Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.82772956 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1539957278151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
82772956

>>82772901
>They make really tough CPUs, handling all this power.
lol

>> No.80507107 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1539957278151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
80507107

Inlel cpus are literally seething topkek

>> No.76894402 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, Temps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
76894402

>>76889971
Buy Noctua D15/NH-U12A or similar in performance or go proper water.
There is no point in going AIO for the minimal thermal performance they potentially can reach over a high-end aircooler.

The pumps are tiny, and place on the block, which makes them trash. Their flow rates are also fucking pathetic, sharp 90 degree thin routes for liquid is also bad.
Then it's the radiators that are always thin, and thus have to have high FPI and will therefore need a noisy fan to even work properly, while still performing worse than a thick radiator with a low RPM fan.

>> No.75676327 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, doesntrunhot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75676327

>>75676296
NONONONONO AHAHAHA

>> No.75642151 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, mgulb87ivft11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75642151

Is that a Phenom?

>> No.75363839 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, mgulb87ivft11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
75363839

>>75363778
nice try this shit was debunked long ago nobody takes tpu seriously

>> No.74092678 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, doesntrunhot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
74092678

>>74092666
>9900k
>decent
decent at heating the home for winter and not much else

>> No.72183429 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, OH NONONONONONO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72183429

>>72183337
>AMD
>overheating
pot calling the kettle black, eh?

>> No.72068203 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 9900k has worse overclocking than ryzen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
72068203

>>72068182
so 101c is absolutely fine, intelfags everyone

>> No.71952887 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1563205857146.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71952887

>>71946925
Still cooler and infinitely more secure than Intel pozzed housefires.

>> No.71952183 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, OH NONONONONONO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71952183

>>71948038
>60 under load
lol retard

>> No.71915427 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, ohnononono.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71915427

>>71915405
lmao

>> No.71892604 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 9900k has worse overclocking than ryzen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71892604

>>71892589
>9900k
>under 100c
Already debunked this pajeetpowerup shit

>> No.71860265 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 9900k has worse overclocking than ryzen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71860265

>>71859441

>> No.71844337 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, doesntrunhot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71844337

>>71844222
>9900k
>under 100c
Thats now you know the benchmark is fake and gay, no less from pajeetpowerup

>> No.71789087 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, OH NONONONONONO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71789087

>>71784021
>73 on AIO is bad
pot calling the kettle black, eh?

>> No.71606063 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1543241975159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71606063

>>71605360
>air cooled 9900K

>> No.71178279 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1558975793824.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71178279

*crashes everything*

>> No.71160442 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, incel OC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71160442

>>71160352

>> No.71142605 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 9900k has worse overclocking than ryzen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71142605

>>71138388
The 9900ks will have no overclocking headroom at all screencap this

>> No.70869271 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1543241975159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70869271

>>70869245
>>70869250

>> No.70851740 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1543241975159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70851740

>>70851526
Indeed it is.

>> No.70203202 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1543241975159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70203202

>>70202768
>show how the 9900K does

>> No.70153278 [View]
File: 69 KB, 1327x1222, 1543241975159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70153278

>>70153267



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]