Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.79096679 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1606381223978.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79096679

intel bros... i dont feel so good...

>> No.78894036 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, intel wo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
78894036

Fellow goys, I'm afraid this may the end of the 14nm+++++++ temple.

>> No.77996747 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1497689967244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77996747

>>77996706
As waves of plastic fame go out of fashion
You're going out, going out forever unknown...

>> No.77706802 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, penis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77706802

>>77706762

>> No.77128074 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1497689967244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77128074

>>77124677
>>77124801
>4.9
Oh nonono intelbros at least IPC is the same as Zen2 right? RIGHT?

>> No.76468203 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, intell btfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
76468203

>>76467188
checked
F

>> No.76072871 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
76072871

>FCLK 2000 :)
https://twitter.com/1usmus/status/1264803081667174400
It's over intelbros...

>> No.76016273 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, intell btfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
76016273

>>76000449
>1080p
>gayming
>>>/v/

>> No.75860303 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, intell btfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75860303

>>75860229
>>75860273
>it was our turn bros
stay salty you corelet fags

>> No.75537082 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75537082

>>75536991

>> No.75339077 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75339077

>Intel has unironically become the underdog and im beginning to root for them

>> No.74596877 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74596877

>>74596846
>muh gaymes

>> No.74471822 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74471822

>>74471727
>user"benchmark"

>> No.73534562 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, Intel Wojak 08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
73534562

>>73520389
WAKE ME UP

I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.73161541 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
73161541

>>73161504
C O P E
O
P
E

>> No.72406426 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1542025819200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72406426

>>72406369
>>72406330
>>72406418
n-no more...

>> No.72240628 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1497689967244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72240628

>>72237047
>We have an updated version of GROMACS we are still running regressions on. Zen 2 has a newer AVX2 path that this benchmark is not fully taking advantage of. At first, the plan was to take it out of the result set. We do not like that inconsistency. There is a lot of value showing a legacy application performance without using all of the new architectural improvements. GROMACS is the type of HPC application that will be optimized for Zen 2 and AMD EPYC 7002 CPUs, but we still thought this result was interesting.
>Here, the AMD EPYC 7002 series is getting two primary performance bumps. First, it is seeing some benefit from the newer architectural improvements. You can see that with the dual EPYC 7601 to EPYC 7502 numbers. The newer AMD EPYC 7502 has more performance at the same core count and a lower cost. Second, one can see the impact of having 64 core CPUs.
>TDP does not equal power consumption. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 system was using 40% more power than the AMD EPYC 7742 system here. The Intel Xeon Scalable family is well known for pushing higher power consumption for AVX-512 heavy workloads.
>Even with AVX-512 and better optimizations, the Intel Xeon chips are about on par with their AMD counterparts, yet use more power to deliver similar performance. We look at this as more of a worst-case scenario for EPYC 7002 and it is still competitive.
I-it... it's over bros.

>> No.72214939 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1561518932611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72214939

>>72214900
FUCKING DELETE THIS

>> No.71894677 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, intell btfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71894677

>>71892745
>3900x beats an $8,725 intel processor

>> No.71787379 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1542025819200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71787379

>>71787337
>>71787311
>>71787263
>>71787118
>>71787083
>>71787066
>>71786977
n-no...

>> No.71761554 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1533513120928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71761554

>>71761541

>> No.71749234 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1538161415582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71749234

>>71745964
Intelfags few days ago: "ah, intlel doesn't need magical ram"
Intelfags today: "reee it's not fair that intcel's ram is slower (yet at max supported speed)"
also
>plis sir, disable half the cores to make it fair
literally on suicide watch

>> No.71726859 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1526744257435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71726859

Intel still hasn't announced something to combat the new ryzen

I'm beginning to think that they don't have anything

>> No.71685112 [View]
File: 123 KB, 638x599, 1538161415582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71685112

P-please please for the love of Jesus, please let me switch over to the AMD side and accept me AMDbros. I hate my 8700k now.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]