Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 76 KB, 1006x949, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59084080 No.59084080 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Post your Cinebench.

How much of a performance boost would you get if you were offered a Ryzen R7 1800X?

>tfw haven't felt the need to upgrade since 2011 but now it's starting to struggle.

>> No.59084104

>How much of a performance boost would you get if you were offered a Ryzen R7 1800X?


This reads like actual advertiser shilling

>> No.59084149

>>59084104
A shill with and old Intel CPU?

>> No.59084234
File: 40 KB, 400x672, cb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59084234

>> No.59084370

>>59084149
>le amd is commie from the ghetto le meme
fuck off and die. amd are also corporate.

>> No.59084500
File: 36 KB, 501x930, cb15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59084500

>>59084080
1156 bro here, x3470

get a x3440 on ebay if you want a boost, but not wanna buy a whole new system. They go very cheap and overclocks pretty good.

I'm getting zen if it runs fine on Win7, if not then this cpu will hold me up for a few more years atleast.

>> No.59085004
File: 14 KB, 497x231, CinebenchR15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085004

>> No.59085145
File: 127 KB, 368x593, bench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085145

soon

>> No.59085218
File: 28 KB, 324x838, cinebenchFinalMAX.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085218

The old shit wrecker.

Don't have a scrot for my 5680s, but it's close to 1700 multi

>> No.59085236

can you please be less abvious with your marketing
pls

>> No.59085251
File: 20 KB, 497x361, CINEBENCH .png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085251

Waiting on 2nd cpu, gotta go fast

>> No.59085268
File: 34 KB, 320x761, poorfag.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085268

>>59084080
>tfw "poorfag"

>> No.59085295
File: 26 KB, 365x565, cbs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085295

>> No.59085327
File: 31 KB, 314x812, bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085327

a lot

>> No.59085339

>>59085327
fuck, posted multi core, first time using cinebench

wait

>> No.59085383
File: 29 KB, 317x699, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085383

[email protected]

>> No.59085419
File: 31 KB, 374x945, isactually.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085419

>>59084080
7600k at 5.2ghz, the other score was at 5ghz

>> No.59085440

>>59085339
sorry guys, you're not getting single core anytime soon, I was running it then it started to make burned smell

>> No.59085567
File: 53 KB, 302x761, huge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085567

>> No.59085600

haha, I like how everyone has an AMD GPU

>> No.59085620

>tfw my cpu that i just replaced thermal paste is idling at 60°C+

fucking scary

>> No.59085643

>>59085620
you applied it wrong or most likely the cooler isn't fitted properly
try pushing on it while it's own and maintain the pressure while looking at cpu temps

>> No.59085650

Had around 915 cb
X5650 at 4.1 ghz (6 cores)

>> No.59085669

>>59085643
the thing is, I think the temperature sensor if fucked, even before I replaced the thermal paste (I was using the same for 1 year and half), the temperatures were the same, even with the dried out paste

>> No.59085685

>>59085440
That's not right

>> No.59085690

>>59085669
Put your and above your CPU and check if the air is hot
60° is certainly something you can feel for yourself

>> No.59085691

>>59085600
Most of them are 200 series, which still get performance/optimization drivers compared to nvidia, notice how there are only pascal nvidia cards? really makes you think

>> No.59085697
File: 133 KB, 496x834, CINEBENCH Windows 64 Bit_2017-02-23_18-19-01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085697

>>59084080

r8 m8

Running on 3.9GHz

>> No.59085707

>>59085690
your hand*

>> No.59085745

>>59085690
the air is kind of warm, but not nearly enough to justify those temps, if it were really that hot the cpu cooler would be running like a madman

>> No.59085829

>>59085745
Does the vrm's on your motherboard have cooling? What motherboard you have?

>> No.59085862

>>59085829
I have a GA-F2A85X-UP4 (shitty amd richland)

>> No.59085891
File: 1.17 MB, 1444x876, Cinebench R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59085891

If the numbers are right the 6c/12t ryzen chips can match my xeon in MT and shitstomp it in ST.

Core for core and thread for thread, the Ryzen chips would flatten the Xeon, and for less power consumed too.

>> No.59086401

>>59085891
But the clock isn't the same, 2.9 vs 3.4
And Xeons overclock retardedly well if you're brave enough.

>> No.59086427

>>59086401
SB-E Xeons and higher are locked and locked hard. The most I can get out of this chip is 3.3ghz all core and thats from turbo. Cinebench is also incapable of reading turbo clocks.

>> No.59086457

>>59086427
Oh.
Even if you throw voltage and bclk at them?

>> No.59086500

>>59086457
Yep, the higher straps dont work, increasing by smaller increments takes everything else out of range, and voltage is pretty much useless.

Its definitely the major reason why I'm excited for Ryzen: I can get a proper 8c CPU that isnt either locked down super tight or $1000+

>> No.59086556
File: 99 KB, 750x589, 1482872371944.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59086556

>>59084080

cpu 4590
cache 4488
ram 2448

throttled h100i gtx

>> No.59086622

>>59086457
>>59086500
I think the only xeons after 1156/1366 that can oc is the 1600 series via bclk strap as far as I understand. Never confirmed it actually is possible tho.

>> No.59086774
File: 202 KB, 823x827, cbr15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59086774

>> No.59087075
File: 168 KB, 421x754, cinn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59087075

Should I upgrade yet?

>> No.59087254
File: 156 KB, 364x625, 623358084901413b84bc91205a2d51f0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59087254

Clocked at 4.2GHz
I guess I'd get something like 20% more performance at the very best.

>> No.59087608

>>59084080
>3470
3x.

>> No.59087838
File: 44 KB, 323x687, Screenshot (125).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59087838

wew

didn't realize how much my haswell has aged

>> No.59087945

>>59085620
What did you clean the old paste with? Microfibers from paper towel and the like can increase heat. Also too much, too little or loose cooler fitting like the other anon said.

>> No.59088015

>>59087945
I used q tips, but made sure there was no residue

But as I was saying before, the sensor is probably fucked

>> No.59088171

>>59087838
what clock speed?

>> No.59088806

>>59085440
ah the good ol burning smell.
scares the hell out of me on the current pc, but it has gone away. i'm just assuming some dust got somewhere it shouldn't have been or dislodged as there is no sign of hardware burning itself.

>> No.59088839

>>59088171
it's at stock

>> No.59088870
File: 102 KB, 749x594, 1465133582023.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59088870

>>59086556

>> No.59088874

>>59088839
Oh well no wonder it's shit. That chip is hilariously underclocked. With moderate cooling 4-4.2GHz is a reasonable OC.

>> No.59088889

>>59088839
shit has barely aged, the issue is you didnt clock it up, would be almost if not parity with kaby if you put it at 4ghz+

>> No.59089018
File: 63 KB, 802x423, cb4.5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59089018

>> No.59089118

>>59088806
I'll try to run it again, now the room temperature is somewhat colder

>> No.59089188

>>59084080
lol what a bunch of fags

so this shit replaces the gay speccy homo gatherings?

lol g is full of fags

fags

>> No.59089249
File: 30 KB, 320x764, bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59089249

>>59089118
there we go

>> No.59089285

>>59089249
I upgraded from basically that single core performance (it was a slightly better APU clocked at 4GHz with 4 core 8 threads)

to this

>>59085004


The change in performance for my encoding time was drastic.

>> No.59089287

>>59089188

Tech is in large part, data centric. Where would you find any correlation between performance and orientation? ego aside

Ryzen set a new world record on cinebench with the 1800x, 2449 at 5.2ghz

It also beats the 6900k, 1601 to 1474

>> No.59089336
File: 32 KB, 374x684, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59089336

>>59084080
5 year old tech reporting in

>> No.59089341

>>59089336
what's it clocked out for those scores?

>> No.59089369

>>59089341
4.7 daily but I can do 5GHz for benches. Or at least I used to before I switched from water.

Still gonna do a Ryzen build.

>> No.59089420
File: 36 KB, 322x690, CINEBENCH Windows 64 Bit_2017-02-24_01-48-37.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59089420

>> No.59089482

>>59089369
Yeah I figured it was something that crazily high, it was rivaling my 5820k at 4.3GHz

>> No.59090012
File: 50 KB, 321x698, Screenshot (127).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090012

>>59087838
>>59088874
>>59088889
alright lads
I got it overclocked at 3.5Ghz now
new results are in

>> No.59090021

>>59090012
meant to say 4.5Ghz

>> No.59090136

>>59090012
>175CB
The 6 core Ryzen Cinebench R15 run leaked the other day had it at 146CB single core and ~1130CB multi core

Over clocked it might come close to yours in single core as well.


It has 2 more cores though, and hyperthreading for 12 threads so it obviously does a lot better in multicore than yours.

Though only 2x yours with 3x as many threads (4 vs 12)

>> No.59090153

>>59089285
I can only imagine, must be like a dream

>> No.59090293
File: 42 KB, 380x1000, cbenchr15 v1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090293

>>59084080
currently at 4ghz. gonna redo when i get my new cooler and get up to 4.2-4.3

>> No.59090379
File: 175 KB, 1227x841, bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090379

passmark at 4.7
cinebench is at 4.6GHz
running at 1.38 volts I believe?
probably wanna upgrade zen+
second iterations of new uarch is typically best with most improvements able to be done
(see core i7 series)
r8 h8 compare

>> No.59090395
File: 211 KB, 327x316, 1462252897511.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090395

>>59084080
>intel IPC has barely improved since the i5-750

>> No.59090399

>>59089482
Sandy/Sandy-E overclocked high. 4.7 on a 3930K is fairly average. Ivy and Haswell weren't that great but Kaby and hopefully Kaby-E are bringing back the good clocks.

>> No.59090416

>>59090379
>>59090012
how is your single score better than mine? mines being run at 4.6 ghz
does the mp ratio have something to do with it?
they're both haslel arch
>>59090293
even this guy has the same processor with lower score
something is up

>> No.59090448

>>59090416
okay you corrected yourself with 4.5
so take out my comparison with the other 4670k
but still its clocked less than mine and is scoring more
i made sure anything in the background was off

>> No.59090479
File: 19 KB, 372x492, ss (2017-02-24 at 04.15.18).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090479

>> No.59090513 [DELETED] 

test

>> No.59090525
File: 46 KB, 376x710, 1462258070972.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090525

>>59090395
nigga please

>> No.59090538

>>59090525
Clocked?

>> No.59090626
File: 10 KB, 294x256, 1481185179812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090626

>>59090538
4.4GHz
at an uncomfortably high voltage

>> No.59090648
File: 33 KB, 322x644, cine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090648

>>59085383
Mine at 4,7GHz

>> No.59090685

>>59090626
what's uncomfortably high to you?
pretty much anything should be able to run 4.4 at a safe voltage
cooler?

>> No.59090688
File: 32 KB, 368x936, Bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090688

I am pretty comfy with my PC build for a nice 1080p gaming experience, i will consider ryzen on the very low end, a mATX R3 Ryzen 4c/4c and a RX460 for business travels.Let us wait for the real benchmarks.

>> No.59090713
File: 109 KB, 1234x807, cinecpuz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090713

>>59084080
I'd get a pretty huge multithread increase, probably a notable singlethread increase once overclocked too.
Most probably going to grab either a 1700X or 1800X sometime late 2017 or early 2018.

>> No.59090740

>>59090713
>early 2018
might as well get Intel's response whenever that will be
Or Zen plus depending how soon it'll release after

>> No.59090778
File: 1.12 MB, 1343x746, cine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59090778

I was not goy enough to buy an i7 with K but those unlocked Ryzen are fascinating.

>> No.59090808

>>59084080
single core 190
multi 1367

>> No.59090829

>>59090808
Broadwell e oc?

>> No.59090864

>>59090740
Depends on how good Intel's response is, how good Zen plus is, and how prices are going to look on the used market.
I've got bigger priorities for the time being though, like upgrading my graphics card to something that isn't a GTX 960, and maybe getting a more suitable case.

>> No.59091019

>>59090864
I'm thinking Zen plus should be pretty good
Given its the refined version of a new uarch
See core 2600k

>> No.59091088
File: 425 KB, 1010x768, 1474364200772.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091088

>>59090778

without any shilling, puts "the new king" 10x previous gen perf in perspective

>> No.59091112

>>59090778
All Ryzen CPU's come unlocked[1]!

[1] http://www.fudzilla.com/news/processors/42578-all-amd-ryzen-cpus-will-be-unlocked

>> No.59091206
File: 119 KB, 2164x396, 1463724444879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091206

>>59091112

ECC support

>> No.59091308
File: 61 KB, 1029x1029, Walmart_Desktop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091308

Help.
I can't wait much longer

>> No.59091334
File: 126 KB, 802x1010, Cinebench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091334

My 4790k.

>> No.59091438

>>59090012
there is just some shit you can't do, such as render faster, or make games play faster that can take advantage of threads, but overall, should feel like a brand new cpu.

assuming you have a cooler that can keep it cool at 4.5 should hold you over till zen+ or intels next uarch.

>> No.59091511
File: 1.18 MB, 1920x1040, 4690k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091511

>>59084080
a six core would be a decent upgrade but im happy for now, i'd like it for streaming mostly.

>> No.59091529
File: 31 KB, 366x583, 8bd8e64d1ec83a44b55e17514108a297.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091529

>> No.59091612
File: 33 KB, 314x806, 4987894654541.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091612

Anyone have/know what a 970 or Xeon Westmere-EX rates?

Just wondering, since I am eyeballing the 1600x

>> No.59091667

>>59091612
Overclock your 950 and find out.

>> No.59091683
File: 34 KB, 325x676, stockvoltages4.5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091683

Got 4.5 on stock voltages, can probably push further but don't have time to test.

>> No.59091705

>>59091667

970/Xeons are 6 cores

>> No.59091755

>>59091308
how are you, my fellow APU user?

>> No.59091774

Will I gain much of a performance increase from my fx-8350 @ 4.6?

>> No.59091780

>>59091774
if the single thread performance is what amd is saying, yes

>> No.59091816

>>59091612
>Xeon Westmere-EX
see
>>59089018

>> No.59091824
File: 69 KB, 315x635, noregerts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091824

This CPU really does run a lot hotter then I expected. around 80C under full load, I'm thinking about delidding.

>> No.59091917
File: 50 KB, 479x216, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091917

I think it can OC well but I'm a noob.

>> No.59091966
File: 56 KB, 488x580, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59091966

Fug, maybe I should upgrade. Then again, how much juice do you guys think I could squeeze out of me old CPU?

>> No.59092059

FX 6300 @ 4.4ghz, gtx 770

486 cb - CPU

Is this normal?

>> No.59092086
File: 38 KB, 510x705, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092086

I may still build a dedicated Ryzen stream/recording PC.

>> No.59092109
File: 5 KB, 170x213, 1318747327241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092109

>bench my bentium
>beats 3rd gen i5 in multi core
>equal to 3rd gen i7 in single core
not too bad for 80 bucks

>> No.59092296

>>59091816

Thanks, should have looked through thread closer.
Thats not bad considering its a cheap upgrade for me to move towards. But Ill wait for 1600x benchs as planned.

>> No.59092307 [DELETED] 
File: 303 KB, 1248x987, cinebench425.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092307

Go away amdfags.

>> No.59092423
File: 161 KB, 749x1099, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092423

Intel 2600k at 4.6 GHz.
Do i even need to upgrade to Zen?

>> No.59092449

>>59092086
Whats is that running at? what are your temps? cooler?

>> No.59092460
File: 34 KB, 322x817, Cinebench426sing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092460

>>59092307
heres one with singlethread

could be worse.

>> No.59092552

>>59091824
What is yours clocked at? Which cooler are you using?

>> No.59092568

X5650 @ 3.6Ghz

I will probably try for 4Ghz soon.

The i7 920 in the graph was what I upgraded from.

>> No.59092578
File: 50 KB, 560x1017, cine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59092578

>>59092568
Fug, forgot image

>> No.59092609

>>59084080
6700k owner
not necessarily inclined to upgrade atm
maybe in 1-2years. we'll see what amd continues to do, and how intel responds

>> No.59092801

>>59092609
As a 6700k owner im selling this piece of fucking shit and giving amd my money. Fuck Intel the jewish dogs.

>> No.59093275
File: 248 KB, 1212x712, cinebench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59093275

I can get around 300% improvement for rendering? I sort of want to wait and see what the opterons will be like.

>> No.59093503
File: 23 KB, 232x334, 1476848533407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59093503

>>59091966
>mfw i just bought a 1700
>over 2.5 times better multi
>Single core performance increased over 50 percent.

>> No.59093541
File: 81 KB, 376x1030, Screen Shot 2017-02-22 at 10.23.41 PM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59093541

No desktop at the moment, hoping to be building a 1600x with RX 580 soon. Only have an old Retina MacBook Pro 15.

>> No.59093910
File: 1 KB, 356x21, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59093910

>> No.59093918

>>59093910
@4.2ghz btw

>> No.59094063

>tfw Ryzen's cinebench is exactly twice mine and I have a 4 core

>> No.59094327
File: 38 KB, 751x660, single+multi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59094327

I would get some performance, but it won't justify spending almost 1000€ on a cpu + mobo.

>> No.59094523
File: 36 KB, 1110x608, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59094523

I don't regret it at all. I built my computer several months ago (right about a month before the 1070 came out, I actually did without a dedicated GPU for that time kek) and didn't want to wait for AMD. It appears that the wait for AMD's ~$200 offering will be even longer, so even if the Skylake i5 isn't a great value compared to Ryzen, I still got several months of gaming in. By the time games actually need moar cores like Ryzen offers, it'll be time for me to upgrade anyways.

>> No.59094564

>>59094523
Wait, wtf? Why does it say I'm running Windows 8 professional edition when I'm running Windows 10 pro?

>> No.59094664

>>59090829
>Broadwell e
Haswell e, 5820k @4.7ghz to be specific

>> No.59094924

>>59094564
Ive had that same thing happen to me

>> No.59095066
File: 34 KB, 368x989, 3570k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59095066

>> No.59095779

>i5-2400
>473 cb

did I do gud?

>> No.59096006
File: 45 KB, 586x700, old system result 20170224.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59096006

I have had my current system for a while, didnt have the funds to upgrade in the past. I am aiming for an 1800x this time so I expect a huge improvement for me.

>> No.59096039
File: 24 KB, 377x591, Screenshot_353.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59096039

>>59084080
Running a 4790k @ stock, OC'd I'd probably get a decent performance boost, no need for me to upgrade at the moment. Perhaps I'll dump my 970 when Vega is released or wait for the 11x series on the nVidia side.

>> No.59096435
File: 32 KB, 298x882, work_sucks_pc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59096435

>>59091308

>> No.59097919
File: 39 KB, 381x711, CINEBENCH Windows 64 Bit_2017-02-24_17-46-47.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59097919

Don't think I need anything better for my stuff desu, but I'd gladly take that Ryzen for a ~30% multi core boost.

1118 was when I had all other programs closed. Also don't think the opengl test benefits from sli.

>> No.59098101

>>59092449
4.8ghz runs kinda warm and maxes out at 85 with an h115i. I'll probably delid soon

>> No.59098107
File: 87 KB, 1006x949, cinebench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59098107

>>59084080
beat this you disgusting plebeians

>> No.59098133

>>59091824
>>59091917
>>59091966
>>59092086
>>59092423
>>59092460
>>59092460
>>59092578
>>59093541
>>59094327
>>59094523
>>59095066
>>59096006
>>59096039
>>59096435
>>59097919
trash

>>59098107
good

>> No.59098138
File: 16 KB, 417x414, cpuz-5680-bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59098138

>>59098107
>only 8000

>> No.59098149

>>59098138
did you not see the single gore berformance blebeian

>> No.59098161

>>59098149
Multi is all that batters XD

>> No.59098204
File: 45 KB, 756x659, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59098204

judging by this, I'd get just a bit less than 3x the performance in multithreaded tasks ifI were to get a R7 1700/R7 1700x

bretty good, probably gonna pull the trigger on one of them

>> No.59098292
File: 114 KB, 515x176, 1468105684740.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59098292

Hello AMD I am writing to you today in response to your offer to shill for your CPU for a free copy of minecraft and 1 free rhizome CPU.

I turn the setting in the bios up before benchmarking correct?

T. LinusTechTips

>> No.59100176

>>59087075
Clock?

>> No.59100547

>>59093910
>>59093918
Why not push it higher
you can probably get 4.4 at a safe voltage
i'm running mine at 4.6 with 1.38v
temps are fine

>> No.59100591

>>59098101
I thought it's fairly common to hit 5ghz with reasonable temps
is your chip just garbage maybe
do you have overkill voltage for your frequency maybe?

>> No.59100666
File: 23 KB, 338x438, cbench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59100666

meh
werks bretty gud still, but might fall for the meme just to finally upgrade something

>> No.59102517
File: 58 KB, 372x943, sad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59102517

Been my faithful companion for almost 6 years now, definitely the best CPU I have owned for the price/performance/longevity considering it's been clocked at 4.5GHz from day one and it's been on for something along the lines of 2000 days.

Might upgrade to a 6700k if intel drops the price a bit following Ryzen's release.

>> No.59102709
File: 39 KB, 381x949, cbenchr15 v2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59102709

>>59090293
redid with new cooler. only at 4.1 cause bsod at 4.2

thanks intel.

>> No.59102927

>>59102709
Have you tried adding voltage??

>> No.59103914
File: 20 KB, 301x245, 999999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59103914

my upgrade gonna be gud?

>> No.59104021

>>59102517
price already dropped 90$

>> No.59104556

>>59104021
Since last week? Where did you see that?

>> No.59104789

>>59102927
its at manual 1.25. might try upping it, but i really dont care.

>> No.59104931

>>59104789
Well that's why you can't get higher frequencies. Pushing it to like 1.35 is safe if you have adequate cooling

>> No.59105169
File: 57 KB, 1160x800, intelmeme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59105169

>>59084080

>> No.59107290

>>59098107
>>59098133
Samefag

>> No.59107448
File: 522 KB, 1280x1024, fuckingplebs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59107448

y'all bunch of plebs

>> No.59107572

>>59104931
then it idles at 40+, which i dont like. im still kinda annoyed it idles at 35ish at 4.1 with 1.2v even after repaste and new cooler.

>> No.59109678
File: 40 KB, 762x711, Q9550_3.8_r9270x CHine15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59109678

Do i want to upgrade to Zen?
hmmmmm

>> No.59110145
File: 201 KB, 950x1057, Intel-Broadwell-EP-Xeon-E5-2698-V4_Cinebench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59110145

>How much of a performance boost would you get if you were offered a Ryzen R7 1800X?
Negative boost.

>> No.59110936
File: 65 KB, 509x767, cst.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59110936

So happy i bought Sandy at launch. New it would be a long term gem. (Same as 7970, 290x were) But RYZEN is here, and that 1700X is looking real good. Got the same IPC as my 4.6 Ghz i5 when its at stock. Plus with 8 cores/16 threads.

PERFECT upgrade.

>> No.59113488

i got ~100cb (multi) last i checked

don't even need more

>> No.59113898

>>59107572
Set it to adaptive mode. When you're idling it doesn't add any voltage that isn't needed

>> No.59113953
File: 21 KB, 375x443, cinebench_apu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59113953

Already bought a 1700X
end my suffering

>> No.59116326

>>59100591
25% can hit 5 ghz I had this one running at 5ghz but the temps were way too fucking high.

>> No.59116683
File: 21 KB, 330x508, t420 nscore cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59116683

T420 represent

>> No.59116982

>>59116683
surprised it made it through.

>> No.59116992

>>59113898
i did that and i get whea uncorrectable BSODs.

>> No.59117033

>>59085383
Weird. My 4670k that's also at 4.4GHz gets 670 in multicore and 176 in single core.

>> No.59117034

>>59085419
kek, I can get a higher score with my 6 year old xeon that i got for $40

>> No.59117462

>>59117034

only took about 6 years :^)

>> No.59117779
File: 91 KB, 372x978, memes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59117779

>>59110936
mu nigga

>> No.59119394

>>59084080
>Cinebench
As if this were a good benchmark for normal workloads. How much of your day is spent waiting for your CPU to fucking render video to an output file??

Personally if I'm going to do anything like that, I start the job before I go to bed and it's done by the time I wake up.

>> No.59121287
File: 74 KB, 811x900, sdasdasd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59121287

Haven't CPU wanked in a long time. Is 180 good ?

>> No.59121441
File: 104 KB, 1012x978, cinebench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59121441

The 8350 has no OC on it.

>> No.59121509

>>59121441
you should oc it

>> No.59121547
File: 74 KB, 371x611, wew lad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59121547

>>59091529
1700x for both of us.

>> No.59121629

>>59085383
That seems really low. When I had my 4670K at 4.5 I was getting about 680. Now it's at 4.7Ghz and gets about 708 average

>> No.59121763

>>59084080
Obviously a 6c or 8c is going to do better in cinebench but I use my computer for gaming so literally all I care about are those benchmarks

>> No.59121910

>>59121763
Whay you would be happy to admit this I will never know.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action