Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 139 KB, 737x843, HAHAHAHJAJA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61796844 No.61796844 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/x399-raid-threadripper-amd,35149.html

*breathes*
HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAPHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHGGGGGGGGAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.61796865

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

Oh look, clickbait.

>> No.61796867

>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature
SOPA

>> No.61796921

Only reading the titles makes Wikipedia browsing a lot easier.

>> No.61796957

Fuck rAIDS. It's false security. Always backup.

>> No.61796983

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature
BRAZILIAN EDUCATION

>> No.61797003

>>61796957
RAID is for speeding up read/writes not for protecting your data.

>> No.61797057

>>61797003
you don't need more speed once you're already on nvme, that's linus-tier faggotry just for giggles

>> No.61797567

>>61796844
Reminder to report shitposters.

>> No.61797742

>>61797003
RAID-0 is not even a RAID because it is not redundant you clown.

>> No.61798168

>>61796844 (OP)
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

>> No.61798196

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

>> No.61798208

>>61798168
>>61798196
Haha, you guys really showed him by bumping his dead shitpost back to the first page, haha.

>> No.61798276

>>61797567
A-ha and get banned then. No thanks

>> No.61799370

>>61796957
>false security

Look at the click-bait article, it's about not being able to boot off RAID-0. That's not exactly something you use for security since it doubles the chances of losing your data.

The only raid levels I use are RAID1 for my SSD (with a spinning drive as --write-mostly) and RAID6 for storage (two of six drives die and it's gone).

RAID-0 for boot seems a bit silly - but that's just my opinion. Actually, I don't see the point in risking using it for anything unless you absolutely need the speed.

>> No.61799613

>>61799370
RAID0 is tits for huge HDD scratch disks

>> No.61799885

>>61799370
>>61799613
Kill yourselves for bumping this thread.
Retarded sacks of shit. s4g3

>> No.61800407
File: 350 KB, 672x794, 1502192923956.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61800407

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

U M A

>> No.61800979

U M A
DELIC√ĆA

>> No.61801307

>>61796844
>needing RAID on NVMe
>retardissimo
maybe after 5-10 years

>> No.61801350

>hardware RAID

>> No.61801364

>>61796844
this is a bunch of nothing... confirmed.

>> No.61801370
File: 98 KB, 361x453, UMA_MACACO_STRIKE_AGAIN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61801370

>>61796844

>> No.61801997

>In August 2005, nVidia (how it was spelled at the time) released the nForce 4 SLI X16 chipset for the Pentium 4 in Socket LGA775. The chipset supported a whopping 40 PCI Express lanes.
>Not long after, Intel realized that Nvidia was cutting into chipset sales and stopped licensing x86 to the company.
>In the years hence, we've been stuck with 16 PCIe lanes.
Fuck Intel

>> No.61802014
File: 8 KB, 300x295, 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61802014

>>61796844

>> No.61802101
File: 24 KB, 589x634, 4147_25_nvidia_nf200_x16_x16_vs_intel_x8_x8_p67_performance_analysis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61802101

>>61801997
The P67 board I'm using has an Nvidia NF200 and supports 16x/16x SLI (and 16x/16x/8x).

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action