[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 149 KB, 1048x1068, kik.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61787529 No.61787529 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

>A mobile CPU is better than 600 dollar ryzen

>> No.61787544

>this is what intel shilling is reduced to


>> No.61787556

>post datasheet
>>hurf durf this is better
Thank you for your input.

>> No.61787566

Do you even know how TDP limits work?

>> No.61787568

wow op
this is a really bad thread
like, really genuinely awful
you should go somewhere else

>> No.61787584

Oy vey. Intel processors are battle tested.

>> No.61787612

>i7 cpu
>really just a shitty downclocked dual core
This needs to stop

>> No.61787858

how dare you all treat a member of god's chosen race with such disrespect. can't you schmoes just admit that 4 of intel's fantastic threads are better than anybody elses 16?

>> No.61788339

>people can't accept a 15W CPU for 400 dollars beats $600,99+tax ryzen

>> No.61788352

You know a spec sheet isn't a benchmark, right?

>> No.61788360
File: 87 KB, 927x527, intel battle tested.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

sure are

>> No.61788387

how can I install windows 7 on this?

>> No.61788564

Yeah, there's a reason it beats the $600 Ryzen CPU. There is no Ryzen CPU at that price point, so I guess it wins by default.

But just for shits and giggles, let's compare it to a $300 Ryzen CPU that's currently in a laptop made by ASUS.



Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.