[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 148 KB, 680x486, 1488550547210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59927465 No.59927465 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]


>Those 8th Generation Core laptops may be more attractive to customers. The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.

>Those 8th Generation Core laptops may be more attractive to customers. The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.

>In theory, the 10-nm chips should be faster than the 14-nm chips. But the first low-power Cannonlake chips will have fewer transistors, and won't be comparable to the mature 14-nm chips with more transistors.

>The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event,
>chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.

Say it with me everyone.



>> No.59927577

Does anyone find the situation once again mirrors 2004 where Intel has to push clocks and power consumption as high as possible to compete? So many fond memories.

>> No.59928177

I'm assuming that the 10nm chips are extremely energy efficient.

Which is one of the most important features on mobile chips, such as in laptops.

I don't see a problem here.

>> No.59928352

What about desktops?

>> No.59928372

Now if this was AMD you would get dozens of posts saying 'they will optimize it, just wait" and other such excuses.

>> No.59928397

>Just Wait(TM)
Shekelchasers BTFO

>> No.59928411

I expect Intelshills to proclaim AMD as the sole cause of climate change.

>> No.59928412

Sorry mate, but when intel fucks up, they don't hire 30 pajets to spam these boards with damage control at all times.

>> No.59928414

I guess we'll find out if it carries over to desktops.

>> No.59928424

>I expect Intelshills to proclaim AMD as the sole cause of climate change.
No you are thinking of AMD fanboys mate.

>> No.59928455

So basically a repeat of Broadwell? Broadwell got two LGA1150 CPUs that nobody bought because they were slightly slower than Haswell refresh. They did run a lot cooler but desktop users don't care that much about that unless you're going over 120W TDP.

>> No.59928635

Present evidence notwithstanding?

>> No.59928674


>> No.59928788

What is 120W TDP

>> No.59928792

>Energy efficient
Hey goy, put more small batteries

>> No.59928941

The 5775C was a gaming beast.

>> No.59929933


Intel/AMD/Nvidia whatever. Look at what you want to do. Either play a game, or make patterns in Excel.

Buy what does the job best at the time you need to buy and get what you can afford/fits your budget.

Welcome to /g/, where we make 30 threads a day about the same thing and circlejerk hate on Intel/AMD/Nvidia. Because clearly Intel/AMD/Nvidia is better guys.


>> No.59929964 [DELETED] 

I wouldn't know i was only 4 years old then :^)

>> No.59930036
File: 155 KB, 640x360, 1486510190271.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Because watching Intel get into a losing fight with the laws of physics is entertaining as all fuck.

>> No.59930067

Yeah I must've been hallucinating the POOZEN BTFO threads with laughably shit gaymurr benchmarks constantly being spammed for a month straight.

>> No.59930068


Sadly we like arguing.

>> No.59930245

underage b&

>> No.59930258


>> No.59930293

Is this even news though? Intel already said a while back that Cannonlake would be a mobile/embedded release because of shitty 10nm yields.

That being said,
>Coffee Lake

>> No.59930324
File: 162 KB, 633x900, 1489103005792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59930349

People that say buy whatever you need just have the tip of AMD's dick in their ass.

Sane people say Intel/Nvidia always.

>> No.59930354
File: 13 KB, 503x145, a071e36374176d145db94c4274bc8fbf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not sure what the problem is here.
My i5 3210m laptop from 2012 used to beat all of these low voltage processors up until recently.
This is just them pushing out yet another low power cpu.

Probably because that's the power consumption thing they can really improve nowadays and they're aiming for the mobile sector.
This low power thing is the trend, until they decide to finally stop milking people and switch away from silicon to something like GaAs.

>> No.59930378

What's it like for you 15 year olds to concern themselves over performance gains in the worst plateua in history?
I remember back in 2006 when each generation promised magical gains and every iteration was worth upgrading to

Yet here I am in a 4400 and still don't have a reason to upgrade

>> No.59930387

but he's 18

>> No.59930390

>hey intel can I have a 10nm process?
>14nm? What do you need 16nms for?
>delid in 4miles

>> No.59930393

When the T580 comes out with like 24 hours of battery life on 50Wh batteries nobody will be complaining.

>> No.59930415
File: 52 KB, 242x208, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59930429

What's the point of an Intel CPU if it's universally shit?

>> No.59930434

Pure Innovation. They managed to lower their 1% gains even lower and in fact have now achieved negative gains. Such courage

>> No.59930480
File: 25 KB, 650x425, jewkiller.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59930518

Northwood , Prescott et al
130watts in a single core,
Hairdryer for a pc

>> No.59930520

Kill yourself, tripfag.

>> No.59930549

Intel's already losing the fight against quantum physics, you want them to lose the fight against entropy as well?

>> No.59930583


This. I don't need a fast chip in a laptop. I just need low power/heat.

Desktop and server market is another question though. Maybe they will find a home in htpc fanless type stuff?

>> No.59930625

Mate. This is fucked. What happened to you?
You used to be reasonable. Now that Ryzen's came out you went full blown obvious shill.

>> No.59931298
File: 212 KB, 977x688, 1492381411461.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Even Bulldozer is faster than Broadwell-E

>> No.59931316


>> No.59931322
File: 282 KB, 752x548, intelfags.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59931360

You are retarded if you ever thought that he wasn't always the worst tripfag on /g/. Also you should also kill yourself.

>> No.59931366

>You used to be reasonable
>Be awesome
He's always been a troll on all topics, for years now. If you ever find yourself agreeing with him on anything then something is wrong. He denies basic facts in an attempt to push his bullshit.

>> No.59931402

Maybe because Intel is 100x larger than AMD and can probably afford 20 teams of CPU designers that each get billions of USA bucks in funding , while AMD can have maybe 2 max

>> No.59931491

Nah, just that he used to put effort in. Then again Ryzen has really fucked things over for shills. Not much to fall back on other than absolute peak frame rated in games. Everything else gets shat on.
> for years now.
I don't come by that much.
He was having a 'good' spell six months ago.
But now it's just pathetic.

>> No.59931655

What do 'CPU designers' have to do with process development?

>> No.59931745

>laptop chip is underpowered

>> No.59931982

This is why Intel is fucking shit.

>> No.59934170
File: 599 KB, 1312x1740, 1490472047431.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Kill yourself, you perma BTFO'd tripfaggot.

>> No.59934227
File: 2.04 MB, 237x304, 1446321698659.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>TFW I switched from an am3+ chipset to an 1151 build last year because I believed in Intel for the present to the near future
>Canonlake will perform worse than Ryzen and Skylake
>There will be a chipset refresh after canonlake
>I won't be able to get a decent upgrade over my 6600k without a new motherboard even though I spent a lot of time making sure that I'd be able to buy jumping into a chipset at the beginning and getting off at the end
My blood is boiling desu

>> No.59934269

> last year
About time to get a new motherboard anyway according to intel logic.

>> No.59934288


No one but to blame but yourself.

Everyone said wait for Ryzen. Even days after Ryzen was announced Intel knew they had no response and started working on a new architecture.

If Zen wasn't as good as it is, Intel would have gladly sold you a cannonlake for am even higher premium.

>> No.59934310
File: 84 KB, 653x726, 1491958654249.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Kaby Lake-X is going to destroy Ryzen in every benchmark.

>> No.59934324


And then we get to see what Ryzen+ can do shortly after. Competition is great.

>> No.59934392

Anybody who believed in "wait for Zen" a whole 12 months ago would have been laughed at and rightly so

>> No.59934433

What does Ryzen have to do with Kaby Lake-X using new socket?

>> No.59934464


Then you hadn't been paying attention at what a monster Zen was turning out to be, or the effectiveness of bulldozer gaining steam in multithreaded games.

The tea leaves were there.

>> No.59934558

Oyy Vey

>> No.59934581

>bulldozer gaining steam in multithreaded games.
I bought an 8350 six months because of this.
(first build)
Four cores are fucking stupid this late in the game.

>> No.59934596

>babylake - x
>new socket
>7740k 4c 8t
>112W Housefire™
>Just Wait™

back in the oven

>> No.59934612

>competition is great
>both companies are putting out chips not even 50% faster than a 6 year old Sandy Bridge.

It's sad seeing the progress of current CPUs.

2011-2017 - 45% performance gain
2007-2011 - 200% performance gain
2003-2007 - 450% performance gain
1997-2003 - 950% performance gain
1993-1997 - 6500% performance gain

>> No.59934620


>> No.59934629

>t. 2600k owner

>> No.59934637

They will Intel and AMD both start shitty in the beginning and then get it together afterwards.

>> No.59934655


Sucks though. Not upgrading ever at this point.

>> No.59934663

>Either play a game, or make patterns in Excel.
Very subtle way of saying buy intel.
Fucking fan bois getting assmad.
Was perfectly fine when people were getting (((recommended))) i3's instead of FX8XXX.
But noooo. Now that intels behind you'd rather there be no discussion on the facts of the matter anymore.

>> No.59934677

Every other manufacturer is just going to use this as a opportunity to skimp on batteries and make a thinner laptop

>> No.59934705

No where do I say buy Intel.

Or from any company for that matter. They're corporations that just want to take my currency. They aren't "loyal" to me. I've never understood why people blindly follow a company and buy everything they release.

It's weird that we live in a day where what you buy seems to define you socially on the internet.

>Look guys, check out this thing I bought that's clearly better than what you did. Faggot.

That's all that anyone does.

>> No.59934790
File: 18 KB, 406x411, bdljds[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

That's pre-ryzen though.
With ryzen you have a over 150% gain from sandy in MT.

>> No.59934838
File: 161 KB, 625x560, 1465384009016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59934915

>just wait for skylake x
>just wait for cannonlake
>just watch - AMD will go bankrupt

Future is so bright I gotta wear shades

>> No.59934923

>comparing a $450 CPU in 2017 to a $290 CPU in 2011
You CPU shills are really fucking desperate are you, Intel or AMD.

>> No.59935064

>what you buy seems to define you socially on the internet.
No, it's what you said. You're wreathing that there's something other than intel and nVidia.
You simply cannot handle it. So you'd rather all conversation stop.
>check out this thing I bought that's clearly better than what you did. Faggot.
Your point?
This a board of discussing technology. I'll agree the "hey /g/ I just brought 3k worth of vidocards" threads are fucking stupid.
But discussing what's currently the best for activity X is not something that should cease here.

You'll come to accept this in due time. 7 stages of grief.
Also, stop abusing the return key you gigantic homo.

>> No.59935100

Kill yourself.

>> No.59935110

After you.

>> No.59935528
File: 992 KB, 801x1500, 1492127495787.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59935670

except now instead of making them slightly faster and hotter, they're making them slower and colder.
absolute genius

>> No.59935722
File: 149 KB, 691x767, 1491712723494.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]



>> No.59935748
File: 22 KB, 500x396, 1492129465417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]




>> No.59935776

>trying to fight quantum mechanics

>> No.59935778
File: 29 KB, 175x136, 175x400px-LM-704bb4d5_spurdospin.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I forgot one thing: you forgot to change the pentium 4 image to the core i7 image.

>> No.59935853

Pretty much all 1700s do 3.7-3.8ghz.
A $330 2017 CPU vs a $320 (with inflation) cpu.

>> No.59935913
File: 871 KB, 801x1500, bintel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]



>> No.59936187

>not believing in the certified shit wrecker

>> No.59936224
File: 74 KB, 627x627, 1480858901324.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59936258
File: 495 KB, 1070x601, 1489122339460.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

The best part is everyone assuming Intel had god chips just sitting in a warehouse waiting to BTFO AMD if they ever became competitive again.

It turns out they really were sitting on their collective asses all these years

>> No.59936278

Intel's architecture is like a dried up old titty. All the milk has been sucked out. It's just a flabby bag of skin. But full-grown manchildren just keep trying to suck out of it.

>> No.59936291

>m-muh secret sauce

>> No.59936321


The damage control on /g/ alone has been hilarious.

>> No.59936330

You don't get to say that about people who were right.

>> No.59936930

when does the x86 architecture patent expire?

>> No.59937013

>just optimize less transistors
>hotfix more gates
>download more cache

>> No.59937034

ebin : ----------------- DD

>> No.59937329
File: 252 KB, 653x726, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>10nm slower than 14
>h-hheh it's for laptops anyway

>> No.59937379
File: 18 KB, 321x321, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59937721


>> No.59937988


>> No.59938219

God I hate you /g/. Luddites to the highest degree.

>> No.59938270

They are just doing whatever they want now
Nobody is going to force there hand, despite what shills will tell you intel seriously couldn't care less about Ryzen
they are seriously free to just release whatever they want whenever they want

>> No.59938325

>I'm assuming that the 10nm chips are extremely energy efficient.
ARM already is energy efficient

>Which is one of the most important features on mobile chips, such as in laptops.
Pick one, anyone (see normies) who uses a laptop thinks of it as his daily use machine, his "mobile" is his phone or tablet, where ARM is already dominating.

>I don't see a problem here.
Mmmm, this reeks of shill

>> No.59938326

sadly this
all they have to do is just release a processor with a 5% performance gain and it's back to nobody buying AMD again
they seriously don't care which makes me wish maybe nvidia made processors

>> No.59938447

Coffeelake > Cannonlake > Kabylake in clock speed

Laptops are bare die unless built by Sager

Even Alienware laptops will see 30C drop with Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut.

X99 OCF is to draw up to 1300W for the cpu alone

>> No.59939041

>>I won't be able to get a decent upgrade over my 6600k without a new motherboard

Oh, come on now.

If you want to upgrade without buying a new mobo, Intel has never given you much time to do it.

Look at the timing on the sockets:

1156 (2009 and 2010)
1155 (2011 and 2012)
1150 (2013 and 2014)
1151 (2015 to 2018)
Icelake (2018 to ???)

So Intel graciously gives you about a 2-year window to keep your mobo before they make it obsolete. (The only reason the 1151 socket is going to last so long is because the transition to 10 nm is a real bitch, slowing the tick tock way down.)

>> No.59939075

Does anyone ever uses laptop battery? Where do you do that? On a train?

>> No.59939307

>1156 (2009 and 2010)
>1155 (2011 and 2012)
>1150 (2013 and 2014)
>1151 (2015 to 2018)

I miss the Pentiums and Athlons era.

>> No.59939381

They scraped the old system, it's now TICK-TOCK-PANIC

>> No.59939469


>> No.59939470

>when does the x86 architecture patent expire?

Type "lscpu".

See that huge list of flags?

Those are all the features that Intel has incrementally added to their CPUs over the years.

Every feature is patented, and every feature has an installed code base that relies on its existence.

You can't compete against Intel by releasing a CPU that's missing the past 17 years worth of new features. If you want those features in your CPU, you have to license them from Intel. And Intel only allows one company to license those features: AMD. Intel allows AMD to sell x86 CPUs for only one reason: to serve as a defense against anti-trust prosecution. AMD is Intel's "monopoly shield", and Intel doesn't need any other company to fill that role -- so you're completely out of luck if you want to enter the x86 CPU market.

Yes, /g/entlemen, that's right -- AMD competes against Intel in the x86 CPU market ONLY because Intel authorizes them to do so. If it wasn't for anti-trust legislation, Intel would have bought AMD many years ago.

>> No.59939615
File: 564 KB, 3072x2304, OB7ll matrix screenless laptop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ok, now what?

>> No.59939640

>Intel allows AMD to sell x86 CPUs for only one reason: to serve as a defense against anti-trust prosecution.
Not exactly. AMD developed and owns the AMD64 extension to x86. AMD and Intel are in a mutually beneficial patent deal so that Intel can use the 64-bit extension and AMD can use the x86 base.

>> No.59939700


The x64 cross license deal is still massively in Intel's favour. As far as I understand it it is "if AMD ever goes belly up Intel gets all rights fuck you" but if Intel imploded AMD doesn't inherently get any rights to x86.

Then again both VIA and (iirc) IBM still hold an x86 license.

>> No.59939716

> Not exactly.
> AMD64 extension

If it wasn't for anti-trust legislation, Intel would have simply bought AMD to acquire its patent portfolio.

So, ultimately, AMD exists only because Intel allows it.

>> No.59939789
File: 73 KB, 600x392, judaism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

They'll just release an upgrade card like they did with the pentium g6950.

>> No.59939820

>5 watt 2ghz cpu is slower than 150watt 5ghz cpu with 4 times more transistors


>> No.59939885

>if AMD ever goes belly up Intel gets all rights
Not really. AMD is the last real competition to Intel in x86 space, so Intel would have to license it to whatever competitor comes up or face the wrath of an antitrust lawsuit that they lose by default.
If no competitor comes up, the government steps in and splits Intel in a big divestiture, not unlike what happened to AT&T back in the 80s.

>AMD exists only because Intel allows it
I'm not sure "allow" is the right term since they have no other choice.

>> No.59939896

>implying that they won't make batteries smaller again because "muh thin and light" and battery life will be exactly the same

>> No.59939928

intel's 10nm laptop chips will be slower than their 14nm laptop chips you retard

>> No.59939937



>> No.59939964

Because you're comparing high end laptop 14nm i7s to soon to be released 10nm Y (lower end than even i3s) cpus. You're not fooling anyone you stupid indian I won't buy your curry shit

>> No.59939966

on mine right now

>> No.59940000

Intel next year will come out with a 6-8 core CPU at 4.5GHz and will competlely fucking destroy AMD

>> No.59940008



>> No.59940032
File: 871 KB, 801x1500, besin falls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59940054

The irony is that you can't get any poozen cpu to oc over 4.1ghz even if you set the volts to 300 without your motherboard catching fire

>> No.59940063

>Just wait
Holy shit! Is this real life?
Intelfag finally the one who actually saying this?

>> No.59940073
File: 46 KB, 340x314, 0000000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>8 Intel Housefire(tm) cores
>4.5 GHz

Hope you have a good fire insurance plan.

>> No.59940096
File: 474 KB, 200x150, IMG_3177.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>shit streeters

>> No.59940107

Kill yourself.

>> No.59940138




>> No.59940146
File: 102 KB, 601x806, IMG_2564.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>just wait
For what?

>> No.59940163

>Jim Keller
>Jem Keller
>Jew Keller
>Jew Killer
makes u think

>> No.59940181
File: 39 KB, 468x631, Intel reslet in his natural 800x600 habitat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>March 4

>> No.59940182


BUT NEXT YEAR! >>59940000


>> No.59940192


>> No.59940196


>> No.59940205


>U-uh, next year intel will destroy AMD with 8 cores
>w-wait for what?

Make up your mind please intelshill.

>> No.59940207

But i5s were shitty for at least 2 years, very obviously, but shills on here kept pushing them.
It was apparent in frametime graphs 2 or 3 years ago that they were a stuttering mess on so many games coming out and that average FPS was a shitty measurement.

Sure Bulldozer was worse, but shilling a bad chip because it kind of fits someone's budget was never a good idea. That's the reason Intel didn't need to improve their SKUs more so than a lack of competition, that fucktards would overpay for them anyway.

>> No.59940218

They actually did :^)
Just like Intel did with Netburst, Westmere and Sandy Bridge.

>> No.59940221

>muh +10 FPS average at over 100 FPS

Still turns into a stuttery mess as soon as the game tries to load from the disk or a background task does anything at all.

>> No.59940227

You had to be retarded to think a 4c/4t in 2016 was good then, let alone for the future.
You could still sell it and get a 6700k instead.
Or just sell the whole mobo+cpu+RAM and get Ryzen.

Better to fix your mistake now than let it depreciate further.

Ryzen+? It's going to get BTFO by 12core and 16core HEDT Ryzens. The 1900X and 1950X(tentative names).

>> No.59940228
File: 504 KB, 2094x1242, IMG_2558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Lul no they didn't

>> No.59940241



>> No.59940244

>implying 12+ core HEDT Ryzen+ won't come out

>> No.59940253

Get a 7700k it will take amd 10 years to catch up to it in any game

>> No.59940267
File: 45 KB, 1500x1500, 1487284046126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Now post 0.1 and 1% lows

>> No.59940276

>games witll be limited to 4cores in the next 10 years

T-thanks intel.

>> No.59940282

You're implying AMD would have tried to make that same ballsy move.

Intel might be a Jewish company, but at least it's taking the right step by coming up with a new technology (10nm is actually smaller than some atoms) that will make it the king of innovation as well as processing power.

If Intel ever hires anybody who comes up with a superconductor that works at room temperature, it's going to own the market even harder than it did before Ryzen. It's the reason why Intel isn't really worried about Ryzen--if Cannon Lake is a success, Intel is basically set for life.

>> No.59940283
File: 151 KB, 1280x720, [HorribleSubs] Gabriel DropOut - 08 [720p].mkv_snapshot_07.06_[2017.02.27_11.53.20].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

How's that pr0 3zp0rtz going for you? Win any tourney lately? Mad dosh from sponsorships?

>> No.59940303

It already loses if you aren't doing insane shit to push it past 5 GHz.

>> No.59940309

>Cannon Lake is a success,

Looks and feels like another Broadwell.
It getting delayed by a year and a half isn't helping.

>> No.59940314
File: 538 KB, 1279x720, IMG_2802.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Kek i3 has higher min frames than indian shit averages lmao

>> No.59940315

Cannon Lake is shaping up to be a low yield turd that performs worse and isn't even worth it in terms of TDP.

>> No.59940320
File: 498 KB, 400x400, eea0abaf0a1d80c7752a0e2431730434.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Mad dosh from sponsorships?
Probably got them 4 mad housefire corez

>> No.59940340
File: 188 KB, 1280x720, 1492360238852.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Excellent cherrypicking, shill. Now pick out a game that isn't a broken piece of shit that hasn't been patched.

>> No.59940366

Who gives a fuck now that ryzen is here? AMD mobile will crush them

>> No.59940377

>Just wait is intel trademark now.

Praise Ganesha, We finally won brothers.

>> No.59940379
File: 514 KB, 500x498, IMG_2801.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>every case where amd proves itself to be shit is a cherrypick

>> No.59940402

That game runs like ass on dx11 too it's not well optimized

>> No.59940403


>> No.59940404

Is that the max the gpu can put out at 1080p or does it go up with more overclock on the cpu?

>> No.59940405
File: 224 KB, 800x1071, intel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

intel fags btfo

>> No.59940412

I like the "release Skylake again" one more.

>> No.59940421



>> No.59940436

Not only that, but it was already patched to run better with Ryzen. Shills getting desperate. https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/247141-total-war-warhammer-will-also-receive-ryzen-patch

>> No.59940447

>different game
>a shittily optimized game at that

>> No.59940454
File: 542 KB, 1900x3028, Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 22.55.04-fullpage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm not worried, reviewers hate the R5's, literally everyone recommends a genuine Intel i5

>> No.59940456
File: 545 KB, 1920x1080, phasechange.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Upgrade to Coffeelake

This motherboard has stronger vrms than the X370 motherboards out there

>> No.59940460

>posting a game that's already been patched
lmfao. You desperate shill.

You may as well completely make shit up and photoshop fake benchmarks. It's the same thing as what you're doing.

>> No.59940482

Don't forget Fallout 4 and ARMA, completing the trifecta of poorly optimized shit games.

>> No.59940497

shit wrecked intel so hard they went full retard

>> No.59940502
File: 183 KB, 1089x682, Screenshot from 15-04-2017 22:07:07.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Why are you niggers arguing with the day one troll using cherrypicked shit instead of average 15+ game performance

>> No.59940518

Better than a 4790k?

>> No.59940523
File: 1 KB, 80x25, benchmark for ants.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

oi vey these goyim don't know how to benchmark a game properly

>> No.59940526

Why Would You Settle For 7.2 Less Than Intel?
amd Is Really Only For Poor People

>> No.59940536

Yeah, but they need to be at 60x40px with half bit color

>> No.59940539

That's not what intel said.

>> No.59940543
File: 193 KB, 650x889, IMG_2828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I guess it's always the games fault no matter that every game shows the same result and it's not actually your indian chip being shit?

>> No.59940549

Not a real CPU benchmark

>> No.59940553
File: 510 KB, 761x768, cherry picking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59940559 [DELETED] 

>tested with a 1060 gpu
Indian nigger trying to hide his shit cpu performance. Try testing again with a 1080ti at least

>> No.59940565
File: 134 KB, 614x529, RYZEN-1600X-1500X-44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59940567

But it's the highest in 4K.
Why would you settle for .2% less performance than what a cheaper CPU gets?

>> No.59940570

>what are diminishing returns

You can only get so much out of silicon.

>> No.59940578
File: 29 KB, 617x837, 1492211407867.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Looks good.
$500 CPU is only 30% slower than the $1750 CPU in a cherry picked benchmark, while it often beats it

>> No.59940579

Nobody is cherrypicking. Your indian cpu is just shit at gamig, get over yourself you autistic gizmo.

>> No.59940598
File: 95 KB, 779x879, Screenshot from 17-04-2017 21:56:27.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>used a $90 mobo for the ryzen and a $250 one for the Intel

Not even your own shill believe you.

>> No.59940607


Ok...now delid the TI83

>> No.59940613


>> No.59940639

>motherboard determines the performance of a cpu
"Indian intelectuals". Also
>used 1 year old z170

>> No.59940652

HI my name is Salazar and this thread greatly offends me

>> No.59940674

>used 1 year old z170


>> No.59940701

>"motherboard determines the performance of a cpu"
>Complain about the motherboard in the next line.

toppest kek

>> No.59940760

I really wish I could filter this fucktard.
I recognize him in so many threads. He just reposts the same day1 cherry picked benchmarks in almost every thread.

I know this is just 4chan and all, but I still wish /g/ could have a rule against posting misleading/fake "benchmarks".

>> No.59940780

I personally call him Ramesh. He's retarded, probably.

>> No.59940781
File: 31 KB, 580x370, 1490802421372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>he thinks motherboards don't have different performance characteristics especially at their infant stages

Hah, nice to know Intelfags are completely clueless.

>> No.59940787
File: 532 KB, 1765x992, 12343151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not using the Apex and running 5.3ghz at low v 7700K and fast ram?

>> No.59940800
File: 124 KB, 784x580, IMG_2649.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Speaking of Warhammer

>> No.59940803

>the most expensive AM4 motherboard has one of the worst ANUS BIOSes of all time not counting the X99 one

Why do people recommend this company anymore?

>> No.59940831

Who knows. Said mobo (ANUS ballhair republic of DOA) also literally bricked itself.

>> No.59940837

Dope af. It will most likely take amd 10 years at the very least to hit that frequency considering their new shit clocks lower than their own old bulldozers lmao

>> No.59940850

Asus has really gone down the shitter. Their 480 was one of the worst in the market.

>> No.59940862

>pre-patch benchmark
How embarrasing, shill.

>> No.59940864

Well the 480 chip itself is shit so there's that..

>> No.59940876

Kill yourself.

>> No.59940891
File: 53 KB, 820x543, Screenshot from 17-04-2017 22:15:26.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Speaking of microcode and BIOS.

Free performance!

>> No.59940900

>XFX chips get 1470mhz
>Sapphire gets 1440mhz
>Asus gets 1380mhz, also throttles down under load because of their retarded temp target.
Nah man, its Asus this time.

>> No.59940901

They literally have IBM's 14nm HP SOI lined up for Zen+.
Zen itself is actually not a low clocking design and has no critical path issues that may hinder clocks currently. The only reason why Ryzen is capping out at around 4GHz is 14nm LPP.

>> No.59940924

1470mhz is pretty shit for a 14nm dude. Nvidia gets their shit running at 2.1 ghz running on 16nm

>> No.59940934
File: 51 KB, 500x500, 1203622889390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

So we waiting for Intel now?

>> No.59940943

>IBM's 14nm HP SOI lined up for Zen+.
Probably no. FinFET to SOI translation is pretty hard. And GloFo has limited production for that node.

>> No.59940958 [DELETED] 

You have no idea of what you're talking about you stupid nigger

>> No.59940970

>low power vs high power now
Really makes you think.

>> No.59940974

Wait until 2021, sure.

>> No.59940983

Nvidia's arch is 32 wide scalar while AMD is 16 wide vector arch, you cockmongling retard.

>> No.59940996

The next SOI is 7nm, possibly late 2019

>> No.59941008

Don't play smart you stinky indian shit because you're not. Amd clocks lower and there's not shit you can do about it

>> No.59941010

7nm is FinFET.

>> No.59941017
File: 74 KB, 242x269, Screenshot from 2015-03-06 20:08:35.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59941031

Kek. It's OK to not know what a word means, anon. You can always ask someone else.

>> No.59941046


This is comedy gold, thanks anon.
Can't get this same shit from amdfan.

>> No.59941125

This is what happens when retards don't understand clockspeed, TDP and IPC.

>> No.59941317

>TFW the only shekelchaser left is literally the dumbest fucking shill in the history of shills
Kikeshills truly BTFO

>> No.59941322

He is the type of the customer that made the Pentium 4 such a success commercially.

>> No.59941390

wait for cannon kek

>> No.59941410


>> No.59941424


>> No.59941428

What is with AMD fans? I mean they must themselves see that they have excuse for everything. One anon provides 6+ independent tests and they call them ALL cherrypicking, while barely providing 1-2 tests in response. I mean, how don't they see the irony here?

>> No.59941434

So this is why Coffee Lake exists.

>> No.59941446

>so this is why another 10 months of waiting exists
What the hell is Caffeine lake (Skylake again) gonna do against Zen+ coming out in the same time frame?

>> No.59941457

Pretend it's fucking competitive. I very much doubt it will be though.

>> No.59941467

It'll clock to 5.0 while Zen+ will only clock to 4.7 AMD is BTFO

>> No.59941481
File: 85 KB, 806x544, IMG_2648.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What kaby lake did to poozen, destroy it

>> No.59941490

Zen+ will clock maybe 10% higher.

>> No.59941501

On a HP process? Fat chance.

>> No.59941502

But Kaby Lake destroyed my house, not Zen.

>> No.59941516

They will never use 14nm HP. The best case scenario is 14nm LPU which is said 10% increase in clock speed.

>> No.59941528

Why do you think "they'll never use it" ?
That's basically limiting yourself, LPP is fine for everything but desktops, but for desktops it's suboptimal

>> No.59941556

Because they give almost zero fucking shits about desktop. They are just selling something not suitable for Naples to consumers. That's. Fucking. It.

>> No.59941568

But /g/ told me desktops are the biggest market

>> No.59941590

The only smaller market is IoT. And desktop is rapidly shrinking.

>> No.59941599

Intel shouldn't be fucking up like this though. They have so much capital at their disposal that they don't have any excuse for fuckups for fuckups like this.

>> No.59941609

I think all boards would be better with per thread IDs and flags.

>> No.59941613

Dude intel 4 core destroys amd 8 core right now they can fuck up whatever they want

>> No.59941620

IoT? Small?
Not only is it the newest meme, IoT is basically fucking everything from wearables to your fucking fridge and microwave.
That's not even mentioning all the slot devices, terminals, ATMs, cameras, sensors, set top boxes, cars etc etc

>> No.59941628

Nah, per board ID's so I can filter retards, shitposters and australians.

>> No.59941631

>in games xdddd
kill yourself

>> No.59941656
File: 196 KB, 1600x917, intel-diversity-fullbleed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Should have put money into your bread and butter instead of feminist frequency, diversity and fucking self driving memes..

>> No.59941671

Money =/= quality engineers. Also their CEO is a fucking retard.

>> No.59941687

I hope this mouthbreather doesn't get fired so I can see Intel roll in its own shit.
And even if they did lay him off finding another one that can compare to Lisa and fixing that faggots mess is gonna take time.

>> No.59941694

Maybe per clock cycle but the difference was minimal and the 4790k's stock speed was 700MHz higher. The 5775C has a better iGPU and 128MB of L4 cache but does 3.3GHz-3.7GHz base/turbo.

>> No.59941724

delid that cd/dvd case

>> No.59941764
File: 143 KB, 665x699, I'm here to talk shit and diversify you, and I'm all outta shit .png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59941793
File: 27 KB, 400x600, IMG_3189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Black bitch still looks better than poo guy

>> No.59941806

The poo guy is actually competent though.

>> No.59941824
File: 3.12 MB, 2208x1242, IMG_3144.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Then why does the cpus he makes perform worse than the cpus the black bitch makes?

>> No.59941831

For desktops you choose ryzen.

>> No.59941845
File: 137 KB, 1280x720, mpv-shot0028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

But poo guy is one of the best GPU engineers on the planet


Here's Intel poo guy.

>> No.59941856

One job, Ramesh. One fucking job.

>> No.59941859
File: 266 KB, 1920x1020, IMG_2650.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Lul no

>> No.59941869

>DirectX 11
Really makes you think

>> No.59941874

>obvious performance bug that requires a patch


Kill yourself, retard.

>> No.59941882


>> No.59941887
File: 72 KB, 939x891, Screenshot from 15-04-2017 01:35:14.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

If your boss sees you posting Linux benchmarks you'll get fired immediately, Linux isn't ICC certified!

>> No.59941900

His best gpu, rx480 is 2 times slower than a $300 low end gtx 1070

>> No.59941903

>$1700 6950X

Oh my God

>> No.59941911

>$500 CPU is on par with $1700 one
Oy-vey another shoah.

>> No.59941915

Not everyone is a poor indian Raja

>> No.59941920

No, it's not.
And rx480 isn't his best GPU.

>> No.59941921

No one with any level of status would be playing some shit league of lol style game. Post some benchmarks that really matter, like cinebench.

>> No.59941928

Fuck this is getting TOO boring.

>> No.59941936

>No charts
>No graphs
>No links
>No evidence at all
Kill yourself, Intel shill.

>> No.59941937

>synthetic benchmark
>matters more than real world usage

I knew indians were retarded but not on this level

>> No.59941938
File: 72 KB, 650x650, 1477062638121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>Does anyone ever uses laptop battery?
>Does anyone ever use a portable computer to actually be portable?

Oh my god.

>> No.59941939

Then I assume you'll have no trouble buying the 32 core Naples?

>> No.59941958

>Just Wait(TM)
Hahahahahahahahaah fucking shekelchasers BTFO

>> No.59941962



>> No.59941966
File: 20 KB, 400x152, IMG_2572.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not until they have better single core performance than a $20 pentium

>> No.59941970

>Day 0 benchmarks
Get with the times kike.

>> No.59941972

It matters if you're doing anything productive. More cores = more productivity. No one cares about your fps numbers.

>> No.59941979

>$500 CPU matching $1700 CPU in well threaded tasks while having 2 less cores.
>probably using less power too

>> No.59941997

>completely cropped FPS benchmark
You could not have tried any less.

>> No.59942006

Installing linux repedeatly isn't productive. It's what wannabe nerds bur actual losers do. Productive people edit videos and programmers work on games, where amd has no change against intel.

>> No.59942012

It's okay, maybe Skylake will have higher than Bulldozer IPC next year.


>> No.59942020

You could link the video you got that from, but what fun would that be, shill? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbK0n5FjvhI

>> No.59942042

[Citation Needed]

>> No.59942043

They work on games and video editing using 4 cores.

I guess Intel's Xeons are literally finished

>> No.59942057

You just proved your cpu is shit, I don't expect indians to listen to a person talk so I'm just showing you the chart which your 70% poo 30% actual brain matter can understand

>> No.59942069


>> No.59942071
File: 2.33 MB, 1480x8356, Screen Shot 2017-04-16 at 23.51.07-fullpage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Forgive this retard, for he knows not what he's speaking.

>> No.59942073

Just fucking stop replying to him. Got dammit what happened to this board. Shitposting used to be art.

>> No.59942078
File: 207 KB, 680x473, stop-liking-what-I-dont-like.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Autistic people actually getting triggered and responding seriously to this retard
>In korean cartoon picture forum.


>> No.59942086

Kill yourself.

>> No.59942087

Kill yourself, shekelchaser

>> No.59942090

Do you hear yourself? Ryzen slams anything intel has to offer when it comes to video work. It's also the better choice for 3d modeling. And if you're programming games, you don't need anything more than a 486 and vim to write code so comparing performance of modern cpus is idiotic.

>> No.59942097



>> No.59942104


>> No.59942105

Funny how you always compare amd 8 core flagship against intel's 4 core in multithreaded apps and compare it again against intel's 10 core in single threaded apps

>> No.59942116



>> No.59942122
File: 148 KB, 763x930, intel_j.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59942129

Even a 1500x beats intel's flagship.

>> No.59942130

thank you Jim, thank you so much.

>> No.59942138

Missed the 6900k getting its ass blown or something?

What very convenient eyes.

>> No.59942142

No it doesn't. If you consider yourself a professional and need to edit videos, you can afford a 6950x which amd has no chance against. And if you want to game, good luck with your indian piece of shit against a 7700k lul

>> No.59942144



>> No.59942149

Good goyim

>> No.59942160



>> No.59942163
File: 94 KB, 879x714, Screenshot from 05-04-2017 23:59:51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just wait for Skylake bro, in the meantime buy our $1700 CPU that's as good as the competitors $500 one.

>> No.59942170


>> No.59942179

If you consider yourself a professional you'll understand the importance of not wasting money.

>> No.59942183





>> No.59942195

>Intel will design and manufacture a whole new architecture in a year to compete

Yeah, just like that will cut the pricing of their $1100 6900K, to compete with a $330 1700 which is currently on par or beats it.

>> No.59942230


>> No.59942238
File: 138 KB, 603x602, 1500x-4300mhz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Seems like new batches are already doing their job.

>> No.59942246
File: 54 KB, 800x551, 1491879222470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59942247


>> No.59942249

100-200MHz doesn't mean much to me, 200Mhz at crazy core counts for some VM deployments would be real fucking nice though.

>> No.59942259



>> No.59942267

Oh, nice, I've seen 1500X at that voltage barely hitting 4.0, much less 4.3

>> No.59942271


>> No.59942290

This isn't new, Haswell overclocked like shit when it launched, only later did it consistently hit 4.5+

>in a MT test
>against dual xeons and a 16 core Xeon-D

It would get clobbered

>> No.59942322


Fucking hell.
Looks like I need to JUST WAIT again.

>> No.59942324

First batch of OG Phenoms also OCed like total shit.

>> No.59942344

Yup, pretty much same for Polaris too.

>> No.59942380

Could be a combination of mobo BIOS and fab improvements.

Actually I'd bet its more due to the motherboard BIOS, some boards really go fucking overkill on the LLC shitting up voltages to insane levels.


>> No.59942397

There is a teeny bar for single threaded performance on there, though.

>> No.59942404
File: 238 KB, 506x361, Screenshot from 17-04-2017 23:58:46.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

tl;dw version

>> No.59942429
File: 75 KB, 856x489, AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-sysbench-CPU-Benchmarks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Well I guess for comparisons you can run some tests 4 times slower if you want..

Here's a ST only test though, the guy who does this doesn't even have a 7700k, he sells server hardware.

You can actually see a AWS server and Xeon Phi in comparisons in some tests

>> No.59942456

Come on, everyone knows single core is the only thing that matters. Forget IPC, TDP, cache, price, upgradeability, etc.

>muh clocks

>> No.59942461

>overclocking ryzens
>but not the Intels

How desperate can you get.

>> No.59942474
File: 17 KB, 409x435, 1491691485303.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>overclocking server hardware

>> No.59942479

That's the kernel version , smegmabreath.

>> No.59942499

>overclocking non-server hardware
>but not overclocking server hardware

>> No.59942520

>OC a server.


>> No.59942531

>Actually I'd bet its more due to the motherboard BIOS, some boards really go fucking overkill on the LLC shitting up voltages to insane levels.
BIOS updates have allowed people to drop voltage like 0.05v or so.
So instead of 4.1ghz at 1.4v people are getting that are 1.35v much more commonly.
So you can up it to even higher clocks on 1.4v again instead.

>> No.59942536

What kind of clock is "4.10.1" ? It's the kernel version.


>For our Ubuntu 14.04 with kernel 4.10.1 benchmarks we standardized on a very simple platform.

It's also on a $90 motherboard, people seem to love these B350 ones.

>> No.59942552

Does LLC vary by mobo or is it a CPU thing?

>> No.59942578
File: 310 KB, 439x387, [HorribleSubs] Kobayashi-san Chi no Maid Dragon - 10 [720p].mkv_snapshot_03.09_[2017.03.15_14.20.51].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Intelshills are this stupid

>> No.59942597

Mobo, some are fine after OCing on any LLC, some are complete messes at the first 2 levels, some actually are reversed, so LLC1 is lower voltage than LLC5

New platforms really need some documentation, that's why I'll bide my time with this 3570k until Zen+

>> No.59942624

Are you fucking retarded?

>> No.59942658

You know what's a shame? This retarded clown with a very obvious posting style doesn't have a trip, if you put the dumb garbage he said over the last 5 weeks it would look that dumb tripshit that got his ass reamed look smart.

>> No.59942916


Just wait folks, new Intel architecture by 2020! Skylake will keep you company.

>> No.59943177

>Just wait folks, new Intel architecture by 2020
Will it have 2 lids to delid this time?

>> No.59943194

You'll have to solder your own caps into this one for that sweet 50Mhz

>> No.59943400

>until Zen+
But when is that? My 2400 is dying and I can't even overclock it.

>> No.59943594

>Intel's fab advantage disappears at the same time of AMD's resurgence

this is the best timeline

>> No.59943625

10-11 months likely.

>> No.59943697

You can always get a cheapo 6 or 4 core, the AM4 socket will last you both zen1 to zen+++ in 2019/20

>> No.59943707

Allegedly Q1 2018.

>> No.59943784

yeah I was planning on buying 1500x anyway since I'm poor, but I also can't afford upgrading every year or 2.

>> No.59943840

Get 1600 then.

>> No.59944126

Save up for the $219 for the 1600. Use stock cooler and get one of the cheaper boards. Upgrade to zen++ in 2019.

>> No.59944198

Is it really that much better? I don't think I'm gonna be using those 2/4 more cores/threads that much, but it's not that much expensive so if it's worth it I might pick it. Still would rather save as much as possible and when I saw the price for i5 build I just wanted to kill myself. That was before I knew about ryzen good thing I waited.

>> No.59944221

Yes, it's fucking 6/12 for $219. No better value exists.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.