Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.77206503 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1580631506278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
77206503

Don't worry bros, this will be fixed very soon™ with Zen 3, just wait™

>> No.75680351 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1555619056221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75680351

>>75680338
>you don't need more than 4ghz!

>> No.74731980 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1580631506278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74731980

>>74731941

>> No.74616978 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74616978

>>74616936
Ryzen came out at the correct time, it's not even the marketing, FX had the most hype marketing of an chip AMD ever made, the problem is the delay of FX, it should've come out in 2010 to compete with the $1000 6 core westmere chips while undercutting them significantly, because FX-8150 for $250 does make a $1000 extreme edition 6 core look silly, but by the time FX-8150 had come out, 2600K had already been out for a while for $350, used less energy than an 8150, and made $1000 westmere CPUs look silly, people would've eaten it up FX-8150 arrived on time, because it really does compete with westmere more than anything, AMD had literally nothing to respond to sandy bridge for almost 6 years and if almost ruined them.

>> No.71804632 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71804632

>>71804563
>clock FX-8350 at 2.4 GHz
>scored 58 on single core with 1866 ram
>mfw Q6600 scores 58 on single core with 800MHz ram, mem controller on the board and an old ass FSB connecting everything

>> No.71699854 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71699854

>>71699846
>tfw FX8350 with 1.4V can't be cooled by air under load with the windows closed in Cali summer

>> No.71377040 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71377040

>>71373672

>> No.71114196 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71114196

>>71114164
You better delete that, Anon.

On a serious note, I love my 8350 system but that ryzen 8 core for the cost of a 2600 is just so juicy.

>> No.71084043 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71084043

>>71083672
>tfw never bought sandy when it was new
>tfw never got to have a viable gaming rig until 2017 because Intel milked quad core into the fucking ground

>> No.71006220 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71006220

>>71005398
>FX at the bottom

>> No.70921899 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70921899

>2019
>FX-8350 still worse than 3570K for gaming
Muh multicore shills btfo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEwwX7VEhDk

>> No.70850398 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1555619056221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70850398

>>70849807

>> No.70748138 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1555619056221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70748138

>>70739780
>amd
>5ghz
why is it so hard bros?
Maybe we just need more cores (tm)

>> No.70604926 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70604926

>>70604563
>tfw FX-8350

>> No.69780691 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
69780691

>>69780657
>tfw 5GHz 8350 is only 800cb
That may be a housefire but goddayum.

>> No.69499615 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
69499615

>>69499543
Fug that was pretty good.

>> No.69356646 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
69356646

>>69355699
>tfw CPU has 36 GHz of compute power but it's still shit

>> No.69252490 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
69252490

>>69252440
>tfw stock vcore is 1.5375v on an FX9000 chip
I still want to buy one of those 9000 8 cores or an 8370 because the binning is the same and those are way better binned that 8350, i'd like to see what one kind of frequency one would do with 1.38-1.4v.

>> No.68999236 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1541207157992.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68999236

>>68998166
>mpc-hc
>mpc-be
>mpc-qt

>> No.68795514 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1526519088130.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68795514

>chiplet cores with even more lag than ryzen ccx's
>memory controller off die, adding even more latency
>up to twelve cores on only dual channel memory (LMAO)

oh sure but this piece of shit glued together grade school diorama of a cpu will totally btfo intel for real this time, honest, just you wait (tm). keep dreaming streetshitters.

>> No.68741323 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68741323

>>68741192
>tfw neck and neck with X5680 that has less cores

>> No.68523236 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68523236

>>68523185
>tfw 2400g actually is better in every way

>> No.68497443 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68497443

>>68497366
>tfw even when bulldozer is running one of it's cores with all the resources free, it is still 5% worse than a phenom core at the same speed

>> No.68444411 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68444411

>>68444366
Shit FX9590 owners must be fucked because their CPU ships with a 1.5375v VCORE

>>68444372
>tfw 4.2GHz Thuban performs the same as 4.4 GHz bulldozer
The FX uses little voltage to get 4.4 but thuban technically does beat it, even if it needs 1.5v to do it.

>>68444396
One phenom core is 5% better than an FX core clock per clock, put two cores in an FX module under load and the ipc will be about 25% less than a phenom core, but there's 8 of them at a high frequency.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]