[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 102 KB, 1024x768, titla.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
51880308 No.51880308 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Speccy thread:richfag edition

>> No.51880334


>> No.51880359

it's okay to be jelly (x

>> No.51880360

Install ublock origin you asshole

>> No.51880369

Keep wasting your money richfag. I'm perfectly fine with my 383

>> No.51880427
File: 160 KB, 600x1024, 44 euro tablet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This is my really expensive tablet. It almost cost 50€

>> No.51880458
File: 2.45 MB, 2592x1944, IMG_20151213_194523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Also has some very interesting BIOS options. I wonder what would happen if I changed this setting.

>> No.51880489
File: 104 KB, 674x532, IMG_13122015_210804-20151214_012708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Does this count as richfag?

>> No.51880505

>shitty monitors
>OS probably installed on HDD even though you have an SSD

>> No.51880538
File: 38 KB, 749x562, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Which one should I upgrade to
FX-8320 or FX-8350?

>> No.51880567

8320, 8350 is just an overclocked 8320 and therefore a waste of money when you can just set the multiplier / volts up in the bios manually for the same / better performance

>> No.51880577
File: 105 KB, 1280x800, 2bhlad..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

My daily for the last 6 years.

>> No.51880592

thanks, thats kind of what i thought too
all I want is decent frames in csgo, so 8320 should suffice

>> No.51880598

OS is on my SSD. Monitors are shitty because they were free so I didn't bother spending more dosh on newer ones.

>> No.51880610
File: 200 KB, 1065x753, speccy1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

no, this does though

>> No.51880638
File: 34 KB, 741x491, specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

i5 4690k OC @ 4.4GHz

>> No.51880643
File: 40 KB, 714x532, screen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm the richest fag on this board

>> No.51880665

That would probably run better with Vista or 7

>> No.51880678

>consumer laptop

>> No.51880684
File: 12 KB, 179x282, 491.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.51880691

Thanks bro

>> No.51880696


>> No.51880711
File: 59 KB, 889x515, speccy-2015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

how well would Fallout run?

>> No.51880718
File: 40 KB, 798x483, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51880720
File: 46 KB, 669x526, ucantbeatme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You can't beat me faggots

>> No.51880777
File: 51 KB, 1063x679, speccy yo v3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Bonus option if the price is right: 8320e due to the lower voltage it needs - simply clock it up as high as you can cool it.

>> No.51881119

Wow, that is bad.
Enjoy your heat and deteriorating hardware

On my 8350, I hit over 5ghz under 1.4v a while back
And 5.5ghz on 1.55v a while back

Don't advocate these kind of unsafe overclocks to people. 1.4v is high, and 1.43 even higher. Not that short runs will do anything, but for 1.43v I would expect 5.0ghz easily.

>> No.51881186

>gayming laptop
Fucking reatrd

>> No.51881232
File: 44 KB, 813x561, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51881278

I use it for digital media and Adobe Suite, 3dsmax, Rhino, etc. I'm an architect student.

>> No.51881310

>richfag edition
>posts an average pc

>> No.51881315

Torrent it and try it out faggot
It's unoptimized shit so it'll run just not amazing.

>> No.51881342

>someone who actually invested in his studies by getting a decent laptop
You dun good bro. Most people skimp on computer-related stuff.

>> No.51881394

We use the same theme anon

>> No.51881469

>780 Ti
Are you me? Also, nice stock cooler senpai

>> No.51881549

How's the battery life?

>> No.51881553

it doesn't actually

>> No.51881875
File: 88 KB, 809x614, MuhSpex.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51881888

What voltage did you set to get to 4.4

>> No.51882000
File: 157 KB, 1086x629, specs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm rich af desu

>> No.51882043
File: 47 KB, 861x703, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51882065

>980 Ti
For what pvrpose

>> No.51882105

144hz monitor

also why the hell not?

>> No.51882123
File: 2 KB, 304x58, i9 at idle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


can't beat my i9

>> No.51882138

id like to see how that does after an hour of prime95

>> No.51882199 [DELETED] 

Some of these make me not feel bad about my build which is over 2 years old now.

Been thinking about a fresh build though but just doesn't seem like hardware has really made big enough jumps that much of my stuff is too outdated.
Might just get new monitors, and a new 2-3TB HDD.

>> No.51882201
File: 254 KB, 1366x768, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51882211
File: 59 KB, 558x389, currentspeccy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Some of these make me not feel bad about my build which is over 2 years old now.

Been thinking about a fresh build though but just doesn't seem like hardware has really made big enough jumps that much of my stuff is too outdated.
Might just get new monitors, and a new 2-3TB HDD.

>> No.51882218

stock cooler on which?

It doesn't show but the cpu is at 4.7 ghz

Stock cooler on the GPU though.

>> No.51882249
File: 39 KB, 664x449, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

yeah i'm a super rich fag.

>> No.51882288
File: 46 KB, 775x573, Screenshot 2015-12-15 16.10.08.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Am I Cool enough?

>> No.51882308

>46 at idle
nigguh you best be alt tabbed out of a game or have like 3 monitors

>> No.51882322

Man, if you guys are so rich, where are your raid 0 setups?

>> No.51882329

I live in the carribean, so it's kind of hot, like always.

>> No.51882346

>not having a separate storage server.

>> No.51882348
File: 113 KB, 500x394, img.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

real richfag here xD

>> No.51882359
File: 42 KB, 662x526, hi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.51882363

damn dude that sucks. you ever try setting custom fan curves using msi afterburner?

>> No.51882364
File: 92 KB, 675x525, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

a big upgrade from an amd fx 4xxx line. well satisfied with the performance.

>> No.51882410

wel memd

>> No.51882415

I could try. But it sure would make it a bit louder and since the case is right beside me. 46c is that hot for idle, anyway?

>> No.51882416

>. you ever try setting custom fan curves using msi afterburner?
im gaming :P

>> No.51882418

What the fuck is that thing

>> No.51882443
File: 106 KB, 1008x1216, 1446929530464.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]



How's that 7970 performance treating you?

>> No.51882487

honestly it is a bit high. what are your temps under load? thats what really matters the most

>> No.51882491
File: 249 KB, 453x532, i7speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>tfw poor but still have a decent computer

>> No.51882492

What thing?

>> No.51882495
File: 1.99 MB, 250x158, 1338054174611.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.51882511

it doesn't go beyond 70c at 100% usage

>> No.51882527
File: 47 KB, 967x556, temps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Are my temps ok?

>> No.51882544

Im gaming!

>> No.51882592
File: 102 KB, 597x781, Crysis_01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

you wot

>> No.51882611

what are they like under load?

>> No.51882624

thats not too bad. Even with a slight fan curve you could bring that down a bit

>> No.51882638

I'll see what I can do I. Thanks anon.

>> No.51882640

Yes im playing gta 5 right now (ultra settings)

>> No.51882657
File: 230 KB, 1400x652, 2015-12-15_15-39-41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I don't know why Speccy always reports my CPU temps as wrong as they are.

>> No.51882682
File: 440 KB, 1280x1024, Bildschirmfoto.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51882693
File: 28 KB, 500x610, farcry4_2560_1440.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


There is a reason why older benchmarks match yours and newer ones have them closer to my chart. These days a 780 (non ti) is often competing against a 7970.

Even in this pic a 280x isn't the mile behind a 780ti it should be.

>> No.51882694

Good job posting a nvidia title that LITERALLY renders an extremely tessellated INVISIBLE OCEAN under the player model to abuse the fact the nvidia penalty is 10~20% of the average fps, vs 30~40% (amd's).

>> No.51882706
File: 50 KB, 860x724, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

dual cpu reporting in

>> No.51882707

when you alt tab out your temps are going to drop to normal idle temps so thats not accurate

>> No.51882742


The tessellated ocean is crysis 2, not 3.

>> No.51882749

more like latino edition

>> No.51882754


Speccy will report sub ambient temps for FX chips because speccy cannot into AMD's sensor (which I believe is the same on their newer chips as well).

>> No.51882801

How much does such a setup cost today? The CPUs are 6 years old now so they should not be that expensive.

>> No.51882832

most expensive bit was the motherboard
cpu's are peanuts, those ones were either $40 each or $20 each

>> No.51882913

Had my Intel core 2 duo E7500 for 5 euros, so yeah its cheap

>> No.51882938

Yeah, but who wants a C2D these days

>> No.51882947
File: 56 KB, 796x537, Schermopname (124).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.51882974

These charts could also be different clocks. Not to mention the 380X is a SLIGHT bit better than the 7970, and it's price reflects that.

I'm not saying a 780 ti wasn't rediculously expensive when it came out, but used nowadays you can get them for a similar price as a 380X

>> No.51883064
File: 39 KB, 674x532, spec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Step aside, plebeian.

>> No.51883090
File: 45 KB, 608x442, Speccy B85.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Poorfag build I put together out of mostly spare parts/free/on sale parts. Going to a friend of mine who got a used 280x to pop in it.

>> No.51883114
File: 35 KB, 660x526, poorfaggotry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm poor as fuck, /g/.

>> No.51883140

How do you only h ave a 2GB 980 ti?

>> No.51883158


Thats missing the point - the 780ti should be competing against a 290x when it clearly isn't anymore. You shouldn't be able to get a 7970/280x even close to reference clocked 780ti performance as thats two whole tiers of performance above it. Remember: the 7970 existed to dethrone a 680.

>> No.51883216
File: 35 KB, 710x539, Untitled2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not as rich as some of you. Still pick up $1500 Ultra Gaming Rigs on CL erryday.

>> No.51883273

But how can that be, When the 780 ti was beating the 970 in benchmarks when the 970 was released, and every chart you've linked has it sitting above the 780 ti?

I bet it has something to do with the 3GB limitations when the 380x has 4GB

And if that's the case then 1080p benchmarks would reflect that, and 1440p benchmarks of newer games would obviously bring them closer.

>> No.51883307
File: 81 KB, 635x970, 2656279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


No 780ti, but the 280x is nibbling on a 970. Tahiti truly is GOAT.

>> No.51883325
File: 21 KB, 636x542, Speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

As long as you don't count my water cooling kit i'm middle class

>> No.51883332

Do you think this has something to do with mantle? the 290x clearly competed with the 780 ti before, but not now. I guess AMD just nailed it with their software updates.

>> No.51883360


Given the game does not support mantle I do not believe that is a factor. I also severely doubt AMD nailed their driver updates to that degree so there is clearly something else going on.

>> No.51883408

Oh well, honestly I'm still happy with mine. Tbh I was going to get a 290x 2 years ago but this was when they just came out and were on back order for months because of mining. 780 ti was in stock and it was a very generous gift.

I don't play many graphic intensive games anymore anyways, and if I was I'd save up and get a Titan X because triple monitor gaming

>> No.51883427

i have one as well and for somereason it shows the same on speccy, but on everything else it shows the full amount

>> No.51883473

fuck that shit, who cares what it's branded to do, the specs are fucking high. also not me you replied to.

this guy gets it

if I'm getting a laptop, I want it to last. the ROG badge does not negate specs.

>> No.51883534
File: 85 KB, 751x924, speccy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Do I count?

>> No.51883537


>> No.51883545

>those displays
>almost 2016
Sure anon... You're rich...

>> No.51883566
File: 53 KB, 816x717, specceh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Do I count?

>> No.51883568

>ROG badge does not negate specs.
It does negate battery life
You know, the reason why I want a laptop is for mobile usage

>> No.51883628
File: 42 KB, 646x491, specs and cores.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>that Intel SSD 750 1.2TB
How's it treating you friend. Thinking about getting one as well.

>> No.51883685
File: 179 KB, 1280x1024, xp_bitches.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

yeeeeeeeeeah motherbitches come fuck with me!

>> No.51883727
File: 17 KB, 472x343, erferv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

you could cut back on that voltage and save you some heat

>> No.51883741

Learn how to screenshot focused windows and maybe you will find a job.

>> No.51883776
File: 47 KB, 868x463, nt4heater.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>his shitbox can even run Speccy at all
disqualified desu

>> No.51883787

Install win2k, then you can run the first release of speccy

>> No.51883808

hows the third world treating you, anon

>> No.51883828

At least get a Geforce 6

>> No.51884225
File: 358 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot (5).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

no gpu I know this but here I am.

>> No.51884288

>retarded scaling
What the fuck are you doing

>> No.51884350

im using a 42inch tv for monitor. whats wrong with explorer?

>> No.51884366

>whats wrong with explorer?
What the fuck are you doing on this website?

>> No.51884395

enjoying your digits, help me out faggot. what do I DO??? you make me feel 2 inches tall

>> No.51884418

1. Lurk more
3. Read our wiki: https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/Main_Page

>> No.51884463

fuck your Gentoo bullshit, and im trying to lurk here and ask a few questions but I get these responses. should I be using firefox instead?

>> No.51884495


>> No.51884498

nt4 is too cozy
there's nothing like the feeling of accomplishment I get when you manage to install software without breaking the system

>> No.51884522

wew lad
As I said, lurk more before posting

>> No.51884527

Prime 95 celcius, kek

>> No.51884549

are you a digits wizard? im very new to internet shite, thanks for the help friend.

>> No.51884562
File: 34 KB, 657x444, FHARQWEHET.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Should I buy an i5 4590 with shit mobo or R9 380 4GB and PSU?

>> No.51884565
File: 741 KB, 1440x900, speccy 4930K.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

more like speccy thread: animu edishon

>> No.51884619
File: 70 KB, 675x529, spec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

surprised how many people fell for the win10 meme

>> No.51884693
File: 40 KB, 880x573, Untitled2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51884805

Surprised how many people can live without virtual desktops with specs like this ;>

>> No.51884872
File: 1.43 MB, 1920x1080, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51884909


I'm surprised people can live without SPINNAN CUBEZ.

>> No.51884937

>windows 10 invented virtual desktops
You could get them since windows 95. With an MS tool.

>> No.51884975
File: 88 KB, 741x446, shick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Yep, rich as a jew.

Good laptop though.

>> No.51885190
File: 41 KB, 673x533, 980f2534896c4674a51a712119625ce9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.51885228


funny you mention it, I have been looking at either a Geforce 6200 or trying to find an ATI Radeon HD2600 or better PCI card. The machine doesn't have an AGP slot on it which severely limits what I can get for it.

If I can find one, an HD2600 has GPU based H264 video acceleration so at the very least I can watch video without it being a slideshow.

>> No.51885251


pretty well. This is the machine I use 50% of the time for my consulting business. The other 50% of the time it's a WinXP VM on my laptop.

>> No.51885319
File: 237 KB, 1100x1380, 1355739283325.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.