Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.71572768 [View]
File: 172 KB, 1946x1178, hierarchy-of-evidence2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71572768

>>71572733
I love how you keep posting this as if it actually means anything. There are literally hundreds of confounding variables in that case which make it practically useless to draw any meaningful conclusion from.

>> No.71377688 [View]
File: 172 KB, 1946x1178, hierarchy-of-evidence2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71377688

>>71377622
>There's ~2600 studies
None of which conclusively prove that non-ionizing radiation is harmful to humans in the amounts that cellular networks output. If the very best study you can put forward is a flawed animal trial then I'm afraid you won't be stopping the behemoth that is the global telecoms industry anytime soon

>> No.71359646 [View]
File: 172 KB, 1946x1178, hierarchy-of-evidence2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71359646

>>71359452
>case report
Into the trash it goes.

>> No.71203773 [View]
File: 172 KB, 1946x1178, hierarchy-of-evidence2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71203773



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]