Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 57 KB, 806x402, cpu-z.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59529049 No.59529049 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Is your CPU stable at 5GHz, or are you a clocklet? Not that there's anything wrong with that!

>> No.59529060

>7700K

Lol look at the corelet trying to talk big

>> No.59529069

>>59529049
i'd rather be a clocklet than a corelet

>> No.59529126

>>59529060
>>59529069
>MOAR COAREZ!!1

>>>/r/Amd/

Poozen finally killed that meme forever. Four is the maximum amount of cores that a CPU should have.

>> No.59529137

>>59529049
>>59529126
I wonder who could be behind these posts.

>> No.59529153

>>59529049
4.5 Ghz to 5 Ghz is only 10% overclock.

Realistically you'd see less than 10% increase in performance.

Intel has been reaching their OC threshold limit.

>> No.59529165

>>59529049

is this stable with a 24hr prime95 run?

if not then you arent stable at 5ghz

>> No.59529178

>>59529153
You have littke to knie ifea what you sre speaken of so iwill nowdisregard you

>> No.59529184

>>59529049
KYS corelet

>> No.59529198
File: 1.00 MB, 843x409, hurr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59529198

>not getting at least 5111 MHz

Talk about not even trying.

>> No.59529204

It's currently at 4.8GHz and 1.248v. It can do 5GHz at 1.32v, but I need a better cooler.

>> No.59529232

>>59529165
Only eight hours of P95 and a few hours of IBT so far. Can't be fucked to do more right now.

>>59529198
On air? I'm just using a single tower air cooler (Noctua NH-U14S), so 1.312V under load is already pushing it (85 on the hottest core when stress testing).

>> No.59529234

>>59529165
>he thinks prime95 is enough to test stability
I can pass 12 hours of Prime, but get a BSOD an hour into playing Battlefield 1/4 multiplayer.

The best stability test right now is Realbench and x264 for 12-24 hours.

>> No.59529240

>>59529232
Water and delidded.

>> No.59529241

>>59529234
A full run of IBT on maximum settings has never failed me for an OC so far

>> No.59529247

>>59529049
would a 5niggerhurtz i3 be faster than ryzen?

>> No.59529262

gotta get that 5% perfomance increase?

>> No.59529275

>>59529241
This. I do a full run of IBT, Realbench for 8 hours overnight and finish off with x264 for 8 hours the next day.

Usually, either IBT or Realbench fails within the first 5-20 minutes if it's unstable.

>> No.59529291

>>59529240
I see. I'm considering delidding, since this seems to be a decent enough chip.

>>59529247
Depends. For most gaymes, yes.

>> No.59529294

>>59529049
>5GHz
>not 8.1GHz
you are the clocklet, kid

>> No.59529302

>>59529178
Is this even English?
>>59529049
>>59529126
>>59529198
>>59529240
Corelets.

>> No.59529316

>>59529049
I only got a meme 212 evo and a 4690k

>> No.59529318

What version of prime are you guys using for stability testing?

>> No.59529319

>>59529294
>8.1
>Not 8.4 Stable all 4c/8t of an 8350 using your infinite supply of liquid helium and freon
Shiggy, clocklet.

>> No.59529325

>>59529319
8.8GHz is better though

>> No.59529327

>4 cores
lmao senpai

>> No.59529329

My 4790k is at 4.7 and that's without delidding and running on air under 1.3v.

>> No.59529338

>>59529302
Are you an even raging techo fuck???? Notall ofus wereborn in English First Language Countries!

>> No.59529348

>>59529338
Calm down pajeet

>> No.59529354

>>59529319
shit, didn't know someone broke the 8.1GHz P4 record, i'm really out of touch with all the overclocking shit

>> No.59529361

>>59529338
Considering filing a report.

>> No.59529470

>>59529338
reported pajeet

>> No.59529616

>>59529327
2x4 weak poo cores at 3GHz with broken SMT and IMC.

>> No.59529621

>>59529338
Hi pajeet.
POO IN LOO HAHAHAHA.
Bye pajeet.
*reported*

>> No.59529637
File: 69 KB, 809x403, teachmesenpai.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59529637

convince me to bother upgrading. money and time is no issue. simply no desire.

>> No.59529686

>>59529637
>convince me
>money and time is no issue
t. poorfag pretending to be rich because he saved up $500 to upgrade his 10 year PC

>> No.59529730
File: 532 KB, 1765x992, 12323151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59529730

>>59529049
What's your ram specs?

>> No.59529737

>>59529049
>last-gen [email protected] from 2017: 2512 single threaded
>[email protected] from 2009: 1413 single threaded

we are so stucked

>> No.59529769

>>59529621
Haha your racist but it gets you nowhere me and my brothers and sisters already are here! We run your companies as too well! Except your world is not as it once was and welcome us we can be good friends i think.

Ee are smarter and faster and quite onbviously gifted you woukd do wel not to fight us.

>> No.59530163
File: 343 KB, 1000x869, uber_dland_large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59530163

>>59529769
don't worry, pooloo when there's a race war you cow-lovers are one of the first to go...

>> No.59530187

>>59529049
>he fell for the overclocking meme
kek

>> No.59530439

>>59529049

>5GHz
>1.31v

Enjoy your housefire.

>> No.59531033

>>59529730
Water chiller? Or you live in a freezer.

>> No.59531060

>>59529126
what do white women prefer?

>4 inch baby corelet

or

>8 inch BBC cores

fuck off corelet.

>> No.59531114

>>59531060

um the iphone only has 2 cores

>> No.59531146

>>59531114

and modern android snapdragon cpu's have 8 cores

so it's obvious that modern women prefer efficiency over everything

>> No.59531204
File: 55 KB, 810x404, cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531204

I'm at 4.5ghz. But I don't know how to go higher.

>> No.59531223

>>59529049
Single-core 1.0Hz.

fite me fegs

>> No.59531234

My H110i is arriving today. Hope to get 4.8 on my 5820k 6 core.

>> No.59531238

>>59531223

no proof, no care

>> No.59531258

>>59531238
>proof
literally who gives a shit

>> No.59531260
File: 35 KB, 403x402, cpuz_2017-03-23_00-02-53.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531260

>>59529049
Why should I even bother, this baby runs at 4.2 passively cooled

>> No.59531268

>>59529049
Why didn't clock speeds advance at all since pentium 4? Like back in the day everyone knew one guy who'd overclock his pentium IV above 5GHz whilst cooling it with a fire extinguisher or something.

>> No.59531310

>>59531268
we don't need fire extinguishers now

>> No.59531324

>>59531260
>passive cooling
do you like taking it in the butt too? Passive cooling is for people with girly ears who can't stand any noise

>> No.59531329
File: 29 KB, 499x500, 1486574877988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531329

>>59529049
I7 2600k- 2011
Overclocked to 5.0ghz

We really have gone nowhere with frequencies.

>> No.59531333

>>59531268

a pentium processor @ 5ghz is like telling 5 guys to pick up the pace while kaby lake at the same peed is like telling 20 guys to pick up the pace. you'll get a lot more done.

>> No.59531356

>>59531333

and you're limited by metallurgy and physics. obviously 5,000,000,000 cycles is the most that we need at the moment. the trick is to put in more transistors that can keep cycling.

>> No.59531374

>>59529049
corelets are so cute

>> No.59531407

>>59529126
You cant perceive more than 4 cores.

>> No.59531413

>>59531268
>>59531329
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcC7ao_c7MU

>> No.59531421
File: 194 KB, 1439x947, 212 Evo Not Delidded.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531421

>>59531268
IIRC it's one of the limits of using silicon. A physical limit just like the problems that occur at low fabrication processes.

>> No.59531442

>>59529291
Delid the shit of that.
I gone from 5ghz 1.33v 85c to 65c.

>> No.59531457
File: 423 KB, 1102x1170, radiator9x140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531457

>>59531033
Water

>> No.59531469
File: 941 KB, 1040x1400, cpu-z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531469

>>59529049
>mfw intelcucks think they can overclock
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.59531473
File: 17 KB, 331x372, coretemps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531473

gotten up to 4.8 @ 1.35V stable, haven't been able to pull off the 5 @1.425V much. i can get it to boot, but games all crash. might try a lower V.

at [email protected] i can game / stream / infinite tabs browse all weekend long and i see a noticeable frame boost in Open world games.

>> No.59531509

>>59531473
God if this is true you got a bad one.
On average you can hit 5ghz up to 1.35v.
If you aren't stable check your ring ratio and dial it down also increase vccio if you use high frequency ram.

>> No.59531533

>>59531469

Suicide run?

>> No.59531583

>>59531473
what cooler m8?

>> No.59531601

>>59531469

still can't play fallout 4 @ 1440p on ultra

>> No.59531608

>>59531473
my settings are all fucked i barely tuned shit i jus used some guys settings from oc.net doin some reading now LLC changes i gotta make. the review im seeing now has 5.0 @ 1.34

will update shortly.

>>59531583
h115i

>> No.59531627

>>59531033
>>59531457
>water
please stop

>> No.59531650

Anyone know if I can fit a fridge pump in my PC to cool it down?

I'd love to use ice water instead of ambient water.

>> No.59531652
File: 15 KB, 540x540, 14485150_1675285142786499_7594004883122784000_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531652

>>59531469

>> No.59531661

>overclock
>The only thing that changes is the fps counter in the top corner that I hide 99% of the time

This hobby is stupid. I literally only play 2 games on a regular basis and you can run them on potatoes

>> No.59531683

>>59531661
>literally

>> No.59531707

>>59531533
Stable, stays under 50*C on water.

>>59531601
Can't hear you over my HIGH CLOCKS AND LOW TEMPERATURES.

>> No.59531750

>>59529126
> Four is the maximum amount of cores that a CPU should have.
Gaymer confirmed

>> No.59531769
File: 400 KB, 1259x993, moar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59531769

>>59531509
thanks for the motivation bro!

got it to complete real bench without crashing on the benchmark now.

1.35
LLC TURBO (was auto before)
4.7 Ucore?

>> No.59531771

>>59531683
>figuratively

>> No.59531782

>>59531707

yeah but that's like a guy with a huge dick that can't get an erection.

>> No.59531824

Clocklets vs cucklets

>> No.59531842

>>59530439
>3.9GHz
>1.45v
Enjoy your Indian "cpu".

>> No.59531882

But I had 2500k 2011-2015 @ 5GHz 1.52v on air 24/7.

Now a sad clocklet with 6600k @ 4.8GHz 1.32v.

>> No.59532098

>>59531469
So stable that you couldn't risk prtscreening to paint.

>> No.59532178

ITT: Faggots who believe frequency is the most relevant feature for performance

>> No.59532199

>look at me! i'm the goodest goy!

>> No.59532497
File: 36 KB, 469x495, cpuz_x64_2017-03-22_20-46-41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59532497

>>59531842

>indian cpu

Of course...

>3.9GHz
>1.45v

Source: my ass

>> No.59532701
File: 49 KB, 804x402, cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59532701

Suits my want for a fairly cheap 5960x alternative, and I didn't have to give the jews at AMD more than I had to.

>> No.59532769

>>59531627
>Not using distilled water.
>buying premixed "coolant"

lol

>> No.59532806

>>59529621
Yes went with ahead and report my of anytime imaginary infractions. Myself and them would laugh to that person coincidently ran that boared laugh upon you are and yours reports and shared taking the my screen copies to those will nothing be done!

>> No.59532808

>>59532497
I was talking about poozen.

>> No.59532817

>>59530163
Of yours racist remark myself wuold report

>> No.59532824

>>59532701
>1.352v
>for 3.9GHz
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HJAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And this is probably once of the "better" binned chips. Others need over 1.4v. Pathetic.

>> No.59532838

What version of prime are you guys using for stability testing?

>> No.59532853

>>59532824
>higher volts
>still uses less power
:thinking:

>> No.59532883
File: 639 KB, 500x2016, ancient-indian-technology_c_6398669.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59532883

I am so tired that I just as being treated because I always say not good because some or my grammar as I try and speed typing can I still love technology and I still have to earn respect.

>> No.59532899

>>59529049

>corelets

When will they learn?

>> No.59532915

>>59532853
>reaches thermal and voltage limit at 3.9GHz
>b-but muh power

>> No.59532934

>>59532838
>using prime for stability testing
It's not 2011, grandpa. Run Realbench stress/stability test for 1-3 hours and maybe a full run of IBM.
I can pass 12+ hours of Prime95, but BSOD in less than 2 hours playing Battlefield 1 multiplayer.

>> No.59532938
File: 79 KB, 485x485, main-qimg-beda1bb4780ff31fa916f70b3564df58.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59532938

In the middle of the Pacific Ocean on a small desert island stranded for several months by an older person in the sand with a tree a bottle tree. Bottle and Cork in the race shaking hands removed the message. "Due to lack of maintenance," he read, "we are sorry that it is necessary to cancel your e-mail account. "


Lol!

>> No.59532942
File: 185 KB, 3520x1080, 2017_MAR_23_W10S01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59532942

Housefire tier here:
>1.355v
>4.6GHz
>on the 212 hyper evo
while it did pass that intel burn test, im not too 100% sure about playing siege on this, although it didnt BSOD after 30 minutes so far. fan speed is near max at min, but only one fan for the CPU and 2 on the case, might add more later/soon. i normally use 4.4GHz and 1.25v anyway, just trying out 4.6GHz to push it

>> No.59532946

>>59532934
what yeah but what version of prime. I've read to use v26 (iirc) but would like to know what others use as part of their testing regimen?

>> No.59532968

>>59532942
im at v1.175 4.7ghz going to run a few more days like this and push up. really dont want to go past v1.25

very responsive at these speeds. huge improvememnt over my old 3630QM in photoshop

>> No.59532976

You have an i7-7700K cpu. You likely have a GTX 1080 equivalent or some gpu close to it. You likely have 16 gb of fast DDR4 ram. All of that means you already can run every title out there on ultra max settings at well over 100 frames per second. What is the point of overclocking your system other than the hobbyist nature of it?

>> No.59532994

>>59532808
>65w TDP r7 1700
>95w TDP r7 1700x
>95w TDP r7 1800x
>housefire
haha no

>> No.59533016

>>59529049
4.7GHz stable. Throttles like a motherfucker though thanks to that shitty TIM Intel uses, 25% clock "increase" for 10% performance increase is fucking bullshit.

>> No.59533019

Human eyes can't see more than 2GHz anyways

>> No.59533032

>>59532976
>buys a k cpu
>doesn't overclock

besides undervolting is nice, saves on power and disrupts the housefire meme

>> No.59533033

>>59532994
>1.45v 3.9GHz
>65-70c (poozen can only handle 70c)
>not a housefire

>> No.59533043

>>59533033
Kill yourself, shill.

>> No.59533057

>>59533043
Don't try 1.5v, poojeet. You're going to burn your shanty house down.

>> No.59533062

>>59532976
>All of that means you already can run every title out there on ultra max settings at well over 100 frames per second
You'd be surprised. A GTX 1080 system is probably paired up with a 1440p monitor at least and it most definitely won't run everything at 100+ FPS.

>> No.59533098

>>59532968
nice, although somehow i have to get quite a high voltage to achieve stability compared to other people. I did ran the stress test on 1.32v and it passed, but it crashed 4 mins in on siege. the temperature is no problem for me due to it being 56c max on 1.355v on siege but i'll see if it's even safe to even get near 1.4v dynamic

it's very responsive for sure at least

>> No.59533180

>>59529319
https://valid.x86.fr/vytt61

>>59529354
https://valid.x86.fr/q0tc0h
Got revisited not too long ago, got one of them this high.

>> No.59533210
File: 376 KB, 1280x970, 5ghzclub.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59533210

>>59532098
>im so jelly im pissing myself
I'm not deaf, I can hear the dripping.

>> No.59533280
File: 973 KB, 801x1500, 1479834857320.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59533280

>>59531268
>>59531329
>>59531333
>>59531356
>>59531421
Dennard scaling halted awhile back

Might've continued a bit if Tejas and Jayhawk ever got made. But
>51 stage pipeline


imagine Netburst on 14nm

>> No.59533301

>>59533098
yeah i had to go a lot higher than what some had to use voltage wise, silicon lottery and all.

still way way below what my msi motherboard would automatically set, I saw 1.38 once in hardware monitor while trying 4.8Ghz figured it was time to do this by hand

>> No.59533751
File: 26 KB, 811x560, cpu oc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59533751

This is my overclock for my 4790k, ran stable at 1.35v, and...

>> No.59533765
File: 56 KB, 808x544, cpu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59533765

>>59533751
this is my fun overclock on my Q9550. Totally ruined the motherboard, but being able to get into windows, pull up speccy, and see this was fun.

>> No.59533799

>>59533765
WHAT

>> No.59533875

>>59533799
Yeah it usually ran with a bus speed of 333 mhz. Had to drop the ram multiplier to very low. It didn't last for very long, and after using it like that for more than a few minutes it would have extremely frequent drops to like 100 mhz, the vrm was shot

>> No.59533930

>>59533765
>>59533875
Nice job ruining the goddamn hardware for some BIG NUMBERS.

>> No.59533977

>>59533875
Should've CPU-Z verified

>> No.59533991

>>59533765
What a waste of good hardware that could have been used for much better applications.

>> No.59534232
File: 95 KB, 809x405, stable OC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59534232

>>59529049

3770K master race reporting
If I didn't have such shitty RAM for OC'ing, I'd be stable over 5GHz EZPZ. For now this is as high as my 3770K will go, while remaining stable.

>> No.59534988

>>59533991
It was a trash motherboard anyways. Only one dimm slot was working, half the usb ports didn't work, and I'm pretty sure only one pcie slot worked. I was going to recycle it but I figured I'd have some fun first. Plus the processor still works, I currently have it running with an x48 board where it hums along smoothly

>> No.59535056

>>59534988
Why didn't you CPU-Z it though

>> No.59535278

>>59529049
the human eye can't see more than 4GHz

>> No.59535284

I had to bclk for 4
http://valid.x86.fr/e5h92j
the4 cpu+mobo were only $135 though.
>>59534232
nice, I need an i7

>> No.59535309

>>59529049
>He doesn't have a Xeon
Sorry, I'm an adult with a workstation.

>> No.59535322

>>59532701
The single threaded performance is impressive. I hope the quad cores clock high.

>> No.59535329

>>59532817
This is advanced shitposting

>> No.59535373
File: 44 KB, 600x176, X264.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59535373

>>59529126
>Poozen finally killed that meme forever. Four is the maximum amount of cores that a CPU should have.
Ever heard of x264 or x265? More cores the better.

>> No.59535385

>>59532915
>muh housefires

Intel shills are pathetic

>> No.59535402
File: 53 KB, 838x612, my 1800x.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59535402

>>59532701
Nice clocks for the 1700, if I wasnt autistic I would have gone for one, they seem to mostly get good OC's for being 170 bux less. Im halfway tempted to try for 4.2 but im spooked by nobody posting too much success there without obscene 1.45+ voltage.

>> No.59535409

I have a 7600k that's at 4.8 with stock voltage right now just because I didn't want to get too crazy- and my cooler is just a hyper t4. Might snag a water cooler aio sometime soon. If I want to hit 5 should I pump the voltage to 1.3?

>> No.59535856

>>59535402
>1800x @4.1GHz
that thing must chew some nice ass in transcoding eh?

>> No.59536029

>>59533210

What cooling are you using? That seems beyond even water cooling.

>> No.59536144
File: 29 KB, 500x750, 5032268995660088820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59536144

>4790k @ 1.41v
>5ghz but need a custom loop to keep it cool

Housefire

>> No.59536223

>>59536029
he probably lives in canada or some really cold place like that and he pumps cold air directly to his pc, or he does something similar with air conditioning

or he has one of those phase changing coolers

>> No.59536250

>>59532824
>>59532915
Was a dirty OC, I just put 3900mhz + 1.35v in the BIOS and stress tested and it worked perfectly, haven't bothered messing with it since.

The motherboards VRMs are the issue, they're hitting 85c under load. 65c on load for the CPU, so I'm nowhere near a thermal wall.

>>59535322
They probably won't, since it's the same die. Although for $170, it'll be a decent i5 alternative.

>>59535402
I thought so too, not too shabby for a 1700. Haven't tried anything further (or going for lower voltage at 3.9).

>> No.59536285

>>59536029
Sweden, 2x 360mm rads & 3,5L reservoir. EK block.

>>59536223
Just water.

>> No.59536293

>>59536285
room temp?

>> No.59536328

>tfw my release day 4790k could only hit 4.3 stable

Not like my ryzen right now can do any better, but damn that chip was a dud.

>> No.59536345

>>59536293
Don't remember what it was back then.Usually 15-20*C but could have been less.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action