Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.79433780 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1580742530596.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79433780

Any way to tell it to use one network interface (my VPN) when available, but default back to another (my normal one) if now? When I'm torrenting anime etc. I don't give a fuck about starting my VPN, and I don't feel like going into options every time to switch it back, then back to VPN when I'm downloading something that might get the MPAA uppity.

>> No.78313835 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, cat question.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
78313835

>>78313699
send wallpaper please

>> No.77424273 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1596108520216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77424273

>>77419213
Do Linuxtards with their tiny marketshare (especially for production and gaming) really think Nvidia gives a shit about them? They should be glad Nvidia dedicates any time whatsoever to Linux.

Them thinking they can give ultimatums is the definition of hubris.

>> No.77046583 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1573786451899.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77046583

>>77045234
>switch from OpenVPN to WG
>much faster and just all around better
>can't change IP by disconnecting and reconnecting
This obviously is desirable on certain websites, is there any way to make WG acquire a new IP when reconnecting? I assume the fact that it uses the same IP is intentional and probably part of the reason you can turn it on and off 8 times in the span of time it took OpenVPN to connect once.

>> No.76519370 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1579675750844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
76519370

>>76518121
Ok so clear this up for me:
How is it not going to be massively more expensive to send this shit up than just improving ground infrastructure? There will have to be either a lot of satellites or they'll have to be really big to handle all the traffic, have you ever seen the size of a datacenter? So you'll need either a tonne of them, or very expensive big ones. Supposedly they burn up in the atmosphere after 1-5 years? So on average they will have to be replaced every 3 years. How is that not going to be very expensive?

Also what happens when it's cloudy or worse? Massive packet loss?

>> No.75705736 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1583184668278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75705736

Why would anyone ever use Unity? If you want a game engine, why the fuck wouldn't you pick Unreal?
>miles better tools
>C++
>source access
Only case I can think of is 2D.

>> No.75233388 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1585403005905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75233388

>>75233375
Where's the lie

>> No.75087788 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1563344408512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75087788

Is there a free equivalent of Stardock's Fences, or should I pirate it?

>> No.74928527 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1575541013329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74928527

>>74925189
>on W10 LTSC
>game won't start
>people saying I need Windows Media Feature (AKA Windows Media Player, probably)
>go into install optional Windows features
>it's not there
Is it because I'm on LTSC? How do I get my hands on it?

>> No.74813352 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1573641892672.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74813352

>>74784140
>No, and will never. Wait for LTSC 2022.
Is this just a way to tell people pestering the thread for this to fuck off, or will they really take until 2022 to add that to LTSC? How much difference does it make anyway?

>> No.74653534 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1563093848945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74653534

Are there any decent OLED monitors that aren't 35"+?

>> No.74594839 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1578432053009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74594839

Buying a new PC soon-ish, but in the meantime I really need a new SSD, I'm sitting on an old OCZ 128gb from 2012 or so.
Requirements are:
>SATA (current PC is too old for NVME)
>512GB or higher
>fast enough to do some (light) work on (Houdini, assorted productivity)
>ideally cheap
Once I get my new PC I'll chuck this in as secondary drive, so no cheap chinkshit that breaks in 2 years.

Currently eyeing a Samsung 860 EVO, 512GB or 1TB variants. Is there anything else I should consider around that size and pricepoint?

>> No.74547771 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1551408514716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74547771

Why are Americans so goddamn servile?

>> No.74075831 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1574962334559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74075831

>>74071885
More importantly, what happens when we hit quantum fuckery? At this rate we'll hit it this decade, then what?

>> No.72194875 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, B6F29ADB-DD01-48DD-B8DE-4EF05118C254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72194875

>>72194832
Okay, so Twitter should allow radical islam contents because it has ‘monopoly’ on the Internet and it shouldn’t discriminate speech right?

>> No.72190170 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1539043580429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72190170

>>72188563
Does anyone honestly give a shit about security vulnerabilities aside from drones, schizos, and actual enterprise? Most of them require way more access than anyone will normally have to your desktop.

>> No.72120264 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1542354722078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72120264

I keep hearing about TLC and QLC being shit, so what are some drives that aren't? Disregarding price (within reason). Pretty sure I've seen someone go
>QLC/TLC
about even higher end NVME drives.

>> No.71733993 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1532470148465.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71733993

>>71733913
>>71733924
>>71733944
Why would Nvidia care? It gets beaten by Super and barely matches the normal 2000 series, and you have to be delusional if you think anyone will pick a AMD card over an Nvidia one at the same price, or even somewhat cheaper.

AMD has to start delivering better performance at 100$ or more less if they want anyone to buy their GPUs.

>> No.71675832 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1538461211473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71675832

>>71675469
You only play a shitty dumbed down console shooter?

>> No.71480430 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1547782563146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71480430

>gonna buy a new PC soon
>everything is obvious except the screen
>will be doing VFX work so it needs to be accurate not just gayman
Fuck do I do? Get two screens? Going to be hard to find a good gayman monitor that also has the color accuracy for productivity unless I want to pay as much as the whole PC for the monitor alone.

>> No.71298144 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1550776602420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71298144

So what happens in 30 years when US and Europe are stuck with cuck panels and windmills that can't come close to filling energy demands resulting in $1/kWh (or more) while China and Russia have almost free energy from 4th gen reactors?

>> No.71201104 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1549860602101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71201104

Any good shit shown at Computex regarding monitors? I just want a 1440p 144hz 10bit IPS (ideally with mini/micro LED backlight). Fucking hate these normalfag subhumans forcing the 4k meme so all monitors that would fit the bill must be 4k therefore they drop refresh rate or something else.

>> No.71107249 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1558657243418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71107249

>>71090417
Ok lads I am gonna get LTSC, but how do I make sure I get a proper image? I don't trust the people selling the keys when it comes to providing the image, and MS seems to give out specific trial images (likely to stop precisely what I am doing).

>> No.71089878 [View]
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1528596480965.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71089878

Why is quad channel such a pain to get? I have to get workstation chips if I want it.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]