New WAYWT

[Anonymous No.7924284]

Other one is being ruined by a cam-whore.

[Anonymous No.7924312]

man things are weird

[Anonymous No.7924833]

Bump for future use

[Anonymous No.7926712]

sorry i took it with a potato
thoughts?

[Anonymous No.7926734]

>>7926712
get better cam

[Anonymous No.7926745]

>>7926734
haha had to set my laptop on the table

[Anonymous No.7926798]

rc
commune
zanerobe
w+h
walmart
kva

[Bio !!5CUaXay7Inn No.7926852]

MA_Julius
Julius_7
Cheap Monday

[Anonymous No.7927463]

>>7926798
So fucking bad

>>7926852
So much fucking denim jesus christ

[Anonymous No.7927469]

Pls r8 my pjs

[Anonymous No.7927473]

>>7926852
roll the sleeves down on that jacket, the shirt underneath it is coming out too much

[Anonymous No.7927484]

>>7927469
Forgot pic

[Anonymous No.7927494]

>>7927484
Let's see the back

[Anonymous No.7927510]

>>7924284

[Anonymous No.7927517]

fucking new thread

[Anonymous No.7927519]

>>7927510
your jeans need to taper through the leg more, for the silhouette you want.

[Anonymous No.7927548]

>>7927510
i like the bottom half - top half could be better though.
>>7927517
fucking disgusting

[Anonymous No.7927546]

>>7927517
What the hell is this. Are you some sort of ugly dike?

[Anonymous No.7927547]

>>7927517
i would probably avoid you irl

[Anonymous No.7927550]

[Anonymous No.7927572]

wow this thread's a trainwreck already

[Anonymous No.7927586]

>>7927550
is this a repost or just the exact same fit redone

[Anonymous No.7927597]

>>7927517
u look like u have a disease

[Anonymous No.7927612]

>>7927586
yeah man same fit

[Anonymous No.7927617]

>>7926852
rugged on rugged just doesn't work. Pick one or the other before you make a fool of yourself.

[Anonymous No.7927632]

noob here

[Anonymous No.7927656]

>>7927517
I like the top part minus the hat at least.

fit would have looked 10x better with a tomboyish skirt, those tight pants look like they are squeezing the fat and smothering your musty omanko

[Anonymous No.7927658]

>>7927632
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.7927660]

>>7927658
noted

[Anonymous No.7927664]

>>7927632
change shirt
get better shoes
you seem to be in good shape

/fa/ is acting really autistic today

[Anonymous No.7927678]

>>7927550
that jacket is fucking with your proportioons

[Anonymous No.7927679]

>>7927632
>Af1 mids
>Ever

[Anonymous No.7927687]

>>7927632
im gonn assume its not so hot if you are wearing black pants so buy some outerwear will ya?

[Anonymous No.7927701]

>>7927664
>/fa/ is acting really autistic today
>today

:---DDD sily anon u can b autistic wid us everyday!!!

[Anonymous No.7927712]

>>7927687
I dunno m9 some people wear black pants year round

[Anonymous No.7927746]

>>7927664
Yeah I'll change up the shirt. What's wrong with Af1's? I just bought them yesterday and still have the receipt, thought they were generally liked by /fa/. Open to recommendations.

>>7927687
I'm in TX so it's pretty hot during the day, I'll change up the shirt though

>>7927679
I was torn between mids and lows, idk man I still have the receipt.

[Anonymous No.7927760]

>>7927746
return it

get some stan smiths/common projects/killshot/blazer low/superga/butteros like a normal god damn person.

[Anonymous No.7927773]

holy fucj this thread is so bad

[Anonymous No.7927779]

>>7927632
/fa/ can fuck off the shoes are fine, buy what you want

[Anonymous No.7927790]

>>7927746
White lows are the shit, sockless, especially with navy cuffed/hemmed pants

[Anonymous No.7927815]

Damn didn't expect so much shoe hate,

>>7927760
How are AF1's any less normal than the other shoes you mentioned, there's a AF1 thread in the catalog right now

>>7927779
Yeah, thanks m8

>>7927790
Considering

[Anonymous No.7927865]

[Anonymous No.7927880]

>>7927865
pls tell me that's a joke fit.
better belt.
no watch?
better fitting shirt
button it up more I don't want to see your undershirt
untuck the shirt

[Anonymous No.7927888]

>>7927865

>actually wearing an undershirt
be man, only button up
stop giving a fuck about your shit and stop looking studied. go nuts with your fit, even if youre aiming for prep/fa/g

[Anonymous No.7927892]

>>7927865
great lighting

[Anonymous No.7927894]

>>7927880
I am wearing a watch...

>>7927888
Do you agree with untucking/different belt?

[Anonymous No.7927901]

>>7927894
yeah. I can't see the watch very well. You might want to take it off. Sorry about my poor wording

[Anonymous No.7927908]

Help a homie

[Anonymous No.7927911]

>>7927901
It's all good. It's my first time posting and I was trying to get outside of my comfort zone. I knew it looked a little weird, but I attributed my fit to just me not being used to the more preppy look I guess

[Anonymous No.7927920]

>>7927908
>dem laces

[Anonymous No.7927922]

>>7927920

they're long af homie

[Anonymous No.7927928]

>>7927894
going back to untucking, you can if you want. develop your own feel of what looks most comfortable. some dudes just seem so tryhard when they tuck it in, or they try to look passive-cool when they keep their shirts loose.
for entry level type shit, either keep the tuck really tight and tailored, or 90's style baggy and billowing.

[Anonymous No.7927946]

>>7927928
The shirt is long and you wouldn't be able to see my belt. Is that ok?

[Anonymous No.7928016]

>>7927946
That's part of the point of untucking. If you're wearing an untucked shirt and your belt is visible when you're standing straight you have a problem

[Anonymous No.7928031]

this, + a fairly long wire-knit cardigan about the same blue as the shirt.

[Anonymous No.7928055]

dont have a full mirror which is pretty lame, also shittybun

[Anonymous No.7928089]

slept for two hours. it's cold and I'm going to subway.

[Anonymous No.7928134]

>>7928089
the employees at subway will wonder and be confused about what world you came from

[Anonymous No.7928156]

>>7928134
u don't even know. I live in Iowa.

[Anonymous No.7928151]

>>7928089
w2c hair and face?

[Anonymous No.7928168]

>>7928089
how tall are you? you should probs be a model

[Anonymous No.7928176]

>>7927687
wearing black keeps u cooler mang so its better for hot days

[Anonymous No.7928211]

>>7928168
6' 117 lbs
I was scouted by the agency that also scouted Karlie Kloss and Ashton Kutcher but I didn't follow up because I decided that keeping my normal steady job was a better choice.

[Anonymous No.7928224]

>>7928156
Aww shit man, I might be moving to Iowa City for grad school, I've been worried about that exact problem. Please tell me living in a place known for corn and footbal isn't as bad as I imagine

[Anonymous No.7928234]

>>7928224
I work full time second shift in front of a computer so I don't really have to deal with anyone ever. Just get used to boring bullshit everywhere. There is nowhere to shop and people don't know what to think if you aren't wearing KR3W jeans and team jordans.
On the plus side everything is cheap.

[Anonymous No.7928300]

>>7928234
>mfw reading KR3W jeans and team jordans

maybe we could be friends? you probably don't live in iowa city though

[Anonymous No.7928311]

[Anonymous No.7928321]

>>7928311
Is uncuffed better or worse?

[Anonymous No.7928326]

>>7928321
With those shoes cuffed

[coco !!0Nv8GZw4mac No.7928331]

>>7928321
worse but fit is solid summer basics, try and get some more interesting shirts.

[Anonymous No.7928337]

>>7928300
I'm in Cedar Rapids which is 15-20 minutes away.
Iowa City is a lot better than Cedar Rapids due to the college.

[Anonymous No.7928366]

>>7928331
Gotcha.

[Anonymous No.7928383]

>>7926852
no

[Anonymous No.7928408]

>>7928337
Ah, well that's good, but it's still probably not that much better. Hopefully I can hide away in the library when the locals look at me funny for having a drapey tee.

[Anonymous No.7928419]

>>7928408
y'know people probably don't care that much

[Anonymous No.7928502]

[Anonymous No.7928506]

>>7928502
everything is shit

[Anonymous No.7928508]

>>7928502
fresh tigers straight outta the box

[Anonymous No.7928510]

>>7928502
nah no nope

[Anonymous No.7928511]

>>7928089

the only good fit in this thread tbh

[Anonymous No.7928512]

>>7927946
lmao yes that's a good thing

[Anonymous No.7928533]

>>7928055
Nice

[Anonymous No.7928559]

>>7927908

Anyone? help?

[Anonymous No.7928589]

>>7928419
yes, i know, i find it funny to joke about though, but nice of you to be out protecting people from fashion related insecurity

[Anonymous No.7928593]

>>7928502
solid fit, ignore the haters. you've got basics, and I think everything fits well, but jeans and shirt could stand to be upgraded.

[Anonymous No.7928611]

>>7928593
thanks a lot. i always get medium shirts because i'm thin but i'm thinking of switching to large for a little more length. thoughts?

[Anonymous No.7928629]

No reason to dress up today.

[Anonymous No.7928815]

ill fitting clothing

[Anonymous No.7928817]

>>7928502
>>7928508
>>7928593
Jeans could fit better
Don't like the hem of your shirt
Looks like the shade of your shirt and jeans are too similar, and I don't like the colour of your jeans into your shoes

[Anonymous No.7928819]

>>7926852
That jacket and shirt look too similar to go well as direct layers, bio-anon
And cuffs like that don't look good under rolled-up jacket sleeves
>And it might just be the angle but the jacket sleeves look kinda awkward in length, like they should be one cuff longer or shorter or something

[B86669 No.7928825]

>>7928629

shirt ??? w2c shirtt ???
it's beautfiul

[Anonymous No.7928837]

>>7928502
Just swap out the trainers for pure whites. Nobody else has any clue. If it was bad I would know.

[Anonymous No.7928838]

1

[Bio !!5CUaXay7Inn No.7928842]

>>7928819
Yeah I cuffed them twice to see how it looked and forgot to roll them back down, it looks much better cuffed once.

[Anonymous No.7928843]

>>7928508
Does look mildly weird from the side. But who really cares... Oh woow the hem of your shirt is a bit fucked. When you're walking down the street look around at the other guys and try to tell me they ain't all leagues worse.

Doesn't take much effort to put yourself above most guys.

And even when you do it makes no difference at all. Really it's all for your pleasure only.

[Anonymous No.7928844]

>>7928838

2

I have 2 because I bought the first one then found the second one afterwards when I had already paid for the first one.

Feels kind of greedy / excessive to have 2, was thinking of selling the second one but man I love both of them so much, don't know what I should do

[Anonymous No.7928853]

[Anonymous No.7928856]

>>7928844
>don't know what I should do
get a haircut

[Anonymous No.7928857]

>>7926852
Nope, coloring doesn't match. Woops! By the way I'm not that familiar with Julius but that stuff looks a lot less impressive than I'd expect from a high end brand. Are they diffusion lines?

[Crept No.7928859]

>>7928853
Hey

[Anonymous No.7928860]

>>7928844
sell the one with the pinstriped arms
keep the other

[Anonymous No.7928861]

>>7928857
>Julius_7
>Is it a diffusion line
Short answer, no. julius_ma is similar to Julius_7 as drkshdw is to mainline rick

The photography doesn't help, but what exactly do you mean by 'impressive'?

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7928866]

>>7928838
>>7928844
oh didngt know it was u w/ the staff coats

2 cdg 1 yy right?

[Anonymous No.7928882]

goof sleeper

[Anonymous No.7928886]

>>7928882
can't see shit to tell whether you actually look like a shapeless black blur or not

[Anonymous No.7928893]

>>7928886
the essence of ninja

[Anonymous No.7928905]

>>7928861
nope, MA_ is a true diffusion line. unisex, lower quality, focus on basics. tatsuro has said this himself

[Anonymous No.7928914]

>>7928905
1. source?
2. >lower quality
No.
3. >focus on basics
lol no, minimal =/= basic

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7928925]

>>7928905
basic & unisex dont mean diffusion

is it lower quality? isnt in my experience but i mostly ahve handled _7

[Anonymous No.7928928]

Workwear

[Anonymous No.7928929]

>>7928925
I own dozens of pieces from both ma and 7, there is no dip in quality between both

[Anonymous No.7928933]

>>7927550
you look like a skinner yung lean

[Anonymous No.7928934]

>>7928914
read literally any tatsuro interview where they ask him a question about MA_.

the garments are lower quality, as they're manufactured with generally cheaper materials in order to fit a lower price point. that's why you see so many more weird blends like rayon/viscose/cotton than in the mainline. that doesn't mean they're ZARA quality, just not at the level of the mainline. it's very obvious when you take, for example, a mainline cotton longsleeve and an MA_ cotton longsleeve and lay them side-by-side (as i just did.) like i said, the difference in quality is important because it allows the pieces to be sold at a lower price point: in other words, they can be stocked in stores that couldn't afford or don't have the customer for something like $1500 jeans, $1200 leather, $300 tees. for example although _7 is stocked almost nowhere in the US, there are quite a few middle and high end streetwear stores that stock MA_ (ODD NY until very recently for example.)

not sure where you got minimal from or the idea that anyone was equating basic to minimal. MA_'s staples and profit-machines are its basics: longsleeves, t-shirts, knits, and simple sweats/trousers, whereas the mainline mostly makes its cash from the more substantial cargo pants/jeans and leathers. of course MA_ also does some outerwear, but the heavier, more substantial, and more detailed pieces always come from the mainline (gasmask, holster jackets, etc.)

lower quality + unisex + bigger focus on basic pieces --> more buyers interested in picking it up --> stocked in more stores --> reaches a wider consumer base than mainline. it's a diffusion

[Anonymous No.7928937]

>>7928928
post fit and labels.

[Anonymous No.7928942]

>>7928089
that hairstyle is not working

[Anonymous No.7928953]

>>7928934
holy shit, i think i understand why women love shopping so much.

[Anonymous No.7928957]

does urban outfitters just blatantly rip off givenchy or am i seeing things?

why are there so many givenchy clones anyway?

[Anonymous No.7928960]

>>7928957
what makes givenchy special?
They images/designs
it's easier to copy something like that than the cut of a rick jacket

[Anonymous No.7928962]

>>7928953
?

[Anonymous No.7928968]

>>7928962
well if they're used to zara quality clothes and get to go to the big cities where they sell top of the market stuff, they'd be in heaven. and they're too dumb and lazy to order things and size them online.

i'm talking legally blonde type women.

[Anonymous No.7928972]

>>7928960
i guess.

>>7928968
zara isnt that low quality.

its not $800 quality but its not $5 quality
id say its $50 selling for $30 quality

[Anonymous No.7928979]

>>7928972
it's low quality compared to thousand dollar designer clothes like the kind you were talking about.
>like $1500 jeans, $1200 leather, $300 tees

[Anonymous No.7928982]

>>7928972
this
>>7928979
'fast fashion'

[Anonymous No.7928985]

>>7928982
yes, fast fashion. what's your point?

[Anonymous No.7928989]

>>7928979
not the dude you were talking to but either way zara isnt made to be cheap. its high quality but affordable.

they sell it for about how much it takes to make it id say.

>>7928982
nothing wrong with fast fashion
whats it gunna do? destroy already destroy hype beast brands? is zara and UO sell renaissance mosaic shirts that mirror givenchy its not the end of the world

[Anonymous No.7928994]

>>7928979
anything is low quality compared to designer clothes, faggot.

[Anonymous No.7928993]

>>7928972
each garment costs them around $3
maybe $30 for some of the jackets
>>7928989
>it's high quality but affordable
>high quality
>zara

[Anonymous No.7929006]

>>7928972
actually, most zara articles of clothing cost around $5-$10 to produce because they use polyester/synthetic fabrics which can be had for pennies a yard and don't pay their workers a living wage. you think about a shirt that uses maybe a square yard whose pattern is machine-cut and takes a worker 3 minutes to sew ... it can come out to even less than $5.

on the other hand, in a factory like olmar + mirta, since (say) the cotton is natural and sourced in Europe it can get up to $20 and $30 a yard, all patterns are hand cut, and the workers are paid a minimum wage, so you can see how the cost of making a garment gets up to $80 or $100. that t-shirt then sells wholesale for $200, a 300% markup, and then the boutiques sell it for $350 on top of that ... but that's still only 350%, versus the zara tee which is selling for $99.90, which is almost a 2000% markup (and will disintegrate within the year.)

if you ever work for a middle or higher-end boutique where you actually are involved in making buys every season then you really start to see how much of a disgusting rip-off fast fashion really is. even brands like alexander wang and theory which are considered lower high-end by most people just literally nauseate me now because i understand how little the garments are actually worth.

[Anonymous No.7929008]

>>7928942
I think it's the light

[Anonymous No.7929012]

>>7928994
are retarded? that's my point. that's why it's exciting for women when they get to shop at designer clothing shops.

did you even read it in context?

>>7928989
zara is fast fashion, therefore it's less valuable as a commodity. it's mass produced, so it holds little value compared to designer clothing. even if all clothes used the same fabrics, the ones that are uniquely designed and tailored specifically to the season of a particular year and marched down a runway will be more valuable. fast fashion would still be fast fashion but with no quality distance between other fast fashion brands.

[Anonymous No.7929036]

>>7929006
to add ... what's really funny is that it's almost exactly the opposite of what people think: low-end brands have INFINITELY larger margins than brands whose clothes retail for $2000, $3000. a guidi boot made with $75/yard guidi leather (obviously guidi isn't actually paying for their own leather, but they're paying the costs of sourcing/producing it; guidi leather used by brands like incarnation wholesales for much more) might take close to 100 manhours to finish. say the guidi craftsmen work at minimum wage (they don't and shouldn't) and you are already above $1000 just to make the shoe. brands like CCP, m.a+ actually usually lose money...and the problem is compounded by the fact that the fast fashion business model convinces people that a pair of shoes should cost $30-$50.

>>7929012
nah, the lower quality is what makes the fast fashion model feasible, that and the fact that their customer base will BUY low quality clothes (non-discriminating.) they have to have the huge profit margins.

[Anonymous No.7929038]

>>7928934
can you link these interviews?
i don't know how true this is, a lot of early Julius did suiting, jackets, trousers but as the label matured it streamlined into a more dedicated vision (one where those pieces did not have a place).
i think MA_ was an outlet for the pieces that did not fit _7's narrative.
MA_ also has larger sizing to accommodate western demographics so I don't know if it was that they saw MA_ as a lower quality alternative (although i have seen some pretty "frail" pieces too).
It's really just two different markets I think
Texhnolyze or Ergo proxy vs Cowboy bebop.
Kind of like Damir Doma and Silent.
different story in history and birth but similar in appearance and marketing

[Anonymous No.7929044]

>>7929038
>two different markets
>designed to accommodate requirements of a broader market
>compares it to silent, the DEFINITION of a diffusion line
come on man...i swear to god people on 4chan are more concerned with proving themselves right than actually learning anything or holding a real back-and-forth discussion haha

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7929049]

>>7929044
calling something a diffusion line based on what gender its aimed at is pretty fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.7929052]

whats dolce and gabbana's quality like?

probably the only designer id actually buy from

>muh italian fashion

[Anonymous No.7929053]

>>7929036
it's really a cost of productions thing. As the scale of the industry increases the costs of production decrease at an exponential rate.
this also brings a difficulty in communication and management which is often the reason why the "fast fashion" labels fall as somewhere along the line they realised that it would not be feasible to try and manage at such a level where top quality worksmanshop could be secured, so there would be no point in using top fabrics, defaulting to the bare minimum to accomplish in all regards driving this brutal fast fashion cycle.
I'm skipping a few steps but Geoffrey B. Small has a few good writings on the topic.
Having said all this Rick Owens circumvents all this and still churns out top shit.

[Anonymous No.7929055]

>>7929052
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.7929057]

>>7929044
can you link the interviews?
sorry, by markets I meant consumers, two different types of aesthetic interests.
a diffusion in my eyes is AW and T by AW.
it's the exact same vision but a watered down cheaper version.
MA_ and _7 are two completely different visions although I think MA_'s is a little incomplete while _7's is continually enforced.
MA_ is its own beast, like Silent is its own.

[Anonymous No.7929061]

>>7929055
who salted your anus?

[Anonymous No.7929062]

>>7929049
do you disagree with this post? >>7929006

[Anonymous No.7929069]

>>7929055
>Not wanting to look like this

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7929071]

>>7929062
i dont see how thats relevant at all but yes? or did you link the wrong post

[Anonymous No.7929073]

>>7929062
He didn't disagree with it, infact, he's right: "bi-sexual clothing" is not grounds for diffusion, sexuality doesn't belong in clothing in the first place.

[Anonymous No.7929077]

>>7929073
>men wearing lacy bras

[Anonymous No.7929078]

>>7928211
nigga u done fucked up

[Anonymous No.7929080]

>>7929071
oh sorry, meant this >>7928934
can you explain why you disagree?

[Anonymous No.7929085]

>>7929077
>Not wearing a lacy bra under your "Ice" rick owens silk/rayon blend full ribbed long sleeve
gender binaries must suck

>pic related but imagine a strip of shreded lace strapped onto the body like mangled oily hair under a fogged pane

[Anonymous No.7929086]

>>7929073
wtf lol when did anybody start talking about being bisexual
mainline julius doesn't do womenswear, MA_ does, but that wasnt the whole basis of that argument, he raised a lot of other important points

[Anonymous No.7929087]

is it true zilli actually has 6 figure priced clothing?

[Anonymous No.7929092]

>>7929086
>"lower quality + unisex + bigger focus on basic piece"
Sorry, meant unisex.
Unisex is not an indicator of diffusion
Not really an indicator of anything but maybe forward thinking? I don't know, if you're thinking in clothing sexuality you're already gapped by galaxies.

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7929098]

>>7929080
>the garments are lower quality, as they're manufactured with generally cheaper materials in order to fit a lower price point.
not my experience
>that's why you see so many more weird blends like rayon/viscose/cotton than in the mainline.
again most of my _7 tees are cotton or rayon, the odd silk blend
>like i said, the difference in quality is important because it allows the pieces to be sold at a lower price point
you could be right about this, i dont keep up with retail prices much, i dont buy things retail. but could this no just be because its womens/unisex? womens versions of mens garments (same materials, same factory, etc.) are often far cheaper
>not sure where you got minimal from or the idea that anyone was equating basic to minimal. MA_'s staples and profit-machines are its basics: longsleeves, t-shirts, knits, and simple sweats/trousers, whereas the mainline mostly makes its cash from the more substantial cargo pants/jeans and leathers. of course MA_ also does some outerwear, but the heavier, more substantial, and more detailed pieces always come from the mainline (gasmask, holster jackets, etc.)
this doesnt say diffusion line to me, selling different pieces makes it a different line. selling lower quality versions of _7 pieces would make it a diffusion line, but like you said, its different

[Anonymous No.7929104]

>>7929086
To add...
>>7929092
Mainline Julius doesn't show Womenswear in Paris for financial reasons (a whole nother show and contractors to feed). The mainline used to do smaller sizes (for womens i presume,I have some in my wardrobe) but it didn't really fit the vision/didn't pay the bill.
Regardless, a lot of the pieces still fit women.
What important points?

[trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR No.7929108]

>>7929087
exotic leathers + exorbinant markups + tastless guidos = $100000 jackets

not that ive bothered to check though

if youre going to go that far you might as well just get some bijan or billionair couture

[Anonymous No.7929110]

>>7929098
that's not me.

>>7929104
>>7929092
>>7929085
>>7929057
>>7929073
>>7929053
>>7929038
>m

[Anonymous No.7929119]

>>7929108
billionaire couture doesnt look that bad but dear god not for 6 figures

whats the most expensive brand? i always though it was zilli with their 100,000 jackets

[Anonymous No.7929124]

>>7929108
>>7929119
this costs 11 grand

jesus

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.7929139]

>>7929087
yeah, zilli and bijan are brands that look horrible and command tens of thousands of dollars for low quality shit

they even fit baggy on me, went in to the bijan here in LA for shits and giggles, then took my pleb ass back to the neiman marcus sale rack to look at clothes only in the 4-5 figures :(

[Anonymous No.7929146]

>>7929139
did you look like this schlub? >>7929124

[Anonymous No.7929149]

>>7929124
you can get 2 custom made kiton suits for 11 grand why the fuck would anybody buy that?

[Anonymous No.7929165]

>>7929146
on top of them making the wearer look fat, he's already fat.

[fukrrr !!c0xfRE6hJF/ No.7929168]

o/

[Anonymous No.7929170]

>>7929168
basic
o a
r d
i
n
g

[Anonymous No.7929188]

>>7928859
Hey

[Anonymous No.7929213]

>>7927517
i'd still fuck you

[Anonymous No.7929219]

>>7929168
My favorite fit in this thread so far.

[Anonymous No.7929223]

>>7926798
oh wow...

[Anonymous No.7929232]

m9

[Anonymous No.7929238]

New james pearse shirt :^)

[Anonymous No.7929297]

[Anonymous No.7929336]

composite image but w/e

autumn atm

[Anonymous No.7929356]

>>7928321
w2c pants

[Anonymous No.7929388]

>>7928089
3/10
needs to work legs

bro no one is mirin
your twig legs

they probably laugh at you

[Anonymous No.7929391]

>>7928321
4/10 nice style granpa

no one's mirin your twig arms either

[Anonymous No.7929396]

>>7928508
5/10

Looks something straight out of the late 80's early 90s there denim dan

[Anonymous No.7929401]

>>7928825
flux clothing melbourne

[Anonymous No.7929404]

>>7928629
6/10 shirt
8/10 body would love to top dat twink ass
mirin dem veins and low bf

[Anonymous No.7929408]

>>7929404
thanks homie i love you too

[Anonymous No.7929411]

>>7928815
Try roll your pants those cuffs look gross, and get new shoes.

[Anonymous No.7929417]

>>7929408
send me nudes bro

[Anonymous No.7929453]

>2014
>wanting to be normcore when u can look THIS cool
ishiggydiggy

[Anonymous No.7929463]

>>7929453
if I saw u on the street id probs point & laugh & get my crew to do the same

[Anonymous No.7929470]

>>7929463
do it bro, id laugh back at you and im ready 2 fight ur whole crew

[Rezr No.7929496]

>>7929453
This would be 100x better with black Velcros. Just looks off with the white/holo. Like even if you're trying to make it the stand out piece, still looks weird.

[Anonymous No.7929499]

>>7929453
r u the guy with the westie

[Anonymous No.7929512]

>>7929453
sell those shoes

[Anonymous No.7929533]

>>7929496
i think its just the pic that doesnt do them justice.
>>7929499
The dog?? no
>>7929512
hell no, theyre my only white shoes and theyre the sickest white shoes i could possibly imagine.

[Anonymous No.7929535]

>>7929470
no ur not my crew r cut from the hard stuff & only wear rare rick owens clothes

[Anonymous No.7929572]

Can I into business casual

[Anonymous No.7929575]

>>7929572
what a nice untermensch-core look!

[fukrrr !!c0xfRE6hJF/ No.7929580]

>>7929533
if you ever change your mind about the shoes, and they're in my size, ill buy

[Anonymous No.7929594]

>>7929575
I know what that means
:)

[Anonymous No.7929597]

>>7929575
what did I do wrong?

[chilljin No.7929641]

:) nice day

[chilljin No.7929648]

>>7929641
also pants are cargo

[Anonymous No.7929652]

>>7929648
where u buy ur pants

[Anonymous No.7929650]

Haven't posted in a while

[Anonymous No.7929661]

>>7929648
bad
>>7929650
top's ok, pants are shite, cant comment on shoes. w2c that bomber or w/e?

[Anonymous No.7929659]

>>7929650
w2c bomber?

[Anonymous No.7929688]

>>7929648
usually quite dig ur fits. not feelin this tho

[Anonymous No.7929706]

>>7929648
Its great except the shirt. It makes a great palette but the pattern kinda kills the whole fit. If you could find a tee with the same colours it'd be perfect

[Anonymous No.7929771]

>>7929648
i dont like how the pants are way too casual with the parka and boots (especialy if those are sweatpants), and i dont like the plaid shirt either (especialy with a shirt undernearth. Very messy fit.

jeans would be better, replace the plaid shirt with a solid color buttondown and throw a sweatshirt (no hood) over it if its cold

[Anonymous No.7929817]

>>7929648
what parka is that?

[Anonymous No.7929827]

advice pls

[intimacy No.7929850]

comin in hot with that early morning weirdness

[Anonymous No.7929856]

>>7929453
Dude, why are you wearing leggings

[chilljin No.7929864]

>>7929771
Lol

[Anonymous No.7929870]

>>7929827

ill fitting jacket and jeans

[intimacy No.7929889]

>>7929771
>I don't like this fit
>completely change it or else

[fukrrr !!c0xfRE6hJF/ No.7929888]

>>7929219
thx )

[uuuuhhhh No.7929904]

>>7929648
this is cool don't listen to anyone else

[Anonymous No.7929932]

>>7929650
The pants and bomber are realy nice, having a heavy bottom isn't too bad when carrying a backpack. Also the sweatpant+doc look is very nice in my oppinion
I like it.
>>7927550
Somehow I don't realy feel the sadboy style. The silouette seems to be so off with that weird hat. However I like the pants and the sweater w2c?

[Anonymous No.7929933]

>>7929650
Where 2 cop pants?

[Anonymous No.7929943]

>>7929297
That T-shirt looks terrible. Everything else seems to be in place. 5/10

[Anonymous No.7929950]

>>7928844
You look fucking ridiculous.

[dyeldavebased !JlKEroVwAM No.7930042]

>>7928838
>>7928844
mad cool

[Anonymous No.7930186]

>inb4 cankles

[Anonymous No.7930197]

I'm so shit. And my fucking face

[Anonymous No.7930233]

>>7929356
Adidas SLVR. Sold out doe.

>>7929391
ty bb ;)

[Anonymous No.7930238]

>>7930197
you look like matty helders

[Anonymous No.7930258]

>>7928089
im so jealous of your legs

[Anonymous No.7930260]

[Anonymous No.7930293]

thoughts on this sweater?

[Anonymous No.7930320]

>>7930293
Tell me you're not serious, please.

[Anonymous No.7930333]

>>7930320
I am

[Anonymous No.7930346]

>>7930293
What the hell is that
Take it off, quick

[Anonymous No.7930356]

>>7930346
Not until you give me some constructive criticism.

[Anonymous No.7930360]

>>7930293
yesstyle pls go

[fine chyna phone !iJvTprGbUU No.7930364]

[Anonymous No.7930368]

>>7930364
same shit as every day

boring

[Anonymous No.7930378]

>>7930293
someone find this sweater on yesstyle and add it to the yesstyle infographic

[Anonymous No.7930384]

>>7930378
Mind telling me what yesstyle is?

[Anonymous No.7930389]

>>7930384
google m8

[Anonymous No.7930394]

>>7930389
Asian fashion?
Just looked at the hoodies they have, fucking awful.

Im guessing the way the sweater buttons up is what grinds your gears?

[Anonymous No.7930403]

>>7930364
looks good mang

[Anonymous No.7930405]

>>7930364
you post the same pic everyday

[Anonymous No.7930410]

>>7930394
that and the overall look of it imo, but who cares wear what you wish

[Anonymous No.7930415]

>>7930364
You obviously have your style on lockdown teddy but it's the same shit everyday lel

[Anonymous No.7930419]

>>7930415
>your style

teddy is an asian hypebeast he has no style

[Anonymous No.7930421]

>>7930419
lol post fit

[Anonymous No.7930423]

>>7930410
everyone cares what you wear, thats the point right?
thing is i sometimes love this sweater but sometimes i also think it has too much "shit on it".

[fine chyna phone !iJvTprGbUU No.7930433]

>>7930415
Well ive been wearing a lot of different stuff but I decided to wear this and I yes I do wear this outfit very often because these are my favorite articles of clothing currently.

[Anonymous No.7930510]

>>7929232
i like cept for the shoes

[Anonymous No.7930515]

>>7929297
w2c jacket

[Anonymous No.7930549]

>>7924284
How do I s/s

[Anonymous No.7930553]

s'alright?

i'm new to /fa/, first post. i'm not as skinny as you fucks.

[Anonymous No.7930567]

[Anonymous No.7930570]

>>7929850
Where the fuck do you take your pictures?
Is bretty rad

[Anonymous No.7930577]

>>7930549
Jeans are way too light boi, they'll never work together with that vest. Swap one of them out.

>>7930553
Get a nicer shirt and nicer trainers. You look like a chav farmer.

>>7930567
Real nice. w2c bomber?

[intimacy No.7930582]

>>7930570
at work :)

[Anonymous No.7930584]

>>7930582
Do you work in warehouse?

[Anonymous No.7930660]

>>7928089
better without the head
>>7930186
better without the head
>>7930197
better without the head
>>7930364
better without the head

[Anonymous No.7930666]

>>7930577
thanks!
It's "elvine bill"

[Anonymous No.7930675]

>>7930260
Get a crew neck shirt instead of a v

[Anonymous No.7930678]

>>7930197
Matt is that you?
You've lost weight and gained height, good on ya

[Anonymous No.7930704]

>>7930678
lol
does matt even post here anymore tho

[Anonymous No.7930767]

>>7929850
shoes?

[Anonymous No.7930789]

>>7930767
yes

[the cosmicbutt experiment !!qblBZSgYzBX No.7930792]

I need a tan

[Anonymous No.7930797]

>>7930792
looks like you have a disgusting manbun

[Anonymous No.7930798]

>>7930792
you look like a girl i know with that face and haircut

i would fuck either of you

[Cool Man Luke !!0aHqY2/owxC No.7930803]

>>7930792
Whenever I see a problem in my life, like lack of a sun tan, I do what I can to solve it. Posting on 4chan is a great way to get a sun tan.

PS you look awfully gentle in that pic.

[the cosmicbutt experiment !!qblBZSgYzBX No.7930812]

>>7930803

very witty

[Anonymous No.7930814]

>>7930792

u manage to make even the nicest of items look drab n shit. i think its the thights? i dunno. u got potential stop ruinin fitss friend

[pigfuck !!F1hg9EtV7MP No.7930823]

>>7930792
fat lard

[Anonymous No.7930824]

>>7930803
did u seriously just say he looks gentle? wtf does that even mean

[Cool Man Luke !!0aHqY2/owxC No.7930825]

>>7930812
Take some zinc, Vitamin D, do cardio and eat steak.

let me guess...
>i'm vegan

[Anonymous No.7930817]

>>7930814

*thighs

u can do it mang, just do it

[Anonymous No.7930828]

>>7930792
i actually like this
would definitley change top but still decent

[Cool Man Luke !!0aHqY2/owxC No.7930830]

>>7930824
Someone told him he looked gentle once and I thought it was funny, so I was reminding him of it.
Just two guys having some guy time and goofin'.

[the cosmicbutt experiment !!qblBZSgYzBX No.7930833]

>>7930824

he's playing off of something i said earlier

>>7930817

you mean my thighs or too big or something of the sort? i've started cardio as of late and i've been doing aight

[Anonymous No.7930851]

>>7928089
do you live in a pineapple under the sea?

[Anonymous No.7930852]

>>7930660
Bro that's mean

[Anonymous No.7930854]

>>7930260
that posture...comfy skeleton?

[Anonymous No.7930868]

>>7930851
How did you know

[Anonymous No.7930872]

>>7927510
you need jeans that are looser in the thigh and tighter in the calf. those make ur thighs look hella grily

[Anonymous No.7930888]

>>7928089
Why would you do that with your body
I mean you can't look like this without reason
Start eating please

[Anonymous No.7930891]

what happened to all the grills?

i swear there was like 5 yesterday

[Anonymous No.7930893]

>>7930553
Would look pretty ok with chinos or slim jeans. Even better with good shoes. Actually good with a nice shirt.

[Anonymous No.7930908]

>>7930891
Do you really post your fita every day? I'm not one of the girls, but I don't.

[Anonymous No.7930917]

>>7930888
I think ur jel

[Anonymous No.7930919]

>>7928815
mac demarco-core

[Anonymous No.7930934]

>>7930893
those are rolled up chinos. no go?

new shoes incoming.

[Anonymous No.7930940]

>>7930917
Losing weight is easier than getting it and growing muscles

[Anonymous No.7930972]

>>7930940
I haven't made an effort to lose weight. I've been this height and weight since my sophomore year of high school.

[Anonymous No.7931145]

>>7929388
>>7930888
>>7929391
/fit/ fatties need to leave.

[Anonymous No.7931762]

i went with something simple today

[Anonymous No.7931796]

shitty phone camera pic
jacket and shirt: j. crew
pants: zanerobe
boots: redwing

[Anonymous No.7931811]

>>7931796
lrn2proportions
honestly this is hilarious

[Anonymous No.7931805]

>>7931762
>too skinny to look otter, too fat to look skinny
Dyel fuccboi

[Anonymous No.7931813]

>>7931796
also 80's cabinets

[Anonymous No.7931824]

>>7931811
yeah I was afraid of that... tried something new, didn't work...

[Anonymous No.7931842]

>>7931805
true

[Anonymous No.7931892]

>>7931842

[Anonymous No.7932200]

>>7931762
fuck off faggot!

[Anonymous No.7932211]

>>7927908

don't like the sneaks, and they don't really work that well in a fit like this. Otherwise it's okay.

[Anonymous No.7932224]

>>7928844

you look like a fucking alien lol. Both the jackets have terrible proportions, they fit you like trashbags. They look like something you'd wear if you worked in a sewer.

[Anonymous No.7932230]

>>7929827

shoes are fucking scary

[Anonymous No.7932243]

>>7931892
>>7931842

I love everything individually, but without a full body pic to check proportions it's hard to tell if the sweater is too tight or not. You look pretty skinny so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

[Anonymous No.7932265]

>>7932224
>you look like a fucking alien
> terrible proportions, they fit you like trashbags

objective achieved
i have ascended
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.7932488]

/fa/ I need advice on how to stop being a fuccboi. It's kind of hard to do when you're a poorfag though. Pic is me

[Anonymous No.7932510]

>>7932488
read the sticky, lurk /fa/ and other forums and learn. crawl before you walk
shirt is ugly and ill-fitting. lose some weight, button shirts up all the way. That one is an ugly color and dumb pattern though, get rid of it. Pants don't fit well. Looks like they're too long. Roll them or even better, get nicer pants
Shoes are terribad. Get black chucks or vans if you're that poor. get a job and start saving for quality pieces. Go to Superfuture and Styleforum and start reading threads like waywt, inspiration threads, clothes and fits for beginners, etc. etc.
finally, be patient and willing to learn

[the cosmicbutt experiment !!qblBZSgYzBX No.7932511]

>>7932488

your shirt appears to fit okay, but it looks horribly cheap and it's ugly for notable reasons (wrinkled fabric, spread collar, breast pockets, the color)

your chinos fit okay, but with a fit as straight as that, there should be only one break/no stacks. you could also opt for a more tapered fit

shoes look very cheap but they're inoffensive

your glasses are also an issue

fundamentally, you aren't doing too bad though. don't sweat it and lurk

[Anonymous No.7932521]

>>7932511
Man I get everything else but what's wrong with the glasses? Also what do you mean one break/no stacks?

[Anonymous No.7932525]

>>7932488
Shirt is bad, glasses are bad. Bottom half looks okay~. I prefer solid color button downs bt that's just me, don't get ugly patterns like that. Uniqlo may be your friend if you're going for that look.

[Anonymous No.7932540]

>>7932525
Thanks. Yeah the shirt is kind of my father's and I didn't really have another one to wear at the time. But can someone please tell me what's wrong with the glasses? This is one criticism I did not expect

[Anonymous No.7932549]

>>7932540

The white handles on your frames look terribad. I'm sure there's a guide for face shape and glasses somewhere, you can never go wrong with all black wayfarers.

[Anonymous No.7932560]

>>7932549
Thanks I'll try and search around for a guide like that. Man I really expected my outfit to be torn apart but glasses I did not expect :( - btw they're prescription. I mostly wear contacts most days though. Would that be better?

[Anonymous No.7932569]

>>7932560
Whatever you prefer, as far as glasses go I hear you can get really cheap frames online, just know your eyesight number/prescription/whatever and you can order it for like $20~. Forgot where though if anyone wants to chime in.

[Anonymous No.7932603]

>>7932488
Is my winter wear maybe slightly more appealing? Or worse off?

[Anonymous No.7932615]

halp

[Anonymous No.7932646]

[Anonymous No.7932701]

>>7932488
sell all your clothes
dont go to the mall

[Anonymous No.7932706]

Simple

[Anonymous No.7932711]

>>7932701
>>7932525
>>7932511
>>7932510

Is this better?
>>7932603

[Anonymous No.7934125]

>>7930666
Thanks. Any chance you could tell me your height and jacket size if you see this?