/fa/ - Fashion

DO YOU ACTUALLY THINK?

YOU IGNORE THE MEANING OF «ANCIENT».

>>14283029
>… [INCONGRUOUS]…

>>14282924

SHE HAS A ROUND FACESHAPE; FRINGES ARE INCONGUOUS WITH ROUND FACES.

>>14280995

FROM THE THUMBNAIL, IT SEEMS LIKE THEY ARE «SIAMESE» TWINS.

>>14272212

THE BASICS ARE:

— PSYCHOPATHY.

— ETHNOCENTRIC SUPREMACISM.

— FRUMPY MILITARY SURPLUS GARMENTS.

— ANTICHRISITANITY.

— ANTIMOHAMMEDANISM.

— MORBID DRIVE TOWARD WORLDOMINATION

— WORSHIP OF THE ANTICHRIST, OF SATAN, OF THE DEMIOURGOS..

WHY THREE?

https://www.interviewmagazine.com/fashion/new-order

THERE IS NOTHING FASHIONABLE IN BEING A FARCICAL HERETIC WHO DISSIMULATES HIS ATHEISM, OR HIS AGNOSTICISM, BEHIND A PSEUDOMYSTICAL FACADE.

>>14259994
>When girls compliment you on what you're wearing does that mean they want your dick?

NO —BELIEVE IT, OR NOT: NOT EVERY SOCIAL INTERACTION IS ROOTED IN SEXUAL MOTIVES.

CULT OF UGLINESS: MORBIDITY AS THE SKELETICAL, OR AS THE OBESE.

>>14257046

>I should look fine in anything but that really isn't the case especially when you can't afford the clothes made for them (i.e. high fashion or designer clothes).

«DESIGNER CLOTHES» ARE NOT A REQUISITE, NOR A NECESSITY, TO DRESS WELL.

>The majority of (American) women have medium to larger sized chests and thus it makes sense that most clothes are made with that in mind.

I REITERATE: SELECT ITEMS THAT FIT YOUR BODYTYPE, AND YOUR FASHIONSTYLE; IF AN ITEM FITS YOUR FASHIONSTYLE, BUT NOT YOUR BODYTYPE, AND YOU OVERLY LIKE THAT ITEM, HAVE IT TAILORED.

>I'm not talking about clothes "fitting right", I'm talking about outfits that look especially good on flat chested women.

THERE IS NOTHING PARTICULARLY APT FOR «FLATCHESTED» PHYSIOGNOMIES, BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING TO «REMEDY», AS THERE WOULD WITH ANY CHEST WITH A CUPSIZE ABOVE «B».

YOU SEEM TO ALREADY KNOW YOUR FASHIONSTYLE —«FEMININE, GIRLY»—, THEREFORE, I DO NOT COMPREHEND WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM, BUT AS I CONJECTURED IN MY FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD, IT MAY BE YOUR DEFICIENT SENSE OF STYLE, WHICH IS CAUSING YOU INSECURITY; IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, YOU SHOULD EXPOUND YOUR PROBLEM BETTER.

>>14256995
>You don't have to get so mad, jeez.

?

I AM NOT «MAD».

>Just because it doesn't have a "preshaped chest zone" doesn't mean it's flattering lmao

I DID NOT STATE THAT ALL UPPER BODY GARMENTS THAT DO NOT HAVE A PRESHAPED CHESTZONE ARE «FLATTERING»; MY «POINT» IS THAT VIRTUALLY ANY UPPER BODY GARMENT THAT FITS YOUR BODY, AND YOUR STYLE, WOULD BE BECOMING, BECAUSE A NEOTENOUS PHYSIOGNOMY IS GRACILE AND GRACEFUL, AND VIRTUALLY ANYTHING SEEMS AESTHETICALLY GOOD ON SUCH KIND OF PHYSIOGNOMY.

>>14256951

VIRTUALLY ANYTHING, AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT HAVE A PRESHAPED CHESTZONE; THE ORIGIN OF THE PROBLEM PROBABLY IS NOT IN THE CLOTHES, BUT IN YOUR DEFICIENT SENSE OF STYLE.

>>14256866

THE CAUSE FOR THAT IS THAT «FRAME» IS NOT CONTINGENT ON DIET, NOR ON PERCENTAGE OF BODYFAT; MORPHOLOGY IS CONGENITAL.

>>14256213

«ROLLTOP».

FRENCH BAROQUE IS WORST BAROQUE, CLOSELY FOLLOWED BY ENGLISH BAROQUE.

NOVOHISPANIC BAROQUE IS BEST BAROQUE, CLOSELY FOLLOWED BY PERUVIAN BAROQUE.

THE BAROQUE ORIGINATED IN ITALY; DEVELOPED IN SPAIN; FLOURISHED IN NEW SPAIN, AND IN PERU; WAS EMULATED IN GERMANIC COUNTRIES; WAS IMITATED IN ENGLAND; DECAYED AND DEGENERATED IN FRANCE.

>>14255444

DEFINE «TUCKED SHORTS».

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgeV1FDBVUc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOLm-twm650

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xIEtV7NgiI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siNFOQ0Si6U

{MY ARYAN QVEEN MVSE}

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfgl57vINmw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FAJnEiyPxg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh8QOvZnFtM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_OpYdA0fck

{/MY ARYAN QVEEN MVSE}

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hykao5zckYU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt1V1LFn46E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZaHvPElkkI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKupNXXu56g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL-2slEtzHQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I71de0wHQbY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YffBFpFn7OU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF_sQjXfca4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZXKxsLf62o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guROIev_q4U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oppIHsk8JkA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZI291mvBo4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt9YQYrZXpQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19ASCCAqf2g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia5SKDc2r1Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgaolLA_ez4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEZAo0w2XgU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ni6fEFhbwU

>>14250716
>«IS MERELY A COLLECTION [OF] AUTISTIC SYMPTOMS...»

>>14250701

WHAT IS TERMED «ASPERGER'S SYNDROME», FORMERLY REGARDED AS DIFFERENT FROM AUTISM, IS MERELY A COLLECTION AUTISTIC SYMPTOMS; THERE IS NO «ASPERGER'S SYNDROME» AS A CONDITION IN ITSELF; THERE IS ONLY AUTISM.

>>14250272
>>14250279

QVOD VIDE:

>>14249801

>>14250005

THE «MOVIE» «KIDS» IS FROM YEAR NINETEEN HUNDRED NINETYFIVE.