Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.59165710 [View]
File: 87 KB, 504x587, [email protected] [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
59165710

>>59165694
This thread is for R15, not R11.5 just saying.

>> No.58677443 [View]
File: 87 KB, 504x587, [email protected] [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
58677443

>>58677399
No
>>58677379
I just did it to see if it was possible on my chip, In my use case there was no real difference between this 4.8GHz and my "normal" 24/7 OC of 4.4GHz.

This cinebench R11.5 run shows 3 different clockspeeds of my 5820k.
>4.7GHz
14.82
>4.4GHz
14.02
>3.3GHz (stock)
11.80

>> No.58248851 [View]
File: 87 KB, 504x587, [email protected] [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
58248851

>>58248833
Meh, if I need the performance it's a simple restart away, I have a BIOS switch, first BIOS is 4.2GHz, 2nd BIOS is 4.6GHz (though I have tested 4.7GHz)

>> No.54799660 [View]
File: 87 KB, 504x587, [email protected] [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
54799660

>>54799615
Lol i'm stil waiting on your Cinebench R11.5 scores anon, I know you're the same retard from yesterday trying to pretend cores mean nothing.

>> No.54788151 [View]
File: 87 KB, 504x587, [email protected] [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
54788151

>>54788104
Helps if I include the right benchmark.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]