Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 60 KB, 1245x747, cinebench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55309972 No.55309972 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Post your Cinebench R15 scores

>> No.55309991

>>55309972
How about everyone post your single core scores

>> No.55310022

>>55309991
Why?

>> No.55310026

R11.5 is better in my opinion for CPU comparisons.

>> No.55310132
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55310132

>> No.55310269
File: 17 KB, 379x328, xd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55310269

>> No.55310545
File: 34 KB, 293x263, WPRnRXv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55310545

Got the 8320 on sale for $130 and a corsair a50 for $5 at the thrift store. Pretty comfortable score for me given the circumstance.

>> No.55310573
File: 1.17 MB, 1444x876, Cinebench R15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55310573

Fun chip.

>> No.55310598

>>55309972
About 1k on a xeon x5650 at 4.2Ghz with HT on. Too busy to look for the file for proof.

>> No.55311440
File: 275 KB, 1906x1073, 2016-06-29_00-17-17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55311440

@4.5GHz. Could push it to 4.6 or 7 for this, but it's too much of a pain in the ass.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action