Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 52 KB, 782x542, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61899787 No.61899787 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?

>> No.61899826

Faster Function Units. It's a known fact that Intel has better FUs than AMD. Their superscalar professors are just naturally better because of this.

>> No.61899829

Because Intel paid you to say so.
/thread

>> No.61899846

>>61899787
AMD CPOOs are inherently cheap knockoffs. That's literally the only reason AMD exists - making budget clones of Intel chips. Some things never change.

>> No.61899882
File: 86 KB, 930x916, s-s-tutter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61899882

>>61899829
Or maybe it's because Intel products don't stutter.

>> No.61899919
File: 1.66 MB, 3840x1032, 1492842903517.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61899919

>>61899882
>one gaymen benchmark

>> No.61899949

>>61899846
Nobody buys Intel stutterfires anymore since Ryzen is smoother and infinitely better in every conceivable way.

>> No.61899954
File: 38 KB, 650x350, another massive dissapointment.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61899954

>>61899919
Runs great on my PC.

>> No.61899993

>>61899954
Now for the actual proof

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JypkqwpOtNI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Ovmxfejvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZcCqnE5mRw&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuQu-y0GnPM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11NfsMykyAk

>> No.61900009

>>61899993
That's all well and good, but an i7 still runs great on my machine.

>> No.61900021

>>61900009
That's because you think stutters are normal.

>> No.61900082

>>61899787
|
|>
|
|3
|
|

>> No.61900182
File: 38 KB, 650x350, 1502638780640.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61900182

>>61899954
No matter how many times you post this, you will never be any less of a faggot.

>>61883972

>How convinent that the 7900X isn't on that chart and you just happened to pick the image using a R9 Fury (why?)

>And the other GPU they test with is a 1080, not even a 1080ti. Anandtech's testing has been a fucking joke lately.

>Ironically the "ultra best gaming GPU" 7740K does just as bad as TR here. Even though I'm sure there's some other problem with their testing methodology.

>> No.61900199
File: 83 KB, 980x735, 1502413488795.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61900199

>>61899882
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/amd-threadripper-review-1950x-1920x/

>> No.61900217
File: 232 KB, 800x449, intel ceo yells at clouds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61900217

>>61899846
Get back to work, Brian.

>> No.61900228

>>61900199
The results of this test already got debunked, Intel is way ahead.

>> No.61900234

>>61900228
Source?

>> No.61900278

>>61900228
o vey

>> No.61900345

>>61900234
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/mistakes-in-our-testing-methodology-wrongfully-cause-7900X-to-appear-slower-in-some-titles/

>> No.61900402
File: 3 KB, 256x224, Cool_story_bro.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61900402

>>61900345
>uppercase X in fake URL

You didn't even try and make it believable. 0/10.

>> No.61900888

>>61899882
>no doom benchmanrk
into the thrash

>> No.61900921

>>61900888
nice digits, but doom is trash and should be in the trash

>> No.61900940

ITT: good goys

>> No.61901058

>>61900921
Best game of last year, bro.

>> No.61901074
File: 28 KB, 550x550, single socket holocaust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61901074

>>61899787

>> No.61901083

>>61899787
>Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?
>Implying they do

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE7qMJVll5U
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-admits-problems-pentium-iii-1,235.html
https://www.pcper.com/news/Editorial/Yes-Netburst-really-was-bad-CPU-architectures-tested

>> No.61901154

>>61901083
Ah yes, let's not forget the recent Atom - blunder of the decade.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11110/semi-critical-intel-atom-c2000-flaw-discovered

>> No.61901274

>>61900921
>literally the best game in terms of optimization
>also great game overall
>thrash
is this what shills belive?

>> No.61901297
File: 315 KB, 800x531, intel-crematorium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61901297

Sorry, I couldn't resist

>> No.61901299

>>61901274
If it runs better on AMD, it's trash. That's how it works, didn't you get the memo?

>> No.61901311

>>61901297
10/10.

>> No.61902971
File: 5 KB, 118x90, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61902971

>>61901297

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action