[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 2.22 MB, 3264x1836, 20140319_110839.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7964105 No.7964105 [Reply] [Original]

You guys know the drill:
Stan Smith 2014 for me, they are half a size big though and I need new no shows

>> No.7964117

>>7964105
oh, the 2014s have a loop on the tongue as opposed to the earlier versions? Bummers, shouldn't have jumped that earlier model without the loop. Now I have the tongue slipping around all day.

>> No.7964122

>>7964105

why the socks

>> No.7964123

2chunky4me

>> No.7964129
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1836, 20140225_191535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7964129

>>7964117
The leather is also way softer. It's kinda sad that they fit 0.5 bigger than the old ones though

>> No.7964142
File: 106 KB, 1500x1500, 81RSgVaA36L._SL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7964142

>>7964129
they only come in UK sizes, I think, and UK 10 felt a bit tight due to the pretty thick padding (I wear EU 44 mostly).

I'll probably have to take mine to a tailor to sew the tongue on one side, I guess.

>> No.7964152

>>7964122
All my no show socks got holes in them and I don't really like going sockless

>> No.7964411
File: 1.83 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7964411

>> No.7965298

>>7964105
I just got the same in the mail a couple days ago. I actually went up a half size and they fit perfectly. Maybe its just cause I went up from my converse size because they're supposed to run large anyway.

>> No.7965603

I went TTS with stan smiths and fit fine.

To anyone looking to cop, go tts.

>> No.7965617
File: 178 KB, 800x1180, 1394996470626.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7965617

Sorry no pics yet but I managed to find the adidas in pic for cheap on eBay. They came today and they are damn comfy. Just need a navy sweater like Sakaguchi and I'll be baller

>> No.7966249

>>7965617
What model it is?

>> No.7966288
File: 2.45 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7966288

2 real

>> No.7966320

>>7965298
My Converse size is one size lower so yeah.

>> No.7967007

>>7966288
this is amazing

>> No.7967046

>>7964105
looks good OP.. i have been looking for sneakers and i wrote off stan smiths because of the color accent but those look good. especially compared to the kent wangs posted in that one sneaker thread

>> No.7967106
File: 617 KB, 500x883, with w2c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7967106

>>7966249
not him but here you go-Adidas zx500

>> No.7967116

inb4 dozens of Nike runners

>> No.7969214
File: 1.66 MB, 1456x2592, 1395322522310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969214

>>7964105
uh..

>> No.7969221
File: 375 KB, 1836x3264, IMG_20140320_073646_207.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969221

Nothing special

>> No.7969228
File: 1.65 MB, 1964x2046, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969228

These bad boiz

>> No.7969245

>>7969214
you should pinroll instead of cuff.

>> No.7969246

>>7969228
dat backdrop dough

>> No.7969252

>>7969228
w2c pants

>> No.7969254

>>7969245
i just lurk a little. i had to google what pinrolling is, but thanks for the tip.

>> No.7969269
File: 65 KB, 540x960, 1395323747506.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969269

>>7969254
no problem man, theres a youtube vid on it. :^)
wiwt + pinroll

>> No.7969359
File: 863 KB, 1536x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969359

NB m1500

>> No.7969361

>>7964411
comfycore

>> No.7969371
File: 1.82 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969371

>> No.7969387
File: 2.33 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969387

>>7969252
American Vintage

>> No.7969402

>>7969371
I have those, lel, couldn't tell what color were they after few months. I bleached and dyed them white and changed laces to white as well, they look p good now.

>> No.7969406

>>7969269
when should you pinroll as opposed to cuff?

>> No.7969412
File: 1.03 MB, 1456x2592, 1395326936731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969412

slightly less shit?

>> No.7969433

>>7969412
still bad

>> No.7969449

>>7969412
putrid shoes

>> No.7969464
File: 232 KB, 581x778, IMG_20140320_110000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969464

>> No.7969501

>>7969406
Pinrolling gives more of a "sporty" look

>> No.7969505
File: 198 KB, 960x1280, IMG_20140316_023630.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969505

In class so i dont wanna take a new pic

>> No.7969508

>>7969464
are you really wearing those with regular indigo jeans?

>> No.7969544

>>7969508
indigo? are you blind?

>> No.7969551

>>7969544
Not the person that you are replying too but they look indigo on that pic.

>> No.7969567
File: 79 KB, 634x651, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969567

Jazz shoes

>> No.7969568

>>7969551
I think they look like waxed black.

>> No.7969699

>>7969406
pinrolling can be done with low/highcut sneakers/shoes, do it with slim, skinny, or tapered type of pants.

>> No.7969702
File: 425 KB, 691x518, BeaterSS1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969702

>>7964105
>not wearing vintage distressed beaters SS

>> No.7969707

>>7969412
Please accept this as constructive criticism, those shoes and pants are not /fa/ at ALL.

but I'll give you credit since nobody does perfect pinrolls at first go, you didn't do too bad. & yes it does looks better than the previous cuffs.

>> No.7969716
File: 23 KB, 489x652, unnamed (3).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969716

We can't all be /fa/ all the time.

>> No.7969723
File: 1.59 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969723

Sorry for pic quality

>> No.7969725

>>7969723

plz get the fuck out of /fa/

>> No.7969741

>>7969723
this isnt a wayt thread dude, and yes.. that whole fit is shit quality...

>> No.7969834

>>7969741
My bad, I'm on mobile and misread :/

>> No.7969864

>>7969725
Chill

>> No.7969937

>>7969702
My other pair (>>7964129) is p beaten
also
>tfw your Stans will never be that distressed

>> No.7969967

>>7969371
dad gtfo of my anime forum!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.7969982
File: 732 KB, 1000x750, SHOESTODAY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7969982

CP

>> No.7970003

>>7969982
Nice bowling shoes

>> No.7970329
File: 1.63 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970329

Omw to work atm, took this before I left

>> No.7970448

>>7970329
is this a joke

cause its funny but i hope its a joke

>> No.7970460

>>7970329
pants are so baggy

>> No.7970467
File: 1.70 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970467

I'm a basic bitch

>> No.7970476
File: 718 KB, 1080x720, flyknit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7970476

>> No.7970487

>>7970329

cheap baggy denim, cannabis socks, cps

lel

>> No.7970495

>>7970487
technically japanese maple leaves

>> No.7972201
File: 1.03 MB, 2048x1536, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7972201

Nothing extraordinary

>> No.7972477

>>7970476
w2c pants, do they come in black? hnnngg

>> No.7972489

>>7969269
airmax essentials, nice man i use to have that in grey/black. :)

>> No.7972492
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7972492

Make fun of my docs horrible taste and all

>> No.7972502

>>7972492
i own vintage1461s that model is p ugly dude but ill give you some credit they're worn in really well that they now look cool.

>> No.7972504

>>7970467
middle class households aren't /fa/

>> No.7972902
File: 2.22 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7972902

H8rs gonna h8 pt 2

>> No.7972914

>>7972902
woops sorry it's flipped. used my iphone.

>> No.7973077
File: 420 KB, 1808x2180, IMAG1673_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7973077

one of my favorite pair of shoes that I own.

>> No.7973086

>>7973077
damn what are they?

>> No.7973172

>>7973086
adidas forum low ot tech apparently. after extensive googling.

>> No.7973450

bump

>> No.7973465

>>7972902
i like it. i kinda want a pair now. it's pretty feminine but i like it. how's the quality?

>> No.7973500
File: 220 KB, 720x960, IMG_001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7973500

me in subway

>> No.7973508

>>7973500
>tfw everyone have red wings
>tfw when im broke ass nigga

>> No.7973527

>>7973500
Really awkward that he's wearing it better than you.

>> No.7973529

>>7973527
that's what I was thinking ahaha

>> No.7973530

>>7973500
Awkward

>> No.7973531

>>7973465
IMO great build quality. far superior to standard converse. worth the extra money, to me anyway.

>> No.7973533
File: 547 KB, 1816x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7973533

Had them for 3 weeks

>> No.7973542

>>7973533
Do you store them in an ash filled room?

>> No.7973545

>>7973542

London Underground, so close enough.

>> No.7973547

There's like 3 good shoes in this thread. I expected more of you, /fa/

>> No.7973721
File: 180 KB, 820x492, Flyknit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7973721

>> No.7973738

>>7965617

why copy such a mediocre fit?

that pic is reposted to hell and back because retards like you see the japanese writing and slanty eyes and just assume it's top tier

>> No.7973787

been wearing nothing but my black achilles low since I got 'em. so GOAT.

>> No.7973796

>>7973738
Upvoted

>> No.7973809

>>7973738
post a fit
>>7973796
shutup >:(

>> No.7973831

>>7973500
Did you guys fuck and cum on each other's selvedge afterwards?

>> No.7973841
File: 39 KB, 320x480, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7973841

>>7964105

>> No.7974045

>>7973500

Ducking lel

>> No.7974070
File: 411 KB, 1836x3264, IMG_20140321_071408_707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7974070

Stay mad nerds

>> No.7974164
File: 152 KB, 799x554, 2014-03-21_215753.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7974164

UK12...

>> No.7974181

>>7974070
>wearing high tops with shorts

lmao

>> No.7974202

>>7974070

Theses only look good beaten up IMO

>> No.7974209

>>7970448
I'm sorry to be the one to shatter your hopes :^(

>>7970460
straight leg, don't like skinny

>>7970487
yeah they're cheap won't lie lel ain't proud of it but I didn't feel like wearing my good jeans to work

>>7970495
got that loud pack heem japanese maple leaves

>> No.7974264

>>7974181
Waiting for my nbs to come so for now I'm stuck with these.

>> No.7974458
File: 198 KB, 1024x575, WP_20140321_001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7974458

>> No.7974461

>>7974264
>wearing nbs

>> No.7974569

>>7973527
But they look exactly the same

>> No.7975626
File: 2.46 MB, 3264x2448, foto_no_exif.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7975626

Run 2.

>> No.7975640
File: 684 KB, 565x754, 1395434748758.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7975640

Haven't decided if I'm going to keep them yet

>> No.7975646
File: 1.44 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7975646

dont mind the other bed that's my roommate's

>> No.7975660
File: 380 KB, 1212x1615, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7975660

>>7975640

They look dope.

I'm wearing destroyed desert malis at work and I'm not super thrilled about. Need new ones.

>> No.7975865

>>7975640
ay those are sick fix ur fuckin jeans tho

>> No.7975999
File: 876 KB, 581x1047, 2014-03-21_2301.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7975999

I was debating picking up these for the longest time, but they honestly fit incredibly well into my style. No regrets.

>>7975640
Keep em, they look sick as fuck.

>> No.7976010

>>7975646
best flyknits

>> No.7976025

>>7975640
are those wings + horns?

>> No.7976035

>>7976025

ummmmmmm

>> No.7976059

>>7976035
>
yes?

>> No.7978433

bump

>> No.7978541
File: 2.59 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978541

>> No.7978546

>>7978541
decided to not sell them eh.

>> No.7978551

>>7978546
truth is i did not have any other high tops with me that day and it was shorts weather
so yeah decided to wear them for a while and i like them, will probably keep them

>> No.7978572

>>7969567
so hideous

>>7969982
look like shit

>>7970467
water cooler under the tv

>>7970476
sick taperrr

>>7973545
Last time I was in the underground when visiting London I blew my nose and it was fucking black. gross.

>> No.7978573

>>7976059
it's a bit of a taboo to not realise they're rick owens but I'll tell ya.

>> No.7978574
File: 659 KB, 2583x2583, 1395485218340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978574

Leather Purcells

>> No.7978579

>>7978551
meant low tops
>>7978574
look allright

>> No.7978577

>>7978574
horrendous

>> No.7978583

>>7978574
i take that back
why does your hair suddenly stop growing

>> No.7978586

>>7978583
No idea, socks maybe? Been wearing socks that length for the past 11 years 5 days a week so maybe they stop it from growing idk

>> No.7978730
File: 122 KB, 640x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978730

going to the gym

>> No.7978740

>>7975660

Those aren't desert malis, they're just generic chukkas.

>> No.7978763
File: 92 KB, 960x720, 1395491642069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978763

managed to keep clean after bout 2 weeks

>> No.7978767

>>7978730
what model?

>> No.7978803
File: 1.66 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978803

>>7978763
Just gonna post better resolution pic

>> No.7978841

>>7978803
those look nice. I have the 574s myself.

>> No.7978859

>>7978841
thanks i feel like the best ones are the 420's the 574's and the 998's
i only have these by now though

post pic of yours?

>> No.7978885

>>7978859
>implying 576 arent miles better than the 420 or 574 and 996 and 999 arent on par with 998

>> No.7978886
File: 57 KB, 750x500, 1395494209608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7978886

>>7978859
I can't get a pic of them now but here's the exact colour of what I have

>> No.7978891

>>7978885
what is even the difference btw 574 and 576

>> No.7978893

>>7978891
the same thing that differs them all, the cuts

>> No.7978907

>>7978893
so the cuts are miles better?

>> No.7979059

>>7978767
normal 574s

>> No.7979070

>>7979059
or if you want to get specific ML574BBK

>> No.7979188

>>7978573
they don;t look like geobaskets man...

>> No.7979206

>>7979188
Toppest kek

>> No.7979212
File: 179 KB, 717x960, 1395500707356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7979212

>> No.7979256

>>7979188
le epik bait XDdd

If you against all odds were serious, the reason they don't look like geobaskets is because they aren't geobaskets. Rick Owens have made plenty of different shoe models.

>> No.7979362

>>7969412
seriously, those shoes are hot trash

>> No.7979861

>>7975646
What model are those?