[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 68 KB, 880x587, 106-OUTLIER-Climbers-RockKnee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8591692 No.8591692 [Reply] [Original]

I've been reading around about the different pants from Outliers, and I can't seem to find a definitive comparison between their different pants.

Between the Climbers, Slim Dungarees and the 60/30 Chinos, can someone order them from slimiest to "baggiest"?

According to their size guide (28), the Climbers seem to have the slimmest thigh, followed by the Slim Dungarees, then the 60/30 being the roomiest.

The Climbers also seem to have the smallest leg opening, followed by the 60/30, with the Slim Dungarees having the largest leg opening of the three pants.

I just find it strange that the measurements aren't proportionate all the way through.

I'm also a bit confused about the fabrics that are used. What I'm getting from the website is this: The Climbers are stretchy nylon pants. Do they retain their original shape or do they get stretched out?

The Slim Dungarees are jeans that have a slight stretch to them?

The 60/30 are just slim stretchy chinos, but the baggiest of the three pants?


Typically when I buy jeans I like them to be snug around my thighs, calves and I like a hard taper around my ankles. If I don't have to point my feet to get my heel though the leg opening, then usually I consider the leg opening too loose. I also like the pants to be sight around my hips.

I only own one pair of "stretchy" pants, but they're cheap ones from Urban Planet. I also don't own any chinos because whenever I try on a pair, they're way to baggy for my liking, but I would love to own a pair that actually fit me. I'm 5'10" and 132 pounds. Which pants do you think will fit me the best?

>> No.8591825

Bump, I've been wondering the same thing. I was going to buy one of each pair, but that would be a pain in the ass if I only liked one of them.

>> No.8592088

Bumping, want more info on the dungarees. I don't think they are jeans but rather "like jeans". You should email their customer support, OP

>> No.8592294

I'm surprised that there aren't more replies. Everyone on /fa/ seems to be raving about them.

>> No.8592471

i have a large booty that all the girls seem to like, but i feel its to large(i swam for a long time so thats why i have it) as per, im concious when buying pants and have been eyeing the outlier climbers for quite awhile as its fit better for active wear, but i wonder if the slim dungarees would be better?

ive also been looking at norse projects two jeans, stone island jeans, and a few pairs of pants from tripple aught design. I would rather prefer techwear pants, but i just want a nice black pant that fits onna big booty bitch like me.

anyone help?

>> No.8594245

They have a subreddit, also some sufu threads on outlier are useful. /fa/ raves about them because they're grails for most, not everyone owns them

>> No.8594275

I copped the dungas, apparently they're between climbers (slimmest) and chinos (more relaxed).

But dont take my word, I hadn't had a chance to compare all 3 models./

>> No.8594562

>>8594245
subreddit eh? I'll check it out. The sufu thread is really slow.

>> No.8594566

>>8594275
That seems to be what the website is saying, but I'm hearing from some people that the Dungs are slimmer. I'm wondering if people feel that way because they don't have an much stretch as the climbers.

All of their pants seem to be made from a really similar fabric. I wish I could just seem the three of them in person before placing an order.

>> No.8594572

>>8594566
Why not mail them and ask for a side by side effects photo?

>> No.8594641

I bought climbers about 2 weeks ago and they are pretty slim. There is a lot of stretch, though, so it's not restricting or uncomfortable. The outer fabric is somewhat rough feeling while the inside is softer. I bought them because I felt they would be versatile enough for casual and semi-casual wear, and they definitely are. They have measurements online so just compare them to pants you own. 6'3" 145 lbs and a size 29 works well for me. I guess I can answer any questions you guys have about them to the best of my ability.

>> No.8594648

>>8594641
Oh another thing to note is that the fit of the pieces varies between production cycles. These are the slimmest iteration of the Climbers I've seen in the year I've followed the brand, thus my cop.

>> No.8594670

>>8594641
Could you wear the climbers with a button down and light blazer? Or are they too casual lookin for that?

>> No.8594692

>>8594670

There's a very prevalent gusset on the crotch of the Climbers

Might look a little weird

The 60/30 chinos work with business casual though

>> No.8594700

>>8594692
Yeah I imagine the climbers are towards tho bottom of the list for outlier pants that work in a smart casual fit

I'm just skinny af and I think they'd fit me better than 60/30s

>> No.8594794
File: 32 KB, 497x430, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8594794

>>8591692
>>8592471

Measure your fucking self and then look at the size guide. You're all autistic.

>> No.8594871

>>8594670
My pair are black, and despite the crotch guesset, I think they would go fine with such an outfit. That was kind of Outlier's intent, to create a pant that people could comfortably bike to their office job in. I can post a picture of them if you'd like.

>> No.8595332

>>8594572
They're a small company. I suppose I could try that.

>> No.8595344

>>8594648
That would explain all of the different cuts I've been harding about, but can't seem to find on their website.

>> No.8595356

>>8594871
Please do.

>> No.8595359
File: 26 KB, 300x400, i seriously hope you beware.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8595359

>buying meme pants

>> No.8595362

>>8594692
Do you own the 60/30 chinos? If you do, can you post a picture of you wearing them?

>> No.8596701
File: 1.68 MB, 2448x3264, 0804142028c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8596701

>>8595356
Okay, so I'm a shit photographer and don't have optimal lighting setups, but here's what I've got. On my 6'3" 145 skeleton manlet body:

>> No.8596711
File: 1.38 MB, 3264x2448, 0804142034.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8596711

>>8595356
>>8596701
aaaaaand the infamous back crotch gusset in beautiful harsh lighting. It ends about 10 inches down from the crotch, which is a little below mid-thigh for me (I have a 34 inch inseam).

>> No.8597559

>>8596701
>>8596711
I like them. That gusset is strange looking though. I'd prefer if it didn't have that, but I suppose that's one of the reason why the pants have their mobility. I think I'll cop a pair.