/fa/ - Fashion

>>10079994
Yes, and better yet, the model's fit is already pale.

>>10079737
>Thus why I think it's important to look for inspiration outside of just "techwear" (or whatever you're wanting inspo for.) I mean, that's kind of how inspiration works. You find unrelated pieces and shape them and put them together in to a cohesive piece for your own purpose.

Absolutely. There's no doubt that looking for inspiration outside of outfits helps stimulate unique ideas, coordination, and such. People are more prone to emulating as well, when all they look at are outfits and they consequently end up getting the wrong idea about how style works.

I'm sort of drifting here, but a broad and general example of this problem is pretty evident in WAYWT threads. I mean, sure, wear what you want, but be fully conscious about your decisions.

Thanks for stating this, by the way -- good thinking.

Wow, this thread has really taken off. Awesome stuff.

>>10079251
Yeah, functionality is key.

>>10079475
kek

>>10079442
I like that parka.

>>10079042
I really like that jacket. Anyone know what brand this is? Would definitely cop.

>>10079512
Techwear FedEx driver, I actually like it


About the debate over what's techwear and what's not --
At the absolute minimum, I think anything that has the direction/concept or aesthetic of a functional garment or functional outfit at can be considered techwear. Moreover, the outfit as a whole is what really matters -- how much that comes off as techwear, at least, when you look at how cohesive pieces are when put together.

I mean, don't get me wrong, definitely bonus points for actual functionality since that's the core of techwear, but concepts are also worthy of recognition. We're discussing looks, after all -- whether your style is representative of your lifestyle or not is your own business. It's something you just have to get creative with.

>>10075758
>>10075859

This is a good start. I'll start organizing something for future threads.

thanks guys

Hmm

>>10075450
I'll check it out, thanks.

>>10075466
As different of an idea as this is, I'm genuinely interested in seeing something like this being made.

Can we get some more color going on here, guys?

>>10075432
I'm not quite sure why that's there. It looks like it's a part of the interface. But, I've never had one before. Maybe you can swipe it up to select other apps/controls?

Samsung's Galaxy Gear S had the right idea with the curved display, but the panel is ultimately too thick, in my opinion. What a shame.

>>10075138
I don't know, but I like it.

What do you guys think about smartwatches? I feel indifferent about them.
They often seem clunky, but I do like the design of the pic related, except the round shape makes it seem a bit silly and impractical.
Does anyone have experience with wearable technology like this?

techwear general:


Ask, discuss, share inspo, etc.

>>10075087
>Rick Owens
>most prestigious/expensive designer
Anon should definitely calm down, but speak for yourself.

>>10075075
platform sandals are an interesting choice for an outfit like this, but you make it work
simple; i like it

>>10074687

>>10074146
Shin Sekai Yori

>>10073053
>>10073057

I dig this.

>>10072131
Only this board (for the most part) would be the one to judge from that perspective. Anyone outside in the real world doesn't look at this guy based on his style. Ugly and boring outfit anyway, tbh

>>10071834
Not that I'm 100% sure of this, but it's almost like he doesn't want you to look at his face full on -- maybe he's insecure about it, so he only wants to be seen in pictures from a certain angle? He's obviously self-conscious, and yes, I'm pretty sure he got some kind of work done for his hair.

Pic related; awkward

>>10072016
There's shouldn't be any pain, my man.
I mean honestly, this board shouldn't be taken seriously to that extent.
There's more than sufficient evidence in WAYWT threads that money can't buy you good looks or a style; go check it out for yourself (beware).

I only come here to sort of browse around and see the different styles and pieces people are talking about or wearing. It's only recently that I've started to purchase more expensive pieces only on the basis of pure quality.

>>10071942
>Does this have to be clothing specifically or can it be any 'aesthetic' image that we enjoy?

Anything kind of image can be inspo, honestly.
It's actually very intriguing, because I really like the outlook in your post, and I have thought of this before, in a strikingly similar manner.

There's a certain 'effortlessness' and spontaneity when it comes to representations or outfits (if you want to be dynamically relevant) associated with this idea. The existence of the setting is what speaks for itself, everything that's going on within it. I've always admired the reality of what people are able to visualize or create and the beliefs or philosophies between each of them. Everyone has what fulfills them; there's something admirable about this aspect of individuality (and life) that is hard to put my finger on.

tl;dr: comfy af

>>10071780
Saw this fit in the last thread. You look great, dude.
I'm not so keen on the matching rips for the jeans, but it's a nice look. The belt actually works well too.

Hey /fa/, do you have any unusual/different inspo that helps you visualize and grasp your style better? Not literally, but conceptually.

Share your weird inspo. I'll start.
Pic related: Pokemon Trainers -- they always look comfy as fuck, and their layers are 10/10. I've always admired their attire since I was a kid.

>>10071760
Solid fit to start us off with.
Literally a 10/10. Superb coordination, my man.

>>10068868
What the fuck

>>10068855
>>10068862

First one, for sure.

>>10068875
Was wondering the same thing. Comfy af