KB, 477x318, 1514431994814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530386

>>65530304
>>65530349
>>65530372
>he shills for amd
>he does it for free

>> No.65530414

there are rumors you can now overclock the IF. if this is true intel is truly fucked

>> No.65530417
File: 51 KB, 604x410, 1294840231482.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530417

I am an admitted AMD fanboy, but all this shitposting over games gets tiresome. Doesn't /g/ have anything better to discuss? I can't wait til VIA releases their x86 chips so there's some other cpu to talk about....which will just devlove into MUH GAYMES

>> No.65530424

>>65530417
VIA is shit and will always be.

>> No.65530427

>>65530378
Here
https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/2018/04/review-amd-ryzen-7-2700x-x470/

Translated
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en-419&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Felchapuzasinformatico.com%2F2018%2F04%2Freview-amd-ryzen-7-2700x-x470%2F&edit-text=

>> No.65530430

>>65530414
isn't IF tied with RAM speed?

>> No.65530442

>>65530424
Nah, VIA is really good for the power envelope it's trying to meet. Supposedly their newest chips will be at least somewhat performance focused.

>> No.65530445

>>65530430
This was always assumed. AFAIK AMD never confirmed it nor denied

>> No.65530459
File: 196 KB, 318x337, 1502421121879.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530459

>>65530427
Thank you anon

>> No.65530465
File: 210 KB, 718x568, 2700latency.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530465

>>65530414
>>65530378
Ram latency is also closing in on being as good as intel

>> No.65530466

>>65530427
>he can't read Spanish
baka gaijin

>> No.65530471

>In b4 Intlel fags saying 8700K is not overclocked to 5 niggerhurtz

>> No.65530474
File: 155 KB, 1267x859, 1503632667105.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530474

>>65530459
Np

>> No.65530475

>>65530011
Glad to see AMD back on their feet again. It's honestly about time.

>> No.65530498

Again it's the same issue though. Intel shills will continue to spout how they can overcock their CPU's to 4.9-5.2Ghz and wipe the floor with AMD in games.

>> No.65530508
File: 85 KB, 603x657, 1521278269293_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530508

>>65530427
>Nothing spectacular. Going head to head against Intel
And that's actually the big news here.

>> No.65530521

>>65530498
Their joy will end when 7nm Zen hits the shelves

>> No.65530524

>>65530508
Well, considering that AMD closed the gap that took Intel 7 generations to create in just 2 gens, I think this is actually big news.

>> No.65530526

>>65530521
intel mainstream 8 cores with 200W TDP when?

>> No.65530528

>>65530459
It's spanish, not br.
Which means the site is cheating because they used a Ryzen blanco on those benchmarks.

>> No.65530531
File: 18 KB, 1922x506, screenfetch-taeyeon-2018-03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530531

>>65530054
>show it rynning some 3600 or 4000 RAM
They probably can't. Don't know how the new motherboards will perform and don't know about their new CPU either but current AMD motherboards and CPUs have a hard time running 3000 MHz with most kits. Some what related, they don't tell us what timings are used so it's hard to say how much the RAM they used matters for the performance numbers (2400 can be faster than 3000).

>>65530498
Well, they can. 99.9% of people who buy their products aren't going to overclock - even if they buy the K parts. But if you prefer random bluescreens over a stable system then you can get more out of overclocking Intel chips.

>> No.65530545

>>65530498
>BTFOs all non-k parts
:')

>> No.65530559
File: 729 KB, 1024x1280, __black_general_zannen_onna_kanbu_black_general_san_drawn_by_jin_mugenjin__15691ce764a628cea6207dc43ee61614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530559

>>65530524
Long live AMD

>> No.65530565

>>65530531
3200 is now a supported configuration on 2xxx/x470

according to GN the subtimings are all tweakable

>> No.65530566

>>65530011
Why are you spic posting before the embargo was even lifted? There's no way to verify these.

>> No.65530571

>>65530566
when the embargo lifts?

>> No.65530593

>>65530571
Apri 19th? It's the release date

>> No.65530596

I'm not familiar with CPU price trends. Would it be best for me to preorder my chip now as the prices will increase over time like gpus, or should I wait for a sale?

>> No.65530599 [DELETED] 
File: 162 KB, 1000x1000, 1413913323099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530599

>>65530566

>> No.65530602

>>65530593
meh, it's way too far
spicposting is the way

>> No.65530644

>>65530596
Nah
Prices might get lower in like 8 months but there's really no reason to wait for a 20 dollar slash

>> No.65530647

>>65530528
>CPU normally operates at around 3 Ghz
>But if you push it at 3volts briefly, the CPU will crash for a while, but then will recover and start to deliver a staggering performance while still at 3 Ghz because it will be able to naturally dodge all forms of stall and just keep executing perfectly
>It's not very consumer friendly because it keeps playing this song quite loudly via piezo effect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi4Hnaj74pQ
>It also makes the computer case have this glowing white aura

>> No.65530692

>>65530011
I am all in for amd beating Intel but this pic seems fake.
>6700k beating 8700k
>6700k appears twice with same memory speed but different data
>8400 beating 8700k with the same memory speed

>> No.65530696 [DELETED] 
File: 45 KB, 200x200, intel jew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65530696

>>65530011
DELID

>> No.65530720

>>65530692
Look at any gaymen shit for the coffee lake release the 8400 was on top, its real

>> No.65530763

AMD supplied reviewers with Sniper-X 8400 DDR4. So expect some interesting results.

>> No.65530788

>>65530763
4000MHz B-Die when?

>> No.65530800

PLZ B REAL

>> No.65530813

>>65530692
kek, Sandy Vag can match the 8700K in gaymes

>> No.65530891

>>65530788
I believe all of the ram that runs that fast is b-die. I have a middling 3600 cl16 kit that could do 4k and I'm sure they sell these same chips stock at 4k.
Even on intel I got a massive FPS uplift at 1080p going from 2400mhz to this kit, like 20fps average.
Getting ready to jump on that 2700x train here soon.

>> No.65530939

>>65530891
can't wait for the reviews
I wonder how much the 2700x can be overclocked on a d15

>> No.65530953

>>65530011
>time of muh gaymes benchmarks
>>>/v/
inb4
>haha, butthurt jewteler
I have 1700 ryzen

>> No.65530967

>>65530953
gaymen doesnt matter but its just to rub in the face of the permabutthurt intelfags

>> No.65531022

>>65530011
wow, whyd they give the intel chip 3600 ram and only 3200 to the ryzen?

>> No.65531030

>>65530647
The video's not from the show right? Looks too high quality.

>> No.65531047

>>65531030
Last few eps had more frames of animation than the whole rest of the shw.

>> No.65531066

>>65530011
Gaymer fag detected
>>>/vg/

>> No.65531110

>>65530465
71,5 to 66,3 is a drop exactly according to frequency change. 80ns on older X370? What?

>> No.65531127

>>65531110
>80ns on older X370? What?
Buggy BIOS. They couldn't test gaymes on it because it's too unstable with the 2700X

>> No.65531135

make your bets on how much IPC will improve on zen2 compared to zen+
for me it's 15~20%

>> No.65531179

>>65531127
ree

>> No.65531198
File: 246 KB, 882x758, 1497816617718.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65531198

Roses are red
AMD lies
Ignore the fake news
Intel is /ourguys/

>> No.65531308

I think it's good.
It's a brand new CPU after all, it'd be a shame if it didn't stack up to Intels older stuff.
Intel threw out the 8 series and beat AMD last time so let's see what they try this time.
Since they always hold back just so people can buy that 1% increase in performance per CPU gen...

Though AMD really need to fix they ram problems.
I want the old AMD x64 3700+ RAM monsters of the past again.

>> No.65531314

>>>/v/ is that way.

>> No.65531353
File: 162 KB, 1000x1000, 1413913323099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65531353

>>65531314

>> No.65531436

>>65531135
10% tops
10% clock speed tops

>> No.65531488
File: 152 KB, 398x397, 1493925047318.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65531488

>want to buy this to replace my 1700x

>> No.65531508

More of a general question: couldn't AMD and Intel do some 4c/8t or just 6c processors with clock speed something like 4GHz and TDP about 20W for desktops? Perfect htpc/quiet build processors.

>> No.65531516

>>65531314
/v/ are intel shills that crossboarded from /g/, you double nigger.

>> No.65531532

>>65530011
Keep in mind that Ryzen 2 is basically Ryzen 1 but with better clockspeed and GAMES got optimized for it over the last 1 year.

I mean, I constantly saw improvments by each driver/update they release for the PC/Motherboard.

>> No.65531535

>>65531135
They said beating 6% industry average. So I'm betting 7-8%

>> No.65531612

>>65531508
Nope.
The transistor tech simply does not allow that to happen.

>> No.65531626

>>65531508
https://www.amazon.com/AMD-AD5350JAHMBOX-Quad-core-Desktop-Processor/dp/B00IOMFAQ0/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1523689701&sr=8-2&keywords=amd+am1+cpu

they don't make it anymore but if you can find it for sub 50$

>> No.65531679

>>65531626
>5350

it only supports single channel ddr3 and it only has pcie2.0 x4 . i own one but it's nothing more than a little media pc.

>> No.65531783

>>65531679
>little media pc
isnt that what you wanted

>> No.65531803

>>65531783
yes but it's not good for a quite build processor like the other anon was saying. it's a nice little chip

>> No.65531883

>>65531508
>6c for an htpc
Kek

>> No.65531924

>>65531508
Maybe if they made atom-equivalent designed for high clocks, but not with high-performance cores.

>> No.65532120

>>65531924
they will prob do this when they need to make a successor to the cat-core arch that is in the current consoles

>> No.65532175

>>65530286
you do realize there is a difference of 400mhz clock speed, do you? i think what was implied that even with that clock speed, theoretically ryzen should destroy intel, and i'm sure there will be ways to oc to 3.6 without having to water cool this

>> No.65532188

>>65532120
Very unlikely. If AMD does make a successor for cat-cores, it'll be to target sub-5W market. The entire point of them is that you get cheap, low-power products such as entry-level laptops and tablets, at which point 20W is way too much.

>> No.65532198
File: 92 KB, 768x783, 1452274458515.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65532198

GO AMD GO

>> No.65532200

>>65532188
Didn't they try that with the Opteron A series and failed, at least when it comes to mobile processors. It's still take it for server usage any day.

https://www.amd.com/Documents/A-Hierofalcon-Product-Brief.pdf

>> No.65532440

all i'm interested in is how 2600/x will compare to i5 8400.

>> No.65532652

>>65530939
I wonder if Noctua will release a new cooler to go with their new fans.

also, funny watching intelfags make threads about gaming for years but the second amd does it better it's off to /v/

>> No.65532678
File: 35 KB, 653x726, 1518090342450.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65532678

>>65530011
>Lost to 8400
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.65532693

>>65530011
Why is 8600 slower than 8400?

>> No.65532736

>>65532678
>>65532175

>> No.65532740

>>65530011
That's antisemitic
delete dis NOW

>> No.65532781

>>65531488
don't
wait for ryzen 3700 x :^)

>> No.65532791

>>65530011
based 1600x here

GO AMD GO YAAAY RYZEN

>> No.65532849

>>65532781
noooo

>> No.65532872

>>65532849
stupid mortal you are not ready for such power

>> No.65532880

Nice
Ryzen had made a good argument before but i am a retard gaymerfag,now theres nothing really stopping me from getting ryzen

>> No.65532900

>>65531022
intel shills getting desperate

>> No.65532996

>>65530011
these huehue comparison charts are all over the place with which CPUs and RAM were used.
I have no idea how some of the listed stuff made its way that high up the list.

Still gotta wait for proper western reviews from people who have some semblance of a consistent testing methodology.

that said, i've done my good goy duty and preordered a 2700x with x470 Mobo.

>> No.65533063

>>65530566
you're only under embargo if you were sampled by AMD. Some retailers in huehueland went full retard and sold the stuff too early.

>> No.65533066

>>65532996
>these huehue comparison charts are all over the place with which CPUs and RAM were used.
This vid goes on about huge perf differences depending on RAM manufacturer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WuDE95JisM

>> No.65533072

>>65530596
prices are like to stay within 40$ of this, and are unlikely to budge until Intel releases something or adjusts their own pricing.

>> No.65533134

>>65533066
>some manufacturers RAM just randomly performs 20% worse for certain applications
wtf.
hope i didn't shoot myself in the foot buying G.Skill.

Then again it's all just a holdover waiting for DDR5. Not much reason to get upset, didn't spend a lot this time around.

>> No.65533144

>>65533134
>hope i didn't shoot myself in the foot buying G.Skill.
My worry about it is that everyone's just gonna use some shit RAM and release hundreds of shitty Ryzen reviews saying it performs like a Phenom just like they did last release cycle.

>> No.65533184

>>65532996
>which CPUs were used
Well it's a CPU benchmark, so I would hope a different one every time...

>> No.65533199

>>65532678
You're referring to it beating the 8700K right?

>> No.65533203

>>65533184
yea but i'd also like to see the same CPUs paired with the same RAM reappear in each of the charts

>> No.65533236

Is it time to upgrade to Ryzen?
I've had my i7 4790k for a while now and I've been wanting to move to a smaller form factor like mATX.

>> No.65533262

>>65533134
>hope i didn't shoot myself in the foot buying G.Skill.
Have you seen the "Ryzen DRAM Calculator"?
Apparently it can fix shit factory timings on cheaper kits.

>> No.65533333

>>65530011
tested with a 1070, would much prefer a test with an 1080ti

>> No.65533336
File: 245 KB, 800x612, 1489160516428.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65533336

>>65530077

>> No.65533395

>>65530011
No anon you should test the game in 320x240

>> No.65533420
File: 15 KB, 543x443, 1523504568313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65533420

>>65530011
So is this saying the 2700X is a better GPU than the 8700K?

>> No.65533445

When should I upgrade my 2600k??

>> No.65533454

>>65533445
Ryzen 3 or Ice Lake since they're both gonna be bigger jumps. 2600k still does great when overclocked.

>> No.65533698

>>65530293
>sell 6700k
Why would you do that though, are you lacking the 2+2 cores? I'm on 7700k and gonna sit comfy on that shit unless DDR5 platforms comes in and consumer cpus will be 10+10

>> No.65533797

>>65533445
never, be one of the many poorfags on /g/ who never shuts up about their sandy bridges being futureproof despite every benchmark proving otherwise

>> No.65533801

>>65530427
To be fair, all the benchmarks are run at 4k high settings, at which case you aren't as much CPU bound, but rather GPU bound. We do see the 2700x deliver a 10% improvement over the 1700x consistently, though. And we have to take into account that, if you've bought a 2700x for gaming, you're not going to be playing at 720p low settings. So are you going to get your moneys worth at high end gaming with a 2700x? Definitelly. While also getting a much better workstation than the equivalent Intel offerings. I'd expect the Threadripper lineup to be even better, not sure about its gaming performance, though.

>> No.65533913

>>65531508
>>65531626
>>65531679
AMD Athlon 5350 is a great little chip. I've got two of those which I do not (ab)use anymore. Nice low-power part which runs just fine with a fanless (I used one from Arctic) CPU heatsink. There's two real drawbacks, just two SATA slots and 3 PCI-e slots on motherboards for it (all MicroATX). I used two two-port SATA controller cards (and a network card) when I used one as a home gateway/server. I used the other one as a HTPC. The main reasons I retired it is that the APU does not do x265 hardware decoding so it can't 4k, not unless you install a GPU. But even with a GPU it can't high-resolution videos properly from browsers (did mange to make it do mpv).

Anyways, if you want the AMD Athlon 5350 complete with a motherboard then do feel free to go to Sweden and pick one up, I've got two just sitting there in the basement. It was a really nice chips when it was released in 2014 but they were low-power weak chips back then and they are weak today. Still, got to say, the awesomeness of a computer with a fanless PSU, SSD, no GPU and fanless CPU (totally quiet) was very nice.

>> No.65533916
File: 69 KB, 806x544, 2600k-revisit-gtav[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65533916

>>65533797
>still in denial about sandy bridge superiority
>b-but muh 4.7ghz
Wasn't hard to reach with the soldered CPUs. I'm actually surprised they got the 3466 to boot with the 1700X.

>> No.65533949

>>65530011
LEMAOO GAMESSSS XDXDXD

>> No.65533962
File: 708 KB, 640x640, 1520558299296.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65533962

>>65533949
>games only matter when they're 256x144
>k, here's an AMD cpu doing that
>games? LOOOOOOOOOOOOL XDDDD

>> No.65533977

>>65530011
UMA

>> No.65533992

>>65533962
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO
*wheeze*

>> No.65534016

>>65533977
FRECUENCIA

>> No.65534019

>>65533916
GTA V is probably the game that favors Intel+NVidia the most. It's not exactly representative of a CPUs gaming performance. But if you're like my NEET brother who lives in my poor old mothers basement and you play GTA V all day every day then a computer with a Intel CPU and a NVidia GPU is the obvious choice IF you somehow managed to get some kind of display capable of doing more than 30Hz. That's usually not the case, my NEET brother uses some old 30Hz 1080p television. Not that it matters, he can't afford a computer anyway.

>> No.65534027

>>65530316
This Can't be HAPPENING! with only 3200Mhz RAM! damn!

>> No.65534041

>>65533949
>>65533962
>>65533977
>>65533992
>>65534016
>>65534027
kys

>> No.65534044
File: 87 KB, 806x681, 2600k-revisit-mll[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534044

>>65534019
As long as a game isn't using many threads sandy bridge still does great. /g/ discounts it too easily.
>>65534041
Go back to your phone thread.

>> No.65534048

>>65534044
>>65534041

>> No.65534049
File: 84 KB, 653x726, 1491958654249.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534049

>>65534041
Gayms don't matter anymore

>> No.65534056
File: 70 KB, 216x228, 1522992625640.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534056

>>65534048
>>65531198

>> No.65534061

>>65534049
>>65534056
>>>/r/eddit/

>> No.65534064

>>65534041
kys yourself first

>> No.65534069

>>65534061
>>>/hm/

>> No.65534074

>>65534041
There's always that one newfag that has to quote everyone.
Here's your (you), you fucking attention whore, now post tits

>> No.65534075

>>65534064
>>65534069
>triggered

>> No.65534083

>>65530011
With a 2 fps difference and the 6700K is outperforming the 2700X by 1.5fps?

Ryzen can't run 4000, only up to 3600CL16 while the 7740X / 8700K can run 4266CL17-17-17-37 CR1

>> No.65534085
File: 18 KB, 267x297, 1497883390389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534085

>>65531198
IT'S NOT FAIR

>> No.65534091
File: 310 KB, 563x563, 1522536729497.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534091

When will we stop having AMD-hope threads? If you're not retarded you would notice that all they have money to do is play "catch-up" with Intel and nVidia.

Every single fucking thing they release is as powerful as last-gen technology while consuming *more* power. What's the point in getting excited over any of their products when we've had better ones for months or even years? You're either a shill, in denial about your buyer's remorse, or have never used better products in the first place.

>> No.65534109

>>65534074
le newfag meme

>> No.65534129
File: 3.70 MB, 717x675, 1521197959092.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534129

>>65534091
>start off somewhat logical
>go into a nonsense rant about how amd is slow and consumes tons of power while firelake is using more with two less cores
sad

>> No.65534166

>>65534091
Now intel is trying to play catch up with Ebyn

>> No.65534274

That 2700X looks wonderful. If somebody makes a PLX motherboard so I can get 2 x16 PCIe slots it would be a really damn tempting upgrade. If not, I guess I'll be waiting for new Threadripper.

>> No.65534329

I don't need a 2700x since all I do lately is anime/manga and browse. But I want one.

Maybe I can justify the purchase by mining monero?

>> No.65534333

>>65530011
I love how AMDs max tdp increases every generation, won't be long before they are back at 200W cpus

>> No.65534395

>>65534333
t. 1kW intel cpu user

>> No.65534420

>>65533698
I mean given that the 2700X is the sameish power draw to the 6700k (which says it's 95w but really it's more around 115-120), why not have double the cores for roughly the same power consumption? You'll effectively be using half the power for a given task.

>>65533801
Yeah but at 4k, or even 1440p, the higher consistency of

>>65533916
LMAO 4.7Ghz on 2600k is a fucking unicorn. Usually at more like 4.2-4.3.
But the 2600k is still pretty good. 2500k is not.
GTAV is also a 5 year old game that doesn't use SMT well.

>>65534333
Whereas how Intel just straight up lies about TDP, with a 95w TDP exceeding 120W stock? Even when you don't count AVX256.

>> No.65534439

>>65534420
The real unicorn 2600K is at 5ghz.

>> No.65534511
File: 54 KB, 640x480, marth sword head.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534511

>>65530459
>delicia memester
>spanish site

Americans need a fucking map in schools. You're a whole fucking continent/ocean wrong.

>> No.65534633
File: 30 KB, 369x349, 1502146018892.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534633

>>65534511
Made you reply xDDDD TroLl MEisTer4000

>> No.65534638

Good if true.

>> No.65534705

>lel gaems
>lel kys
>lel kys you’re self


the absolute state of /g/.

>> No.65534712

Are all the KVM pass through bugs fixed?

>> No.65534713

>>65534129
What about AMD's consumer products?

>> No.65534733

>>65534705
>reddit spacing
>being a gaymer
>>>/reddit/videogames
>>>/v/
>>>/trash/

>> No.65534738

>>65534733
Get laid.

>> No.65534770

>>65530316
>the amount of faggots in this thread knowing nothing about statistics and interpreting benchmarks
As much as i'm happy about AMD finally challenging Intel, you guys "le beats intel in everything" are plain fucking retarded

>> No.65534773

>>65530011
looks like a fucking gpu bottleneck to me lol

>> No.65534814

>>65530531
>but current AMD motherboards and CPUs have a hard time running 3000 MHz with most kits
reviewers are being sent kits running at 3600 with it

>> No.65534856
File: 70 KB, 1252x499, Impossibru ram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65534856

>>65530531

Not even B-die lol.

>> No.65534871

>>65533454
this, and then donate the sandy bridge build to some poorfag relative, and he'll be happy
>t. poorfag, so i know

>> No.65535133

>>65530316
>Benchmarking CPUs in 4k

>> No.65535888

>>65534439
Not really, I hit 5Ghz on my 2600K with just a shitty H80 cooling it, it gets pretty toasty though with 1.5v.

>> No.65536339

>>65535888
>1.5 Vcore
>Toasty
Dude that shit is going NUCLEAR

>> No.65536379

>>65532693
Gpu bottleneck probably. The 8600 isnt much faster anyway

>> No.65536404

>>65530316
>posts gpu bittlenecked 40 fps 4k benchmarks
Hahahaha

>> No.65536550
File: 130 KB, 800x600, 1521576450615.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65536550

***Pay no attention to the single threaded benchmarks behind the curtain***

>> No.65536577

>>65536339
You'd be surprised how much sandy bridge chips can take, much more than modern chips, if you pumped 1.5v into a 8700K it would fucking melt...but this can take it pretty well.

Also performs pretty decent with a 1080Ti, I'm not very compelled to upgrade it any time soon, which how underwhelming all these current gen CPU's are performing.

>> No.65536649

>>65534773
>call the intel 480p police
>3700x comes out
>call the in the 2d benchmarks!

>> No.65536656

>>65536550
>Running MS-DOS in 2018
>muh single-task

>> No.65536669

>>65536577
god bless that Bridge made of Sand, reminds me of the FX series taking that much Vcore like its nothing, poor Motherboard VRMs

>> No.65536697

>>65536649
>Call in the 7zip benchmarks
>8700k comes out
>Call in the meltdown bug

Either way is the Jews vs the Poojets if only IBM had the balls to make a normie CPU...

>> No.65536715

>>65531883
My media center has a Ryzen 7 1800 in a Fractal design node 304 white

>> No.65536723

>>65536404
But it is important. Look, for example, at how the 1700x behaves in comparison. So something is indeed different and much closer to Intel's offerings, at 4k at least. I don't think anyone getting a 2700x is interested in 720p low, anyway.

>> No.65536730

>>65536697
zen is the better architecture
the rest is just shitposting

this zen+ was just like 3-6months of tweaking

zen2 on the "7nm" hitting 5Ghz and going beyond 8 cores is just RIP intel
They have no new architecture because they just milked sandybridge to death

>> No.65536738

>>65536697
>Jews vs the Poojets
Intel has more Indians in lead tech and management positions than AMD. In addition to their Israel R&D house.

>> No.65536759
File: 240 KB, 1100x1380, 1355739283325.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65536759

>>65530011
Goddamn I'm erect, AMD actually delivered

>> No.65536760

>>65530011
Thank god Apple ditched Intel.

>> No.65536776

>>65536730
how will intel ever recover

>> No.65536800

>>65536776
with the chance of 7nm epyc coming at the end of this year I seriously dont know
>lets grab radeon Pajeet and make a GPU!
good luck vs nvidia how has had the 1180/2080 just sitting in the warehouse for a year now

>> No.65536803

>>65536730

> going beyond 8 cores

I don't see how they can do that without murdering latency even more. Fundamentally each CCX HAS to be 4 (or 2) cores as otherwise some cores are further away than others.

>> No.65536853
File: 9 KB, 250x250, 1483321158164.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65536853

>mfw threadbrapper+ in a few months
>12 cores of fuck intel for a reasonable price
This is it lads. This is the year of AMD.
And next year Zen2 will be even better, can you believe it.

>> No.65536862

>>65536649
are you retarded? what's the point of a CPU benchmark where the GPU is the limiting factor? i dont want 480p benchmarks, but at least use a 1080Ti or Titan Xp and not a fucking 1070 lol

>> No.65536868

>>65536803
I hope they 6 core per CCX
But if they deliver 5GHz on zen2 8 core with even more IPC and latency improvement no one can complain...
I mean intel is still to launch the 8 core 9700k and the 6 core 8700k is only doing 4.3Ghz with housefire alerts on the horizon

>> No.65536881

>>65536862
>HURR DURR U RETARDED
>GAYMEN IS DA DEFINITIVE CPU BENCHMARK

>> No.65537082

>>65536803
6 cores per CCX
Starship will have 48c/96t, fucking behemoth

>> No.65537114

>>65536730
I meant that shit can be mentioned about both companies, they both saucked at one point and even fucked us as customers, it is a better arch the one in Ryzen i am eager to get one of those r7 2700, but they still need to work somethings around like the OC, i am currently on an i7 6700k, and had a Phenom II X6 1100t, which i had until skylake released, FX had nothing on my Phenom II but i was tired of waiting on AMD to catch up, anyway, when the benchmarks come out on april 20 if they are good enough for 144hz gaming at 1080p i am ditching the Jews...

>> No.65537125

>>65536738
Make it Jew Poojits vs Regular Poojits then m8

>> No.65537144

How to get a decent computer:

1. Throw money at the project
2. Don't stress about it
3. Enjoy

>> No.65537147

>>65536881
Its not, but most people want a CPU that can do it all perfectly or at least as good as the rival company.

>> No.65537384

>>65531110
New BIOS is not out, and expect that it won't be properly optimized to push x470.
chipset means shit for ryzen CPUs, it shouldn't have any influence on performance it's just I/O addon

>> No.65537498
File: 100 KB, 1280x720, Yes~.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65537498

>>65531883
>mfw as soon as Zen2 hits, the HTPC will be running a 1700

>> No.65537590
File: 304 KB, 720x405, H7MO_house_fire.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65537590

>>65530427
>4.2 GHz
>1.456V
Jesus fucking Christ that's not good.
I'd rather leave XFR on and get 3.8GHz/3.9GHz on all cores without going nuclear voltages.

2700 looking like the more interesting option again.

>> No.65537591

>>65530011
I see about 3% difference. That's truly huge.

>> No.65537617

>>65537591
since they are cheaper than jewtel's options, that's a pretty bad outlook

>> No.65537687

>>65534329
You want it, you buy it. No need for reason.

>> No.65537844

>>65537590
Maybe they lost the silicon lottery, but AM4 SKUs don't seem to have any top bin anymore (unless AMD releases a 2800X, which seems unlikely. They're going to become entry-level Threadripper).

>> No.65537934

>>65537590
xfr makes voltage go past 1.5v tho

>> No.65537975

>>65537934
1.5Vcore on 12nm is this safe? last time i went nuts on OC was on an AMD FX 8320e that hitted 4.9Ghz @1.456Vcore but that was at 32nm...

>> No.65537983

>>65537934
Well shit, this can't be good on the long term.

>> No.65537999

>>65537975
12LP is just a slightly tweaked 14LPP process AMD used previously. Although desu I wouldn't go above 1.35 for daily use.

>> No.65538033

>>65537999
1.42v for 1 year and 2 months, it just works

>> No.65538132

>>65538033
Damn

>> No.65538134

>>65537999

The crosshair hero overclocker's guide suggests under 1.45v at ambient.

>> No.65538155

>>65538134
Overclocking voids warranty anyway. They can tell you anything.

>> No.65538275

>>65535133
>being poor

>> No.65538279

>>65536550
Games are single thread dumbass

>> No.65538281

>>65538155
>Overclocking voids warranty
Officially it does. Practically there's no way for them to know whether you overclocked or not.

>> No.65538295

>>65538281
They don't need to know, they just want you to buy a new one.

>> No.65538326

>>65537975
Is the -e FX better binned or is it just a meme?

>> No.65538393

>>65538326
>>65537975
>using shitdozer

>> No.65538402

>>65537975
no, don't go over 1.45 for ryzen

>> No.65538697
File: 83 KB, 681x522, 1500635558651.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65538697

>>65530011

>> No.65538740

>Ryzen release
>'Only games matter'
>Ryzen+ release
>'lol games. Go back to /v/ kiddies'
Intlel shills in a nutshell

>> No.65538826

>>65538326

The 'e' chips are binned for low(er) power draw. Vishera can take absolutely obscene levels of voltage - generally far beyond what you can actually cool. Its not unusual for the 9590 to come at over 1.5v out of the factory.

There are a few reports on places like OCN of people running at 1.6v when part of a monster custom loop.

>> No.65538838
File: 92 KB, 800x600, 2701a6d0-clinton-4x3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65538838

>>65533420
>gpu

>> No.65538863

>>65538838
Are you shills dense? Look at the 1st gen Ryzen below in the charts.

>> No.65538873

>>65530427
UMA

>> No.65538897

If it was a GPU bottleneck Intlel would STILL supposedly be at the top. Or does performance on CPU's like the 8700K degrade with a lower spec GPU?
Intlel Idiots.

>> No.65538900
File: 209 KB, 600x582, 1516312921757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65538900

>>65534091
>more power
[citation needed]

>> No.65538901
File: 241 KB, 882x758, 1501991613334.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65538901

>>65538740
DELID

>> No.65538916

>>65534091
>40W less than the 1700X
>"more power"
the absolute state of Intel shills

>> No.65538930
File: 33 KB, 1060x722, 1504093690779.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65538930

>>65534091

>> No.65538982

What the fuck even happened to /g/. nu-/g/ is just a bunch of intel vs amd circlejerks with gayming benchmarks. /g/ is basically /v/'s hardware board now

>> No.65538996

>>65534091
Except Zen is very efficient.
Don't you remember the 7700k, a quad core CPU, consuming more power than AMD's 1800x?
They're not playing catch up anymore, they are winning in just about everything except high clockspeeds.

>> No.65539009
File: 115 KB, 1119x529, Fermi God.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65539009

>>65538982
It's been this way for about 6 years now. There aren't that may spicy memes either.

>> No.65539017

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-ryzen-5-2600x-5-88-ghz-ln2-oc/

>> No.65539088

>>65538326
I am sure i was a bit lucky, but i dont think they were serious about binning the 8 core FX chips...

>> No.65539101

New in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=4WuDE95JisM

>> No.65539106

>>65538393
Meh i had for like 2 months then i sold it and bought an i7 6700k, had it only because a lightning storm took my phenom II x6

>> No.65539107

>>65539088
The -e versions were noticeably better binned, as they achieved the same clocks as the normal 8350 but within a 95W power envelope instead of a 125W one. They also had a reputation for being excellent overclockers.

>> No.65539144

>>65539107
i am glad i waited i was literally in line for the Zambezi Bulldozer FX 8150, then something in me said, what if they release an FX II with more cores and better performance, and i backed out, then the Pildedriver came in, i was a bit undercut in money, and waited till the e series dropped....

>> No.65539212

>>65538982
/g/ is watches, chink shit from aliexpress, mac fag cirlejerk, headphones, screenfetch, smartphone home page, speccy, /guts/, and all those useless shit that are floating around and allocate half of the board's threads.
now people complain about cpu and gpu discussions.

>> No.65539286

>>65539101
Fuck me Steve is saying it looks good from their early testing and since he is on AMD's naughty list right now he sourced early retail CPU's and boards and has had plenty of time to do a thorough and less biased (less judgemental) review. He's enjoyed having the extra time afforded by going the backstreet route.

Get ready for GaymansNextAss to put out a favorable review!

Intlel shills literally gonna get BTFO!

>> No.65539377
File: 28 KB, 729x394, ryzen-2-mem-scaling-x470_1[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65539377

BIOS updates still pending on launch day or shortly after.

>> No.65539394
File: 32 KB, 807x563, ryzen-2-mem-scaling-x470_2[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65539394

>>65539377

>> No.65539440

>>65538740
>'lol games. Go back to /v/ kiddies'
Where have intel users said that? Usually it's AMD people chanting that here for over a year.

>> No.65539522

>>65530316
Fuck off back to linus tech tips retard, enjoy your shitty cpu that gets you 1 more frame per second on your gaymes.

>> No.65539534

>>65539440
Err. Like every benchmark posted ever by Intel shills? Usually single thread heavy games at that.

>> No.65539686
File: 303 KB, 888x1263, dumb speedposters.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65539686

>>65539377
Which kit is the GeIL?

>> No.65539698

>>65539686
Are you color blind?

>> No.65539734

>>65539698
No it's just that I'm dumb and have never heard of GeIL memory kits.

>> No.65540261

>>65539017
Uwaa that's pretty fuckin' baller.

Now I don't care about LN2 world record clocks on Ryzen because it's basically the same design on basically the same process, so results should be marginally the same WRT 12LPs improvements over 14LPP. Someone pushed an 1800x to 5.8Ghz at 1.92V, and we see a 2700x hitting 5.88 at 1.76, I'd call that a good first result with some headroom.
With that said, the extreme-circumstance 2200G memory clock shows us the limit of Zen's IMC on this semi-updated uArch. It seems AMD did quite a bit of work improving and fine tuning the IMC, and subsequently(necessarily) the interconnect system. IIRC similar setups on 1xxx series Zen topped out at about 4Ghz RAM speed.

Maybe in a month or two's time after BIOS updates and tinkering the more extreme guys can show us what Ryzen1.5 can do at 4.3Ghz using low latency 3866 or higher. I'm really interested in those CCX-to-CCX latencies, and if the L3$ was tweaked more for response to the CCX or latency over the MCM network.

>> No.65540365
File: 32 KB, 600x600, 1501250462016.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65540365

>>65539522

>> No.65540395

The question is will it be better at 1080p high refresh gaming?
Right now I'm using a 7700k and ddr4 4266 cl17 because my favorite games are all drawcall bottlenecked and scale like crazy with ram speed.
The only thing worth a shit that intel has done for me is support ddr4. Would be nice to see some REAL performance uplifts.
Need something to murder the shitty engines my games run on and never drop below 165 fps.

>> No.65540526

>>65540395
look at the OP

>> No.65540549

>>65540526
I see it but it doesn't really say anything. Don't know what frequency anything is running at(my 7700k is 5ghz) and I don't think they're even using a 1080ti. Looks more like 1070 performance, which wouldn't tell me very much.
I'm sure ryzen 2 is going to be good but I have doubts that it will be able to compete at 1080p high refresh.

>> No.65540614

>>65540549
for the record the best ryzen gen 1(OC'd, fast ram) is about 30-40 FPS behind at 1080p in total war warhammer, destiny 2, and rise of the tomb raider so they have a ton of ground to cover with this refresh.

>> No.65540741

>>65539734
Geil is a pretty big vendor actually. Like everyone else they're just selling modules with the same DRAM chips that everyone else buys though. It just comes down to which lot of chips are on the DIMM.

>> No.65540888
File: 375 KB, 1228x1094, 1497506386191.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65540888

>>65530011
DELID

>> No.65541296

>>65530011
REEEEEEEE

>> No.65542203
File: 36 KB, 660x525, I regret win10 every day of my life.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65542203

Am I going to need to replace this CPU any time soon? I don't know what else to look for other than "Higher than 3.5 GHz"
I know anything higher than a 1070ti bottlenecks.

>> No.65542222
File: 180 KB, 935x923, AMD fucking finished.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65542222

>AMDrones a year ago
>LMAO GAMES DON'T MATTER FAGGOT GET A JOB I ONLY USE MY PC TO RENDER 15 VIDEOS WHILE IM STREAMING IT FOR SOME REASON GAMES ARE IRRELIVANT

>AMDrones right now
>LMAO GAMES ARE SO IMPORTANT HOLY SHIT HOW CAN YOU EVEN BUY A CPU IF IT ISN'T GOOD AT GAMES

Make your mind up AMD cucks, when real benchmarks come out we'll see that Ryzen is still shit for games.

>> No.65542234

>>65534420
>2600k 4.7GHz
>Unicorn
Choose one--unless you are talking about crap-tier cooling

>> No.65542294
File: 58 KB, 960x774, 1503394560557.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65542294

>>65542222
I see quads i see truth...

>> No.65542601

>>65542222
more like
>AMDrones a year ago
>LMAO GAMES DON'T MATTER FAGGOT GET A JOB I ONLY USE MY PC TO RENDER 15 VIDEOS WHILE IM STREAMING IT FOR SOME REASON GAMES ARE IRRELIVANT

>Inteldrones right now
>LMAO GAMES DON'T MATTER FAGGOT GET A JOB I ONLY USE MY PC TO RENDER 15 VIDEOS WHILE IM STREAMING IT FOR SOME REASON GAMES ARE IRRELIVANT

>> No.65542667

>>65542203
>need
eh, not any time soon really, depends on what you do with it

>> No.65542736

>>65542667
I have an Oculus so I'm wondering if I should get a 1070ti or go higher, but if I go higher I should probably upgrade the CPU. I think I'll just stick with it then and upgrade all at once in a few years.

>> No.65542939

>>65542736
For VR get whatever the best GPU you can afford is, you'll regret it otherwise.

t. 1080Ti and Oculus owner

>> No.65542967

>>65542939
But what about bottle necking? I guess the 1080ti only has 13% against the 1070ti's 10%.
I've been playing VR with my 770, it's a miracle it's even managing. Maybe a 1070ti would still be enough.

>> No.65543008

>>65542967
>But what about bottle necking?
Depends what games you're playing, 4770K is still good but not ideal. Pretty easy to fire up MSI Afterburner and set up a log to see what your per-core CPU usage is during VR gaming, and if it's causing you to drop from 90FPS or not.

>I guess the 1080ti only has 13% against the 1070ti's 10%.
I don't know what you're talking about.

Either way, Nvidia will be launching new shit in a month or two, if your 770 is doing okay for now probably best to make it last a little longer.

>> No.65543036

>>65543008
How much does the new shit usually cost?

>> No.65543040

>>65532200
Opteron was never for mobile, Geode and some APUs were
The A series Opterons were to break through a new market for AMD, they failed silently

>> No.65543080

>>65543036
Probably about the same as the current shit but add 25-50% to the performance.

>> No.65543082
File: 126 KB, 1280x960, 1518407091570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65543082

>>65543080
Fucking hell I'm so tired of waiting to have fun

>> No.65543917

>>65530011
REEEEEEEEEE

>> No.65543919

>>65536550
If you actually compare IPC, AMD is on par as of Zen+
Of course reviewers tend to be retards and benchmark 4GHz vs 5GHz.

>> No.65543929
File: 96 KB, 640x619, 1523205127742.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65543929

>>65538863
>gpu

>> No.65543938

>>65542222
Your pic is from before TR optimizations for games. Nice try though.

>> No.65543950
File: 26 KB, 619x453, cc1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65543950

>>65543040
>Geode

>> No.65543956

We need to ban all gaming discussion from /g/ including gaming benchmarks.

Seriously fuck off to /v/

>> No.65543961

What's the point of this debate on saturday night? All shills should be norming...

>> No.65544045

>>65530197
>6700k twice
pretty sure its a 7700k, its just a typo

>> No.65544192
File: 22 KB, 330x374, 1523617852597.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65544192

>>65543929

>> No.65544207

>>65544192
>Tardus Maximus.
The 8700K and 1800X are CPUs, not GPUs.

>> No.65544227
File: 56 KB, 645x729, 1523118198073.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65544227

>>65544207
>sperglord ranting on because of a misspelling

>> No.65544242

>>65544227
>brainlet doesn't know enough about computers to tell the difference

>> No.65544281

>>65544242
>retarded fuckwad can't understand context

>> No.65544285

>>65544281
>thinking context makes CPU=GPU

>> No.65544315

>>65544285
>implying I said that
Get fucked, nigger

>> No.65544319

>>65544315
>I'm just playing stupid

>> No.65544325
File: 1.32 MB, 720x1280, ryzen.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65544325

>>65530011
We already seen this shit already when 1700 launched

>> No.65544340

>>65544319
Well played

>> No.65544357

>>65530531
>hard time running 3000 MHz with most kit
Anything except for micron shit runs at 3000-3200 just fine starting from ravenridge agesa.

>> No.65544378

>>65542222
>gta5
like pottery

>> No.65544821

>>65534044
>>65533916

sandy is good, but its also old to the point I would worry about motherboards, when ram prices come down, I would be seriously looking at a new build.

>> No.65544849

>>65538996
on ipc amd has a slight advantage
on power amd has an advantage
on $ per performance they have an advantage

what intel has to counter is a clock speed that makes up for less ipc, and that is going away in less then a year anyway if not already gone.

>> No.65544855

>>65542203
Nah, just overclock it and throw in a 1080ti, you'll be fine.

>> No.65544872

>>65530531
ryzens speed is tied to ram mhz, not absolute speed, the faster the ram speed the faster ryzen is, timeings mean nothing as amd didn't clock high enough for ram to bottleneck yet.

>> No.65544882

>>65534856
yea, some people are lucky and they push 3200 without issue, some people get 3600

I got 3000~ or what ever amd clocks it down to with a 3200 kit, not worth the time to find out why its doing it, everything is fast enough to not give me issues.

>> No.65544908

>>65531508
>2018
>Even bothering with a HTPC
Why would I bother when I can buy a fire TV or a shield?

>> No.65544915

>>65537082
depends on how amd does it

will it be 6 cores a ccx, or will it be 3-4 ccxes a die?

there is a good deal of weird shit amd could do to get a 48/64 core cpu

>> No.65544920

>>65544872

I'm impressed anon, everything you said is completely wrong.

>> No.65544950

>>65544920
the infinity fabric is tied to ram speed, or more specifically in consumer 1:2 ram speed, its the reason there is a massive fucking difference between 2400 and 3200, where as if you had intel the difference would be coming from the total ram throughput.

basically, the first zen cpus were not pushing shit fast enough to be ram bottleneck, where as intel cpus can quite easily get to a ram bottleneck where you now need better timesings to alleviate shit.

>> No.65545110

>>65544950

>the infinity fabric is tied to ram speed, or more specifically in consumer 1:2 ram speed

This is correct.

>basically, the first zen cpus were not pushing shit fast enough to be ram bottleneck

This is wrong. The need for ram bandwidth (let alone touching latency) is workload dependant. Intel gets hit the same way if a task devours bandwidth like americans inhale burgers - there is nothing special about zen (or any of intel's architectures) in this regard.

>> No.65545155

>>65530417
>concern troll: the post

>> No.65545360

>>65539534
>Err. Like every benchmark posted ever by Intel shills?
That makes no sense considering intel cpus have been and are so far as I know best at single core performance.
> lol games, go back to /v/ you vermin
has been a slogan of AMD shills here for a year now. So I really don't get you trying to turn this around somehow.

Games performance matters to people who play games and if AMD finally got better performance there, great, post more proof and hopefully multiple sources agree on this.

>> No.65545524

>>65530313
>being impartial makes him a shill
k
y
s

>> No.65545666

>>65530011
>i5-8400 above i5-8600K
Okay.

>> No.65545860

>>65530011
I have a big boy job now, so depending on the reviews I'll probably upgrade two weeks after they launch.

>> No.65545962

>>65545110
true but only half true.

intel will push things like lets say games to the point that overclocking ram yields benefits, something that hasn't been true in years now, but amd doesn't hit the same speeds for this, and it benefits more from just faster ram (mhz) than absolute ram speed (mhz+cl)

sure a load that is 100% or largely ram bottlenecked is going to bottleneck everything, but thats true on both amd and intel, the difference is in where the bottleneck is when ram isn't normally the key factor,

on amds side, its just mhz
in intels side, its mhz+cl

>> No.65546029

wait, when is the embargo lifts?

>> No.65546480

>>65545962
Actually, Mindblank made a couple videos about it, some months back.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6yp7Pi39Z8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p--iuQhujqI

It seems like 3200mhz cl14 is best for Ryzen, but higher mhz with tighter timings do produce even better results. Just unsure whether its worth the $$ and effort

>>65546029
On the 19th, brother. 4 more days.

>> No.65546773

>>65533801
might be the first rational post in an intel vs amd thread.
totally agree with you.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action