Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 115 KB, 565x896, cb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55611659 No.55611659 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

post your scores


this is at my 24/7 oc of 4.6ghz

>> No.55612212

4.6 is pussy shit. Pushing 4.9 on the same chip on air.

>> No.55612227

>>55612212
post your temps under prime95

>> No.55612298
File: 31 KB, 371x723, Cinebench R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612298

>>55611659
Cpu is at 4.4ghz

>> No.55612509
File: 20 KB, 368x437, Cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612509

About what I expected. Probably could have gotten a slightly better result by turning a few programs off, but I'm too lazy

>> No.55612529

>>55612509
that is pretty bad results...but laptop processors are always neutered...

>> No.55612596

>>55612529
It's good enough for me. As long as I can play games without making them ugly I'm happy. Beats trying to lug around a desktop too.

It does make me long for the day that I have $4000 and literally nothing to spend it on but a new computer.

>> No.55612667
File: 10 KB, 376x166, R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612667

>>55611659
stock 4770k ill do a test on my servers stock 4670k, posting pic soon

>> No.55612697
File: 115 KB, 356x589, R15 server.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612697

>>55612667

>> No.55612712
File: 17 KB, 570x385, StockSkylake.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612712

Stock 6700k here. I can get to 4.7ghz on stock voltage. Just lazy and haven't bothered really.

>> No.55612797

>>55612712
Is this under clocked? 811 is really low for a stock 6700k.

>> No.55612880

>>55612667
>>55612697
same guy here, there is one thing that weirds me out with my 4770k or motherboard, i dont know. everytime Turbocore or the CPU itself is over its stock speed by 0.0001mhz it always fucks my computer. regular mouse freezes, keyboard hangs up. you name it. but it doesnt freeze the computer itself, JUST keyboard and mouse. so i cant overclock, it just fucks me in my ass when i touch the multiplier

>> No.55612883
File: 19 KB, 332x439, Untitled2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612883

Is this good? I think it took 20 minutes to run the benchmark.

>> No.55612893

>>55612883
that's the shittiest score i've seen from a non AMD cpu, even my intel HD can do better with the OpenGL test

>> No.55612930

>>55612883
Can you overclock it at all? That's a pretty low core speed

>> No.55612948
File: 55 KB, 492x699, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612948

>> No.55612976

>>55612930
I don't think I should. it got to 89 C running the benchmark.

>> No.55612986
File: 20 KB, 370x439, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55612986

>> No.55612989

>>55612976
Case dusted?
Thermal paste fresh?
Decent cooler?
Airflow good?

>> No.55613061

>>55612986
what clock speed & temp

>> No.55613165
File: 34 KB, 358x888, morph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55613165

4.8

>> No.55613177

>>55613165
how is that 4.8 ?
my 4770k stock 3.5 has 715 cb or something

>> No.55613216
File: 43 KB, 504x1004, cine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55613216

Stock cock.

>> No.55613219

>>55613177

HT disabled

>> No.55613289
File: 20 KB, 373x445, Cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55613289

>> No.55613411
File: 375 KB, 943x1150, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55613411

Inched my score up with minor OC. Modern Xeons are shit for overclocking. Dat E5-2600 v3 series tho...

>> No.55613583
File: 67 KB, 415x1093, 2016-07-17_00-57-22.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55613583

>> No.55614457
File: 26 KB, 489x527, zen please.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614457

>> No.55614530

>>55614457
still higher than an i5

>> No.55614636
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614636

5820k @ 4.4GHz.

This is my 24/7 OC, I can get it stable at 4.6-4.7GHz but it would only increase the score by a little.

>> No.55614667
File: 36 KB, 371x730, CINEBENCH+Windows+64+Bit_2016-07-17_18-37-35.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614667

[email protected]

>> No.55614714
File: 2.33 MB, 2018x1110, 2016-06-27 06_39_57-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614714

>>55614636
Here is a Cinebench R11.5 run at 4.7GHz

so close to 15.

>> No.55614777
File: 32 KB, 368x607, benchmarkcpu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614777

still going strong after 6 years

>> No.55614851

>>55614777
how does it fare in real life (modern multi-core) applications?

>> No.55614880
File: 31 KB, 313x646, bench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614880

stock

>> No.55614894
File: 1.17 MB, 1444x876, Cinebench R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614894

Running at 3.3ghz, and the single core turbo is fucked all to hell because my board a shit.

>> No.55614896

>>55614880
see
>>55614457
hmmm

>> No.55614917
File: 33 KB, 365x591, benchmarkcpuandgpu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614917

>>55614851
I dont do any video rendering or cpu intensive tasks, but together with a 290x a have never run in serious problems (60+ fps everywhere), altough I think it will be time soon to upgrade

>> No.55614927
File: 32 KB, 372x673, cine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614927

My CPU's getting old...

no longer stable at 4.6ghz OC, gave up benching it/toying in the BIOS.

day/day stuff is no problem though so thats a positive, though I have no idea when ill have the $ to build a new rid it could be worse.

>> No.55614978

>>55614927
>320 cb

You posted the graph for the OpenGL score, you'd be nowhere near the top on the CPU graph.

>> No.55615001

>>55614978
yea my bad, graphs pointless though the numbers above are correct

>> No.55615004

>>55614927
>That OpenGL Score
?!?!

>> No.55615032

>>55615001
Sure but if you showed the CPU graph it'd be a lot more obvious that CPU is slower than intel laptop CPUs.

Just pretty misleading unless you actually know what the cb number means and just looking at your screen shot alone would not give you much info. Obviously if you know cinebench R15 you know its a shit score, but someone else wouldnt know.

>> No.55615061
File: 31 KB, 374x674, cineredo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55615061

>>55615032
>>55615004

redid it, totally don't wanna mislead anyone on 4chan

>> No.55615065

>>55614927
How the fuck do you get more fps than
>>55614917

>> No.55615084

>>55615065
dunno

its just a overclocked 7870myst(essentially a 7930)

>> No.55615200

>>55614457
forgot to do the opgl score

>> No.55615211
File: 38 KB, 500x831, zen please 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55615211

>>55615200
>forgot pic

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action