[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 137 KB, 792x528, 73.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041272 No.8041272[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

alternatives to cp's?
I'm a student and I don't want to use my parents money right now so like preferably under 200 bucks would be good.

thanks fa

>> No.8041277 [DELETED] 
File: 667 KB, 2560x1920, CAM00085~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041277

>> No.8041291

I think CDG just (or is about to) introduced a similar model. That being said, it IS CDG so I have no clue what the price would be.

>> No.8041312

All white converse.
All white PF Flyers
Kent Wangs

>> No.8041337

Acne Adrian, National Standard Edition 3, Kent Wangs.

>> No.8041342 [DELETED] 

>>8041291
>>8041312
>>8041337
no
>>8041277
yes

>> No.8041343

>>8041272
adidas stan smith
white/green being the best ones

>> No.8041354

>>8041343
they are not an alternative to cps

>> No.8041359 [DELETED] 
File: 667 KB, 2560x1920, CAM00085~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041359

>> No.8041364 [DELETED] 

>>8041291
>>8041312
>>8041337
no
>>8041359
yes

>> No.8041369

>>8041354

CPs are an alternate to them.

>> No.8041377

Go into a shop and ask for a pair of "shoes"

>> No.8041416

>>8041369
cps are versatile and can be dressed up or down. stan smiths are ugly degenerate topmanwankertier pleb trainers

>> No.8041437

>>8041416
>can be dressed up or down
not with those ugly factory numbers on the side of them

>> No.8041433

>>8041416

>dressed up

They're fuckin plimsoles.

>> No.8041441

>>8041416
talk shit post fit

>> No.8041457

just get AF1's instead

>> No.8041468

>>8041457
april fools was yesturday

>> No.8041481
File: 15 KB, 290x370, image1xlCA6NZTA3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041481

ASOS house brand knock-offs

http://us.asos.com/Selected-Homme-Steven-Sneakers/12vt5s/?iid=3684843&mporgp=L1NlbGVjdGVkL1NlbGVjdGVkLUhvbW1lLVN0ZXZlbi1UcmFpbmVycy9Qcm9kLw..&WT.ac=rec_viewed

>> No.8041495

>>8041312

Opinion on Kent Wangs?

I'm from Canada (shipping will make it ~$120) so I want to know if its worth it to buy for an entry level white shoe? mfa seems to be on the fence.

>> No.8041498

>>8041481
>that toebox
ew

>> No.8041503

>>8041481
i rather get stan smiths tbh

>> No.8041549

>>8041481
those are selected homme not asos

>> No.8041559

>>8041495
Suck. Glued sole, not stitched, bulky

>> No.8041572

>>8041416
agreed
stan smiths are p ugly imo

>> No.8041614
File: 19 KB, 300x400, 300x400[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041614

Generic Man white hitops on sale for 210 Eur on gilt btw

>> No.8041660
File: 2.55 MB, 3264x2448, 1396461385554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041660

>>8041572
I disagree. They are for sure unfit to be some cheap as replacement of cps, but as an everyday beater they still are great. And they come with a stitched sole, which is rare in that price segment (got mine for 50 eur)

Plus disregard the socks, I've been too lazy to collect my laundry today.

>> No.8041736

>>8041559

>Glued sole

Why is this a negative thing btw?

>> No.8041760
File: 2.50 MB, 3264x2448, 1396462731744.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8041760

>>8041736
Breaks fast. Faulty by design, so to say.

My shitty cheap plimsolls

>> No.8041761

>>8041660
>those ugly ass shoes,
>those shitty ass straight fit levis
>that shitty cuff
>black shoes with blue jeans
opinion disregarded

>> No.8041774

>>8041660

they look mad cheap and highschool tier

>> No.8041779

>>8041761
talk shit post fit

>> No.8041789

>>8041761
nice try.

>>8041774
and that's why I said beaters.

>> No.8041879

>>8041779

ur not slick. stop posting fagit.

>> No.8041940

>>8041377
People always say this but it's actually fucking hard to find plain, open laced sneakers with as nice a shape as CPs.

>> No.8041968

>>8041940
/fa/ should get together and design a lower priced CP alternative.

>> No.8041977

>>8041968
Stan smiths for the 1,000,000th time

>> No.8041994

>>8041977
Just cause anorak said so, doesn't mean you need to jump on in. They are a good shoe but still not the same.

>> No.8042001

>>8041977
too bulky
also i don't like those holes it has on the side

>> No.8042002
File: 127 KB, 1000x1000, 1_237187_ZM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8042002

Are Toms effay with skinny jeans?

>> No.8042006

>>8041994
Lol fuck anorak - was one of the first people to say get off his dick

>> No.8042341

>>8042002

think about it on your feet.

then try again.

>> No.8042813

>>8042002
don't buy toms, they are shit

>> No.8042818

>>8041291
They'll be cheaper, they know they're entering a market dominated by CPs and alongside a ton of other similar looking sneakers.

>> No.8043956
File: 20 KB, 1019x1384, 97U07GWHT_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8043956

here u go

http://www.topman.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=&catalogId=33056&storeId=12555&productId=12446739&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&searchTerm=TM97U07GWHT&resultCount=1&geoip=home

>> No.8043982

>>8041291
>>8043956
The black stripe CDG collab ones are 288 usd on tres bien and common projects are 320 usd. If you are outside the EUROZONE.

>> No.8043999

>>8043982
Does the 30% off also get tacked on the 20% outside Europe deal?