Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.56321209 [View]
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56321209

>>56321193
For benchmarking I had it up at 1.34v for 4.7GHz

Managed a 10 minute encode and Cinebench R11.5 run.


It's summer though so I only did a few tests at that clockspeed.

For the most part I keep it at 4.4GHz daily.

>> No.56003129 [View]
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
56003129

>>56003106
I can run my 5820k at 4.7GHz with 1.34v which should beat or at least match your 4790k in single core.

>> No.55997767 [View]
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55997767

>>55997687
>>55997533
also just as another fuck you, here is my 5820k at 4.7GHz 1.34v Cinebench R11.5

>> No.55310132 [View]
File: 258 KB, 1020x552, 2016-06-28 22_45_41-CINEBENCH R11.5 (64 Bit).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
55310132



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]