[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 52 KB, 600x428, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9860407 No.9860407 [Reply] [Original]

None on front page/all dead

Go

>> No.9860421
File: 172 KB, 1000x1000, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9860421

I want to cop this to have a basic shirt that isn't just solid color black, and I like the idea of the nelly texture, and I overall like the look.

The only issue I have is I'm afraid people will look at it and think it's a graphic tee of outer space, like something you'd get from hot topic or something.

Thoughts?

>> No.9860429

>>9860421
Neppy*.

>> No.9861131
File: 48 KB, 456x608, common-projects-original-achilles_women_white.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9861131

>>9860407
seriously thinking about copping at the end of this month i will have the sufficient funds and do not care about paying retail. i cant be arsed to wait around for a sale.

my style is boring,uninspired and minimal majority of the time. i like safe fits.

cop or no?

i feel like they will fit in well with my clothes. i already have stan smiths that i love to death. but the bulkyness makes me feel childish when i wear them.

i feel like the CP silhouette will improve my fits and give me a more mature look.


i hear they are a pain to break in. i recently broke in some 1461 so if they are anything similar to that ill survive i suppose.

>> No.9861818

>>9861131
no need for blabbing
just cop

>> No.9861911
File: 48 KB, 516x607, IMG_20150518_191133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9861911

>> No.9861922

>>9860421
W2c?

>> No.9861946

>>9861131
>style is uninspired and minimal
>wants to buy uninspired and minimal shoes

>> No.9862551

>>9861946
perfect match right?

>> No.9862629
File: 1.62 MB, 2160x1440, Screenshot (42).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862629

Should I get anything here

>> No.9862635

>>9862629
no

>> No.9862647
File: 109 KB, 895x1024, slips.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862647

Want some slipons for work, cop?

>> No.9862660

>>9862629
Username on Grailed?

>> No.9862669

>>9862635
Thanks
>>9862647
These look not good. Just buy some vans

>> No.9862699

>>9862647
What work do you do? Slip ons are generally not appropriate work wear.

>> No.9862711

>>9862699
Game development, and since it's Berlin it's everything from suits to crocs & shorts.

>> No.9862783
File: 46 KB, 780x519, raf-simons-x-adidas-2015-spring-summer-response-trail-sneaker-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862783

There's a store in my city that actually has my size.

Convince me to spend 585 CAD ;_;

>> No.9862786
File: 281 KB, 2038x1018, 1431676872842.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862786

reposting to get last minute opinions before I decide on one

left is junya and right is eg

>> No.9862792

>>9862783
For those? God no.

>> No.9862808
File: 84 KB, 800x600, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862808

>> No.9862813

>>9862786
Both are basic hunting jackets you could get for cheaper, but I'd probably go for the one on the left because the collar is more traditional.

>> No.9862822

>>9861911
if youre dark haired / dark skinned, cop, otherwise nah

>>9862629
maybe hat if you can pull it off, maybe jumper if you can pull it off, nothing else

>>9862647
don't like the colour.. cant imagine black or blue jeans would work with them, and beige chinos definitely won't so

>>9862783
no, just get huaraches and stop trying so fucking hard to be different /fa/ggot

>>9862786
cop, left because the contrast collar makes it look immediately 10x better... consider a barbour one aswell pehaps

>> No.9862834
File: 104 KB, 700x700, HUF-BAMBOO-SS-WOVEN-SHIRT-WHITE-1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862834

Posted this in dead thread does anyone know where to get this shirt or similar in london/uk/online

>> No.9862907
File: 256 KB, 1000x500, copperknot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862907

Poorfag looking for versatile all black shoe for summer.
Left/right/alternative?

>> No.9862948

>>9861131
tres bien has 20% off cps right now

>> No.9862975
File: 966 KB, 1390x1040, Captura de pantalla 2015-05-18 a las 23.15.06.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862975

Thoughts on this jacket?

>> No.9862978

>>9862907
if you know what to wear with them then they're both great

>> No.9862979
File: 1.06 MB, 1382x992, Captura de pantalla 2015-05-18 a las 23.15.11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9862979

Second.

>> No.9862982

>>9862975
goth pee-wee herman

>> No.9862999

>>9862822
>no, just get huaraches and stop trying so fucking hard to be different /fa/ggot

-huaraches
-better than raf

mfw this is actually what hypebeast.com subscribers think

>> No.9863006

>>9862975
I don't like the cut of this jacket at all. You would definitely need an appropriate wardrobe to pull it off.

>> No.9863034

>>9862808
Not a fan of the texture (that sort of cracking occurs naturally in some leather anyway), and I find Tigers to be a bit over-hyped, but those aren't bad. If they fit your style, go for it.

>>9862834
Please, please don't wear a shirt like this. It's one step away from a silk Dragon Ball Z shirt.

>>9862907
Both are just kinda awkward and bad. Why not some sort of simple dress shoe? Or do you need more of an athletic sole?

>>9862975
>>9862979
The smoothness of the leather is unnerving, but not in a bad way. I can see this being a very, very limited jacket, but maybe an interesting statement piece. I'd get it if you wouldn't mind flushing the cash down the toilet, so to speak - it's definitely going to spend more time in your closet than on you unless you have the ideal wardrobe for it.

>> No.9863171

>>9862822
Jumper just sold haha

>>9862660
Why

Anyone here have the embryo bag? How's does it work for a single strap?

>> No.9863419

>>9863034
>>9862834
Is that because of the pattern or because its a short sleeve button down? I thought it would go well in a casual summer fit

>> No.9863422

>>9860421
definitely doesnt look like a graphic tee, you should cop

>> No.9863424

>>9863419
>Is that because of the pattern or because its a short sleeve button down? I thought it would go well in a casual summer fit
Both, really. It's just really not good in any way.

>> No.9863432

>>9863424
Ah OK ty for feedback anyway

>> No.9863799

>>9860421
yes
>>9861131
over priced, but if money isnt important to you then yes
>>9861911
over priced
>>9862629
no
>>9862647
no
>>9862783
those literally look like sketchers
>>9862786
n
>>9862808
n
>>9862834
y
>>9862907
r
>>9862975
n
>>9862979
n

>> No.9863914
File: 87 KB, 570x819, il_570xN.733165138_g16n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9863914

? might buy this

>> No.9864035

>>9863914
noooooo. looks like cotton candy hahah

>> No.9864051

>>9863799
This makes me think I'm posting at the wrong forum haha

>> No.9865676

>>9863799
>n
why not

>> No.9865685
File: 506 KB, 1536x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9865685

I'm so tempted


2008 PEARL drkshdw worker jacket

>> No.9865699

>>9865685
n

>> No.9865706

>>9865699
y

>> No.9866128
File: 43 KB, 638x506, nike-nike-wmns-air-rift_242x506max[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866128

>> No.9866255
File: 27 KB, 455x475, 538943_mrp_in_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866255

CLUB MONACO
£160 c/n?

>> No.9866299

>>9865699
oi sieg

rag & bone desert boots, y/n?

and how do they compare to bally's/

was leaning towards ballys, but they're out of stock

>> No.9866304
File: 84 KB, 1024x1024, 2502002001_2_3_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866304

£20

>> No.9866311
File: 7 KB, 217x250, 1417156403408.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866311

>>9866255
>mfw kmart has sweaters like this for $12

How do you wear fades anyway..?

>> No.9866318
File: 56 KB, 505x864, THOR-MZ42_V2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866318

£95

>> No.9866322

>>9861131
Dude the chunkyness makes them good, common projects are too flat a silhouette

>> No.9866324

>>9862783
Go all out with colour man, no point in the whites way less fun.

>> No.9866522
File: 25 KB, 450x600, 382561667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866522

http://www.trademe.co.nz/clothing-fashion/men/jerseys-hoodies/auction-887743129.htm

Cop? Does it look legit?

>> No.9866596

>>9863914
Eww, no.

>>9865685
You'd really need some ideal outfits for this, so maybe?

>>9866128
Look like the thing that Chinese women wear out to walk. So... no.

>>9866255
I like it, but the price is exorbitant. Thus is Club Monaco I guess.

>>9866304
Sure. Simple enough.

>>9866318
Also sure.

>>9866522
Too hipster, so no.

>> No.9866608

>>9866596
>Eww
>maybe?
>...
>hipster
Drop trip

>> No.9866622
File: 82 KB, 960x720, 654616-p-2x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9866622

?

>> No.9866625

>>9866622
I like them and have heard good things from others about them. So I say go for it.

>> No.9866626

>>9866622
DROP

>> No.9866633

>>9866625
They seem decent.

>>9866626
hm?

>> No.9866638

>>9866626
>>9866633
hm is not a word. type in complete sentences. this is shitposting

>> No.9866652

>>9866638
damn...

>> No.9866656

>>9866625
Do you have any suggestions for decent, cheap white canvas shoes?

>> No.9866699

>>9866656
I'll confess the ones that you posted are likely what I'd buy in your scenario.

Converse and Vans are likely options, and probably in that order. That being said, I have mixed feelings about Converse - the pair I own for weight lifting are both somewhat uncomfortable and fell apart quickly (my pinky toe busted out of the side somehow). I also know some people genuinely like Polo Ralph Lauren sneakers at that price point, but I can't vouch for them either way.

>> No.9867157
File: 206 KB, 400x400, 724766_COL_724766-005_4_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867157

>> No.9867269
File: 204 KB, 1280x960, url.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867269

I need some slip ons

>>9867157
Are you a girl? If yes, yes. Go full Vaporwave.

>> No.9867335

>>9867269
>That fucking heel
>plz don't

>> No.9867337
File: 79 KB, 920x920, vansguardsk8hi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867337

kauf oder nein?

>> No.9867342

>>9867337
Nein, Nein, Nein

>> No.9867363
File: 93 KB, 645x312, 650x312 (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867363

Blue. Or...

>> No.9867371
File: 108 KB, 616x312, 650x312.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867371

>>9867363
... Brown?

>> No.9867439

>>9865685
Cop, cop, cop

>> No.9867510

>>9867371
brown, mate

>> No.9867542

>>9867371
w2c? link?

>> No.9867587

>>9867542
jesus christ it reads on the fucking frame

>> No.9867611
File: 122 KB, 930x930, 583218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867611

for casual use and skateboarding

>> No.9867636
File: 734 KB, 1200x542, the-westgate-2-black-white-orig.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867636

>>9867611
Alternative colorway, but I'm feeling the grey bit more and I already have black and white sneakers.

>> No.9867679
File: 34 KB, 975x1463, 5326455530400_001_g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867679

on sale, cop?

>> No.9867686
File: 41 KB, 740x1110, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867686

Our legacy

>> No.9867700

>>9866304
is that zara? if you are ok with quality then cop

>> No.9867702
File: 41 KB, 720x539, 1794477363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867702

15 euros, used but in good condition as you can see

mm whatcha say

>> No.9867719

>>9867636

For how low-end this is, the styling isn't bad. I'm not a particular fan of the logo stitching, which seems to just float a bit in the middle of nowhere and the shiny plastic foxing trim on along the midsole doesn't do anything for me either, but this is miles better than the chunky loaf of bread shoes that I knew Emerica for.

>> No.9867764

>>9867719
>I'm not a particular fan of the logo stitching
Neither am I really, figured I'll probably use marker to hide it or plain cut it off.
I'll be in a market for new skate shoes soonish and figured I could get something I could use for casual use before I wreck em as well.
And I also totally agree with the plastic mid-sole thing as well, really my only complaint (aside from the mandatory branding) about these.
Which color way you figure looks better?

>> No.9867834

>>9861131
cps are comfy as fuck but maybe the break in thing was just referring to the achilles lows so idk

>> No.9867843

>>9867611
>>9867636
>>9867679
these are all basic/average as fuck
no one will notice you wearing them, no one will care. theyre perfect blend in shoes.

>> No.9867861
File: 62 KB, 900x900, BLA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867861

Under $75 at steep and cheep
>sea foam frame available

>> No.9867873

>>9867861
Are you wearing those snowboarding? Otherwise you'll look like you're from the 80s

>> No.9867900

>>9867843
>cop
what if i'm on the run from the law?

>> No.9867918

has anyone bought anything from Weekday here? Can they comment?

Imma cop this but I want to know what I'll be getting

http://shop.weekday.com/Mens_shop/Shirts/Soft_Times_Shirt/542224-3162763.1#c-49929

>> No.9867960
File: 46 KB, 560x361, corn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9867960

Probably getting anyways.

>> No.9867964

>>9867960
Gay

>> No.9867991

>>9867960
gaudy

>> No.9867995

>>9867960
Wearing that shirt will be like telling the same joke over and over again

>> No.9868003
File: 112 KB, 335x295, 1393744928456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868003

>>9867964
>>9867991
>>9867995
>Bitch-boys who wear Supreme spotted

>> No.9868019
File: 3.58 MB, 630x354, 1424324408896.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868019

>>9868003
>implying youre not an autistic fuck who thinks he's being clever by wearing that

>> No.9868045
File: 347 KB, 500x477, 500x1000px-LL-780cd29d_Beetle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868045

>>9868019
>It's wrong to hate giant overpriced fashion corporations, especially ones that make shit clothes worn primarily by meme-rappers and suburban white kids

Post your Supreme, bro.

>> No.9868094
File: 10 KB, 278x310, o_39f-s-black-lace-up-back-round-head-ann-boots-j014-8a72.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868094

Found these on ioffer , they're Ann D reps but I really like these back laced boots, thinking about coping these and taking them to a cobler to maybe change the sole if it doesn't work for me. Heel seems a bit too high.

They're 30 bucks anyways.

>> No.9868122
File: 110 KB, 750x1334, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868122

I need advice they're only $50

>> No.9868142

>>9868122
cop em men

>> No.9868164

>>9867686
I got surprised by them too, def cop

>> No.9868165

>>9868122
ew

>> No.9868194

>>9868094

That arch and shaft proportion is 100% wrong.

>> No.9868204
File: 52 KB, 512x274, 14700.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868204

I have a bit of a round face, will I just look like a tryhard hipster with these?

>> No.9868215

>>9868122
Look fun, but at that price, I wouldn't expect them to last long. I'd still pull the trigger.

>> No.9868276
File: 492 KB, 960x1280, IMG_1047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868276

what do you guys think of this that just got put on Gralied? It's Raf but I'd still want it if it wasn't. It's like $300 though

>> No.9868283

>>9868276
I really like it.

>> No.9868502
File: 40 KB, 467x622, 221483-0014_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868502

y/n?

>> No.9868543

>>9868502
nah. thats "i want to be deep and indie but i shop at the mall for my shirts" core

>> No.9868551

>>9868276
If you honestly have the money to blow on a $300 sweatshirt then cop it because it looks dope af.

>> No.9868578

>>9868543
its j. lindeberg mayne

>> No.9868922
File: 78 KB, 1200x1200, patagonia-caps-patagonia-logo-cap-fitz-roy-p6-black.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868922

y / n

>> No.9868971
File: 158 KB, 936x1368, cn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9868971

for $25

>> No.9868972

>>9867702
No. Just... bad. Too bulky all over, look like former orthopedic shoes.

>>9867861
Absolutely not, at least for non-snowboarding wear.

>>9868094
I could see these having a place, but the sole is definitely too much. Look like those platform shoes short people wear. But for $30, go wild.

>>9868204
Try them on. It's always hard to guess.

>>9868276
$300? Hell no. C'mon, you can find lots within that price range much better than that.

>>9868502
That's basically just a long-sleeved tee with a graphic on it, so no.

>>9868922
Absolutely not. Baseball caps aren't really great anyway, and that's basically dad tier.

>> No.9869026
File: 47 KB, 480x360, Vintage versace glasses.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869026

Anyone know where i can get any reproduction vintage versace's like the S60 style?

>> No.9869047
File: 125 KB, 320x477, want to cop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869047

Also looking to see if anyone knows what brand this tee is ?

>> No.9869062

>>9868971
cop

>> No.9869168
File: 916 KB, 1004x670, which will.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869168

(n)n or gosha left or right?

>> No.9869172

>>9869047
shit

>> No.9869193
File: 75 KB, 750x425, RAEN-STRYDER.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869193

Looking into upgrading my glasses. These guys look swee with the clipons.
cop?

>> No.9869244
File: 15 KB, 247x329, 0400086851940_ASTL_247x329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869244

>>9860407
Will I get much, if any, wear out of a Lilly Pulitzer crop top set? Part of me thinks it'll be cute to wear, e.g. to a Memorial Day backyard barbecue or for brunch with my mother. The other part of me thinks it's a complete waste of money. I think it'd be fine if I lived in Palm Beach all the time, but I don't think it has much of a place in Toronto. Thoughts?

>> No.9869256

>>9869244

Garbage. Robin Givhan's takedown is accurate:

>The classic Lilly Pulitzer dress comes in shrill shades of yellow and pink that are vaguely infantilizing. They are clothes that can be shrunk down and worn by 7-year-old girls without changing a single design element — if there were actual design elements to change. But there are not.

>The clothes are, upon close inspection, not so terribly attractive. Actually, they are rather unattractive. And that is part of their charm. They are not meant to be stylish — that’s so nouveau. The clothes are clubby. Country clubby. One-percent-ish.

>> No.9869260

>>9869168
Left.

Just because kangaroo pockets are kinda uggo

>> No.9869261

>>9869244
Sorry but i don't think shitskins can pull off lilly pulitzer

>> No.9869263

>>9869193
I was worriedwhen you said clip-ons, but those look interesting. I say pull the trigger.

>>9869244
There's nothing wrong with having a sort of super-cute outdoorsy outfit like that for summer-y events, even if you don't plan to wear it often given Toronto. I think that'd work well on you, at least.

>> No.9869284
File: 54 KB, 1000x700, raen-stryder-rootbeer+me++productPageXtraLarge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869284

>>9869263
Here they are without the clips. Would probably just find a way to permanently keep them in sunglass-mode

>> No.9869294

>>9860421
I thought it was a space tee before I read your post, but space is cool so go for it.

>> No.9869328

>>9867960
Tacky and lame. The only people who will get the joke won't think it's funny

>> No.9869331

>>9869284
I'll confess I'm not a huge fan of the look without the clips, and would be very nervous about them looking unusually thick due to the clip, but I imagine I may be over-exaggerating due to my hatred of most mens' clip-ons.

I like the permanency idea, it might have something to it. Give it a shot.

>> No.9869332

>>9868922
Cop it's a cool hat and probably cheap.

>> No.9869344
File: 130 KB, 615x566, Screen Shot 2015-05-19 at 5.24.04 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869344

>>9869331
Same boat exactly on concerns but it actually looks like it fits pretty close to the lens.

trigger pulled

>> No.9869349

>>9869344
>Same boat exactly on concerns but it actually looks like it fits pretty close to the lens.
Damn, that's a tight fit, I like it too. Good call!

>> No.9869358
File: 509 KB, 979x597, Screen Shot 2015-05-19 at 8.13.56 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869358

>>9869256
I laughed because that's very accurate. Most of the time the pieces aren't flattering or attractive. And the "new prints" are always overhyped and awful. I think having a home in Florida has kind of made me unaware of how terrible some of the actual garments because I associate them with polo games and yacht clubs.

>>9869263
I think the idea of the pieces would work. It might look good too (an annoying thing is that I'm a 00 on top and a 0 on the bottom and they're only sold as a set). I don't think it's a very practical buy, at least not at MRSP.

>>9869261
Interestingly enough Lilly Pulitzer's website just got a non-white model!

>> No.9869372
File: 6 KB, 225x225, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869372

Or should i get the classic red/white/blue ones?

Or even the white/green ones?

>> No.9869376
File: 5 KB, 225x225, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869376

>>9869372
Better pic

>> No.9869377

>>9869358
>I don't think it's a very practical buy, at least not at MRSP.
Now I have to ask - how much?

>>9869372
Those white ones are surprisingly cool. I like them quite a bit. I say cop.

>> No.9869388
File: 3.12 MB, 2448x3264, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869388

is it worth $270?

>> No.9869391

>>9869388
It's a bag meant to hold things and get beat up a bit, so I'd say no.

>> No.9869393
File: 64 KB, 600x600, 13s-th3f4l-9999-r2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869393

>>9869376
thumnails

>> No.9869403
File: 379 KB, 1128x2000, Elizabeth-James-Selena-light-pink-short-sleeve-dress-sheer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869403

>>9869377
Only 200 USD, but that becomes 250 CAD and that's 1/6 of my monthly disposable income. It could have been worthwhile for an upcoming outdoor wedding I'm going to, but I bought an Elizabeth and James for the occasion dress months ago (pic related).

>> No.9869415

>>9869388
def cop. it's the best backpack theyve ever released imo

>> No.9869416

>>9869403
sleeves are cut autistic

>> No.9869418

>>9869403
Aha, I see the issue. I prefer the Elizabeth and James dress more anyway, so if the question boils down to picking between the two, you already have a better option.

>> No.9869420

>>9869388
its cool, if you are willing to spend that much id go for it

>> No.9869520

>>9869372
w2c?????????????????
look great.

>> No.9869526

>>9869520
http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/hrdstore/item/th3f4l-9999/

>> No.9869531
File: 71 KB, 600x400, ozzie-guillen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869531

>>9869526
>rakuten

>> No.9869535

>>9869531
>>rakuten
I know. Appear to be Japan-only or close to it.

>> No.9869538

>>9869531
Amazon Japan has them to. I'm still looking for the best place.

>> No.9869653 [DELETED] 
File: 17 KB, 308x308, 2012-new-Ann-Demeulemeester-Europe-and-America-really-cowhide-chalaza-Vintage-restore-ancient-ways-Martin-shoes.jpg_350x350 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869653

>>9868972
>>9868094
Found a better quality pair. For 130$ though. Worth it?

>> No.9869805

>>9868164

Shits pricey. Sexy af tho

>> No.9869838

>>9862786
I personally like the junya more and have had better experiences with Junya than EG.

>> No.9869846

>>9866608
Honestly this Patrick Bateman dude doesn't know anything about designers or the garments they create.

>> No.9869850
File: 273 KB, 1229x871, sssss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869850

Feel like I only have a few hours before someone swoops in on one of these.

Quick opinions before I decide which?

>> No.9869859

>>9869846
>Honestly this Patrick Bateman dude doesn't know anything about designers or the garments they create.
I know where the garments come from, that doesn't mean I don't think they suck. Both of those could be collabs by every /fa/-loved designer on the planet and they'd still be fundamentally ugly.

>> No.9869862

>>9869850

The storm placket on the left is more practical.

>> No.9869911

>>9869859
Lol Speaking of fundamentally ugly, you are the one thinking about buying onitsuka Tigers
I agree that most of the garments you didn't like I didn't like, but shit dude you didn't even recognize a givenchy sweater what are you doing tripping

>> No.9869932

>>9869911
The sweater is fucking ugly fam, haute brand or nah

He called it out how it is

>> No.9869978
File: 130 KB, 600x600, Collar_5_8a98ef62-0c52-4804-9fa1-98806d2b0974_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9869978

It's summertime wacky shirt time boys what do you think?

>> No.9869981

>>9867337

kauf das alta

>> No.9869982

>>9869932
yo i agree it ugly, I would never buy it, but ideally a trip would at least have some basic knowledge of the recent past when it comes to fashion.

>> No.9869990

>>9869982
>ideally a trip would at least have some basic knowledge of the recent past when it comes to fashion.
I don't make an effort to confirm I can identify where certain things come from. Inefficient and unnecessary, especially when the answer is "no, it's ugly." The person asking the question already knows where it's from, after all.

>> No.9870052
File: 25 KB, 800x800, image_3419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9870052

Frank & Oak
$25

It's kinda stupid but interesting

>> No.9870056

>>9860421
W2C???

>> No.9870077

>>9870052
Yeah go for it, it's interesting.

>> No.9870095

>>9870052
Pull the trigger, it's basic and interesting enough.

>> No.9870096

>>9867702
dont use it as a pair of dress shoes

go for something more mc ride-y

>> No.9870121

>>9869850
Could I get more input? I'm leaning right.

>> No.9870158
File: 62 KB, 919x324, chaqueta.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9870158

should i buy this jacket

it's from zara any general opinions on the brand?

>> No.9870164

>>9867542
Warby Parker

>> No.9870167

>>9869850
I prefer left.

>>9870158
For that price, why not. Zara is very cheap, though, in construction as well.

>> No.9870285

>>9869850
left

>> No.9870828

>>9869850
I prefer right tbh

>> No.9870985
File: 2.25 MB, 1716x750, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9870985

can anyone ID these?

>> No.9870993

>>9870985
seriously?
black stans

>> No.9871446
File: 185 KB, 1200x1500, New_Balance-Classic_traditionnels_grey_sneakers_U420SNGG_d3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9871446

Thinking of getting these 420s for $35

>> No.9871467

>>9871446
they look v clean def cop

>> No.9871516
File: 741 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_2015-05-20-08-59-24.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9871516

On mobile, my Everlane broke so I need a new backpack. This is on sale for 60% off. Should I cop and if so what color.

>> No.9871674

>>9871516
NO, this is overpriced garbage
try Jack Spade though
you can find great bags on sale and about the same price

>> No.9872055
File: 61 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872055

Should i or the eyelets disgusting?

>> No.9872080

>>9872055
I like it.

>> No.9872097

>>9872055
i wouldn't for 150, eyelets let it down

>> No.9872674
File: 120 KB, 570x382, 92125.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872674

These Nike Lunartempo, cop?
or...

>> No.9872678
File: 202 KB, 584x554, lunar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872678

>>9872674
Nike Flyknit 3 Lunar?

>> No.9872722

>>9872678
lunar

>> No.9872727
File: 31 KB, 329x397, wemoto-cole-bomber.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872727

cop this for summer?

>> No.9872738

>>9862629
w2c that blazer/jacket?

>> No.9872760

>>9866255
i like it in theory but i dont like the price, the brand, the depth of fade.

personally wouldn't cop its a limited and attention-whoreish piece of clothing

>> No.9872773
File: 27 KB, 280x284, gorby.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872773

>>9867337
KAUF

>> No.9872782
File: 946 KB, 1000x960, Raf-Simons-AW-2012.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872782

w2c raf ombre sweaters
has it been to long to be able to find any of them any more?

>> No.9872784

>>9867960
idk why everyone is opposed... i think its funny...

>> No.9872795
File: 363 KB, 1500x2000, draags94 treaty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872795

cop or not

>> No.9872796

>>9868276
i wouldn't drop 300 almost anything, but holy shit that design is quiet, unique, and beautiful...

cop if you have the money and would wear it a lot with the right pants/shoes

>> No.9872800

>>9868502
he looks healthy and fit, but a bit smug: you'd have to discipline him. otherwise he seems fine

>> No.9872805

>>9869168
the right one 10 times out of 10

>> No.9872815

>>9872795
Not worth it

>> No.9872825
File: 5 KB, 191x264, senpai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872825

>>9872800
HOLY SHIT KEK

>> No.9872843

>>9868972
calling baseball caps dad-tier is a little dated man

>> No.9872897
File: 167 KB, 569x569, gc_ls_tee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9872897

Im on the fence heavy about this.

>> No.9872923

>>9872815
but what if I could find them for less than 100usd

>> No.9872951

>>9868922
w2c

>> No.9872998

>>9866318
W2c?

>> No.9873005

>>9872897
>on the fence

In the closet, more like.

That means you're a faggot, btw.

>> No.9873031
File: 122 KB, 768x765, roshe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9873031

what you think? cop?

>> No.9873042
File: 474 KB, 413x783, ewqewqewq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9873042

Can someone here help me identify those? Cop yes or no?

>> No.9873046

>>9873005
So witty man. You must really do well on your high school debate team.

>> No.9873218

>>9868971
w2c?

>> No.9873240

>>9866596
your feedback is superficial shit

please stop tripping

>> No.9873248
File: 24 KB, 740x1110, 3173_d407d0eb6d-_k0a9715-rtail-standard[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9873248

>>9867686
they are nice, but I like the light ones even more

>> No.9873352

>>9872897
Chop

>> No.9873370
File: 186 KB, 1066x1600, cop or no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9873370

if no, any other recommendations?

>> No.9873450

>>9873042
the shoes?

>> No.9873465

>>9869168
left

>> No.9873681
File: 16 KB, 393x395, 41w0zlQV3UL._SY395_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9873681

copper not?

>> No.9873717

>>9872795
Design is interesting, but the brand is known for being cheap and I don't imagine they're cheap.

>>9872897
No.

>>9873031
If you like them, sure.

>>9873240
I know.

>>9873370
Shorter ones. There are a bazillion retailers for such things - Ralph Lauren, J.Crew, etc. That length is going to look somewhat childish, as the modern trend is decidedly above the knee.

Still, they aren't patently offensive, so if you must have the length, the shorts themselves are not bad.

>>9873681
Hate the sole on shoes like that, so no. There are far too many good dress boots on the market now to go for something like that.

>> No.9874020
File: 73 KB, 640x676, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9874020

This Margiela vomber

>> No.9874025
File: 106 KB, 640x619, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9874025

>>9874020
u can zip the sleeves

and it looks very cozy

>> No.9874034

>>9874025
its still s/s wait for a/w
itd be p cozy for comfy core/palewave

>> No.9874063
File: 79 KB, 880x999, 208-OUTLIER-SlimDungarees-IndigoFront-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9874063

Dark Indigo, Outlier Slim Dungarees.

Cawp or Nawt?

>> No.9874076

>>9874034
god

this is why i never post anything fashion related on here

/fa/ has the average iq of a mentally handicapped redditor with 3 different stds

>> No.9874117

>>9874020
dope cop

>>9872782
i think Muff is selling that check grailed

>>9869393
cool

>>9868276
cool

>>9865685
gross

>> No.9874316
File: 144 KB, 870x1110, image4xxl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9874316

sweater?

>> No.9874323

>>9874316
no

mall-core

>> No.9874326

>>9874323
it even says core on the sweater

>> No.9874339

>>9868972
smh this loser can't even appreciate archive raf

why does it even trip, let alone pretend to have a modicum of fashion knowledge

>> No.9874348

>>9874063
cop

>> No.9874508

>>9874339
this is a troll

>> No.9874564

>>9869978
2 wacky I'd go for more spaced out patterns.

>> No.9874569

>>9872727
>>9873031
>>9873042
>>9874020
>>9874025
cop

>> No.9874589

>>9868276
This looks fucking retarded.

>> No.9874596

>>9869388
No.

>> No.9874611

>>9869388
strangely reminds me of dota

>> No.9874612

>>9874508
care to elaborate?

>>9869391
goddamn why does this loser actually trip??

you realize there are people with more disposable income/ with moe interest in certain brands than you do, right?

>> No.9874663

>>9873717
what would recommend within the range of $150?

>> No.9874674

>>9874663
sorry, for boots that is

>> No.9874680

>>9874612
>you realize there are people with more disposable income/ with moe interest in certain brands than you do, right?
Yes, but disposable income and interest in certain brands does not warrant certain purchases. Even though this is /fa/, a little bit of pragmatism has to be involved at some basic level.

>> No.9874697

>>9874680
it retailed for like $470, and people still bought it at that price? $270 is a steal, considering how they're completely sold out worldwide

i'm curious, do you consider anything from off-white worth buying?

>> No.9874718

>>9874663
>>9874674
Hm, $150 is tough. Most of the ones I'd recommend are a bit outside of that range.

You could try to pick up a random sale, depending on your shoe size. Two places to look that might have mid-low tier brands with better soles and the same dress boot look:

http://www.shopstyle.com/browse/mens-boots?fl=c16&fl=p20:26

e.g.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LCSJTU6/ref=asc_df_B00LCSJTU63693504?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&linkCode=df0&creative=395093&creativeASIN=B00LCSJTU6&tag=wwwshopstylec-20&ascsubtag=1472753035
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00K2O4YPQ/ref=asc_df_B00K2O4YPQ3693504?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&linkCode=df0&creative=395093&creativeASIN=B00K2O4YPQ&tag=wwwshopstylec-20&ascsubtag=1472754048
http://www.bluefly.com/ben-sherman-dark-brown-leather-sarge-lace-up-wingtip-ankle-boots/PRODUCT_FEED/332499201/detail.fly?referer=ca_shopstyle&cm_mmc=ca_shopstyle-_-Ben+Sherman-_-mens-boots-_-3324992&partner=Gate_CSE_shopstyle_Ben+Sherman_mens-boots&utm_medium=comparison_engines&utm_source=shopstyle&utm_campaign=Ben+Sherman&utm_content=mens-boots

>> No.9874732

>>9874718
bump >>9874697


im just curious

>> No.9875200

>>9874697
>t retailed for like $470, and people still bought it at that price? $270 is a steal, considering how they're completely sold out worldwide

Aha, just saw this. We may just disagree on how price should be valued. I'm judging this as someone considering the materials, labor, and the ability I would have to create something like this myself. That, admittedly, has a downward pressure, especially on backpacks that I would anticipate to be beat up regularly. You're viewing value as a percentage of list price, which - while it assumes the list price has reliability - is also understandable.

You could easily (and fairly) characterize me as being too miserly, basically.

>i'm curious, do you consider anything from off-white worth buying?

Sure, depending on your goals and priorities. As has been discussed in the context of Common Projects on this board, individual circumstances dictate whether something is a worthwhile purchase.

>> No.9875557
File: 281 KB, 1000x703, I9Ghj3o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9875557

>>9874697
yeah, I sort of regret not copping it but you know, the guy that did saved me $300. Plus I might like this design from like 2004 more

>> No.9875573

>>9875557

this is very cool.

>> No.9875928
File: 253 KB, 2048x1365, 1424111501522.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9875928

which john elliot tee should i get

>> No.9875948

http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/de/men/jackets/I017809/detroit-jacket

http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/de/men/jackets/I018912/adams-jacket

http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/de/men/jackets/I018604/fynn-jacket

which to cop brah

>> No.9875964 [DELETED] 
File: 23 KB, 293x450, 35.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9875964

>>9875557
i have this piece, it is handpainted runway iteration of that hoodie, theres not a lot of the handinked ones and it is much more valuable than any of that non canon shit the guy on grailed has been selling.

if you're looking at buying this ss04 piece for 440 on ebay i would recommend you do it, noit many people realise the distinction between the handinked version of this and the print but i can tell you the handinked is worth a lot more than $440

>> No.9875971

>>9872678
flyknit lunar3s are sooo fucking comfortable, easily my favourite pair at the moment - i have them in black

>> No.9875974 [DELETED] 

i have this piece, it is handpainted runway iteration of that hoodie, theres not a lot of the handinked ones and it is much more valuable than any of that non canon shit the guy on grailed has been selling.

if you're looking at buying this ss04 piece for 440 on ebay i would recommend you do it, noit many people realise the distinction between the handinked version of this and the print but i can tell you the handinked is worth a lot more than $440

>> No.9875975

>>9862999
>doesn't post face

>> No.9875977
File: 43 KB, 860x214, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9875977

Is this the fate of /fa/

>> No.9875978 [DELETED] 

>>9875557

i have this piece, it is handpainted runway iteration of that hoodie, theres not a lot of the handinked ones and it is much more valuable than any of that non canon shit the guy on grailed has been selling.

if you're looking at buying this ss04 piece for 440 on ebay i would recommend you do it, noit many people realise the distinction between the handinked version of this and the print but i can tell you the handinked is worth a lot more than $440

>> No.9875979

>>9875974
Where did your image go pifguck?

>> No.9875980

Who keep deleting pigfucks posts ffs

>> No.9875982 [DELETED] 
File: 23 KB, 293x450, 35.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9875982

>>9875979
>>9875980
the cuck janitor

>> No.9875987

>>9875982
Should I cop Lang drainpipe pants?

>> No.9875988

>>9875977
yes
i hate this place, i wish there was a filter for tripfags that didnt involve dicking around with greasemonkey or something

>> No.9875990

>>9875978
I would if it was in my size, looks pretty amazing

>> No.9876000 [DELETED] 

>>9875987
unsure of which ones you're referencing, post a pic. also how much

>> No.9876001
File: 127 KB, 1137x1137, 04_0867802697_060_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876001

>> No.9876005

>>9875948
selfless bump

>> No.9876009 [DELETED] 

>>9875948
they're all completely different

>> No.9876019

>>9876009
i am leaning towards the first one (detroit) as i think it is less streety (which i am currently dress in), more clean and minimalistic

>> No.9876020
File: 145 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876020

The jacket

>> No.9876165
File: 333 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2015-05-21-15-58-40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876165

c/n ? thinking about this one or chilli color one, want to pair with nike pegasus 83 summit white

>> No.9876187

>>9876000
The ones on grailed for 120

>> No.9876221

>>9876165
really nice, but very basic. wouldn't pay even $98 for it.

>> No.9876256
File: 224 KB, 1600x1000, 1426697255016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876256

shall i cop? what to wear wit stans? for summer shoes

>> No.9876306

>>9876256
if you're poor

>> No.9876314

>>9876019
the flynn seems the least street wear to me

>> No.9876608

>>9876221
the problem is in my country u can't even find basic looking stuff in which color you want.. if you do there's some shit branding that ruins it.. maybe i don't do shopping enough but idk.

>> No.9876866

>>9875948
does anyone know if i can order at carhartt wip store. i visited the store today and the jacket i keep eyeing is out of stock

>> No.9876926
File: 665 KB, 1248x1872, 0246212002_6_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876926

COP OR NOT

>> No.9876976
File: 82 KB, 640x428, cdg converse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876976

Regardless of however meme it might be

>> No.9876994

>>9876926
Yes. I like it, it's very clean.

>>9876976
A meme, but I do like them, so I'd say cop.

>> No.9877003

>>9876608
where you from?

>> No.9877114
File: 13 KB, 640x640, Nike-Windrunner-Mens-Jacket-544119_010_A_PREM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877114

cop?

>> No.9877120

>>9877114
No. Pleb as hell

>> No.9877209
File: 37 KB, 435x580, produkt-blouson-mit-kontrastreissverschluessen-schwarz_9232785,ef5e85,x580f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877209

>>9860407
cheap bomber for like 40€
Im not sure yet

>> No.9877212
File: 38 KB, 435x580, produkt-blouson-mit-kontrastreissverschluessen-schwarz_9232785,432d25,x580f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877212

>>9877209

>> No.9877391

>>9877003
lithuania

>> No.9877395
File: 213 KB, 905x370, SupremexNorthFace.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877395

Supreme x Northface leopard £100
Not sure if rep, but it's being sold cheaply.
I nearly won the bid originally, but someone beat me by £2 in the last 10 seconds. The starting bid was £80 and buy it now of £280.
The winner of the bid didn't end up paying so the buyer has re-listed the jacket and has made me an offer of £100.
Not sure on how it would fit me either. But I'm tempted to take the offer.
What would /fa/ do?

>> No.9877411

Can anyone reccomend a good quality crewneck?

>> No.9877442
File: 876 KB, 2000x800, bbc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877442

y/n? which color?

>> No.9877446

>>9876001
Who doesn't own 3 sweaters like this? Kek, plain and generic wear it when you game or something

>> No.9877455

>>9867960
SUPREME is Spectacular fuck you!!!

>> No.9877485

>>9877395
cop its a steal than you can resale

>> No.9877668
File: 70 KB, 540x720, troveshort.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9877668

the shorts

>> No.9877684

>>9877485
Buying it would mean I'd have to live next week on £20 and a loaf of bread.
Tough choice.

>> No.9877707

>>9877209
>>9877212
bump for advice

>> No.9877725

>>9877442
blvck one imo
>>9877668
nah

>> No.9878204
File: 114 KB, 1170x643, trainerendor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9878204

$90?

>> No.9880151
File: 23 KB, 335x363, jazzy_grande.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880151

ach ja oder nicht nicht

>> No.9880157
File: 238 KB, 348x473, Screen Shot 2015-05-21 at 10.27.33 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880157

Brand's name aside this looks mad comfy
cop?

>> No.9880612

>>9862786
Going against others and saying to cop the EG

>> No.9880620

>>9880151
ach ja

>> No.9880690
File: 133 KB, 612x553, 2015-05-22 a 12.23.44.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880690

>> No.9880885
File: 128 KB, 1290x401, shorts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880885

15€

>> No.9880890

>>9880690

How much?

>> No.9880895

>>9880151
Lieber nicht

>> No.9880903

>>9880690
Slav Wedding-core. Cop if that sound appealing to you.

>> No.9880914

>>9880885
cop but risk looking v prep

>> No.9881001

>>9880914
what if I combine them with a untucked tee and casual shoes?
is navy a preppy color?
what about black/tan//brown/mustard?

>> No.9881054
File: 25 KB, 500x500, $_12[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881054

Should I cop?

>> No.9881134

>>9880690
hope it's a bait, even if these was no horrendous logo the sole looks like sheeet

>> No.9881198

>>9881134
yes, was a bait, I just wanted to share that shit with you

>> No.9881343

>>9874076
says the metally ill ugly boy who pretends to be a girl on an internet fashion board

>> No.9881345

>>9869388
muji had a backpack exactly like this but without the shit stripe design

>> No.9881584
File: 85 KB, 750x400, lunar force 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881584

>> No.9881595

>>9881584
Not a bad colorway, but the whole AF1 thing says no.

>> No.9881708

>>9862783
yes but different colourway

>> No.9882063

>>9881054
good god no

>> No.9883053
File: 209 KB, 1200x1600, temp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9883053

DRKSHDW tee

is this a good cop? I'm short and skinny, wear S in most things, do you think sizing on this item is reasonable?

http://r.ebay.com/glZOQO