[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 53 KB, 748x619, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
57089394 No.57089394 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

New speccy thread
Only high end/gaming PCs allowed, no poorfags pls
>pic related

>> No.57089405

question op

is your computer actually on fire?

>> No.57089429

no mate it's idle atm, as long as it's under 100 degrees it's fine

>> No.57089430
File: 37 KB, 748x566, specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>neutered i5
>high end


>> No.57089468

Smart anon right here

>> No.57089497
File: 260 KB, 808x861, Speccy 9-26-16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57089526

What the fuck is that?

>> No.57089543

>192 mb ddr2 ram
>haswell i5
wtf op??

>> No.57089548
File: 221 KB, 1540x930, wew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

> speccy
This is a screenfetch thread now.

>> No.57089556
File: 29 KB, 657x471, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>no poorfags pls

>> No.57089581

also 75 celsius ssd temp
is your computer actually on fire op?

>> No.57089589
File: 99 KB, 500x597, d79dd406305e0126340344655a091515.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>2.2 ghz i7

>> No.57089643
File: 24 KB, 495x427, speccy3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Low end shit

>> No.57089673


Do you guys actually do anything with those Xeons?

>> No.57089791
File: 12 KB, 631x269, dsa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>no poorfags
says the fag that didnt have enough money to get good fans

>> No.57091228
File: 21 KB, 448x232, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57091251

100% certified shitposting machine

>> No.57091289

OP is running a VM

>> No.57091302

He would pretty much have to be to get windows on a macbook air.

>> No.57091319
File: 714 KB, 1366x768, Screenshot from 2016-10-14 04-01-45.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


can your computer play youtube videos, op?

>> No.57091390
File: 33 KB, 597x526, untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57091485
File: 104 KB, 1124x533, 1440p Gayming.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57091513
File: 37 KB, 699x532, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57091531

Post them here, duh

>> No.57091539

the 3075 is ancient, you're being impressed by a core 2 quad.

>> No.57091542

Anyone want to rate my specs >>57091485

>> No.57091568

You need to upgrade.

>> No.57091584
File: 156 KB, 989x787, speccy-october2016.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57091587
File: 28 KB, 396x384, 1447529666307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57091590
File: 47 KB, 794x557, Speccy64_2016-10-12_04-56-59.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

high end enough?

cpu is clocked to 4.3

>> No.57091654
File: 292 KB, 1130x723, Screen Shot 2016-10-16 at 12.34.41 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57091677

900MHz is comfy.

>> No.57091694
File: 410 KB, 1123x553, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>tfw first Sandy Bridge in speccy thread

>> No.57091716

Are you one of them re-tards?
pretty sure that's SB.

>> No.57091833
File: 64 KB, 994x782, ss+(2016-09-23+at+08.00.32).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Waiting for Acer X34P

>> No.57091838

why the fuck are you using windows on a macbook air?
do you enjoy pain?
What the fuck is wrong with your text?

>> No.57091853
File: 183 KB, 1057x805, SpeccyOCT.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Tfw one of your drives fails but raid 5 has got your back.

Never trust refurb drives

>> No.57091863

There were some SB Xeons before that, too

>> No.57091881


A Xeon 3075 is a Core 2 Duo with support for multi-CPU setups.

Still kinda interesting to have though.


That's the spirit!

>> No.57091894

>Still kinda interesting to have though.
Not even a little bit.

>> No.57091922
File: 40 KB, 855x675, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Guess this new computer is too advanced for speccy.

>> No.57091970


Old Xeons are cheap as shit and are just as capable of running a NAS or shitposting on 4chan as whatever $800 i7 CPU you spent your GBPs on.

>> No.57092111

What kind of frames do you get?

>> No.57092165
File: 45 KB, 835x634, speccy 8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57092208
File: 40 KB, 734x522, 356765.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

r8 & h8

>> No.57092227
File: 47 KB, 836x594, spec1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>raid 5 has got your back.
For now, but what about next time when you have a drive fail during the rebuild?

>> No.57092230

>Old Xeons are cheap as shit and are just as capable of running a NAS or shitposting on 4chan as whatever $800 i7 CPU you spent your GBPs on.
>Britcuck faggot
Oh ok, that explains why you're impressed with shit hardware.

>> No.57092257
File: 55 KB, 800x353, chickentendies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


> he doesn't know what GBP stands for

Leave 4chan

>> No.57092274
File: 56 KB, 673x518, spec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

my fx/monitor setup brother

>> No.57092284
File: 1.82 MB, 1162x1156, 1474254729811.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57092293
File: 41 KB, 666x593, BROTHER!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

We need to stick together in times like these

>> No.57092353
File: 494 KB, 620x620, 1460177882684.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57092383
File: 35 KB, 504x240, Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 8.49.26 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57092545

already rebuilt it and it is redundant again.
Everything actually important is on the could anyways.

>> No.57092591


>> No.57092684
File: 69 KB, 878x653, 2016-10-16 23_17_45-Piriform Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

It's getting older and older, but can I join anyway?

>> No.57092720
File: 26 KB, 400x462, Disdain for Plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>all these Win 10 tards

>> No.57092727
File: 40 KB, 778x555, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57092737
File: 1.52 MB, 1920x1080, speccy 4930K.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57092794


> Complaining about Windows users
> In a speccy thread

o i am laffin

perchance you would like to stay on your outdated OS with depreciated versions of DirectX and no updates

>> No.57092804
File: 48 KB, 936x671, Spooky.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You realize Windows 10 is practically required for Skylake based setups? I tried. Trust me I tried to get Windows 7 on my new PC. My motherboard (Asus ROG Ranger) just wouldn't support it. No drivers available, not to mention Windows 7 doesn't properly support full speed on NVME m.2 ssds.

dunno what I should upgrade. Or if I should anything. Everything seems to be holding up without signs of breaking. I don't intend to get a new monitor until this one breaks. 1440p is sweet spot for resolution and at 32" it's all that much better.

>> No.57092848

You seem to be pretty set, maybe a better cooler? Depending on where you live those temps seem a bit high for idle

>> No.57092873

>outdated OS
It's still very much kept up to date

>depreciated versions of DirectX
DX12 sure is being widely used... oh wait

>no updates
see above

Enjoy your lack of privacy, inconsistent UI and forced updates+reboots, I guess.

>> No.57092896
File: 1.78 MB, 4848x4008, IMG_20160709_203410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Those temps were at moderate load (1080p movie streaming, several browser tabs etc) and all fans off. Passively cooled inside of a Fractal R5 case.

Seems like I'm just waiting on the current "high end stuff" such as GTX 1080 performance and 4K screens to become standard before upgrading.

>> No.57092974

In that case you're fine then. I doubt you'll run into any problems with that setup for a while, maybe upgrade to a 1080 just for the hell of it.

>> No.57093075
File: 30 KB, 776x481, hLTt97o.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You need Jesus.

True that. Installing Win7 on this Gigabyte mobo is a huge pain in the ass.

Imma buy a new monitor next month. 1440p 144Hz IPS. This PC is for Photoshop and games, so duh, [email protected] is not enough.

>> No.57093095

>[email protected]
I'm still on a [email protected] IPS screen (Dell U2414H).
I'm waiting for 1440p 144Hz IPS to actually become affordable and, well, for the technology to mature before getting one.
Or is it already mature?

>> No.57093135

There's a very wide spectrum of those monitors at different prices, although 1080p is still the mainstream. Whether it's affordable, well, it's entirely subjective at this point.

Check out Pixio PX277, my friend got it. It doesn't have G-Sync, but that alone costs $200... Sounds affordable, and has very good reviews.

>> No.57093136

1440p 144hz is matured, just still rather pricey. For name brand panels, you're looking at $600 minimum.

Hell I bought a 60hz 32" 1440p panel for $650 when 1440p IPS finally reached maturity. Don't wait forever anon. If you have the money, buy a panel that has the features you want and in your price bracket NOW. Not 6 months from now. Playing the waiting game is for chumps.

>> No.57093146
File: 44 KB, 832x583, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Got the 1440p Dell monitor for less than $110 on Dell Outlet New.

>> No.57093190


I'm >>57092684 and well, I built this last year.
I don't think it's powerful enough to run shit at [email protected] at nice settings, so upgrading my monitor would mean also upgrading my GPU, wouldn't it?

>> No.57093217

970 certainly lags behind at 1440p, so 980Ti and higher is strongly suggested, and but only sensible purchase at the moment is 1070/1080.

>> No.57093240

Yeah, and since I don't have the money yet for a name brand 1440p monitor + a new GPU, I think I'll pass on it for the time being.
I'll wait for my next GPU upgrade, and prepare enough money for a GPU plus a [email protected] IPS monitor.

>> No.57093415


I usually play Fall Out 4 at 1440p with this setup >>57091485 and my average FPS is 50, the bottle neck shifts between the CPU and GPU, since I overclocked both.

There are a few spots out doors on the game where the FPS drops to 28 for a split second, but I have heard that is normal even for with new CPU's, If I am indoors it always over 66FPS, not sure how high because my monitor will only overclock to 66FPS.

>> No.57093490
File: 66 KB, 643x579, speccydontwork.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Im poor and Im posting, deal with it.

>> No.57093505

Also I get a terrible CPU bottle neck at 1080p which causes almost the same frame rates as 1440p, so running at 1440p with a GTX 970 I don't notice that I am running a 10 year old CPU until I touch my housefire of a PC.

I had to added a fan to the northbridge and that stopped the insane heat.

If you were to do this I would suggest getting the x5460 for $20

>> No.57093509


Group policy changes negate everything you said.

Takes a few minutes to set up and isn't exactly intuitive for normies though, I'll give you that. Still, the data Microsoft gets from idiots who don't know how to turn it off basically subsidized the cost of my operating system, so I'm ok with it.

>> No.57093539

Fallout 4 is a broken game, very old engine bound to CPU.

>> No.57093603

If you're interested in game benchmarks, let's take a look at newer games. I get 52-60+ fps in Mirror's Edge at 2715x1527 (1080 -> DSR) at 'Hyper' settings. With everything maxed out at 1080p, I had 52-60+ fps in AC Syndicate. I also had 50-60+ fps in the newest Tomb Raider at 1080p with settings maxed out + SSAO x2. Couldn't handle SSAO x4. So, gaming-wise, GTX1080 is the standard for the most famous titles these days at 1440p, if you care about quality over performance, also temperatures/noise. My GPU never goes above 70°C, CPU maxes out at 36°C.

>> No.57093665
File: 32 KB, 658x524, cmptstck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Does its work.

>> No.57093674
File: 57 KB, 801x538, Screenshot_123.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I win

>> No.57093718

I would agree with this, the 970 is not that great for 1440p even with a massive overclock, but I think I will wait a until the next gen comes out before I upgrade it, I have a 3770k that will get sometime this year, hopefully that is still a good chip.

>> No.57093887
File: 271 KB, 716x2500, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>tfw fell for the "games don't need hyperthreading" meme
>$1400 PC can't even play Forza at 1080p/60FPS

>> No.57093929

what's forza

>> No.57094094

Raid 5 does not have your back.


>> No.57094103

GTX1080 gives 55FPS in Mafia III. Nothing we can do about games.

>> No.57094119

I meant >>57093887

>> No.57094130
File: 122 KB, 954x493, Desktop and Laptop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Only high end/gaming PCs allowed, no poorfags pls


>> No.57094150

>Computer basically on fire
>176MB RAM
The fuck?

>> No.57094182
File: 54 KB, 694x490, speccy specs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57094243
File: 48 KB, 833x618, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57094275
File: 67 KB, 715x429, [email protected]: ~_001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57094523
File: 92 KB, 786x442, specco.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Where my 290 390 house fire bros at?

t. 390x owner

>> No.57094536

It's still just a 390x...

>> No.57094538
File: 25 KB, 596x456, Specs built in 2011.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What should i upgrade?

>> No.57094577


>> No.57094592

Frankly, everything... I mean, your build is well-matched, so upgrading your GPU to GTX1070, let's say, you'll need a better monitor, and a faster CPU. [email protected] is for GTX1060. If you upgrade to Skylake, you'll need a new mobo/DDR4, and Win10.

CPU seems to be the weak spot. If you decide to upgrade, you might go for i5-6600k if you don't do anything strongly CPU-bound. Games don't need i7 with a good GPU, unlike RX480.

>> No.57094595

that requires getting a new motherboard and ram

>> No.57094603

Suck it up, it's time to stop using DDR3 anyway.

>> No.57094652

im sticking with an i7
Should i wait for next Intel gen or get Skylake?

>> No.57094662

>falling for the ddr4 meme
>falling for the skymeme

>> No.57094666

Current gen Nvidia GPU or wait till next gen?
I got to save up now jesus

>> No.57094675

he's memeing on you, the 970 is basically the 1060 with less vram.

>> No.57094782

that didnt answer question
1070/1080 or 1100 series

>> No.57094815

1080, there's no point in anything more powerful unless you're trying to do 4k 60fps

>> No.57094840

Depends how much you wanna spend, and how badly you need to upgrade. Kabylake will have 15-20% better efficiency, but Skylake is already a great CPU, and the prices will go down once Kabylake is released worldwide. I suggested i5 because you can easily overclock it to 4.5GHz, but if you like 8 threads, then go with i7. DDR4 is cheap, I paid $68 for 2x 8GB HyperX Fury Black.

GTX1080 and GTX1070 are pretty good, and Volta might be released whenever in 2017, if not in 2018. I do recommend going for GTX1080, though. Mainly because the game industry is shitty, and seeing how games like Mafia III, Forza Horizon 3, AC Syndicate performs @ 1080p, with 1440p becoming the standard, the difference may be critical in like 2-3 years.

>> No.57094874

Remember that if you're not buying a new monitor, which you should, and you're staying at 1080p, upgrading from 970 might be useless.

>> No.57094951

The 970 is still fine, but games are hungry as fuck for VRAM these days, even at 1080p. I'd probably suggest an upgrade to a 1060 to replace a 970 for a bit more future proofing.

>> No.57095032

Welcome to the pinacle of DX11.

>> No.57095055
File: 233 KB, 937x843, speccy -- new dt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57095119
File: 56 KB, 792x580, desktop speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57095125

Games dont use more than 4 cores, most of them are up to 3 cores. What really matters on CPU for gaming is it IPC ratio. Single threaded performance, the higher the better. Since the first core will be up to 100% of usage and then the others will be almost stationary. On DX11 Nvidia is superior due to the close to double drawcalls compared to Radeons, so, the more drawcalls the better the game will perform. So for DX11 games with Radeon you need a way better and faster CPU than you would need for Nvidia get the same performance.
The tide has changed with Vulkan and DX12 when you are able to use all cores for the drawcalls and the driver layer is way way thinner, so While Nvidia is very good on drivers, AMD doesnt need to spend too much into it for DX12 and Vulkan since it is way simpler than it was in past iterations of DX.

>> No.57095128
File: 24 KB, 669x471, laptop specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57095363 [DELETED] 

Isn't that thing better than a stock Haswell i5? Maybe I'll get one

>> No.57095370

Is that thing better than a stock Haswell i5? Maybe I'll get one

>> No.57095389
File: 715 KB, 1366x768, Screenshot from 2016-10-15 16-26-50.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


is my laptop high end?

it was only 180 dollars

>buying a computer that is over 500 dollars

this makes you a retard

>> No.57095391

You need to take it into shop bro. That's 30 degrees Celsius hotter than it should be under full load.

>> No.57095406
File: 52 KB, 962x745, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57095408
File: 224 KB, 719x1041, Screenshot_2016-10-16_00-59-52.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57095419

More like

>buying a computer that is not a laptop
this makes you a retard

>> No.57095425

Meaning that you should build desktops from components, obviously

>> No.57095455

No, when overclocked it is almost as good as i5 2500k at stock speeds, but for $20 is does very well if you are looking to slowly upgrade, stariting with this and a new graphics card, you will see some benefit.

2 years ago this CPU was great $20, sadly now it is showing its age with maybe a loss of 5 or 10FPS at 1440p and having to tweak some of the CPU intensive settings like God-Rays

>> No.57095523

How do you get your 600p NVMe >>57095119
recognized? Mine says unknown interface

>> No.57095555
File: 2.13 MB, 2448x1999, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

New computer, how'd I do?
Also is SSD raid worth it? I have an Intel 730 laying around and the Internet says getting another one in raid 0 or 1 should be just as fast as my NVMe drive or more

>> No.57095557
File: 73 KB, 819x576, 8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

how much would this pentium (actually a g3260) bottleneck a sapphire tri-x r9 280x?

my bid is on
But maybe not, it doesnt bottleneck my sapphire 4gb RX460

also, a 600w psu gonna be decent enough for this monstrosity of a gpu? sapphire recommends 750w but all ive got is 600

impulse buy as fuck, but shit, it was 120$

>> No.57095559
File: 31 KB, 673x457, spec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

toaster coming through
I need new case with better air flow

>> No.57095570

Monitor is restricting your GPU.

>> No.57095581

You keep using this word
I don't think it means what you think it means

>> No.57095585

I think SSD RAID is kinda pointless for my needs, but one of my friends did 2 in a stripe and says he can't go back to anything less. Also neat moire

>> No.57095591

280x isn't that crazy, you'll be fine.

>> No.57095595

>taking a picture of your screen

>> No.57095603

Yeah I should upgrade to a 1440p soon (60hz or more? I hear the 1070 can't do 1440p at high frames)
But I was also the guy who can't run Forza at ultra settings, was considering getting a 7700k when it comes out if it's a comparable price... Or is Forza just a bad exception so I should get a monitor first instead? Most other games seem to hit to 60fps constantly or much higher
I also just was now able to XMP my ram, does 3000mhz really make a big difference? I notice less fps dipping now but it's still there

>> No.57095608

You might wanna think about moving that hdd to a cooler place like a 5.25" bay. I wish case designers weren't so shit when it comes to proper hdd placement and cage cooling.

>> No.57095650
File: 47 KB, 1201x784, s1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57095654

>he fell for the ashitsus meme

>> No.57095669
File: 97 KB, 201x201, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>ROG 2560x1440 144Hz
But haswell isn't the way it's meant to be played

>> No.57095673

I dont even have time to play video games anymore.

>> No.57095688

Welp, I havent thought of that. Gonna move the drive to 5.25" bay for now while i find a 5.25" to 3.5" tray

>> No.57095724

You always want above 60Hz. 60Hz is the absolute minimum, and 1070, a high-end card, is enough to go above in most games from 2012-2015 even @ 1440p.
Take Mirror's Edge. If you run it at 2715x1527 DSR at Hyper settings, you'll see GTX1070 give you 52-67fps. Any older game - up to +100fps. 60Hz is a restriction, and it's enough for GTX1060, or for work, but not for gaming of any kind.
Forza and Mafia III - i7 Skylake and GTX1080 isn't enough for 1080p 60fps. There's no point in building a PC with one product that runs exceptionally bad in mind.

>> No.57096486

Is g sync a good idea for the money at 1440p high fps with a 1070? I feel like it might not hold up 144hz all the time

>> No.57096728
File: 56 KB, 945x710, capt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>no poorfags pls

can I join

>> No.57096873
File: 66 KB, 1006x755, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>waiting for zen

>> No.57097714
File: 87 KB, 726x522, Speccy 08 Oct 16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57097734

G-sync is only a bad idea if you have AMD.

>> No.57097753
File: 42 KB, 858x415, 5619b5768d216613b261d0a9c971ab9c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I know my build is pretty fucking bad, it overheats when playing games at max quality, I'm thinking about changing motherboard and CPU... Should I change something else?

>> No.57098144

If only G-Sync itself didn't cost extra $200.

>> No.57098161
File: 43 KB, 712x571, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57098287
File: 126 KB, 1483x576, snip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

don't buy blower style coolers kids

or at the very least don't buy a blower style cooler with a fucking tiny aluminium heatsink

>> No.57098384


>> No.57098476

47°C CPU; 59°C GPU idle/low workload but completely silent because all of the fans are off but the CPU fan (running at 200 RPM)
31°C CPU; 45°C GPU idle/low workload but a bit noisy because the fans including the case fans are on at low speed

Which is best?
I'm on the former configuration because I'm under the impression there's virtually no advantage to the latter one. Am I mistaken?

>> No.57098781
File: 164 KB, 1366x768, abitnf7s.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>high end
Everything is top of the line.

It would have been a great gaming pc back in the day.

>> No.57098803

Well, one cannot deny it was high-end at some point in time.

>> No.57098816

>these tabs
thank you

>> No.57098873
File: 22 KB, 400x400, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Fuck you

>> No.57099176
File: 43 KB, 690x512, Speccy Update.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What else do I need?

>> No.57099264

4k screen
1tb ssd
Fuck huge case with 7 colors led, if you haven't gotten that.

>> No.57099279

Any decent 4K screens that aren't curved memes?

>> No.57099331
File: 42 KB, 867x630, rigaliggadingdong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

See pic, but discontinued. There's an alternative version still available by iiyama.

>> No.57099362

Why do people buy hardware with "GAMING" in the name?

>> No.57099379

Kinda obvious when you think about it, don't ya think?

>> No.57099414

The Dell 43" 4k came out a few months ago.

Its around $1300, but it's IPS 4k 60hz.

Has decent reviews

>> No.57099624
File: 188 KB, 1280x1024, speccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I win.
Also any suggestion to change the GPU? I only have a 300w psu and people suggest a 210 (I want the Gigabyte Experience 1GB one), I don't want to cause a housefire and I don't need to play at very high visuals.

>> No.57099657 [DELETED] 
File: 34 KB, 661x521, specco.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

it sure is COMFY in here x131e, upgrading ram to 8 as soon as me torx set comes in

>> No.57099679
File: 36 KB, 656x523, speeco.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

it sure is comfy in here x131e little babby laptop

>> No.57099682
File: 47 KB, 869x544, sPECKER.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

check it out fags

>> No.57099695
File: 63 KB, 688x532, high end.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

y'all got nothin' on this

>> No.57099707
File: 51 KB, 655x519, pee sea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just your average 2016-built shitposting machine

>> No.57100089


>> No.57100164
File: 143 KB, 1234x612, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

too bad speccy cant show my vive :^)

>> No.57100281

What you will be doing with that rig? That 210 can barely run GTA [email protected] with the resolution of 1366x768, I had one.

>> No.57100353

It's an all-purpouse. I don't need high resolution, I can play TF2 at low details (high textures, low models, no shadows) @40FPS with res of 1024x768.
It feels like a museum. It's after my brother which did Sai and Adobe Photoshop on this.
He said 1GB would be good enough.

>> No.57100429

Mine was 1gb too, it struggled on Pant.net with pics larger than 10000x10000

>> No.57100459

Just do yourself a favor and get at least a GT730

>> No.57100501

I can't tell if the PSU is good enough. The rough estimate is 300w and I don't know if it would be enough.
I can't really tell because the PSU is well hidden near the mobo.

>> No.57100567

The GT730 TDP is 49W vs 30.5W of that 210 and performance difference is like 400%

>> No.57100570
File: 2.52 MB, 1920x3572, FrontSpeccyBack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Same boat here man

>> No.57100649

I really am dumb, I guess.
The cost here is about 55 dollars (1700CZK) and my current GPU is intergrated, is that an issue?
The OS is also 32-bit and the GPU is 64, is that also an issue?
Also would like to extend the RAM to 4GB, is getting 1 4GB stick better and cheaper to get than 2x2?

>> No.57100705
File: 34 KB, 660x525, 2016-10-04 11_53_05-Piriform Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57100722
File: 13 KB, 532x375, Speccy5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Anything else I need?

>> No.57100766

>my current GPU is integrated, is that an issue?
Of course it's not. But I don't know how good that card will be in your motherboard, because it has only 1xPCI-E x16 and 2xPCI
>The OS is also 32-bit and the GPU is 64, is that also an issue?
>is getting 1 4GB stick better and cheaper to get than 2x2?
Get 2x2GB and enjoy dual-channel

>> No.57100813

>The OS
It's 32-bit. The architecture of the 730 is 64, I'm asking if there are compability issues.
It's a DDR2 and I don't know if the mobo can handle DDR3 or DDR4. Dual channel sounds comfy, but I'm not sure about how many slots my mobo has. ASUS didn't say a thing yet.

>> No.57100851
File: 40 KB, 514x459, 1470971167155.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Looks like you'll need a motherboard.

>> No.57100898

>It's a DDR2 and I don't know if the mobo can handle DDR3 or DDR4.
lol. nigga.

>> No.57100899
File: 57 KB, 500x375, 1476226270746.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What the fuck am I reading?

>> No.57100936

Okay, update: it can only have DDR2.
I still need to get a decent supplier for the RAM. A guy from my local store said Kingston, HyperX, Crucial.
Was he right?

>> No.57100945

The video card architecture has nothing to do with the SO architecture, there are 512bit cards around.

And no, your mobo can only handle DDR2. Here is your mobo page

>> No.57100950

Doesn't matter. As long as the actual chips are made by Samsung, Hynix, Elpida, or Micron, they'll all be the same.

>> No.57100960
File: 52 KB, 900x757, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

got the x5660 @ 4.2 ghz

>> No.57100980
File: 58 KB, 843x717, speccy - jordan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dunno if my rig counts.
I'd call it midrange

>> No.57100991

Alright then, guys. Once Christmas sales are here (I'm actually extremely poor), I'll get the parts and go to my PC service (Intuice in Czech Republic)

>> No.57100995

Post cinebench

>> No.57101017

You don't need high end chips for that rig desu

>> No.57101019
File: 75 KB, 908x385, IMG_20161016_142403.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Small OC, messed with the VGA's max power and fan curves, liking the results so far.

>> No.57101046

>high end RAM chips

>> No.57101057
File: 30 KB, 495x859, Untitled2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


HT off tho

>> No.57101060

Not trying to offend you but is your country really that poor? Is that an average build there?

>> No.57101099

The average salary is about 9000CZK. My salary is about 19200, and with all the mortgages and loans I have about 9000CZK left for food and other things.
So, yeah. A standard here is basically my PC.

>> No.57101103

>probably some Crucial Ballistix™™

>> No.57101112

LOL I dont even think this is an on purpose troll desktop

>> No.57101171

I'm not even joking mate, this is a standard.
People here gotta use PCs to watch their bank accounts, not to shitpost violently.
And politicians get paid 50000CZK average here. Fucking jews.

>> No.57101175

Turn it on, ding dong.

>> No.57101190


>> No.57101205
File: 27 KB, 688x525, Безымянный.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57101213

>People here gotta use PCs to watch their bank accounts, not to shitpost violently.
I kek'd

>> No.57101252

Do you have pics? Your country seems very comfy through Google Images.

>> No.57101261
File: 31 KB, 509x859, Untitled3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]



>> No.57101272
File: 43 KB, 785x562, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

How did I do?

>> No.57101279


>> No.57101282

Look at the brands he cited before

>> No.57101304


how what?

>> No.57101323

Never mind I just realized you only had the one.

>> No.57101331
File: 165 KB, 1280x1024, minimální mzda.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Because the current ministers are doing something good for once, the minimal salary (pic related) is getting higher every few months.

>> No.57101379
File: 58 KB, 879x662, speccynew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>CPU is literally worthless
If I had an expensive CPU, maybe I wouldn't be a poorfag.

>> No.57101430

did you fall for the ES meme or something?

>> No.57101451

>as long as it's under 100 degrees it's fine

Man, i wish i was that confident

>> No.57101462
File: 126 KB, 1492x574, speccybuild.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57101486

I didn't fall for a meme, but it is an ES processor yes.

>> No.57101505
File: 42 KB, 655x522, f500e927a400313832b872989eab48b7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Oh shit, my motherboard seems to be on fire atm.

>> No.57101533

Fuck it just went too 112

>> No.57101549

>it is an ES
>I didn't fall for a meme
Sounds like you did, buddy. How much did you pay for some chips you don't own?

>> No.57101570

what the fuck?
get a fire extuingisher, the fucker has to be smoking

>> No.57101611


>> No.57101625
File: 41 KB, 653x521, d2b20743dbdc8edb0197dd7e220ca63e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

114 now, what do?

>> No.57101650

turn off your damn computer

>> No.57101660


>> No.57101668

Does he even have a fan and a heatsink?

>> No.57101680
File: 245 KB, 1356x960, spex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Hello /g/. Enjoying this cool PC weather?

>> No.57101693

Well he must considering is CPU is 51c

>> No.57101717

It's pretty fucking terryfing though. My mobo goes barely over 30.

>> No.57101757
File: 42 KB, 403x402, asd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i wonned

>> No.57101764


>> No.57101776
File: 42 KB, 655x523, 115.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just turned off my computer for a couple of minutes and it went up a degree. Maybe it's just a bug?

>> No.57101783

How does this fool people time and time again?

>> No.57101792

Well, I'm fooled too. Is the sensor broken?

>> No.57101862

Nice. Can you post a picture of the view of your window?

>> No.57101868
File: 43 KB, 787x567, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Just built this new computer friday night. I paid 1020$ total lmao

ram is fury ddr4

>> No.57101884

Is there anyway I can check to see if the sensor is broken?

>> No.57101895

lol, no.
Contact ASUS.

>> No.57101917


3.5 outta 5

>> No.57101923

The offset is incorrect for your hardware, duh homie. Regardless, if it's not shutting down on its own, it's fine, even if it were at 114C.

>> No.57101994

I can't really put a price on any of the parts that aren't the motherboard, the 4TB WD Red, the 4TB WD Gold or RAM. Those are the only parts I actually bought to build that computer.

>> No.57102307
File: 85 KB, 906x1087, desktop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Check out my trusty ol' "gentle whoosh of air" machine

>> No.57102963
File: 45 KB, 787x582, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57103142

why such a high power supply for such a small system?

>> No.57103332
File: 49 KB, 878x492, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Eh, it works.

>> No.57103507
File: 59 KB, 870x647, shat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57103805
File: 74 KB, 755x532, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Looks like Speccy can't detect its temp

>> No.57104322

Noone r8in or h8in

>> No.57104417
File: 32 KB, 673x426, 2016_10_16_22_28_56_Piriform_Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

maybe i should get a better cpu cooler than the boxed one...

>> No.57104456
File: 53 KB, 740x565, cap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>no poorfags pls

>> No.57104566

It's actually too dark for this since five in the afternoon, lel.

>> No.57106261

>all these temps

Is your house burning or just a shitty case?

>> No.57106325
File: 63 KB, 620x388, 223.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57106345
File: 71 KB, 962x708, Speccy64_2016-10-16_23-42-52.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57106439

There's nothing wrong with those temperatures.

>> No.57106690
File: 44 KB, 552x532, Speccy64_2016-10-17_01-04-31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Is Speccy dead? It hasn't been updated in almost a year.

>> No.57106892

>if you have 12 TB of data across 7 drives and a URE happens when rebuilding.
I am running 3 1TB drives for media, I'd say I'm fine.

>> No.57106924
File: 36 KB, 657x585, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

in b4 memes

>> No.57108096

They don't. Nothing interesting in their brains.

>> No.57108105

Why swear so often?

>> No.57108173
File: 40 KB, 681x577, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.57108309
File: 37 KB, 509x400, checkit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

go ahead, call the mods, they can't un-poor you

>> No.57108374
File: 38 KB, 687x532, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

are these temps okay?

>> No.57108537

>calling others poor with a poorfag rig himself

>> No.57108558


>> No.57108576

as long as your computer is still on, its fine

>> No.57109206

holy shit. I'm impressed. I am honestly not sure what the highest my laptop has gotten to. I think the thermal sensor starts to malfucntion around 98 C. It will jump from 98 to 72 and then back up to 98 and repeat over and over.

>> No.57109231

Do i7s readout the temp to speccy properly? Getting real sick of my fx8320's shit

>> No.57109280 [DELETED] 
File: 123 KB, 1458x678, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Speccy can't my CPU.

>> No.57109293

AMD can't into sensors

>> No.57109325

Ya i noticed one of the many reasons im jumping ship to intel

>> No.57109340
File: 116 KB, 1458x678, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Speccy can't my CPU

Other image lacked half my ram.

>> No.57109351

Everyone knows to buy the 8320e

>> No.57109362


>> No.57109376

That's really mean, dude. Why can't you be encouraging?

>> No.57109397


>no ssd
Enjoy your pentium 4

>> No.57109463

>implying it matters when most games will be run off of the hard disks anyway

>> No.57109506

Rig elections

>> No.57109536

AMD is fucking retarded with sensors. These temperatures are not measured in Celsius or Fahrenheit, it's a AMD proprietary scale that shows you how near you are from hitting the max recommended temperature. I think more than 100 means your processor got too hot and it will start throttling. Also, this explains why there are some screenshots with absurdly low temps.

>> No.57109719
File: 87 KB, 657x525, Speccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

How Boring

>> No.57109722

Not quite, they just know how much power/head their instructions put out and use that to make up random numbers they claim as their temp

>> No.57109755

That is dodgy as fuck

>> No.57110150
File: 22 KB, 480x360, thatsthejoke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.57110604
File: 115 KB, 1133x525, How'sMyFuture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I wonder how long this will last for.

>> No.57110796

>Intel HD graphics
>High end

My ti-83 is better than your hunk of shit

>> No.57110821
File: 51 KB, 683x532, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What GPU should I upgrade too /g/?
Don't want anything too expensive

>> No.57110867
File: 112 KB, 777x612, 148568496541665.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dual monitors are pretty good for programming

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.