[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 34 KB, 647x474, laptop specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56316499 No.56316499 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Speccy thread?

>> No.56316536
File: 38 KB, 606x543, desktop speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56317203
File: 92 KB, 807x518, specs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What's with the potato CPU's?

>> No.56317244
File: 41 KB, 778x555, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317279
File: 1.52 MB, 1920x1080, speccy 4930K.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56317297
File: 143 KB, 816x717, specs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317425
File: 94 KB, 787x573, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317573
File: 39 KB, 658x473, Piriform Speccy 8_28_2016 10_44_38 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317762
File: 72 KB, 837x511, Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317808
File: 38 KB, 659x525, 8734985734.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317824
File: 41 KB, 1071x640, mahrigg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56317827
File: 83 KB, 736x497, specs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>says the kid with an i5

Also, nice shitty graphics card, dude, ahahahaah!

>> No.56317903

>says the one who bought a e3 1230 v2 instead of an i7 to save $50.

No need for an i7 extra threads won't benefit you when it comes to gaming. 960 is fine for me. perfect for 1080p.

>> No.56317944

>says the guy that doesn't know I paid 247 bucks for it, new

Still laughing at your 960 ahahahah! dude!

>> No.56318089

Because you just upgraded? Maybe I should just laugh at you for not buying a 1080.

>> No.56318133


>> No.56318149
File: 75 KB, 950x950, psx_974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I was trolling, Jeez.

>> No.56318175
File: 27 KB, 480x433, specci.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56318241

Guys is this the new Windows 10 thread?

>> No.56318249
File: 408 KB, 1148x2024, speccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56318251

>those thicc windows borders

>> No.56318464
File: 115 KB, 749x585, piece of shit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

hello /g/

Can you tell me a good distro (to use it like a partition) considering this piece of shit?

i'm saving shekels to build a good pc

>> No.56318967
File: 40 KB, 782x558, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56320735
File: 23 KB, 467x412, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56320751
File: 370 KB, 591x696, speccy 6-27-16.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56320792
File: 51 KB, 646x519, burger-pc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56320807

R u me????

Temps a little high

>> No.56320814
File: 24 KB, 546x481, 2016-05-31 10_37_41-Piriform Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

that's at load

and yes, i am u

>> No.56320863

No cpu oc and reference gpu I'm guessing??

>> No.56320890


>> No.56320893

>No cpu oc
It's at 4.4GHz daily, can hit 4.7GHz stable

GPU is just some Asus card that was on sale, it was ~4 months before the 10xx series release and I dont do any gaming really, the GTX 960 has HEVC main10 hardware decoding unlike the other 9xx series GPUs.

>> No.56321010

So your highest temp under something like intelburntest is 60C at 4.4ghz? What's vcore?

>> No.56321021
File: 24 KB, 399x395, 5820k 4.4GHz 1.28v.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56321036

Also, those load temps (>>56320751) are just light load, just some counter strike for an hour to see what my temps got to.

A stress test can bring my temps up to around 70c. I don't let it go over 75c.

>> No.56321051

>all this Windows 10
/g/ is infested with pajeets

>> No.56321070

Nice I'm at 4.5ghz 1.28v on mine. I don't generally see temps break 50C gaming. Intel burn test puts me up around 75C. What cooler you run? I'm using kraken x60 with push/pull.

>> No.56321078

>kraken x60
Corsair H115i GTX, just 2x140mm in push at the moment.

Debated going for push/pull but my temps are fine as it is so i'm not too worried about it.

>> No.56321107
File: 40 KB, 835x709, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56321108

Nah senpai I upgraded because i'd rather deal with botnet than windows 8

>> No.56321170

Can you screenshot in game with afterburner monitoring all cpu threads?

>> No.56321193
File: 49 KB, 916x689, 1472402387461.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>4.7 stable
What's the vcore on that? Mine boots to desktop at 4.6 and 1.3V but crashes in benchmarks or render loads. Have it backed down to 4.4 and 1.25V now.

>> No.56321201
File: 208 KB, 855x501, XeonThinkPadP50.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56321209
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

For benchmarking I had it up at 1.34v for 4.7GHz

Managed a 10 minute encode and Cinebench R11.5 run.

It's summer though so I only did a few tests at that clockspeed.

For the most part I keep it at 4.4GHz daily.

>> No.56321229

Other anon with 5820k here, I was stable at 4.5 1.25v with slow ram. Moved up to 4.5 1.28v wirh 32gb 3200 ram. I can get to desktop at 4.7 or 4.8 1.30, 1.31, 1.32v but all crash when I start burn test. Scared to go much higher for minimal gains.

>> No.56321336


>> No.56321344

he's implying no game would use more than half your cores

>> No.56321357

They won't, who cares?

>> No.56321361
File: 813 KB, 3052x1080, isthiswhatuarelookingfor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Is this what you are looking for?
I don't really game, I do server shit mostly.
So please don't tell me "i7 is better for games" like I dont already know.

>> No.56321371
File: 36 KB, 660x525, speccy_new.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

It's a I need a new screen but 4k is too demanding and 1440p will last me year and a half at best before I'll start eyeing a 4k screen thread.

>> No.56321382

>i7 is better for games
That's just a stupid meme like 'you can't play games with a Quadro bro!'

>> No.56321388

GTA V and Fallout 4 would like a word.

>> No.56321405

With what?

>> No.56321447
File: 54 KB, 687x541, specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56321500

I'm not, I just want to see it

>> No.56321549

You dont think I know this?

>> No.56321566
File: 1.03 MB, 3456x1942, 2016-08-19 11.38.02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

4K is good but at 60hz it's not there yet. I moved back down to a asus pg348q. Lost a few pixels but g-sync 100hz is bae.

>> No.56321575

Thanks, but no.

>> No.56321596
File: 107 KB, 833x747, computer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56321601

Fallout 4 is a terrible example, it's like any other elder scrolls, in that it would rather have a single core @ 10ghz rather than 6 cores @ 5ghz. Gta 5 and bf4 on the other hand love more cores. My 5820k uses most of the 12 threads in either game, obviously not maxing them out but 10-30% usage.

>> No.56321624

Eyes cant see past 16:9?

>> No.56321670

Why not downgrade back to 7?

>> No.56321677

I don't want to deal with all the scaling and UI issues.
Every time I had a non-standard aspect ration it sooner or later became a pain in the ass.
If it's fine for you then great, enjoy it, but I don't want ultrawide.

>> No.56321682


>> No.56321701

Because 10 is a better OS than 8 or 7.

>> No.56321709

Actually the only game on my steam account that has an issue is fallout. Flawless widescreen fixes just about any 21:9 issue you might have. Almost all AAA titles support it out of the box.

>> No.56322001
File: 133 KB, 702x502, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>all those low-res lowlifes

>> No.56322047


Is that a console anon?

>> No.56322048

>he's a tech illiterate and thinks higher res on such a small screen matters.

At a normal viewing distance of about 2-3 feet anything over 120PPI is going to require image scaling, which means all that extra screen real-estate is wasted, sure it looks sharper, but you're not really gaining much space because of the scaling you have to do in order to read anything.

36-46" 4k is the minimum to give you the same pixel density as a good quality 1440p 25-29" panel.

Congrats on falling for the meme though, there is a reason those 4k monitors are so cheap.

>> No.56322051

One of these retarded sub 35" 4k monitors

He was too poor to buy Ultrasharp

>> No.56322056
File: 36 KB, 702x509, kektop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56322070


>> No.56322074

75" here >>56321596

Enjoy your tiny ass monitor

>> No.56322086

You realize input lag on 4k TVs is literally at like 150ms at the moment right?

That's why almost no one uses 4k TVs for gaming.

>> No.56322098

It's unnoticeable and far lower than 150ms, like 55ms (it's OLED) when I measured it.

>> No.56322133
File: 107 KB, 350x319, yourtears.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>sure it looks sharper, but

But nothing. 1440p is the new 720p. You done goofed.

>> No.56322145
File: 36 KB, 655x484, 9d9f4f88061b57c9dfaf0985f69a6516.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Okay, so I know I need more storage, and new RAM. Anymore suggestions?

>> No.56322166

27" isn't too small for 4k.

>> No.56322173
File: 75 KB, 674x533, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Laptop is a Acer Aspire 5349.

>Is Sandy Bridge still good in 2016? Legit question.

>> No.56322182

Buy more RAM and more storage?

>> No.56322186

It is. Anything under 35" is pretty bad

>> No.56322202

That's marketing nonsense trying to shill you into buying a larger version, because the price increases exponentially with the size, not the resolution. Higher pixel density is a good thing, you twit.

>> No.56322230

As far as I'm aware LG doesn't make a 75" OLED panel

They have a curved 77" or a 65", and both of those are $7k+

and anything over 20-30ms is shit for fast paced games, so 55ms is terrible.

Turn on the image interpolation and you will easily go over 150ms

you're retarded and don't understand how resolution works then, literally there is ZERO point in getting a 4k monitor under 35" in size.

>> No.56322250

>literally there is ZERO point in getting a 4k monitor under 35" in size.

Except for the fact that 4k at 27" looks very noticeably sharper and better than 1440p at 27". You're the retard in this. You were told repeatedly not to fall for the 1440p meme.

>> No.56322265

Yes but 60hz makes my eyes bleed

>> No.56322266

So I forgot two inches.
And yes it was pricey.

>aver 20-30ms is shit for fast paced gam
I'm not a Gotard playing a shit game made for cheating.

>> No.56322267

It's really not

>> No.56322279

It really is though?

>> No.56322288

>Higher pixel density is a good thing

Yes but only up to a certain point, the reason it's more important on a cellphone or tablet is you hold them a LOT closer to your face, when you sit in front of a computer you SHOULD be about 2-3 feet back, at that distance anything over about 130PPI is going to be known as "retina", as in your eyes can't see the individual pixels.

So 4k at under 35" is just pretty dumb, 35" 4k is 125PPI which is already more dense than 1080p at anything over 18".

>> No.56322303

the 77" model is over $15,000 i highly doubt you got that one.

>> No.56322305

What makes you say that, kid?

>> No.56322321

my GPU runs cooler than my CPU

also I just checked power on time for my drives, the one I keep my games on is at 2213.9 days

>> No.56322327

>Yes but only up to a certain point,
How are you supposed to know where that point lies? How many sub-30" 4k screens have you used?
>So 4k at under 35" is just pretty dumb,
Not in my experience, it's more than big enough for that resolution to unfold.
>which is already more dense than 1080p
1080p is not a benchmark. It's low-res compared to what's possible now and in the coming years. We'll be moving towards 8k in the foreseeable future.

>> No.56322335
File: 98 KB, 694x775, spec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I fucked up

>> No.56322342

WDDM 2.0/2.1
general SSD improvements

>> No.56322357

So nothing important?

>> No.56322375

>sub-30" 4k screens have you used?
I work at a computer store.

Ultrawide is a meme and sub 35" 4k is a meme.

1440p IPS or 1440p 144Hz is fine for now, but "upgrading" past 1440p without getting a REAL 4k at over 35" is just retarded.

There is no reason to hobble yourself with 4k on such a tiny screen, you're forcing yourself to do GUI scaling and all you're getting is a slightly sharper image out of it... wew fucking lad, what an upgrade.

I'd rather have a 40" 4k panel which gives me 4x20" 1080p windows on a single 40" panel with no bezel.

>> No.56322390

>performance and all around general usage improvements are worthless

uhhh anon, you might be a bit retarded, that or all that CP you're keeping on W7 has rotted your brain.

>> No.56322408

It just works more faster to me on every machine I've installed it to :)

Enterprise version, I do not use Home or Pro.

>> No.56322425

>I'd rather have a 40" 4k panel which gives me 4x20" 1080p windows on a single 40" panel with no bezel.
holy fucking shit this

anyone who buys a 4k panel at under 35", just tell them to open up 4 1080p windows at once and see how usable it is, the WHOLE fucking point of higher resolution is to be able to fit more information on a single screen, with 4k panels under 30" in size opening up that many windows is unusable because you can't read shit. On a 40" however it's like having 4 1080p monitors in 1.

>> No.56322436

I fully support my 3440x1440 100hz ips curved g-sync meme

>> No.56322439
File: 40 KB, 660x525, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56322447

That's a fine meme, but ultrawide is really only useful for people who don't do much productivity work on their machines, 21:9 just isn't great for anything but media watching and games that support it.

If that's all you do though it's a great monitor, I've used one at work.

>> No.56322454

Not from my experience. I just prefer a desktop OS instead of a cloud based one.

>> No.56322468

Games mostly, cranking up that fov is real nice

>> No.56322486

If you think W10 is a cloud based OS you've not actually used it for more than 5 minutes, i've had W10 installed since it launched and never once used any of the cloud connected services.

It's literally just like W7 or W8 as far as the desktop environment is concerned.

>> No.56322539

>it uploads your information to Microsoft servers constantly
I know that doesn't mean cloud, but it's not something anyone sane would use as a personal OS unless they don't have a personality. I'd rather not live in a police state.

>> No.56322550
File: 95 KB, 1358x532, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>they fell for the W10 meme

>> No.56322560

>I'd rather not live in a police state.
You already live in a global police state and if you think otherwise you're simply not as tech literate as you thought you were.

>> No.56322564

Didn't get this from Wireshark while using server grade router.

Only action that happens happens during updates.
>b-but it sends your information during that.
tinfoil harder.

>> No.56322601
File: 19 KB, 487x388, 1460602974171.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56322618

>On a 40" however it's like having 4 1080p monitors in 1.
Yup, 40" 4k is based

>> No.56322651
File: 75 KB, 601x601, 1446864673627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56322793
File: 58 KB, 879x662, speccynew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

My WD Blue has 2152 days. Been in two computers now, and I'm gonna see how high it can go before it breaks

>> No.56322956
File: 27 KB, 747x543, spex.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56323056

What about those screenshots?

>> No.56323076
File: 87 KB, 855x475, speccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56323364

>Two 1080s
Nigga wat do u use this computer for?!? Deep learning?

>> No.56323395

This is exactly why I hate the new naming of the Titan x. Can't tell if old or new

>> No.56323429

I play SNES games

>> No.56323483
File: 104 KB, 1119x812, Unbenannt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Finally... Quick OC'd the CPU to 4.5 @1.25V and it seems to have room for more or less voltage. My old 3770K barely did 4.4 @1.28V and more only with extreme voltage.

>> No.56323657

>Deep 4K learning
I bet he still can't max out some games.

>> No.56323691
File: 631 KB, 1600x1171, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Hey fellas, I have not done much with this rig since i put her together about 3 - 4 years back.
any advice on making her a little or lot better. thanks

>> No.56323692

>I was just being retarded

>> No.56323701

I can. It's just that even GTA V drops to 40, even to 30fps instead of constant 60FPS (that's in grass heavy mountains)

It's playable but could be better

Pascal Titans when etc.

>> No.56323798

>put her together about 3 - 4 years back
GTX 980 came out September 2014 and the 4790k came out July 2014. That was 2 years ago almost exactly.

>> No.56323835

Its 2016 tho so that was like 3-4 years ago if u think about it

>> No.56323856

Pascal Titans are already out, but I would go for 1080Ti. I hope your custom loop is ready for them.

>> No.56323990

>he fell for the pirated windows meme

>> No.56324047
File: 37 KB, 698x522, Untitledd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ok /g/ I'll post my speccy. though I never understood the purpose of these threads. Like it seems to be a who has the best or worst computer thread.

>> No.56324062
File: 124 KB, 714x593, tvnviewer_2016-08-29_12-12-48.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>not having a few years-old midrange PC

>> No.56324209
File: 84 KB, 659x526, New Bitmap Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i love my new graphics card, alltho im not too sure if my processor should be my next upgrade.

>> No.56324392


>no r8

>> No.56325755
File: 105 KB, 512x384, 1456577557162.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>a REAL 4k

>> No.56325821
File: 74 KB, 716x399, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Temps are good.

>> No.56325934

sorry, i added the GPU last year.
but back to the original question, anything i can do to make it better... what i mean is that its been running pretty slow while playing games like BF3 and BF4, sometimes i wonder if its my RAM or maybe win10

>> No.56325999
File: 89 KB, 1034x736, NewestSpeccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56326007 [DELETED] 
File: 53 KB, 800x518, speccy n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56326040
File: 84 KB, 817x601, fuku.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You guys are totally homo sexuals

>> No.56326060

For what reason?

>> No.56326062
File: 49 KB, 1115x687, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Overclock it, should last a while.

5820K anon from this morning.

>> No.56326079
File: 61 KB, 892x565, Speccy64_2016-08-28_16-42-11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I only play league of legends, ama.

>> No.56326081

Literally nothing.

>> No.56326088
File: 32 KB, 537x529, 3f5a00acf72df93528b6bb7cd0a4fd0c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Got the machine with 32, added another 32 because I had random cash and I was driving past a computer shop. No reason other than that.

>> No.56326095

this is pretty shitty. sorry dude

>> No.56326096

>Buys 64gb ram

>> No.56326118

>taken with phone retard

>> No.56326127

i can still see it.
it looks like shit. bye.

>> No.56326133
File: 19 KB, 544x402, specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

need help guys. Should I get a Nitro rx480 4GB? I play at 1080p so 4gigs shouldn't be too bad right? Or should I just go for a 470?
Also: The store I buy from says they might get those 4GB Nitros in stock in a week or so, but I'm quite skeptical about that since as far as I know, 4GB nitro models don't even exist.

>> No.56326137

Eyes cant see past 720p?

>> No.56326143

I'd rather wait for a good 4k 40" 100hz+ IPS with freesync or gsync.

3840x2160 is so much nicer, and if i really want 21:9 you can create custom resolutions 3840x1640 is 21:9

>> No.56326155

GTX 1060 $249.99

>> No.56326195

Dude i had 4K 60hz for over 2 years. Samsung U28E590D to be exact. I can barely tell a difference in the pixel density. What i can tell is that 100hz+ is a must if you intend to play anything besides WoW.

>> No.56326199
File: 37 KB, 669x461, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Which aftermarket 480 should I get?

>> No.56326218


>> No.56326223
File: 6 KB, 696x448, 2016-08-29 11_55_47-Visual TV Size Comparison _ 34 inch 21x9 display vs 40 inch 16x9 display.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

that's because there isn't a difference in pixel density...

40"4k is 110ppi
34" 1440p 21:9 is 109PPI

The point is the extra resolution you retard.

>> No.56326228
File: 22 KB, 581x457, spec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

New HDD. Pls r8

>> No.56326242

I want DX12 and 8 gigs for future bloated ass games, thanks. Not going to buy nvidia when their next line of cards comes out next May, with these thrown in the trash, thanks

>> No.56326247
File: 61 KB, 800x533, 143201-p148286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I just checked and they have some 1060 6gb models in stock for like 40 euros cheaper than rx480 8gb models. Pic related was the cheapest? Anybody got any idea what is this Palit brand like? Never heard of them

>> No.56326277

I went from 28" 4k to 34" 3440x 1440. Thanks for being a tard. Or does 28"=40" now?

Point is you're a poorfag in here trying to tell me how i "wasted" my money and you're waiting on _______________ because its better.

>> No.56326302

palit is good, go.


At 1080p, you will not need 8gb Vram in your lifetime. Still why not go 1060 when its better for the same money.

>> No.56326311

>I went from 28" 4k to 34" 3440x 1440. Thanks for being a tard. Or does 28"=40" now?
Look you stupid nigger YOU were replying to me.
I specifically said in the post YOU were replying to
>I'd rather wait for a good 4k 40" 100hz+ IPS with freesync or gsync.

Fuck yourself for being a dumbass and buying a sub 35" 4k panel to begin with.

>> No.56326356

Triggered the poorfag

We'll be onto to 8K by the time he gets "babies first 4k monitor".

>> No.56326389

I'm a poorfag for not buying a meme resolution? I've got 1440p monitors at the moment as it is, I can easily and happily wait for a good quality 4k panel to be sub $1k.

>> No.56326490

>"i don't have one"

Works for every walk of life.

>> No.56326518

What content is mastered in 21:9?

Further, what can your 34" 21:9 3440x1440 do that a 40" 16:9 3840x2160 monitor couldnt?

It can display 21:9 content just fine if you want, 3440x1440 or 3840x1640.

You can always scale down with larger res, you can't scale up.

It's a meme because UHD content is already being produced and you'll have to downscale it to watch on your screen.

>> No.56326560

What content?

100hz, hence me selling my 4K monitor

Ultra-wide ingame is fucking awesome. Try it before you meme it.

What content will i need to scale down to watch?

>> No.56326579

>potato CPU's?
>only has a i5 skymeme

>> No.56326665

any 4k content, pretty much any big AAA movie going forward from this point will release in 4k.

Also, with a 40" 4k you have identical pixel density to 34" 1440p ultrawide.

Meaning you can just run the 4k at 3440x1440p and it will be identical size and density as your ultrawide, just instead of a bezel you will have black bars and then the bezel.

IDK about you, but I can deal with having black bars.

and like I said, i'm waiting for a 100hz+ 40" 4k which is why I called you stupid for getting a 28" 60hz 4k.

>> No.56326683
File: 50 KB, 865x636, spec2016.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i'm about to add two additional SSD's once i install this PCIe SATA controller

>> No.56326718

Watching fucking movies at my desk? On a 34 monitor? What are you fucking 14?

No i own my own house and will watch 4K movies on my 70" 4K TV with my LG 9.1 Meme surround sound system.

21:9 is perfect for games.

>yes the gamer pc meme

>> No.56326758
File: 50 KB, 763x578, Speccy64_2016-08-28_18-15-54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just upgraded. The i7 6700k I got wasn't a very good overclocker so it's at 4.3ghz.

>> No.56326774

Fuck sorry to hear that man. That's always my fear. .1ghz over stock is rough tho.

>> No.56326919

Yeah, I could definitely push it to 4.4 but I would have to set the voltage uncomfortably high. Higher than 1.350v for it.

>> No.56327059

Yeah definitely not worth it.

>> No.56327225

Nvidia drops proper support for theor cards much sooner than amd. Amd drivers get better over time. Hence amd might just be a better bang for the buck

>> No.56327312

On the other hand it's still quite a step up from my asrock h97 pro4 motherboard and i5 4430 at 3Ghz

>> No.56327334

No doubt, I would have went for the 5820k but 6700k is great too.

>> No.56327510

this is me >>56317808

am i supposed to overclock my GPU or what?

>> No.56327531

Nvidia does not drop "proper support" for their cards earlier than AMD. In fact, AMD drops it earlier, but it doesn't really matter because both support the cards that are a couple of years old.

It only gets bad with cards that are older than ~5 years, eg AMD has very poor support for HD 5xxx series now.

>> No.56327555

For 1080p 60hz, no. You do need to trash that 8350, it's slowing you down more than anything else.

>> No.56327575

This, the difference is amd never has good support for their cards.

>> No.56327699
File: 32 KB, 646x371, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56327756

Guys, i'm about to buy a 1070


>> No.56327759

i think i have 144hz option on this monitor. idk how to enable it tho

>> No.56327764


>> No.56327775


>> No.56327776

>pretending he has a choice between DDR3 and DDR4.

>> No.56327802


the ATI hd 5000 and 6000 latest driver is Crimson Edition 16.2.1 Beta, and it's release on 3/1/2016. HD 4000 3000 2000 and x1000 series otherwise are complete dead no more support.

pick the one with better warranty and support on your country.

>> No.56327810

2133mhz is not the slowest.

>> No.56327844

>le ram speed matters meme

>> No.56327852

2133 ddr4 is low as it goes m8

>> No.56327870

>le poorfag opinion matters meme

>> No.56327880

Those cards work poorly in a lot of games. Don't know why that is, because GTX 480 for example works pretty decent even in modern games.

>> No.56327918

ooooh i go to nvidia control panel. jeezus i am retarded

>> No.56327920

JEDEC say you are wrong. 2133mhz is actually the highest standard. 1600mhz is the lowest.

>> No.56327932

In Windows you go to the resolution settings and select the advanced adapter options or you could do it through the nvidia control panel.

>> No.56328052


>> No.56328146

yea i just figured it out, thnx. i have been at 60Hz for like two months of having this PC, didn't even know it

>> No.56328150

ddr4 goes up to 3200+

>> No.56328187

no what processor can i get if i only have am3+ port in my mother board?

me right now>>56317808

>> No.56328194

OC frequency. Not standard.

>> No.56328243

Whats wrong with the i5 6600k

>> No.56328463

I think your best option would be to get a new motherboard if you want to upgrade your processor. You could either switch to Intel or if you want to stick with AMD then you may want to wait for their Zen CPUs to release next year.

>> No.56328614
File: 84 KB, 700x465, speccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Fell for the Xeon meme, built a computer with a 1230v5. Now I'm saving some money for an M.2 2280.

>> No.56328622

sheeit. ok thaNKS

>> No.56328645

absolutely nothing,
its a powerful cpu with plenty of overclocking capabilities

he's just jealous

>> No.56328851
File: 18 KB, 521x412, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Just built it. What should I upgrade? Got the GPU for free

>> No.56328863

Upgrade the gpu...

>> No.56328869

Obviously. I've got a gtx 1060 coming, forgot to mention that

>> No.56328872

should double the amount of ram as well,
8 gigs is puny these days

>> No.56328884

Upgrading the RAM was definitely something I was planning on doing next.

>> No.56329125
File: 45 KB, 745x575, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

waiting on my 1080

>> No.56329507
File: 40 KB, 654x524, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

tfw could build another good computer for the cost of your monitor

>> No.56329927


>> No.56330055

I got lucky in the panel lottery, no backlight bleed or dead pixels, panel OCs to 100hz with no problems

>> No.56330248


Remember when Acer used to make PCs and not just monitors.
>panels anywhere near Dell

Remember when lucky and lottery used to mean getting your own board panel, company.

>> No.56331374
File: 501 KB, 1649x1312, Image 002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm on a Dell XPS 15 here, they didn't have the 500 GB SSD version and I couldn't buy in in my country. Is my HDD good enough or should I replace it in the future?

>> No.56331476
File: 88 KB, 742x740, 1472517487604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56331726
File: 33 KB, 652x466, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Really dissatisfied with my setup. Dont buy an i5 or a 1070...

>> No.56331728
File: 17 KB, 500x326, Screenshot_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Temps for CPU sucks, going to be installing a hyper 212 evo soon.

>> No.56332094

>not having a CAS latency of 5 on your DDR5 RAM
shit build/10

>> No.56332886
File: 42 KB, 658x524, gaymen pc speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56332906

>tfw gtx 970 is having frame rate hitching
iunno what to do, if it's cpu related or what i7. shit is depressing.

>> No.56332935

post your specs and we might be able to tell you something

>> No.56332948
File: 3.96 MB, 5312x2988, 20160829_140556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56332972
File: 45 KB, 715x562, Jetzel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

The Hyper 212 Evo is a pretty good all around heatsink.

>> No.56332977
File: 43 KB, 658x535, HALP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56332990

Why is your CPU so hot? Are you running a stress test or some shit?

>> No.56332996

Your CPU looks like it could use better cooling, also whats up with your motherboard temps?

>> No.56333010

Just running SC2...I honestly think it's always ran this hot. Should I try and turn up the fans...somehow?
I have no idea :[

>> No.56333019

I feel like that shouldn't bring your temps up into the 60s, that's kinda ridiculous.

>> No.56333315

Ok! It only has one box fan, should I get another? And this was a prebuilt, so maybe there's thermal paste issues...I'm no expert. I raised the fan to the max speed just now at least.

>> No.56333380
File: 40 KB, 716x550, Untitledd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Please rate my new housefire. I just upgraded from 2 gtx 480's to the new rx 480 housefire.

>> No.56333718

how the fuk do u even

ru running this in like a 5 deg environment

>> No.56333745
File: 63 KB, 733x1106, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56333747

how the fuck are the skylakes so cool

>> No.56333774

fake is fake

>> No.56333788
File: 39 KB, 660x528, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

this is some dope shit,
core is @ 4.4
didn't have the guts to go higher

>> No.56333792

not this guy >>56332977

>> No.56333803
File: 20 KB, 480x396, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56333808

>tfw people having a giggle at your computer and you don't know what to do about it
Fucking a.

>> No.56333822

Just surprised at the low temps compared to the other ones lol

>> No.56333842

time for update windows, can't u get win8 for free? or is that crakt?

>> No.56333844

how can you live with so little storage

>> No.56333850

You said it was a prebuilt? Do you have the stock cooler? Cause if you do you really should look into getting a better heatsink

>> No.56333867
File: 3.21 MB, 1065x786, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

shit forgot to include pic

>> No.56333895

Was that sarcasm or is the joke that you have less storage than him?

>> No.56333904

I dont like Win8 or 10. I've used both and prefer Win7 because it's comfy and I don't like the Win8/Win10 interface

>> No.56333909


>> No.56333939


>> No.56334192
File: 79 KB, 833x530, poor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>2x4:3 screens
Was playing rome 2 so that should explains the cpu&gpu temp

>> No.56334713

I might just be retarded, but whats the point in running 2 very different NVidia gpu's they clearly don't SLI. Or is it not for gaymen?

>> No.56334732

Using a noctua u14s in a cool room.

>> No.56335030

Bottleneck is real

>> No.56335054

Forgive me. But let me ask a stupid question. You guys talk a lot about computer hardware components, and how much better a newly released consumer GPU is compared to a year-old one. But you rarely talk about just exactly what component is responsible for the operations of specific activities on the computer. For example; what hardware component(s) are primarily responsible for ensuring the fastest OS startup from boot? The main hardware components are the CPU, GPU, RAM, and HD or SSD, yes? Well, what is responsible for what exactly? Is there a hard and fast rule? Can I request a nice neat breakdown of what component is responsible for specific tasks on a computer?

Can I get a breakdown something like this:
>move/copy files (HD/SSD 90%, RAM 10%, GPU 0%, CPU 0%)

>render large media files
>play super HQ video files
>record lossless screencasts without suffering frame skips
>software open/close
>computer boot/shutdown/sleep

People speak vaguely about what each component does. Like, someone will describe the CPU by saying it's the 'brain of the computer, responsible for abstract math processing'. But what the fuck does that mean in reality? Is a fast CPU crucial for rendering super HQ video, as number-crunching is important for displaying graphics? What computer task heavily relies on a good CPU? Can you get away with having a shit CPU but max out the other components? I just want to deconstruct this ambiguity and understand it better. Because currently, it just seems best to pool money into getting the best of each component because who can tell really what performance you're going to get from your computer if you got second-rate RAM.

>> No.56335065
File: 53 KB, 688x504, IMG_20160830_032905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56335187

4.5ghz @ 1.17v - h110i gt
980ti classified
g.skill 1866/cl9 4x4gb
g2 750w

>> No.56335193
File: 36 KB, 660x497, abigail.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

im a retard

>> No.56335220


senpai you have a 1060 i wouldn't brag
enjoy being stuck at a perpetual 3.3GHz since we all know you don't even know what bclk means.

>muh 60hz monitors

>> No.56335245
File: 56 KB, 1920x1040, 2016-08-30_17-53-49.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56335347

Its not that bad actually, or probably because I havent played any cpu-intense game

>> No.56337185


>> No.56337232
File: 102 KB, 915x682, Uten navn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

The motherboard temp is false.

>> No.56338442


>> No.56338450

how does that even happen

>> No.56338831
File: 23 KB, 673x528, 1444050122713.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Doesn't work

>> No.56340382

>being German

>> No.56341996
File: 43 KB, 718x585, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

no bullying pls

>> No.56342039
File: 137 KB, 825x656, Speccy64_2016-08-30_11-34-13.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

new laptop :DD
am i missing anything? (besides gpu)

>> No.56342072

god damn man

>> No.56342077

>le no bullying pls maymay
go kill yourself

>> No.56342099
File: 1.96 MB, 2988x3942, IMG_20160830_113913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56342117
File: 136 KB, 1030x1020, 1430165337474.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56342176
File: 10 KB, 236x178, nicerabbit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

its ok

/g/ is a board of peace

>> No.56342184

Is this a Windows 10 thread?

>> No.56342205
File: 52 KB, 150x231, dae0b93aa67338523d6537f57e1f7d67.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56342907

>muh overclock
fucking gamer children.

>> No.56343635

According to the fan in the room it's was 19C at the time.

I'm using the 650 to run an extra analog monitor

>> No.56344030
File: 37 KB, 659x523, speccyrig.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56344167
File: 49 KB, 582x444, specs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ive got some cash to burn. Besides an ssd. What should i upgrade?
Priority is ssd + 1 upgrade

>> No.56345047
File: 25 KB, 522x380, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

CPU is 6850K Six Core. Ram is really high MHz.

>> No.56345107
File: 66 KB, 674x532, ss+(2016-07-17+at+01.44.56).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

laptop broke been on this pc for shit 1.5 months new pc coming tomorrow god damn wasted time

>> No.56345258

>According to the fan in the room it's was 19C at the time.

>> No.56345521

Not really, the temp sensors could either be rounding up or down, the fan in my room is currently reading 21 and speccy is going between 20 and 21. I am running an adaptive voltage with a 4.7GHz oc the voltage is pretty low at idle.

>> No.56345549

>not getting the most out of your hardware for the money you spent

you might as well just not turn your pc on, mate

>> No.56345569


no r8s?

>> No.56345607

How does one make their taskbar look like that instead of the apps minimizing into their icons?

>> No.56345624

>taskbar buttons: never combine

>> No.56345679

>he wants to play russian roulette with hardware instead of getting something validated with more testing than he could ever put it through
fucking gamer kids.

>> No.56345695
File: 22 KB, 554x399, Lap specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.56345721
File: 47 KB, 244x325, kek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>implying overclocking is russian roulette

lol. overclocking takes a day at most and if you're not a complete retard you'll never risk your shit dying before an upgrade cycle.

admit it, anon, you can't overclock because you're not sure how to do it and ACTUALLY DON'T know what bclk means

go back to facebook

>> No.56345762

>you don't know what this thing is that's why you're afraid of it
Not everyone on here is doing nothing but playing games. If you want high clock speeds, you buy a processor binned for it and validated. You have no guarantee of a stable overclock and it's difficult to test as thoroughly as Intel or AMD can and do.

>> No.56345781
File: 146 KB, 776x535, speccy 6-6-16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.56345795

nothing is guaranteed so you don't even bother?

why do you even breathe then if you won't at least live to have sex?

>> No.56345857

>over clocking
>Russian roulette
What, do you just put in random numbers for vcore or something and hope it works out? OCing is easy as shit

>> No.56345871

you're a big baka

>> No.56345881

no bak u

>> No.56345896

Really it all depends on what you want or have money to spend. Yeah so my pc has 32GB of ram. Do I use it all? Hell no. But ram is cheap so I thought what the hell and loaded up on it. Do I play the latest games? Nope, so I don't need a 400 dollar graphics card. Long as your pc does what you need, leave it be.

>> No.56345908

you're a big baka

>> No.56345919
File: 39 KB, 996x662, wew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

the ssd was a comfy upgrade

>> No.56346011

>nothing is guaranteed
Literally what you pay for.

Nice try, retard.

>> No.56346108
File: 111 KB, 1271x780, 1080 SLI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


And here is 3D Mark

>Better than 99% of all results

Feels good man. That PC was a fucking PAIN to build. It had so many problems. Fuck.

>> No.56346621

Youre completely fucking retarded if you actually think that there a risk to overclocking hardware. Hell, all the K processors are unlocked so people can buy custom coolers and OC them by at least 20% without ever even being forced to touch the voltage. There only starts to be risk as soon as you up voltages and OC a 3.5 base to something like 4.5+ with heatsink and fan instead of AiO. Hundreds if not thousands of people are running their CPU at higher clock. Are they not eligible for testing stuff or do you claim that all of them are just lucky? Unless you plan to use your hardware for 10 years there isnt a single reason to not OC shit.

>> No.56346652

>Unless you plan to use your hardware for 10 years there isnt a single reason to not OC shit.
Except, you know, stability.

>> No.56346668

>tfw arch
>tfw ssd makes everything faster
comfy t b honest

>> No.56346725

Again, unless you pass a certain threshold there will never be stability issues. You can clock a fucking 6600k from 3.5 to 4.3 without touching the voltage and there will never be stability issues. I did it myself. Same with the 6700k that you can up from 4 to 4.6 without touching anything but the multiplier. Stability issues are only caused if the temp or voltage of the CPU are off, which wont be the case unless you run a fucking stock cooler. Custom fans and AiO system keep the CPU cool at all time so stability issues will never be a problem.

Hell, EVEN IF you run into stability issues you can just reset the CMOS and tune down the clock if you are too afraid of touching the voltage. You PC doesnt fucking blow up if you ended up OCing it too much. Thats not how fucking hardware works. Degradation only happens if you mistreat your hardware for a long duration, like run a Skylake CPU at avg 1.35V for a year or something. You processor doesnt lose half of its life span because it can at a higher clock for half an hour. Jesus fucking Christ.

>> No.56346751

So why aren't people doing actual work overclocking their PCs?

>> No.56346800

Because most
a) are tech illiterates (hell, I bet at least 90% of all PC users have never even touched their BIOS)
b) are too afraid of damaging something and AS SOON AS the get one black screen reset everything and never touch the BIOS again
c) make unreasonable purchases (for example dont even need the stock power)
d) buy hardware that doesnt even give them the ability to overclock (for 1151 socket you need a Z170 board for example)
e) They dont even know what overclocking is

>> No.56346941

So it's because they're stupid and not because there are reasons overclocking is a bad idea?

>> No.56347144

I wouldnt say that people who are uninformed or tech illiterates are stupid per se. How many people really build their own PC? How many actually care? Modern society got used to replacing completely functional hardware for new hardware that doesnt even provide heavily improved performance. You have people who buy a new phone every year. The same people probably do the same with laptops and hardly any of them buy hardware that CAN be overclocked.

Look at the specifications of this or you average prebuild

They dont even tell you what type of processor it is. No way in hell is that an unlocked one, so for most people its not even an option to overclock because their hardware doesnt allow it. Not even the $900 prebuilds on Newegg use unlocked CPUs. This group probably makes up for 90% of all consumers. Then you have 10% who build their own computer (probably only half that if not even less). Most of them are either too lazy to do research on simple shit like hardware or too scared of overclocking to actually do it (see blackscreen example, they just stop as soon as their PC crashed once and are happy about shit still booting). This group probably makes up for 9% of the people who build their own computer.

Then you have the 1% of PC users that actually OCs and builds a PC with OCing in mind. Its a fraction of the market, the fraction that keeps this whole 'muh gaymer' hardware market alive because they are the only ones who even have use for GAMING LABELED MAINBOARD and shit, because only they actually make use of the OCing features etc. The people who are actively endangering their hardware are the 0.1%. These people are specifically buying hardware for benchmarks. They buy entire AiO system just to get a 6600k from 3.5 to 4.9Ghz and knowingly blow up their shit because they planned on replacing their stuff within 12 months anyway. They are the only ones who push the hardware to its limit, no one else really does.

>> No.56347584
File: 40 KB, 752x627, 2011.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I haven't had to upgrade my system in so many fucking years, and it still handles everything thrown at it. What use would any human have for a CPU greater than a quad core overclocked to 3.8ghz?

When did technology stagnate?

>> No.56347593

You should probably post this in the new speccy thread, this one just hit 310 which is the bump limit here so you wont get too many replies if any.

>> No.56347600


That's alright, I appreciate you doing your civic duty, though.

>> No.56347666
File: 69 KB, 1280x768, ImCurrentlyDyingInMyComputerScienceMajorPleaseSendHelp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

File name is not bait

>> No.56347984
File: 49 KB, 926x668, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

ignore the second 1080p monitor, it's connected twice for reasons

>> No.56348002


derp ty, was stuck reading a thread so I had an older cached version

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.