[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 75 KB, 486x724, 724.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6961054 No.6961054[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Hello /fa/ as a person who has almost no knowledge about fashion and how it works I came to ask a question about shoes and how they work with blacks niggers and feminists.

As far as I have understood footwear was actually made for protection against the environment outside and later on got a fashion sense to it and evolved according to it.
>basic rules for males, black brown belt shoes
>basic rules for females shoes and handbags
But how come that regular males just kept it still as a sourve to protect themselves while black and feminist are overly abusing the aspect and spending lots of money on lots of different shoes? Could this be the main issue we have with the differences of our cultures? Is it just like how Dave Grohl states: "finger nails are pretty, finger nails are good, seems that all they ever wanted was a marking" where marking could be heard subliminal as marketing.

If it is who is behind this?

>> No.6961060

>>6961054
bump for interest

>> No.6961075

Come on /fa/ help a fellow anon. I could be on to something.

>> No.6961102
File: 498 KB, 1350x2000, bait-poster02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6961102

>> No.6961117

>>6961102
>I don't agree with it
>so bait

fug off

>> No.6961156

what the fuck did you just write?

I've read it three times and i think you're trying to make the point that black people and feminists like to buy shoes and that is somehow bad for (presumably) white men?

>> No.6961557

>>6961054
this is a bad ruse but hell whatever