[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 80 KB, 750x1000, intel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65429487 No.65429487 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Intel won't release spectre patch for more than 200 processors.


Some of them:
Intel® Core™ Processor Extreme Edition i7-975
Intel® Core™ Processor i7-920, 930, 950, 960
Intel® Core™ Processor Extreme Edition i7-965
Intel® Core™ Processor i7-920, 940
Intel® Core™ Extreme Processor i7-920XM, 940XM
Intel® Core™ Processor i7-720QM, 740QM, 820QM, 840QM
Intel® Core™ i7-970, 980
Intel® Core™ Processor Extreme Edition i7-980X, 990X
Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor E7200, E7300, E8190,
E8200, E8300, E8400, E8500
Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor X9000, X9100
Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9000, Q9100
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T6400, T6500, T6670, T8100,
T8300, T9300, T9400, T9500, T9550, T9600, T9800,
T9900, SU9300, SU9400, SU9600, SP9300, SP9400,
SP9600, SL9380, SL9400, SL9600, SL9300, P7350, P7370,
P7450, P7550, P7570, P8400, P8600, P8700, P8800,
P9500, P9600, P9700
Intel® Core™2 Solo Processor SU3500, ULV SU3500, ULV
Intel® Pentium® Processor T4200, T4300, T4400, T4500
Intel® Celeron® Processor 900, 925, SU2300, T3100,
T3300, T3500, ULV 763
Intel® Celeron® M Processor ULV 722, ULV 723, ULV 743
Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor E7400, E7500, E8400,
E8500, E8600
Intel® Pentium® Processor E5200, E5300, E5400, E5500,
E5700, E5800, E6300, E6500, E6500K, E6600, E6700,
Intel® Celeron® Processor E3200, E3300, E3400, E3500
Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX9650, QX9770,
Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q8200, Q8200S, Q8400,
Q8400S, Q9300, Q9400, Q9400S, Q9450, Q9500, Q9505,
Q9505S, Q9550, Q9550S, Q9650

And a lot of Xeons.

>> No.65429532


>> No.65429561

Why the fuck would you want to patch when you lose 30% of performance to a fucking exploit some jews discovered in a highly controlled environment?

>> No.65429574

Yeah! fuck security!

>> No.65429577

Oh man, that sucks. I'll have to buy a new CPU then. :(

>> No.65429595

where's the faggot from 3 days ago who was shitting on AMD and saying that intel cares for quality and such?

>> No.65429599

>in a highly controlled environment
That now are public.

>> No.65429622

about time you fucking updated poorfags

>> No.65429623

probably shitting up this board with another >poozen thread

>> No.65429662

>Core2Quad memes
>housefire i7s
And nothing of value was lost.

>> No.65429681
File: 78 KB, 1193x674, neeside.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.65429688

How do you update it?

>> No.65429699
File: 106 KB, 820x729, 1521447498269.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

oh no, they aren't patching Pentium III

>> No.65429748

I see no pentium3 on that list.

>> No.65429829

>Stopped – After a comprehensive investigation of the microarchitectures and microcode capabilities for these products, Intel has determined to not release
microcode updates for these products for one or more reasons including, but not limited to the following:
>• Micro-architectural characteristics that preclude a practical implementation of features mitigating Variant 2 (CVE-2017-5715)
>• Limited Commercially Available System Software support
>• Based on customer inputs, most of these products are implemented as “closed systems” and therefore are expected to have a lower likelihood of
exposure to these vulnerabilities.

>> No.65429856

westmerefag here, why should i give a single fuck?

>> No.65429929

It's basically anything older than the Nehalem Xeons. Bloomfield, the Nehalem HEDT SKUs are the only ones remotely useful today, but all of those are interchangeable with Nehalem Xeons since it was a unified platform.

>> No.65430303

These are ass-old CPUs, about ten years old.

Where is the problem? Will AMD release updates for my Phenom 9600 from 2007?

>> No.65430901

/thread and OP is a faggot

>> No.65430982

yes because amd actually care about their customers

>> No.65431001

So you're saying intel should give people with defective CPUs they can't fix new ones??!?

>> No.65431034

>Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9000

>> No.65431035

I patched mine and rolled it back because they pulked support. There is a new patch now and i am not going to run it until i need to. Currently no one is being hacked by spector and its really hard to exploit

>> No.65431041

amd 1600x here

no problems at all
suck shit intards
had a 920 from 2009-2014 as well

>> No.65431059 [DELETED] 
File: 42 KB, 653x726, 1491916955985.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>amd poozen

>> No.65431076 [DELETED] 
File: 300 KB, 2060x1471, Raja-Koduri-Joins-Intel-2060x1471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Poo inside graphics

>> No.65431081 [DELETED] 

>inb4 some intard posts that 1080p low farcry 5 benchmark by pcgaymer

>> No.65431084 [DELETED] 
File: 1.49 MB, 2000x1367, 1467327921774.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.65431087 [DELETED] 

>no bugs
>anon happy that his 1600x is problem-free
>this shill still posts this "poozen" garbage
mate, it doesn't matter that you spent $1000 for intel cpu and motherboard. just sell it and get the cpu you secretly love.

>> No.65431097

Intel fags BTFO!!!!!!!

>> No.65431100
File: 12 KB, 100x100, 1523019352039.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>support for cpus released 10 years or more ago

>> No.65431105 [DELETED] 
File: 222 KB, 852x939, 1495995431673.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Yes. Good goy! Buy inturd!

>> No.65431117

So, you're saying intel is shit and doesn't care about its customers?
wow, shocking. thanks for proving me right

>> No.65431155

So, I own a 3770 Ivy Bridge. I know I'm fucked but how as AMD has some requirements to be exploited does Intel has the same requirements? Or we are spread as a whore for whole world?

>> No.65431179
File: 42 KB, 420x494, mommy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

serves you right for buying jewish garbage
enjoy that cock up your ass, goy, meanwhile I'm /comfy/ with the FX-8350

>> No.65431189


>> No.65431200

>shills trying hard to hide the fact this was a confirmed NSA backdoor

>> No.65431213
File: 240 KB, 320x320, 1522776275673.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>not upgrading annually

>> No.65431224

Are you retarded? I made a question and you made totally different statement from what I've asked.
I live in 3rd world country. Its not like if I live in the US.

>> No.65431225

A socket a year keeps the goyim in fear!

>> No.65431252

And I don't even care about buying a new computer every year. It simply works well anyway. /g/ has large steam library and plays indie games on their ryzen's and skylake processors.

Fuck off.

>> No.65431254
File: 241 KB, 1280x720, 1523029257894.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Some of us demand premium performance. If you laid off the soy toys for little boy boy you could afford premium computing experiences too.

>> No.65431284

Intbeciles are the soy boys if anyone, since you're constantly jerking eachother off over 2 extra frames in the latest battlefield.

>> No.65431310

>how dare them not patching my 15 year old cpu im team poozen now !

>> No.65431373
File: 19 KB, 299x128, 1522874946743.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

It's okay young soyim, lash out in your fear and rage. Cling to your putdowns and ignore how many professionals you are actually talking too.

>> No.65431427
File: 122 KB, 1200x675, shilltel btfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You do know that shilltel chips performing at 60% are no longer viable for professionals, right?
You don't actually run xeon servers at work now that epyc is a thing, right? There's no way anyone could be that retarded.

>> No.65431465
File: 113 KB, 455x675, 1522773645076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Holy shit, I thought you were taking the piss but hot damn you got AMD balls deep in your mouth.

The absolute state.

>> No.65431496

>supporting the company with superior products and ethics

>> No.65431502

>spectre patch
Wow, it's nothing. On the other hand

>implying something else won't come along since those pajeets at Intel are likely hiding a bunch of skeletons in their closet.exe folder

>> No.65431526

I smell another class action lawsuit coming. Think we'll all be getting $15 like with the Pentium 4s?

>> No.65431588

You two are like apes.

>> No.65431606

>Q6600 not in the list

>> No.65431628

Found the phone poster!

>> No.65431654 [DELETED] 
File: 137 KB, 800x867, 1523041099036.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Got my poozen!
Got my Nintendo Switch!
Got my think phone
Got my vape
And oh shit my fave anime Doki Nioh Ri Taki is on!

>> No.65431656
File: 358 KB, 1585x2819, 5n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Here you go, something as relevant as what you just posted.

>> No.65431680

the kpti patch is not the same as the Spectre patch my /v/ro

>> No.65431682 [DELETED] 

Why do you shill for intel?

>> No.65431783

>0 matches
ayy lmao

>> No.65431818

and magically can't be replicated.

>> No.65431847

(((citation needed)))

>> No.65432082
File: 944 KB, 1228x1502, 1500010756103.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


This was supposed to be our YEAR!

>> No.65432087

brehs I'm having a fucking panic attack lmaosss

>> No.65432244


>> No.65432334

wow, so it won't release patches for really outdated processors that have very low market presence and are out of official support by now?

there's a ton of reasons to hate Intel, but getting mad over petty shit is pointless

>> No.65432350

>i7-9xx aren't patched
What the fuck, I thought they were only leaving Core 2 and older from their mainstream products, this is the scummiest move Intel has EVER done to their customers
No need to update if you run anything that runs 64 bit Linux, W10 might have the mitigations in this older CPUs too
All of those are fast enough for anything in $current_year, specially housefire i7's
They didn't even bother adding it, anything pre-Sandy Bridge isn't getting patched

>> No.65432418
File: 17 KB, 499x499, 876556966565956996.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Thinkpad btfo'd

>> No.65432485

No fucking way. Only C2Q and i7s are barely usable today.

>> No.65432529

>Only 1st gen Core can be Liberbooted
>Intel decides to leave these vulnerable

Really makes my pinkle tinkle

>> No.65432561

so wait they're not patching 3570k's?

what the fuck

>> No.65432565

Fact is most applications can't be heavily threaded. Single thread perf is king.

>> No.65432596

but those /g/-thinpads usually use sandy bridge, which are covered

>> No.65432597

I think you're thinking of amd

>> No.65432641

Yeah, was just bantering. My T440p will be fine, As long as you're not some pleb with a Core 2 Duo you'll be good

>> No.65432685

Yes goyim you need this latest i9 for any task!

>> No.65432699

Bullshit, C2Q and 1st gen i5 & i7 processors are still fine for most things except shit like newer vidya. They have absolutely no problem browsing the web and streaming / playing media which is all that the average person does on their computer.

>> No.65432713


>> No.65432722
File: 125 KB, 960x878, 1494523232402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.65432775

Are you fucking retarded? A first gen i7 is i3 tier now.

>> No.65432803

so..perfectly capable for anything?

>> No.65432807
File: 26 KB, 200x200, Holy+i+didn+t+have+that+one+_27f4ea5616d2dbe9b98e1e04f0cfb675.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Yea goyim just buy a new cpu

>> No.65432914
File: 448 KB, 455x395, Laughing Alligators.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.65432931
File: 49 KB, 736x691, 1498456561710.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>no patch for i7 970, 980x, 990x, Xeon W3690
>patch for Xeon X5650, X5660, X5670, X5690, W3670, W3680, etc.
>call the ones that aren't getting patched Gulftown and the ones that are Westmere-EP, as if those things aren't basically the same
I don't understand. I was thinking about replacing my X5650 with a W3690, too.

>> No.65432965

You're sure they're patching them? They might have just skipped them in the announcement

>> No.65432969

>>support for cpus released 10 years or more ago
>knowingly cheated in security to get better cache performance.
>goyim, you caught us late, we will fix only what we want.

>> No.65433175

So? What does this have to do with the CPUs being too old to warrant support either way?

>> No.65433213


>> No.65433259
File: 18 KB, 626x487, 1515002175262.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.65433317

Yep, they're in the PDF under Westmere-EP. Production Status: Production, in yellow so it's updated info.

>> No.65433363

this is literally nothing goym trust us
we also released new cheap motherboards so you can buy our overpriced under powered shit again
we promise no new backddors for next six months

>> No.65433398

8th is already patched? I though this year ryzen will beat intel

>> No.65433414
File: 381 KB, 760x400, 1521830159820.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dam, this soy stuff is getting surreal. I'm scared.

>> No.65433421

There are no remote exploits for Spectre, so who cares.
If you run untrusted code you're fucked anyway.
>inb4 javascript
who the fuck is retarded enough to have javascript enabled?

>> No.65433439
File: 538 KB, 897x1179, chrome_2018-04-06_16-19-40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Last time i checked AMD outsold intel in retail

>> No.65433578

well they offer best price to performance ratio so you are right :^)

>> No.65433894

wew, they really want to push some common customers to newer chips, thank mommy su Ryzen is good

>> No.65434594

>no Q6600
I have that processor.
You laughed at me in another thread!

>> No.65436238

AGESA will bring IBPB to the cpu too

>> No.65436258

>anything pre-Sandy Bridge isn't getting patched
32nm westmere and nehalem Xeons are still getting patched though

>> No.65436310

If the CPUID is different, then the microcode can differentiate. i7 3970X for example have the same CPUID as Xeon E5-2687W.

>> No.65436505

You don't get nothing goyim!

>> No.65437443

>Nehalem and Nehalem EX are getting patches
What the fuck, are these CPUs the best investment that I have ever made? X5675 still out-perform just about everything on the market right now, and they will get patched? Life is good.

>> No.65437453

p3 aint vulnerable

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.