/fa/ - Fashion

>>8558463
Thanks homie they Vans.

>>8558065
You arent very smart, and I can already hear the emotional fire raging in your belly from here.

my advice is cool, pro, and a winning strategy, as usual. you should get off /r/imtoogaytoevenbealive
better yet, don't even use reddit at all. that site sucks. i went on it twice.

>>8557540

>>8557540

>>8557511
Say you have plans tomorrow, but don't be specific. Hint that maybe some other time would be good, but let her ask you when you are free.

>>8556356
I guess you just aren't dressing well enough.

>>8557325
they have the shittiest quality jeans i have ever worn. i've even worn jeans from Old Gayvy (get it I called it GAYvy LOL) that have lasted for a long ass time. Pac Sun has pants that fit me really good for a while, and when I was broke as fuck they were hard to pass up but damn those things got worn out so quick.

i've never been like "damn this is shit quality" besides shirts from Cotton On but those fucking pants were complete shit.

>>8557311
Pac Sun has Vans and some cool socks.

>>8556893
My opinion isn't edgy, it is based on years of research and is verifiable fact. It is not "of all time" it is "of current" and classic Too $hort is CURRENTLY good. You wouldn't know, being an edgy ill-informed idiot, but my post is as true as it can ever get.

Sorry if you go on /mu/ and think you have an opinion because I PROMISE YOU I am right and you're dumb.

>>8556861
Hint: it is

>>8556729
expaln how?
im not a lean fan but the interview seemed very authentic and good to me.
he was having fun, answering questions honestly and wasnt playing a character.

seemed like a good guy in that interview

>>8555706
ha that post actually made me literally LOL for real.

>tfw no cheese-blooded gf

I used to say to text over call, but when you've been with a girl for a while calling is cool.

especially if she always wants to spend more time with you. going from never, ever, calling and only sending six texts a week, to a ten minute phone call will make her fall madly in love with you.

that's why the less effort, the better, because you only need to do a little more to make it seem huge.

>>8554977
He's Kanye without balls.
but i don't actually know if he has biger balls than Ye or not, it's just a metaphor.

A Dollar Ap doesn't ever take risks or even try progressing things forward, but tries so damn hard to be relevant and cutting edge.
Fake it to make it A Dollar Ap, i'm sure you will.

>>8552307
Neither rapper is good, or /fa/
Rocky has SOME good songs, but is lame, and offers nothing. Lean is whatever, and there is no point in talking about it because deep down everyone already knows.

Best rappers are Ugly Mane, 100s, and Too $hort and if you disagree you are literally unfit to talk about music, and I am not joking or posting ironically. 100s is still new, so it could go either way with him, but so far he's doing his thing, keping it 100 (pun intended) and is either loved or hated, no middle.

Everyone knows Ugly is out of the game, but who knows what his final release has in store for us? Danny Brown is still interesting and making good music, and I would say XXX is one of the best albums of the past few years. Classics like chopped and screwed will always be cool and /fa/.

>>8554767
James Dean best sausages.

>>8551194
>You dont need to be shit to have a gf.
Correct. Understanding why may be all it takes to go from being a lame virgin to a pro sex god. I'm proof you can be a piece of shit and still get laid because I sit on 4chan all day (except not now that I got a job) and have a pretty regular sex life.

I don't believe self improvement is masturbatory, but I guess it depends on why you do it. If it's to get girls, you suck.

>>8551201
>women just want a bunch of beta orbiters? They will fuck the guys that arent interested in them.
Everything I have said thus far supports that claim.

>>8551102
I get the mentality that all people can suck, and you won't get an argument on that from me. Yes, self improvement is the only thing to strive for. That's my number one message too.

However, we can't ignore the fact that many guys believe copping the elusive GF will fix their life and that is the mentality I'm against. Women won't save you, and if you let a girl be a huge part of your life, you don't have anything after she's gone. And relationships end out of the blue, for no reason.
So build a life that is good without one, and THEN you are ready for a relationship.

"There’s no superiority because there’s no equality. And there’s no equality because we’re fundamentally different."

>>8551081
i'm not telling you what to do, and i'm sure you'll be fine either way, but you won't be getting attention from guys the same way you are right now (assuming you are).

The type of guy who is going to give you the attention and COMMITMENT you want when you are 30, is the same type of guy stumbling over his words talking to you right now. Think about the 4chan sterotype neckbeard guy. He'll be around to commit when you're 30.

To anybody interested in this, read:
http://therationalmale.com/2014/03/16/preventative-medicine-part-i/

"Nothing is more threatening yet simultaneously attractive to a woman than a man who is aware of his own value to women."

>>8550997
by the time your'e 30 your options for good guys will be significantly lower than they are right now, for several reasons.

i'm sure you know them already.

>>8550966
what exactly do you doubt?

>>8550978
>"woman are selfish and egotistical, they want to be the girl that tames someone"
you're right, there is a difference between trying to demean them, but a huge problem is even saying something about females in a broad, generalized sense is enough to make someone instantly lash out with the word "MISOGYNY!" even on a "guy forum" like 4chan. I've been banned on /v/, /lit/, /fa/, /mu/ for sexism and I don't even make brash claims like "all women are sluts and whores."
In order to really explain the differences you need to have long explanations to cover all the bases, and it's impractical, plus people will still just quote the whole thing and respond "blatant misogyny, sweeping generalizations, not all women are like that" and be done with it.

it's far easier for guys to just cling to the idea that all girls are different and they'll find their special magic princess, or already have, but it's sad to me.

people are too quick to label things as hateful, but there are also a lot of hateful people. to post huge essays about the science of sexual attraction VS the social aspect of modern sexual dynamics and how it effects males and females isn't practical. to break it down to "girls are egotistical" doesn't help either.

Rollo Tommosi is the best at explaining these big concept ideas.
"We study majorities to assess overall condition, not isolations. That’s the scientific definition of generalities, but when they refer to things that are close to us we tend to put ourselves into the generalization and cop the “not-in-my-case” menality. We’d like to think that our experiences are unique and special (and they are, to us), but in the generality we’re simply statistics. So the word ‘Generalize’ gets a negative connotation and the person using it is vilified, because it’s an afront to our “special” conditions."

>>8550911
your sister can mix hella good drinks and that makes me a cunt?

>>8550849
>personally ive taken up less mysoginistic views
"misogyny" is the most overused word today. men and women are NOT the same, and therefore are NOT equal. that does not mean man is better than woman or vice versa - we are differen't. sure, everyone is a special snowflake but there ARE male traits and there are female traits AND there is plenty of science to verify that.

>>8550829
studies show that men's cognitive abilities and tests scores drop when they know they are being watched by a woman. i can't remember the link to the research, but it was something like 80% of mens test scores dropped by at least 15% when watched by a woman.

>>8550639
naw it's just about breaking past the wall of "plausible deniability" and getting creative.