Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.61846772 [View]
File: 76 KB, 417x413, CPUZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61846772

>>61846756
Well, intel took 10.

>> No.61793676 [View]
File: 76 KB, 417x413, CPUZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61793676

>>61784012
Let put this way: improving the IPC in just 2x over 10 fucking years is intel very, very dead.
Now that they need to get their shit together, intel might now deliver actually good IPC improvement as they need to compete.

>> No.61742786 [View]
File: 76 KB, 417x413, CPUZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61742786

Guys, aren't the modern CPUs supposed to be 10 times faster than my ancient shit by now?



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]