Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.84124295 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1619879973525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
84124295

Why do the security patches cripple gaming performance anyway? I remember how everyone kept saying that it was only going to hurt gaming performance by like 2-3% at most. What a load of horseshit that was.

>> No.83974887 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
83974887

>>83974678
>>83974728
I think you need to accept reality and stop inhaling that copium, this is just a small glimpse of intel shitfest security holes.

>> No.82190471 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
82190471

>>82190458
There's like 200+ intel exclusive security vulnerabilities and each one takes 2-3% of some kind of performance away. Things like zombieload, zombieload 2, meltdown, spectre, MDS, plundervolt, LVI, and so many more reduce gaymen FPS to some degree.

Worst part is intel made it so that if you tested their CPUs with all these mitigations enabled you could potentially be throw in prison so not a lot of people know about things like pic related.

>> No.81612822 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1611676947141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
81612822

>>81612770
>14nm in 2021

>> No.81440126 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1609993247327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
81440126

>>81440100
>2021
>intel
do niggers REALLY?

>> No.81410859 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
81410859

>>81410575
There's this teeeny tiny little smidge of a problem where you lose ~10% esports gaming fps every year from intel exclusive security patches. Long term AMD is better.

>> No.81401724 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
81401724

>>81401668
It's actually much much much much worse if you do in depth research on intel CPUs. Those who do reach a horrifying conclusion that you lose around ~10% esports gaming FPS (ie not plebian console FPS) PER YEAR. All those speed hacks have come back to haunt intel and new ones are discovered on a monthly basis.

>> No.81170428 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1600034891912.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
81170428

Oof

>> No.80960469 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80960469

>>80960454
Still 100X better than losing 10% esports FPS every year.

>> No.80866372 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80866372

Really sucks that intel chips lose 10% gaming esports FPS every year from the growing massive mountain of security patches.

>inb4 "lol just disable them lmfao"
Just leave your front entry door wide open when you got to sleep, retard.

>> No.80693518 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1600034891912.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80693518

Emptiness is filling me

>> No.80315591 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80315591

Emptiness is filling me

>> No.80265950 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80265950

:(

>> No.80229358 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, gaymen patch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80229358

Emptiness is filling me

>> No.79837803 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79837803

>>79835266
>>79836022
Fun fact: you lose 10% gaming FPS every year due to a growing mountain of security patches exclusive to intel. This doesn't happen with AMD.

>> No.79820275 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79820275

>>79820091
For real though the gay men community in general has started to turn their back on intel as more and more begin to realize that you actually LOSE gaming FPS every year due to a massive growing mountain of security patches exclusive to intel hardware.

This forces them to 2 choices:
A.) Uninstall all security patches and completely disable windows from updating at the cost of not even having the most bare minimum security possible.
B.) Apply the security patches and watch different kinds of performance get axed after every update.

Intel is going to try every kind of damage control possible but the takeaway is that they're in deep shit. It's not just the gay men crowd unhappy with the performance throttling but server/HPC/datacenter folk as well.

>> No.79788602 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79788602

>>79788241
protip: intel cpus become increasing bottlenecks every year to high end GPUs due to intel exclusive security patches. AMD doesn't have this problem.

>> No.79553024 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79553024

FACT: intel processors lose 10% FPS in games every year from the growing mountain of security patches required to maintain the most BARE MINIMUM security on a computer humanly possible.

The i7-8700K was released the end of 2017 so it has lost about 20% of it's gaming performance already.

>> No.79517083 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79517083

THREE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

>> No.79449938 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, tUtuxbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79449938

>>79449847
Don't take my word for it, there's objective proof that every year intel CPUs lose around 10% FPS every year from security patches. Don't you remember when intel made it a FELONY to post security patch benchmarks online for like a year straight?

>> No.79311413 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1587075610222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
79311413

>>79311388
Are you from a dysfunctional family or something?

>> No.78963456 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1606748923647.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
78963456

Daily inteljeet cope thread.

>> No.78690300 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1602888798429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
78690300

>>78690226
The absolute state of intkek

>> No.78630614 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1623x919, 1602888798429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
78630614



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]