Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 2.36 MB, 3840x2160, 15054799644281267274795.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62442855 No.62442855 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Alright /g/ how'd I do?

>> No.62442881

Cretin.

>> No.62442907

>>62442855
You did good.

>> No.62442927

>>62442855
you wasted money on something that will lose its value within the next half year. you will feel pressured by the market to adjust your system and continue to fall for the consumer bait

you did shit

>> No.62442931

Shit photo, you did a shit job

>> No.62442932

learn to make proper pics ffs

>> No.62442950

>>62442855
>asrock
Almost, you almost did good.

>> No.62442963

nice wall tho'

>> No.62442966

>>62442855
the sad part here is that you willingly bought the objectively shittier just out of spite, knowing that the vast majority prefers nvidia.
the reality however is that no one cares what you bought, you got yourself a 600$ gpu just to "troll" some anons the internet...

dude, like think about what you did, srsly.

>> No.62442969
File: 126 KB, 473x700, iso-speed-vs-motion-blur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62442969

protip: set the iso to 800 when taking pics with a phone. Better to have a noisy photo than a blurry one.

>> No.62442972

>>62442950
not op but asrock is better then bio(no)star(t) in terms of ITX

>> No.62443044

>>62442966
Actually the cheapest Nvidia 1070 which was a crap zotec mini costed the same amount as the Vega 56

>> No.62443082

>>62442855
Ryzen is fine, Vega is trash.

>> No.62443101
File: 68 KB, 611x621, Screenshot_20170822_at_9.56.06_AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62443101

>>62443044
bullet doged m8

You should try UV'ing, turns put most of these fuckers are 200 mV too high. Let us know how it goes.

>> No.62443104
File: 255 KB, 1280x1440, Comb23082017023226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62443104

>>62443082
0/10 bait

>> No.62443141

>>62442855
56 or 64? You did good if you bought 56

>> No.62443198

>>62443141
56 xfx

>> No.62443207

>>62442855
Depends on how much you paid that vega56, anything above 450$ is not good.

>> No.62443263

>>62442855
Depends on how much you payed for the v56, but all in all you did good.

>> No.62443766

>>62442855
Can i have your quake champions promo code?

>> No.62443868

>>62442855
What Ryzen did you get?

>> No.62444070

>>62442855
You did a horrible job at taking that pic

>> No.62444185

>>62442855
Nice

>> No.62444226

>>62442855
>asrock
>AMD CPU
>Radeon

mein neger

>> No.62444248

>>62442855
> 1700
> Vega 56
perfect build tbqh.

>> No.62444299

>>62443104
Literally only game where VEGA has substantial advantage for what ever reason.

Not even shilling.

>> No.62444327

If you paid <$450 for that v56, then pretty good

>> No.62444347

>>62443101
fallout 4 used to run worse than nvidia on AMD. they must have focused on that game which works out well for me :)

>> No.62444407
File: 87 KB, 1262x676, 7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62444407

If you don't care about power consumption, noise and heat output, or higher fps

Bretty gud

>> No.62444796
File: 181 KB, 1600x900, RX_Vega_56_vs_GTX_1070_32_game_aeverage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62444796

>>62444299
uhhhhhh

>> No.62444972
File: 43 KB, 711x533, aHR0cDocG5n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62444972

>>62444407
That's the liquid cooled variant running at 1,600 Mhz with no undervolting that competes with the 1080ti.

Actual air cooled vega 64 uses less than 295W on average

>> No.62445100

>>62442855
Should have gotten nvidia card. Better drivers.

>> No.62445138

>>62442855
>VEGA
You're so stupid. This is what brandwhoring looks like.

>> No.62445654

>>62445100
>>62445138
see
>>62444972
>>62444972
>>62443104
>>62443101

>> No.62445766

>>62442855
DELID THIS

>> No.62445797
File: 36 KB, 413x395, 1310483412100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62445797

>>62444972
>that competes with the 1080ti

>> No.62446432

>>62445797
It does but again it must strain itself at 1.6 GHz and use like 400W.

>> No.62446452

>>62445797
The air cooled vega 64 operates at 1200 MHz which is a whopping 25% slower.

>> No.62448265

>>62442855
are you rich? in my country its like 5 average montly salaries

>>62442881
if you want to insult someone go to reddit fag

>> No.62448536

>>62442855
>itx
shit

>> No.62448546

>>62446432
Stop already, except for a few cherrypicked benchmarks, it's clearly much slower

>> No.62448569

>>62442855
not bad anon. I hope you have ram sticks for those.

>> No.62448620

>>62448546
Nope, Vega 64 locked at 1.6 GHz competes with the 1080ti. But in the end it consumes too much power and generates lots of heat/noise that even AIOs can barely handle. If I could afford a water cooled vega 64 I would downclock it to 1.2 GHz for silent operation, I don't mind 25% less FPS desu. It's not like I need 120 vs 90 FPS on my 60 Hz 1440p monitor anyway.

For this reason alone we will see the vega 64 compete with the 1080 in most games.

>> No.62449051

>>62442855
You fell for the consumerism meme

>> No.62449091

>>62442972
>Mildewy cardboard is better than rancid feces
Well you're not wrong, but I'd probably rather something else entirely.

>> No.62449159

>>62442855
This is the one situation where ASRock is the best call.

>> No.62449443

>>62449159
Not really

>> No.62449878

>>62448620
When AMD fixes the drivers it should compete with the 1080ti. At the moment it doesn't.

>>62449443
Your choice of ITX Boards for Ryzen is pretty limited.

>> No.62450131

>>62449878
Oh for ITX... yeah you're right then

>> No.62450966

>>62442855
Should've waited for ANUS ITX mobos, these are coming in October afaik.

>> No.62452447

Next month (or perhaps the month after knowing AMD) should be pretty interesting once the full fat drivers get released. Primitive Shaders could make a Vega shine. But I won't bet the farm on it just yet. If not then the turd will not be polished so to speak.

>> No.62452457

>Vega

>> No.62452497
File: 906 KB, 793x877, oiK8Bb9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
62452497

>>62452457
The most interesting GPU uarch since G80.
>>62452447
It's several times worth of geometry throughout for everything including tesselation.
Honestly the change is long overdue for GCN.

>> No.62452547

>>62442855
nice

>> No.62452600

I wonder if they are delaying drivers trying to implement deferred vertex attribute computation or they are simply incompetent.

>> No.62452767

>>62452600
More like they are waiting to see what leather jacket man announces.

>>62452343

>> No.62452804

>>62452767
>another ML keynote
But why?
They talked CUDA9 and V100 on HotChips.
This is getting "last three IDFs" levels of silly.

>> No.62452939

>>62452804
1070Ti perhaps? I highly doubt it is Volta.

>> No.62452991

>>62452939
>basically a 1080
Whoa.
Totally a nice idea to do that before AMD launches their own detonator drivers along with fucking AiB models for Vega (you do understand that AiB models are delayed for a reason, don't you?).
Still would be nice to have a better 1070 for a slighly better price.

>> No.62453264

>>62442855
Good CPU, Bad GPU, Bad MOtherboard

>> No.62453298

>>62453264
>56
>bad
?
Even in its current state it's good as long as you can get it as MSRP.

>> No.62453353

They should name Vega11 SKUs Vega36 and Vega32.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action