Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.61572824 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61572824

Pretty glad I got this 5820k for $280 18+ months ago.

>> No.56726812 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56726812

>> No.56704461 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56704461

>>56704341
>>56704422

I hope you dont expect that to last more than a year or two at those speeds.

>> No.56654449 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56654449

>>56654332
yup, two of them might get over 1k, but one of them wont.

Even my 5820k at 4.4GHz barely manages over 1,200cb

What's the point in lying about something that is easily verifiable?

>> No.55784502 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55784502

>>55784471
I only tested at 4.4GHz for R15.

At 4.7GHz it would probably manage ~1350

>> No.55614636 [View]
File: 34 KB, 499x691, 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55614636

5820k @ 4.4GHz.

This is my 24/7 OC, I can get it stable at 4.6-4.7GHz but it would only increase the score by a little.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]