[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 56 KB, 832x418, ryzen-1800x-cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59490977 No.59490977 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

post your cpu-z benchmarks.

>pic related

>> No.59490995
File: 61 KB, 814x400, CPU-Z.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

The CPU-Z benchmark for some reason does not like this Xeon and will not properly detect the other 8 threads.

>> No.59491017

Try manually setting the thread count

>> No.59491028

>cpu-z 1.73
have you tried it on the newer 1.78 version of cpu-z?

>> No.59491029

isn't that an engineering sample?

>> No.59491063
File: 1.17 MB, 1444x876, Cinebench R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Tried manually setting to 16 threads, still no go. Utilization is still limited to 8 threads, one on each core.

Look to the benchmarking side for the version, I was a lazy fuck and composted a screenshot of the recent version next to a CPU-Z screenshot from an older version.

Yep, and I still havent figured out whether its the board being derp (Biostar Tpower X79, apparently it acts strange with all chips because its Biostar) or if its the chip being an ES (release stepping mind you) doing it.

Works fine with cinebench and other benchmarks though. Just not CPU-Z

>> No.59491067
File: 28 KB, 404x403, cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i don't know what else to say

>> No.59491160

you could by posting the bench.

>> No.59491201
File: 167 KB, 243x363, meme.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i'm waiting for my x370 meme motherboard to ship so i can put my 1700 x meme processor in .

>> No.59491209

This looks correct to me, what is exactly not properly detected?

>> No.59491220

>poo theme

>> No.59491228

windows itself is poo so it blends

>> No.59491237
File: 55 KB, 810x404, cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


what does this mean

>> No.59491239
File: 1.05 MB, 999x681, boundandgagged.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>synthetic benchmarks

>> No.59491257

you must have a golden chip to hit 4.5ghz stable with only 1.32v's.

>> No.59491275


yeah it's not bad

>> No.59491284
File: 28 KB, 74x75, 2_cute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Irregardless of the type, since they are all using the same and comparing it is a valid comparison.

>> No.59491313

4.5GHz at 1.32V on skylake isn't good

>> No.59491314

Bullshit. That's an entirely normal voltage for 4.5GHz.

>> No.59491430

$70 BIN on ebay

>> No.59491503
File: 41 KB, 822x409, woo gained 200 points in multithread.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Im not sure why i dont gain more, considering its running at 4500mhz..

>> No.59491518

I bet you could care less as well you southern hillbilly.

>> No.59491528

What about background process? kill everything in the taskbar and shut down your av.

>> No.59491536

No AV on the PC, i closed the browser and everything else beforehand, and winderps was using 0-2% cpu on idle, with the cpu idling too, so at 1600mhz there.

>> No.59491545

>what does this mean
it means 4.5gz>4.2
kaby is just a rebrand anyway

>> No.59491584
File: 44 KB, 822x414, updated cpu-z.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I updated CPU-z and it gave me a higher multi thread score

still seems a little low, considering the OC

>> No.59491617

CPU-Z's integrated benchmark is not utilizing all 16 threads on this CPU for some reason. It will only use 8 no matter how many or how few i have selected.

>> No.59491705

Seems about right

>> No.59491757

maybe, hard to tell without others with a 2500k on 4500mhz tho

>> No.59491761
File: 10 KB, 401x404, 4-7_kaby.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


undervolting and overclocking, take my time. currently at 4.7Ghz 1.175V as per BIOS, aiming for aircooled 5 but not willy to go past 1.28V. We'll see where it goes. Need to reseat my colour and try some new paste at some point oo

>> No.59491808

agreed, but >>59491430 1800/[email protected] on ivy

>> No.59491844

see, thats what makes me thing mines a little low, 1699 ST on 4500mhz vs 1800+ on yours with 4ghz.

guess ill have to upgrade next generation
..buuuut windows 10 sucks massive ass so im fucked

>> No.59491862


>> No.59491873

With a little bit of effort windows 7 will run on Ryzen. Maybe not 100% optimally, but it will run well enough (and if the benchies are to be believed better than win10)

>> No.59491886

Yeah, i was thinking Zen+ though, or coffee lake.

depends whats best for the money at that time

>> No.59491944

what board/bios settings?

>> No.59491962

Asrock Z68 Extreme4
offset voltage -0.0002 or something, it the first - one
Turbo boost +0.004v or something
PLL level 2 iirc

>> No.59492031
File: 52 KB, 403x402, cpuz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59492161
File: 19 KB, 442x433, 2017-03-20 10_28_44.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>tfw your $330 AMD Ryzen R7 1700 CPU at stock (3,2GHz on all cores) beats a $1000 Intel 6900K at 3,2GHz.

Intel is even worse than Apple when it comes to pricing KEK

>> No.59492167
File: 22 KB, 480x360, intel senior engineer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]




>> No.59492180
File: 19 KB, 474x442, 2017-03-20 10_26_00.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


and compared to Intel's gaymen CPU

look at that fucking multithreaded annihilation at a 1GHz deficiency!!!

>> No.59492183

Single thread is low though.

>> No.59492198
File: 8 KB, 473x500, 1486863742229.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>intel has double the fucking TDP (140W vs R7 1700's 65W and still loses

jesus, and Intel's CPU costs 3 times the price, and you need an expensive X99 motherboard aswell. You can run any ryzen processor on fucking 80 bucks B350 boards

>> No.59492221

oy vey shut it down!

>> No.59492266
File: 20 KB, 486x440, 2017-03-20 10_43_01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

and what about Intel's $1600 6950X which has 10 Core and 20 threads?

We are talking about a price difference of fucking $1270 USD holy shit

>> No.59492293

so sad its pretty bad for games though, wish the 1600 had higher clocks with 6/12 cores

and none of that CCX bullshit going on

but nope, maybe next generation, if they fix that its gonna wreck shit though.

>> No.59492310

Why is everybody recommending i7's for gaming now? HT has always been worthless for gaming

>> No.59492334

Here is a good guide.

I don't have those options but.
All spread spectrum off
power saving off
LLC High
Max Current 130%
+ offset
give me best benchmarks. I have some other tweaks but that is to stabilize bclk and oc ram past xmp

>> No.59492339

its finally optimized, somewhat

>> No.59492343

yeah my ram is 1866mhz CL9
power saving also off, LLC Medium (level 2)
max current 500w
also using offset.

Oh, and it hits 65c under heavy load with a Phanteks PH14CT or whatever its called.

>> No.59492361

Ill add, my OC is stable, just seems to score low for 4500mhz is all.

>> No.59492403
File: 241 KB, 731x966, 2771ad6a4711ac21091b7b2823dffc2a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Engineering Sample e5-2683v3. Paid $200 for two of them from my work. Currently waiting on ECC ram to arrive to put them both in a dual socket board I got. This is with only one cpu in an Asus x99a/usb3.1

>> No.59492456
File: 33 KB, 218x210, 1453865711727804.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59492469
File: 1.25 MB, 1845x1923, 1488371469396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>less than 5% difference in average FPS
>Ryzen has better minimum FPS and reportedly smoother and less "stuttery" gaming experience

shill get out

>> No.59492474

its actually less smooth from what ive read.

Shill pls.

>> No.59492499
File: 37 KB, 809x405, CPU-Z bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Single core performance seems to be low?

>> No.59492513

>4.8ghz 6/12 core/thread

Jesus christ that must wreck face in pretty much anything.

>> No.59492602
File: 17 KB, 407x404, ryzen_vs_7700k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.59492720
File: 29 KB, 416x418, cpu-z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

1700X here... CPU-Z or speccy are the only progtams that wont run anymore for some reason it freezes at storage, maybe because I'm running RAID

>> No.59492886
File: 165 KB, 1006x507, cpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.59492974


howd I do? at least i beat an i7-4790k

>> No.59493080


7700k 5ghz. min 98, max 144
1800x 4.1gz. min 121, max 132

aka, the amd cpu has higher frametimes and less stuttering.

aka its the better buy.

>> No.59493133

you mean lower frametimes

>> No.59493147

In probably a supremely cherry picked case

Listen, i want the amd cpus to be amazing too
which they are, just not for gaming right now.

now imagine the zen+ with the issues they have fixed, maybe with a bit more oc headroom.

Sides, at most id get the 1700, 1600, 1500 or even 1400, im not sure why i would want to pay extra for the x versions.

>> No.59493148
File: 38 KB, 403x402, ns55xy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>>59492974 v2 howd I do?


note: this is unstable and crashes after a couple hours once my shitty air cooler starts overheating

>> No.59493214
File: 343 KB, 600x489, 2724.hermit-crab-plastic-f1772.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

hello fellow fx sufferer

>> No.59493235
File: 368 KB, 613x595, OhIXt36.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


suffer not young crab

once you are inside amd sso you will see the light

>> No.59493282
File: 27 KB, 400x397, mister crabby.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i have a 1700x with the motherboard shipping soon i hope.

>> No.59493330


ur instructions tell me ur a special snowflake contact if u want in

why 1700x not man enough to go full cheapskate with 1700 or 1500 series?

>> No.59493335


this was an overall test.

and most reviews show the exact same thing. even tho its 10-20 fps lower, its still has the min/max closer to each other compared to the 7700k.

and with recent bios updates, and new reviews are showing the cpus closer and closer to each other when it comes to normal average fps.

So i dont understand this whole "not good for gaming stuff"

>> No.59493346


i don't even use virtualization

>> No.59493378


Typical ricer. I work http://www.microcad.ca/ use the searchbox for special stuff if you know what to look for. Ex: we sell HP NVDIMMs

>> No.59493404

i appreciate it but i don't know what the fuck you are talking about .

i just build computers , with minimal knowledge

>> No.59494053


WTF they FX space heaters are only 125W? Intel's 6900K is 140W, now those must be fucking mini-furnaces holy shit

>> No.59494081

>Multiplier 16 - 59
w-whats up with that?

>> No.59494084
File: 42 KB, 810x412, ss (2016-08-07 at 12.26.03).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.59494124

thats the multiplier the motherboard supports

>> No.59494139

Hm ok? My OC'ed 2500K shows 16 - 42 and it indeed runs at 4.2 GHz (even though the motherboard also could do more)

>> No.59494149
File: 15 KB, 399x403, Udklip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59494156
File: 64 KB, 646x577, running stock clocks lmao.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Probably just the way asrock does it

>> No.59494159
File: 117 KB, 834x415, lmao.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ayyy lmao

>> No.59494383
File: 72 KB, 832x418, cpu-z.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

AyyMD housefire

>> No.59495268

My old asus does this when multi is set to all cores. It displays true max when set to by core though.
my person of color.
For what is essentially a 2c/4t, a little over half of a 7700k isn't bad.

>> No.59497092
File: 15 KB, 403x402, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

what the shit

>> No.59497168
File: 60 KB, 850x419, 4690k 4.7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

not bad for an i5

>> No.59498238
File: 58 KB, 830x413, CPU Z.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

That's pretty impressive.
As for that single core, well my 5820k gets 1900~ at 4.2Ghz so dunno, doesn't seem extremely low in comparison to me.

One day I need to test how high my CPU overclocks.
These are god tier chips.

>> No.59499516
File: 46 KB, 833x415, CPUz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I am not upgrading till games fully utilize at least 6 cores

>> No.59499718
File: 60 KB, 408x407, whatdoiwin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.59499796
File: 17 KB, 403x402, sup.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

and my secondary @4.3

>> No.59499807

Yeah, my 4790k hits 4.6 on stock voltages.

>> No.59499912
File: 1.99 MB, 488x291, sproing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You'll be fine with that CPU for the next 5 years at least.

What the hell is that thing?

>> No.59500280
File: 46 KB, 408x407, untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59500311

You should get a better chip if possible. There are plenty of Athlon XP chips on fleabay.

>> No.59500396
File: 88 KB, 861x439, 4545re.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Thanks for posting I was wondering how I would stack up to a 1700X. Soon I hope to join you.

>> No.59500655
File: 311 KB, 806x402, cpuz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

pleb reporting in

>> No.59500707
File: 63 KB, 834x414, better_than_bulldozer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

At least it's better than fucking first gen bulldozer.

>> No.59500859
File: 98 KB, 814x400, 2670.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

16c/32t monster reporting in.
Defend yourselves, corelets.

>> No.59501539

Now that Direct X12 games are going to be out, and multiple cores are better supported do you think multicore setups will become the high end for gaming?

>> No.59501721

Yes I think we'll start to see parallelization be implemented more now that 4/8 intel chips are the most common purchase because every gayming laptop comes with an i7 and normies are idiots and buying laptops by the pallet

>> No.59501851

i meant more like 6950x insterad of 7700k for gaming

>> No.59502166


>> No.59504043


>> No.59504647
File: 18 KB, 403x402, 666.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.59504704
File: 17 KB, 403x402, tmp_26620-1700X-Stock688343046.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dayum 1700X, you scary.
2933MHz 15-15-15-36
Asus Crosshair VI, 0902

>> No.59504716


Yes, higher core count will outshine CPUs like 7700k when they start utilizing those extra cores, which will most likely happen fairly soon with these rising core counts on CPUs all across the spectrum.

>> No.59505104

>that single threaded performance
a shitty ass fx 8370 has stronger single threaded than that.

>> No.59505142

amd's phenom 2 where better than their successor, first generation faildozer. deneb was goat.

>> No.59505170

>filthy pooshit subhuman using CPUz which is known for being biased in favor of poozen because of cache
In any real world application, rypoo gets BTFO. If you like synthetic benchmarks so much, try sysmark/passmark.

>> No.59505173
File: 111 KB, 825x423, cpubench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.59505187

>intel gets 170 fps
>amd gets 160 fps


>did i do good my jewish master?

>> No.59505438
File: 34 KB, 412x412, LLCMED_+OFST_ADD_TV_020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

C states all on now, lowered llc and raised additional turbo voltage. Seems stable so far and has the same voltage under load as before but lower idle and better temps.


Would it be worth it to try and sell my 4x4 1600mhz ram and get 2x8 2133+? 1866 cas 10 is as good as it gets within intel spec.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.