[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.69777656 [View]
File: 123 KB, 899x1599, IMG-20181031-WA0006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Why the HELL are there so many variations of the GTX 1050 and all without genuine comparison between which is better?

All I know is that EVGA, Palit, Asus > Zotac and Gigabyte.
But then comes the Asus Strix, Phoenix, Cerberus, MSI Aero, StormX, too many to count.
Then the ITX/Minis which sound like they're ready to crash and burn in 1 year despite *Same power as the big guy*

Can 14nm on 128-bits even utilize 4GB effectively?
Can a 4 core 2.8Ghz processor on 1333 BUS even utilize the GPU's 4GB of VRAM?

There's so much subjective- objective shit to learn and no good documentation.

View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]