[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 1.41 MB, 3200x2400, P1010952.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794238 No.6794238 [Reply] [Original]

wat do /fa/

>> No.6794255

>>6794238
With those shoes?

Hang yourself with the shoe laces.

>> No.6794251

>manlytears tries on capris.

>> No.6794250

cuff if they're raw. dont wanna stain em.

>> No.6794267

ya'll fucking faggots dress the same
raw denim+ket wangs/cps+basic tshirts
develop your own style, stop dressing the way /fa/ tells you

>> No.6794274

are those fake CPs?

>no cupsole

>> No.6794275

you obviously sized down but you have a similar foot like mine and it looks bulged which ruins the silhouette of the shoe. Those pants are also too baggy and would benefit from getting them tapered. Also try not to let your pants hang over your shoes when you wear low tops, it just looks better with a taper in my opinion. Bonus points if you have nice ankles or socks.

>> No.6794278

>>6794238
cuff if they are raw, you don't wanna stain those common pro-...wait a minute, are they those Kent Wangs/CP knock offs? who cares, they're fucking fakes, just stain them. You suppose to be wearing beaters with raws anyways.

>> No.6794284

>>6794278
>>6794274
ahah MFW realize the sole is glued on. What the fuck are those.

>> No.6794285
File: 1.55 MB, 3200x2400, P1010954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794285

>>6794267
>mfw i bought these shoes/pants before ever comign to /fa/
how can i get dem leet stax /fa/?

>> No.6794290

>resize your picture
>be more specific about what the fuck you're asking
>cuff your jeans

pick 3

>> No.6794296

>>6794284
probably first generation kent wangs

>> No.6794301

>>6794285
get jeans with more of a taper, probably, or pinroll. those look good, though; what are they?

>> No.6794300

if you're asking about getting sick stax on your jeans, just wear them uncuffed for a while and as your break them in the stacks will show. it looks ugly for a couple weeks but they show up eventually.

>> No.6794309

>>6794238
>>6794285
And you guys are telling me that those Kent Wangs looks as good as CP. Look good my fucking ass, they look like complete shit, but then again for 100$ you get for what you pay for.

>> No.6794313
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794313

Kent wangs look terrible, but might look good if you can size down 2 sizes lol

>> No.6794316

>>6794309
who the fuck on /fa/ said kws look good lol

>> No.6794335

>>6794313
Fucking Kent Wang trying to copy CP
Adidas look better than that

>> No.6794341
File: 1.39 MB, 3200x2400, P1010956.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794341

>>6794301
the shoes are kent wangs as /fa/ detectives have proudly announced, the pants are indigo petit apcs
>>6794309
>getting mad

>> No.6794345

Anyone got a picture of KW and CP side by side?

>> No.6794355

>>6794341
laces are too spaced. I bet they use less leather on the side pannels to save money which is what causes that thick spacing between eyelets which is what ruins the shoe for me.

>> No.6794367
File: 67 KB, 500x500, tumblr_ms9im0VSME1qbc2yio1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794367

>>6794345

no but i have this

>> No.6794417
File: 461 KB, 1440x1080, P1010957 (Large).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794417

>>6794267
am i deviating from /fa/ enough with these?

>> No.6794425

>>6794417
not in the right direction lel

>> No.6794447

>>6794316
the morons on /fa/ who were like 'durrrrr why spent 400$ on a pair of shoe when you could get the same thing with 100$ kw'

Goddamn retards I swear.

>> No.6794472
File: 513 KB, 1920x1080, IMG_20130807_233658.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794472

>>6794341
nah brah, ain't even jelly. It's just baffles me that you are asking us what the fuck to do with raw jeans while wearing 100$ shoes.

>> No.6794499

>>6794472
I bought that pair off Ebay with good condition, but I ruined them

>> No.6794532 [DELETED] 
File: 205 KB, 610x1920, newjpg (Large).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794532

>>6794425
sorry to dissapoint
>>6794472
$100 shoes that look like $400 shoes i can live with

>> No.6794534
File: 33 KB, 1000x660, generic_surplus_spring_summer_5_2-095.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794534

damn those are p bad
>tfw there are more bad fits on /fa/ then good fits
just bought these, hope they look good
kind of a different style altogether though
but still minimalist

>> No.6794546
File: 205 KB, 610x1920, newjpg (Large).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794546

>>6794425
sorry to dissapoint
>>6794472
$100 shoes that look like $400 shoes i can live with

>> No.6794563 [DELETED] 

>>6794417
>>6794546
Can't wait to see those kent wangs after a couple of months. I bet they look shit when they are beat up.

>> No.6794585

>>6794546
Can't wait to see those kent wangs after a couple of months. I bet they look shit when they are beat up.

>> No.6794591 [DELETED] 
File: 147 KB, 1500x1500, i dunno man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794591

pretty tempted

its goretex

>> No.6794598

>>6794546
You were asking us what the fuck do with raw jawnz while wearing kws. My answer? Who cares, they're 100$ shoes, stain those fuckers all you want anyways. Sneakers aren't meant to be babied.

>> No.6794606

>>6794591
That actually looks good in my opinion, but the branding puts me on the fence, and the yellow pushed me over.

>> No.6794615

>>6794606
sorry for deleting
realised it wasn't c/n
thank you though

>> No.6794654

>>6794546
get a better jacket and that would be a good fit

>> No.6794666

>>6794546
that fit looks bad, it looks like it was straight out of mfa. Go back to mfa.

>> No.6794692

Hey, raws question here

if i like stacks, but for some occasions like cuffs also, would doinging it where some days i dont cuff and some days i do lead to messed up fades?

>> No.6795938

>>6794666
im not that guy, but my god talk shit post fit

based on the waywt's i've seen, a good number of posters on mfa dress way better than some of this shitfits i see on /fa/

>> No.6795972

>>6795938
lol nigga does this look like a waywt to you?

>> No.6795997

>>6794546
>faded pullover
>jeans tight
>fat
>long hair
>ugly palladiums
>belt doesn't match or fit
>shirt does'mt accentuate anything
>dirty mirrow
>oversized ysl wallet

>> No.6796000
File: 74 KB, 250x374, giggles[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796000

>>6795972
>nigga
mfw you're a skinny chink or a peckerwood cracker

>> No.6796022

>>6794692
no it leads to diverse fades, and if that bothers you just get a pair for high tops and another for lows.

>> No.6796100

>>6796000
obv
do people actually want to be black irl lmao

>> No.6796374

>>6795997
if ur better post a fit fuccboi at least he has the balls to