[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 51 KB, 704x783, 1484950567535.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
60222261 No.60222261 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

This is the script I used

>for %%f IN (*.png) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.png" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 4 -qmax 16 -crf 16 -quality best -threads 4 -t 2 -r 1 "%%~nf.webm"

>> No.60222273
File: 8 KB, 218x218, sweating-pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I have a macbook, does it really do this?

>> No.60222284

>hur dur fuck up file and save 2 kb!!!
Kill yourself.

>> No.60222297
File: 166 KB, 704x783, 1484950567535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This is the original PNG file. It's 116KB bigger.

>> No.60222306

write a script that compiles all the pngs in that directory into a single webm and maybe you'll have a fun thread

>> No.60222307

Yup, this is why you should bootcamp windows 7 on it ASAP. mac os for non-important things and windows 7 for important things.

>> No.60222317

>write a script that compiles all the pngs in that directory into a single webm and maybe you'll have a fun thread
for what purpose?

>> No.60222334
File: 2 KB, 299x61, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Thank god for that, I was worried I was going to run out of space.
>mfw dumb NEETfag thinks saving 116KB is some kind of epic feat

>> No.60222344

because it's silly enough that other people might do run it and post the results for a giggle

>> No.60222348

>intentionally programmed to delete private data

That sounds illegal?

>> No.60222369

If everyone in the world cut their file sizes in half then data storage would be 50% cheaper.

>> No.60222381

>data storage would be 50% cheaper
>cut their file sizes in half
Yeah, let me just cut this ISO in half. Maybe it will still work.

>> No.60222391
File: 219 KB, 1224x1445, 1445929737796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

this is the most autistic argument i have seen all day

>> No.60222412

>you can't compress an ISO

>> No.60222417
File: 18 KB, 843x173, TERABYTESOFPORN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

you are like a little baby

watch this

>> No.60222441

> windows for important things
You're a fucking joke.

>> No.60222464

4chan already supports an actual lossy image format. it's called jpeg.
VP8 does not beat jpeg and that's one of the reasons that Firefox doesn't support WebP (the actual image format not some hacked WebM):

>> No.60222502

Just you wait motherfucker. If I wasn't getting so much overtime I'd have a 24 TB ZFS share.

>> No.60222513

Nope, I'm being as serious as a heart attack. I have a macbook 2013 and I can only get work done on it when I boot windows 7 on it. Everything else werks good enough on mac os.

Apple can design good hardware but their software isn't as good as it should be.

>> No.60222534

>Applel can design good hardware
The day pigs get RGB lighting

>> No.60222554


>> No.60222563

Well the 2013 macbook turned out ok. Can't vouch for the overheating donglebooks apple has made thereafter.

>> No.60222719
File: 40 KB, 486x569, 109234870192834614.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

C'mon guys at least try the script, it doesn't make mustard gas. i promis

>> No.60222758

This is retarded. Hope when you die, it's a painful death.

>> No.60222771
File: 35 KB, 459x451, 1491978272889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

So much effort for next to no gain.

>> No.60222787

So you don't care about 4chin images loading faster on your device? Alright, guess this isn't really a tech board anymore. Maybe I should leave this shitty place for good.

>> No.60222815


>> No.60222867

lol you think that's a lot

>> No.60222911

post your storage if its so great

>> No.60222962

no u

>> No.60222968
File: 2.20 MB, 640x480, out.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

that's pretty easy actually

>> No.60222990

elins a cute

>> No.60223122

No. No, I don't care about that. They load fast enough for me to notice. On my device. You retarded mobile poster.

>> No.60223180
File: 2.17 MB, 640x3360, image3410.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

wot in tarnation...

>> No.60223267
File: 207 KB, 640x480, thumb0183.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>386 images into 2.2MB
Okay I am impress. Can you post the script anon? That's batshit crazy.

Script to extract images for everyone else:
ffmpeg -i input.webm thumb%04d.png

>> No.60223462

What if you make a PNG out of that Webm and then turn THAT PNG into a Webm


>> No.60223531

why is this a webm?

>> No.60223535

jpeg is shit compared to webp/webm

>> No.60223555

I agree. Why?

>> No.60223566

hella good compression

>> No.60223598

nothing changed for VP8 since then due to google abandoning it

repeating lies in the face of an actual study makes you look stupid

please check your eyes, that compression is far from transparent and blurry

>> No.60223629

to kill your battery with endlessly decoding VP8 that's non-hw-accelerated on most CPUs

>> No.60223632
File: 2.05 MB, 1011x3032, 1469309230745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You know ebay uses it now, right? Also it's been extensively improved. See pic related.

>> No.60223642

Check again you retard. This webm gives my laptop i3 like 20% load at most.

>> No.60223646

you know the difference between VP8 and VP9?
4chan can't do VP9

>> No.60223665

No shit but webp was based on VP8's keyframe encoding.

motionless webm videos of images just show about how gopd webp would be if it was used

>> No.60223701

are you claiming WebM wasting 20% of your CPU isn't killing your battery compared to 0% for jpeg once it's rendered and cached?

>> No.60223750

>motionless webm videos of images just show about how gopd webp would be if it was used
that would assume same encoder, but cwebp and libvpx aren't.

>> No.60223751

It only peaks to 20% while loading it the first time, after that my cpu goes back to its idle 1-5% load even after minutes of the video being looped.

It's an

>> No.60223760

why not use, dare I say, jpeg?

>> No.60223769

which shitty jpeg encoder is gimp shipping with?
pretty sure it's not mozjpeg

>> No.60223786

The libturbo mozjpeg library was a huge failure. It causes a ton of compatability issues with web browsers/image editors and takes like 10 minutes to encode a single 1080p image in most computers.

>> No.60223788

>Apple deleted my music. No... Apple stole my music. Better headline!

>> No.60223816

if that's the measuring stick, what an epic failure is webp?

>> No.60224181

I want that illya pic

>> No.60224254
File: 15 KB, 704x783, applel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

oh yeah?

>> No.60224257

nvm found it


>> No.60224387

wtf I cant zoom in on webm on my phone
this will never take off

>> No.60224465

share it

>> No.60224469

I just told you the artist

>> No.60224949

why does dithering always give me a warm fuzzy feeling?

>> No.60224999
File: 48 KB, 500x530, fuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Using a video format to turn images in lossy 1 second long loops.

Not pushing for FLIF that offers better compression, does both lossy and lossless and animated images.

The gook should make /flif/ instead of adding all these new useless boards.

>> No.60225253

How the fuck does that even work? How can Apple somehow delete shit off your hard drive?

>> No.60225672

>3D design, animation and rendering, cad, graphic design, finance and other enterprise software, video editing, audio editing and masterization
>on loonix

You are the joke

>> No.60225985
File: 393 KB, 462x497, HorribleSubs_Kobayashisan_Chi_no_Maid_Dragon_10_720p.mkv_snapshot_03.26_2017.03.15_14.21.42.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Damn that's some tech-illiteracy, back to Rèddit with you!

>> No.60226061

OSX is way better for designing and shit.

>> No.60226146
File: 73 KB, 334x468, 1470611408688.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>No drivers
>No latest GPU hardware compatibility
Might as well keep using Winshit like a pleb, senpai. Anything involving Graphics will be slow and stuck in the past…

>> No.60226160

Stop with the bullshit and just prove on a single image example that there is something out there better than jpeg. This whole thread is about lossy compression, right?

>> No.60226483

>blank image
I think your script is broken.

>> No.60226959

Nice trips, but webp has the benefit that it already works in any relevant browser. I'm on Opera 12.X and even it supports webp. FLIF would need some javascript hackery like bgp

>> No.60227000

This shit is real annoying. It technically being a video means that you can't do a lot of shit that you can easily do with an image, like easily zooming in a specific amount.

>> No.60227081

I'm the Opera12 fag and even I can do that with WEBMs. Your browser is shit.

>> No.60227094

How do you do it then? Ctrl+scroll?
Opera generally has weird progressive features though.

>> No.60227122

PNG is lossless, your webm is not.

>> No.60227162
File: 50 KB, 948x1175, indy_200s-c20eab301543d37f3db8f450889906c7fc72d1a6-s6-c30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

even indy is disgusted by those artifacts

>> No.60227543

Yeah but 386 images in 2.2mb mang 0_o

>> No.60227647

Also you can fit 200 eggs in a standard plastic bag if you stomp on them, but what's the point?

>> No.60227757

>file size different when you download the jpg
thank you for proving my point

That's an average of 6KB/pic. JPG can't do that.

>> No.60227814

One of them is blank.

>> No.60227879

So what? If the quality is garbage, I don't give a fuck how small the image is.

>> No.60227968

A really big omelette with extra protein?

>> No.60227993

Well I do. If gookmoot would allow webp then images would load faster. You might have a 1Gbps internet connection but 4chin is limited to serving you content to like 4mbps and on some busy days even slower than that.

In fact this is a big reason why ebay loads faster than other websites.

>> No.60228022
File: 71 KB, 704x783, asmmns.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.60228028

please let this pic be real.

>> No.60228119


I would only touch mac as a ssh machine honestly. Its for people who need other people to manage their shit to keep it from fucking up. And yes that music thing is real though I am not sure if they got enough heat to stop it.

>> No.60228159
File: 14 KB, 1061x141, hdds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.60228202

The ADF (Apple Defense Force) already poured cold water on it and denied it was Apple's problem.

>> No.60228498

VP8 is trash and because of it WebP's lossy mode was obsolete on arrival. We don't need more dead formats.

>10 minutes
Mozjpeg is pretty damn fast, aren't you talking about guetzli? Great encoder by the way.

>> No.60228741

>Well I do.
So you don't care if the quality is "garbage"? Then why not convert every image to a 1x1 white or black png of a few bytes? That's significantly smaller and you could technically say it's a compressed form of the previous picture. The quality is garbage though, but you don't care.

>> No.60228785

see >>60223632

>> No.60228792


>> No.60228812

Because webp uses the keyframe encoding tech from VP8.

>> No.60228815

That's why I need to see that? I already knew that. I don't see how that makes that post relevant.

>> No.60228882

Not the same image, you used lossy compression.

>> No.60229040


Op is stupid as fuck

>> No.60229158
File: 544 KB, 1408x900, compare.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Wow, I wonder why the """image""" in the Op is smaller.

Really makes you think.

>> No.60229773


He's probably the same autist who has been pushing the static WebMs for months. Countless times people have told him that his images look like shit, but he rathers to autistically save 100 Kb.

>> No.60230011

but you can

>> No.60230098

He has a Gmod that has a shill for webp in the load screen.

>> No.60230139

How long until CPU performance is strong enough that file compression can be a simple mathematical expression that equals the total file in binary?

>> No.60230235

Can't zoom on my phone.

>> No.60230299
File: 436 KB, 704x783, difference.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.60231262

i am pretty sure you hoard all you animu in 1080p.

>> No.60231418

In what ways does OSX prevent you from doing work?

>> No.60231487

>not (2^10)^3B

>> No.60232671

seems like only people with iShit devices care about webms.

>> No.60233123

lmao this

>pay ~$1000
>have to jump through numerous hoops to play q webm every time
god, what a joke

>> No.60235710

Why are you doing this? its retarded, ugly, breaks zoom, and breaks the click-to-close function of the site.
Are you really that much of a file size jew?

>> No.60235741

It was probably music that was illegally downloaded.
They probably did it so that people would "have to buy the music from the itunes store"

>> No.60235952

>have a hackintosh t420
>using the latest fag os
>delet itunes
>don't have this problem

>> No.60236302

10^9B is 1GB.
(2^10)^3B is 1GiB.
Windows incorrectly labels GiB as GB.

>> No.60236311

I didn't know those even existed.

>> No.60236328

There are a few 2TB SSD's. There's even a 4TB SSD from Samsung, too.

>> No.60236367

How expensive are those? Also, does there are any M.2 2TB SSDs?

>> No.60236390

bretty sure it's capped at 1.2tb

>> No.60236422







>> No.60236446



>> No.60236920
File: 3.34 MB, 2952x2952, 地獄少女 disc9 レーベル.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just use 96% 4:4:4 jpeg

>> No.60237003
File: 6 KB, 270x87, shot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

plebs out

>> No.60237107


>> No.60237131

nice mspaint skills.

>> No.60237139


>> No.60237169

start -> run -> "mspaint.exe"

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.