[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 87 KB, 750x498, 1393733915136.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874111 No.7874111 [Reply] [Original]

What's /fa/'s opinion on these?

>inb4 the Ryan Gosling clip

>> No.7874112

This colourway is horrible

>> No.7874122

>>7874111
are these 420s? becuase they look great in this fit

>> No.7874128
File: 114 KB, 500x750, 1392472543632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874128

>>7874122
forgot pic

>> No.7874129
File: 61 KB, 760x864, new-balance-u420-snb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874129

>>7874112
This is actually the color I got.

Any better?

>> No.7874132

All running shoes are ugly.

>> No.7874139
File: 31 KB, 450x360, gazelle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874139

>>7874132
wrong

>> No.7874136

>>7874132
thats ur opinion man

>> No.7874157

>>7874132
>Roshes
>Qasa

>> No.7874162
File: 483 KB, 1296x1502, 10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874162

I have the black and white version of these. They're pretty cool.

>> No.7874164

>>7874162
>button up
>sweatpants

>choose one or die in a hole

>> No.7874165

>>7874129
Blue running shoes don't usually look all that good in my opinion, and work rarely with fits.

>> No.7874182
File: 34 KB, 640x480, TPhoto_00001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874182

>>7874162
>not tucking your laces into the side of your shoes

>> No.7874186

>>7874182

yeah ive since been doing that, it looks a lot better that way

>> No.7874194
File: 118 KB, 537x293, shuss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874194

What does /fa/ think of these shoes

>> No.7874214

>>7874182
that is so 12yo circa 2005

>> No.7874222

what ryan gosling clip?

>> No.7874235

>>7874194
make sure u size right they are pretty inoffensive the only problem with them is some mfaer might recognize them and try to be ur friend

>> No.7874237

>>7874222

from Crazy Stupid Love

>> No.7874259

>>7874194
Just got them today, and already got 3 compliments for them. They are really basic but look good. They seem pretty comfortable, and I really hope the construction is good and will hold up for a while.

>> No.7874252

>>7874235

i'll just try my best to seem as dis-attached to any purposeful fashion board as I can

I'm an expert at hiding my powerlevel

>> No.7874254

>>7874194
I really like them and I was considering buying a pair for like ever.
>>7874235
Everyone loves J. Crew shoe collabs. It's a fact.

>> No.7874264

>>7874235
>some mfaer might recognize them

yeah lol these are hyped so hard on MFA

i see them on campus a lot too incorporated into some notably internet-inspired fits (some of them good)

>> No.7874276

>>7874111
>>7874194

Can I wear running shoes with button down shirts/short sleeve shirts? Or do I have to get slightly dressier shoes?

>> No.7874279

>>7874276
do it mang. next level shit

>> No.7874309

>>7874276
Button down shirts, as long as they aren't too flashy or classy, are only a little bit less casual than t-shirts. It usually depends more on what you usually wear. I wear button down shirts basically every day, so they have become casual to me and I wear whatever shoes I want. On the other hand, I have a friend who only wears button down shirts to shit like weddings or funerals, so then they would be considered formal.

>> No.7874313

>>7874309

so they're basically what you make of it?

if you act like they're formal shirts, than they will be?

>> No.7874327
File: 97 KB, 540x536, jcrew_gingham_shirt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7874327

>>7874313
Pretty much. I mean there are shirts that are strictly formal (tux shirts) and others that are strictly casual (flannels), but if you're wearing just normal button up shirts like pic related, then they're pretty much what you make of them, yeah.

>> No.7874335

can you even run in these? seems like they have 0 arch support

>> No.7874366

>>7874335
people didn't have arch support in their shoes until relatively recently

>> No.7876551

>>7874194
Anyone know where i can buy these in the uk, jcrew dont ship um