Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

Search: , offset: 24


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.68444411 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68444411

>>68444366
Shit FX9590 owners must be fucked because their CPU ships with a 1.5375v VCORE

>>68444372
>tfw 4.2GHz Thuban performs the same as 4.4 GHz bulldozer
The FX uses little voltage to get 4.4 but thuban technically does beat it, even if it needs 1.5v to do it.

>>68444396
One phenom core is 5% better than an FX core clock per clock, put two cores in an FX module under load and the ipc will be about 25% less than a phenom core, but there's 8 of them at a high frequency.

>> No.68332375 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68332375

>>68332258
>Radeon wojack
If you're gonna bash the based FX chips, do it right, family.

>> No.67957500 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
67957500

>>67957459
>watching video of Thuban 4.2GHz getting 7.60 on cinebench R11.5
>tfw FX-8350 at 4.4 gets the same score
I still like this chip because multithreading and it does that score with a low vcore, but that ipc is crazy bad when all the modules have two cores fully loaded.

>> No.67128466 [View]
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1526519088130.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
67128466

Now that 32 core threadripper has been confirmed another massive disappointment being completely starved of memory bandwidth by the x399 platform, can we also assume Zen 2 is DOA given the increase in core count? Remember these things have to be compatible with legacy am4 motherboards. i mean there is just no way a 12 core mainstream desktop ryzen is remotely feasible with dual channel ddr4 memory.

>> No.66502681 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66502681

>>66501522
>overclocked my FX8350 to 4.6 on one core per module
>it's performing exactly like an i7 920 but with a lower tdp
Not sure whether I should be pleased or salty, but the ipc of first generation i7 was strong as fuck.

>> No.66447832 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66447832

>>66447811
>All these shiny chinkpads
>tfw still haven't got a T420 to replace my core 2 duo latitude

>> No.66338169 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66338169

>>66338118
>3.7GHz core 60% faster than my 4.5Ghz core
Delet

>> No.66337790 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66337790

>>66336006
>retiring a finewine CPU

>> No.65968121 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65968121

>>65968091

>> No.65765090 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65765090

>>65765065
>Single core 86% better than mine that is overclocked 10%

>> No.65720319 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65720319

>>65718604
>tfw AMD FX ipc is worse than the Q6600 I had prior

>> No.65640501 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65640501

>>65638001
>8c 4m not on the chart

>> No.65605791 [View]
File: 115 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
65605791

>>65594528
>Build 8350 rig on the cheap
>4.4GHz OC performing worse than X58 xeons.



Navigation
View posts [-24] [+24] [+48] [+96]