[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 302 KB, 1800x2160, eqzoom85.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591834 No.6591834 [Reply] [Original]

cop or not thread
pic related

>> No.6592073

>>6591834
sure, why not?

>> No.6592084

Probably if you have something to go with it.

>> No.6592091

>>6591834
fuck it, buy it

dont be a fashion slave when it comes to practicality, it's pitiful

>> No.6592101

>>6592091
what's practical about a small ass bag you have to sling over your shoulder?

>> No.6592874
File: 94 KB, 720x960, 999510_1404355896444209_485172959_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592874

should i cop this?

>> No.6592882

>>6592874
if your a qt grill

>> No.6592887
File: 82 KB, 720x960, 529098_1404357229777409_1663119608_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592887

w00t bout this?

>> No.6593207
File: 26 KB, 768x1024, $T2eC16R,!)cE9s4PtI(cBR9zsOzQLg~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593207

Advice on these?

>> No.6593237
File: 116 KB, 1024x1024, visvim_flynthimarie_lightbrown_01_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593237

Can't decide whether to drop for them or not. I'd be getting them for roughly $525, which isn't a completely irresponsible amount for me, but it's definitely my footwear budget for this next few months.

I'm pretty heavily leaning for yes though, curious to see what others think of them.

>> No.6593249

>>6593207
what's the material

u should go mainline tbh

>> No.6593258

>>6593237

that sole looks glued

>hiroki

>> No.6593277

>>6591834
>>6592874
>>6592887
>>6593207
>>6593237
No.

>> No.6593341
File: 115 KB, 411x325, rick-owens-island-dunk-shoes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593341

>>6593237
yes cop! but only if you feel comfortable with the price. you could get these for about the same price on a side note.

>> No.6593400

>>6593258
Probably is honestly, but that isn't a huge deal, and shoe glue will fix any issues if they start to become detached (like those damn Undercover x Visvim FBT's).

>>6593277
Why though?

>>6593341
I like island dunks a lot actually, never seen them new for around $525~ though. Where do you see them listed for that much? I might consider them instead.

>> No.6593450
File: 28 KB, 540x359, visvim-virgil-boots-folk-1-540x359.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593450

>>6593400
Because I hate anything from Visvim that isn't named Virgil.

I am shallow.

I also see them as one of his less interesting designs, and dislike it when people buy stuff from Visvim when the design isn't fucknasty perfect. Too much brand whoring going on to give him a real kick in the ass when he fucks up, and it annoys me because I think if that happened more, he'd likely be even more on the ball than he already is. Which would be amazing.

Like I said, I am a bitch. lol

>> No.6593472
File: 320 KB, 1024x1024, visvim_kilgorejktlinen_sand_06_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593472

>>6593450
It's all good, biased opinions are still opinions to be taken into account. I honestly thought this Flynt series were some of his best footwear pieces, far better than the FBT for sure.

As for branding, I'd say that the branding on these is a lot more subtle than Virgils though, so that's the only thing I don't get.

>> No.6593480

>>6593472
I didn't mean branding on the shoes, I meant brand dick hopping. Visvim kids seem to hop on Hirokis dick even if the design is faulty, it annoys me.

>> No.6593498

>>6593480
Oh, for sure then, especially feeling that with a lot of the denim and any of the crepe soled footwear.

BUT, that being said, I found this pair particularly on-point, only wish it had stitched foxing. But hell, I've got all the tools to do it myself if I really wanted to add it.

>> No.6593504

Do it.

>> No.6593512

>>6593237
I think it's a good idea.

>> No.6593524
File: 13 KB, 400x236, vans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593524

Need a basic casual sneaker, these are 50 bucks.

Should I buy?

>> No.6593546

>>6593524
Pretty awful colourway in my opinion. If you can spend $75 I suggest a pair of old skool vintage Vans. Suede upper will last you longer and the entire shoe will look a lot better.

>> No.6593554

>>6593524
If you're going to get vans, don't get these shitty ones. Get at least Authentic's, Era's, or Chukka's.

>> No.6593555
File: 7 KB, 276x323, hmprod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593555

>>6593524
go for something a bit more minimalist, fuccboi

>H&M in pic related

>> No.6593563

>>6591834
Nope.

>> No.6593565

>>6593524
>>6593555
H&M's footwear quality is bad and you should feel bad

>> No.6593571

>>6592874
>>6592887
>>6593207
>>6593237
>>6593341
>>6593524
>>6593555

Hell fucking no. Otherwise maybe.

>> No.6593674

>>6593565
gb2leddit

>> No.6593694

>>6593674
Not sure how that relates to Reddit, at all.

But he's right, H&M quality is awful, especially the footwear.

>> No.6593798

>>6593400
http://www.gilt.com/sale/men/covetable-kicks/product/164021835-rick-owens-island-dunk-sneaker

>> No.6593813

>>6593798
>>6593400
better hurry always sells quick

>> No.6595408

>>6593249
Cotton, it's listed as buttoned sweats

>> No.6595821

black harem pants? for this fit i had in mind

>> No.6595840

>>6593813
>>6593798
Eh, if I had more time to think about it I would drop for them, but I don't like the pressure of being timed on pieces like that if there's even the slightest bit of doubt.

>> No.6596091
File: 1.82 MB, 350x234, 1371871984086.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596091

>>6595840
true i feel the same way plus gilt has a no return policy. so good luck tho

>> No.6596106 [DELETED] 
File: 118 KB, 902x766, murray-grain-black.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596106

>> No.6596114

>>6595840
i would cop the dunks if i were you. they would go with a lot more stuff than the others.

>> No.6596157
File: 84 KB, 396x594, coat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596157

http://www.cosstores.com/Shop/Men/Coats_Jackets/Wool_mix_coat/46909-9622837.1#c-9623396

looking for a cheap somewhat minimalist coat, any better options?

>> No.6596342
File: 28 KB, 500x500, 41VxA46AKBL[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596342

Allen Edmond Strand Oxford.
I don't really own any nice dress shoes, should I go for it?
$229

>> No.6597093
File: 523 KB, 1019x1210, 7e0b3f9d973773a97e794550850fd04f_h1211w1020_passthru.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597093

have been thinking about this for a while now and still not sure. waterproof nylon but the suede is of course another story

>> No.6597105

>>6596342
do it faget!

>> No.6597107

>>6597093
supposed to be for university by the way

>> No.6597116

>>6596342
where?

>> No.6597130

>>6597116
Nordstrom

>> No.6597134

>>6597093
cool pack. hate the tag though.

>> No.6597163
File: 584 KB, 1920x1440, 1938452-p-4x[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597163

cop?

>> No.6597176
File: 209 KB, 1145x1500, 163587435683907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597176

cop?

>> No.6597742
File: 382 KB, 955x1400, 5564_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597742

would you be seen with this?

>> No.6597893
File: 103 KB, 1000x1000, palace-reebok-workout-white-2_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597893

Not sure, maybe if i get them proper worn out

>> No.6597906
File: 53 KB, 300x330, 16070014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597906

>>6597093
You can get a better version of that for cheaper, it is Swedish Army backpack with some features from Swiss Army M39. Original is made of thick cotton duck and leather, former can be sprayed to be waterproof and latter heavily greased to make waterproof.

>> No.6597913

New/fa/g here, what the fuck does 'cop' mean?

>> No.6597929

>>6597913
buy

>> No.6597967
File: 62 KB, 700x700, shuz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597967

just ordered it but yah, gud cop?

>> No.6597972

>>6597913
We are deciphering whether the items seen in this thread are a "cop" or "not".
in other words, would your drug dealer question your sincerity in purchasing his contraband by wearing said item?

>> No.6597976

>>6597967
why

>> No.6597981

>>6597967
Did it come with a lack of integrity?

>> No.6598009
File: 138 KB, 843x500, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598009

1 or 2?
I'm a grill.

Also for 2, would it be easy to take the rivets off or would it just be better to keep them on as to not ruin the fabric underneath?

>> No.6598014
File: 45 KB, 442x442, be82f573_dfe9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598014

bag for university for $60
should I cop?

>> No.6598039

>>6597976
Cos they look awesome
>>6597981
who the fuck looks for integrity in trainers

>> No.6598065

>>6598014
I coped that
Been 2 days still not shipped, but it was free shipping so meh

>> No.6598066

>>6598009
1 looks like its from forever 21
2 will make you look like a brand whore

>> No.6598081

>>6598009
Go with one if you don't like the rivets.
They're both ugly either way.
Also, plizz b london

>> No.6598206

>>6597929
>>6597972
Much obliged

>> No.6598287 [DELETED] 

Rick Owen Memphis Jeans

>> No.6598298
File: 210 KB, 721x906, ro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598298

Rick Owens Memphis Jeans

>> No.6598328

>>6591834
no

>>6592874
no

>>6592887
no

>>6593207
no

>>6593237
no

>>6593524
no

>>6596157
no

>>6596342
yes

>>6597093
yes

>>6597163
no

>>6597176
no

>>6597742
no

>>6597893
no

>>6597967
no

>>6598009
no

>>6598014
yes

>>6598298
no

>> No.6598352

>>6598298
those are not memphis. prob detroit

>> No.6598366

>>6598352
oops, i meant to say detroit. are they gonna fit like skinny or slim jeans or what?

>> No.6598441
File: 46 KB, 500x500, fit check.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598441

>>6598366
detroit is supposed to be the slim cut of the drkshdw jeans, but it's a relative thing. just google "detroit jeans" or go to sufu and check out some of the fit pics. they also run pretty big in general (like 2" in the pairs that i've tried on) but thats not to say it isnt still a cool cut

if u want rlly slim or skinny drkshdw jeans, u can always just buy women's.

>> No.6598461

>>6598009
1, 2 is too loud, with the pattern and studs

>> No.6598470

>>6598441
where'd you try them on? am i fucked for options if i don't live in a big city?

>> No.6598483

>>6598470

any place that carries drkshdw, i know barneys carries drkshdw if youre near one. otherwise compare measurements and stretch to jeans you already own, take measurements off of pants that fit u well

>> No.6598485
File: 149 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598485

cop? really considering it but it's significantly more than i can justify spending on a bag as a broke college student.

>> No.6598487
File: 149 KB, 870x1110, image3xxl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598487

>>6598485

>> No.6598497

>>6598441
ik this is a super dumb question, but should i pay the guy on paypal as a gift, or not?

>> No.6598506

>>6598485
>>6598487
no

>> No.6598510

>>6598506
thanks. care to elaborate a bit?

>> No.6598508

>>6598497

do not do that

>> No.6598519
File: 63 KB, 1024x685, DSC_0383.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598519

>>6598508
is that how people scam?

also this is the only pic i got of the tag, should i ask for one that shows and actual rick owens one?

>> No.6598520
File: 95 KB, 812x575, over-shoulder-messenger-bags-popular-messenger-bags[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598520

police officer?

>> No.6598523
File: 186 KB, 500x387, hello friends i am here.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598523

>>6598497
never pay as gift -- paypal won't help u out if the dude scams u. extra 4% is more than worth it my dude

>> No.6598530

>>6598519
well you can see the drkshdw tag in the original pics. p.s. there's so much rick denim on the market that you really don't have to settle for that vietnam pair if you don't want to, like the crotch is entirely blown out

>> No.6598533

>>6598523
kk, do you think those jeans are worth it? i dont have any experience with Rick.

they look really nice from pics though

>>6598530
they are only $40

>> No.6598575
File: 74 KB, 450x600, drkshdw sign.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598575

>>6598533
nah dude. rick denim is definitely worth it, but do some research on the detroits & see if you like the waxed or the cords or w/e colorway first, then find a pair w/o the crotch ripped out and buy that. i see mint or like-new pairs on sufu/sz for $60-$80 all the time. unless that pair was like $20 & u were dope at darning they ain't worth ur money

make sure u find a pair w/ the long tag if u can tho

>> No.6598614

>>6598575
what diffrence does the long tag make?

also where can you see the crotch ripped out? i see the holes in the butt, but thats it

>> No.6598622
File: 176 KB, 1030x1545, 073EE2K018_100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598622

>> No.6598627
File: 115 KB, 570x404, nike-field-general-free-000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598627

i found these but idk what i'd wear them with yet

>> No.6598640

>>6598575
i am interested in rick detroits also. is it tts?

>> No.6598644

>>6598640
why don't you just, you know, read the thread?

>> No.6598660
File: 130 KB, 461x750, tumblr_mpud0iQn9U1rvhwhbo2_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598660

>>6598627

check out some knoch fits bud

herrurst dot t**blr

>> No.6598675

>>6598660
ty, i think i actually have an idea now. are they good for running in?

>> No.6598686
File: 216 KB, 900x471, ellie-goulding-nike-lunar-flyknit-one-halycon-03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598686

>>6598675

hell no they would be way too hot. get some flyknits lunar 1s for running imho

>> No.6598691

>>6598686
ok haha just wondering. i already have some nike frees for running

>> No.6598693

>>6598575
>i see mint or like-new pairs on sufu/sz for $60-$80 all the time
i have been looking for detroit jeans at that price for over 4 months and havent found anything and i am pretty thorough.

>> No.6598703
File: 13 KB, 228x355, black raws.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598703

so

>> No.6598715

does anybody know how these run?
i'm a 9.5 in all-stars but i can't seem to find any half sizes at all.

>> No.6598719
File: 26 KB, 280x420, 32246F132005_1_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598719

>>6598715

>> No.6598733

>>6598693
i just went on sufu for the first time in a year and i found a pair for $70 within two minutes
http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/topic/150365-fsft-bbs-lots-of-rick-owensdrkshdw-geobaskets-leathers-denim-basics/#entry2965816

>> No.6598734

>>6598703
I own these and they are really comfortable, cop. Also, get TTS or size up

>> No.6598740

>>6598719
Mines are UK 8, 41.5 EU 26.5 CM
Thought they would be US 9 but they are just US 8 however they run half a size bigger so it is US 8.5, but they don't mark half sizes.

>> No.6598749

>>6598693
I sincerely doubt that. I just glanced at the first page of DRKSHDW results on yoox and there's six pairs for under $90. I don't think you've looked at all.

>> No.6598767

>>6598734
>TTS

What?


size up?
I know with skinny guys you size down 1 right?

>> No.6598785

>>6591834
Don't cop. It' just ugly.

>> No.6598794

>>6591834
Where to cop?

>> No.6598806

>>6598740
shit...so then i should just get a 9?

>> No.6598808
File: 9 KB, 298x213, effay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598808

>>6598785
>>6598794

>> No.6598817

>>6598767
I sized down on mine and they were too tight around my thighs. So just get your regular waist size

>> No.6598818

>>6597093
Looks good but most people with buckles on their backpack hate using them.

>>6598009
1

>>6598014
Looks fine

>>6598485
Nah

>>6598627
I like these for some reason

>> No.6598826

>>6598808
Different people have different opinions and tastes? Epic OC maymay pointing this out XD

>> No.6598827

>>6598806
If you are US 9 get UK 9 , and you will get EU 42.5 which is pretty much US 9 1/2 since chucks are half size bigger.

>> No.6598828

>>6598808
>I can't tell if I should trust the fellow with discriminating tastes or the one who can't reverse image search.

>> No.6598845

>>6598817
I heard N&F stretches,and I have size 28 UB101's that can't button and the fly is exposed,UB101's are supposedly true to size with a size 28 waist


so I guess I have to order size 28 skinny guys for them to fit properly?

>> No.6598854

>>6598845
They are tagged 28, but they are not 28 inches at the waist for my weird guys. The waist is bigger than the tag. N&F uses no zippers so it is all button up.

>> No.6598938

>>6598854
Aren't they 1 more inch then what they say they are?

>> No.6598961

>>6598487
w2c shoes

>> No.6599099 [DELETED] 
File: 58 KB, 360x516, AG-MS114_V1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6599099

>> No.6599221
File: 22 KB, 460x364, cdg-play-converse-chuck-taylor-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6599221

c/n

>> No.6599246

>>6599221
The black ones are better. The white ones look good, but I think the heart messes with the color too much. Might work well on girls though.

>> No.6599320

>>6598749
>>6598733
what is the best way to search for stuff on those sites?

i usually just uses "what i want site:site" on google

>> No.6599326

>>6598733
>drop crotch

>> No.6599323

>>6599320
shopstyle.com

>> No.6599390
File: 87 KB, 1351x360, cn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6599390

which if any to cop

>> No.6599424

>>6596114
agreed

>> No.6599440

>>6599390
the white KVA, but there are better choices at that price.

>> No.6599441

>>6599390
left

>> No.6599448

>>6599440
like?

>> No.6599539

>>6598575
i kind of like the worn and torn look

>> No.6599536

>>6599448
pls respond>>6599440

>> No.6599647

>>6599539
lol why not just buy some regular jeans for the same price?

>> No.6599927
File: 31 KB, 450x450, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6599927

Now before you rip out your eyes, my friend is selling these for cheap and I think they would look better if I beat the shit out of them. What do you think? Burn them?

>> No.6599958

>>6599927
don't cop

>> No.6599985

>>6599927
dnc

>> No.6600007
File: 198 KB, 914x582, vans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600007

I have a 25% off J Crew card and I'm pretty broke, should I get a pair of Vans from there?

>> No.6600028

>>6598827
43 is closer to 9 than 42.5 is

>> No.6600035

>>6600007
There's also white/cream color.

>> No.6600043
File: 44 KB, 700x350, shoes_ia95832.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600043

which

>> No.6600064 [DELETED] 

>>6597093
w2c?

>> No.6600082

>>6599448
schmid

>> No.6600124

>>6600082
lel those knockoff rafs?

>> No.6600134

>>6600007
my favorite is the grey pair. get those, or the off white ones.

>> No.6600166
File: 27 KB, 480x360, 1763970-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600166

Cop these or the Tobias?

>> No.6600222
File: 479 KB, 1200x824, tumblr_mmynm8Y7241qlxnlbo1_1280[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600222

cop or save $$$

>> No.6600271
File: 289 KB, 712x1102, alfies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600271

>>6600166
i love my alfies, but it depends.
They fade p. fast, but are versatile as anything.
Not me but pic related

>> No.6600276

>>6600124
i would go for the shanghai but ok.
http://www.solestruck.com/mens-schmid/

>> No.6600352

http://www.asos.com/au/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=2572670

>> No.6600641
File: 98 KB, 1200x1191, $(KGrHqR,!r!FHmp6C5PoBR-!sjgV2Q~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6600641

>> No.6600652

>>6600641
cop, was looking at these yesterday

>> No.6600661

>>6593524
Honestly even if you were 12 these would be juvenile

>> No.6600663

>>6593555
Just as bad as the vans

>> No.6600664

>>6599221

Cop, better than the black ones imo.

>> No.6600666

>>6597893
I would like these if they had a smaller tongue and didn't have the ugly palace logo.

>> No.6600672

>>6599927
if you have to mention the fact that something is cheap before you buy it, it's not worth it

>> No.6600674

>>6600641
I've never liked these before but looking at them more now they look pretty cool. I still think there are better pairs of Y-3s though.

>> No.6601025
File: 77 KB, 683x1024, Silent_Satur_Sneaker_black_leather_-_2_1024x1024[1].jpg_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601025

$315.
Kinda hard for me to justify spending so much on sneakers, but they're so so nice.

>> No.6601127
File: 840 KB, 1840x3264, 2013-07-31_22-32-47_511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601127

>>6601025

Worth the cop.

>> No.6601140

>>6601127
Hey, thanks. I don't own many expensive items apart from formal pieces so it's hard to pull the trigger.

If you can be bothered...
How does the leather surface hold up?
How is the sizing?
How often do people say "hey, nice cons/chucks"?

>> No.6601163
File: 240 KB, 1600x1200, ae.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601163

Allen Edmonds, 17 buckarinos

AE is good, right? Secondhand so service and stuff is immaterial, but they're well-constructed and shit right

>> No.6601167

>>6601140
im not him but i own them as well, and
>seems to hold up pretty well but i havent put them through much wear yet
>A little large, TTS or size one down would work.
>hasn't happened to me yet. I think the detail shows more IRL

I got them for $200 but i would still recommend them at that price, im happy with them

>> No.6601188
File: 76 KB, 725x1088, aw-2013-bart_parka_black_high.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601188

>> No.6601200

>>6601167
>I got them for $200
goddamn

Thanks. I'll probably cop tonight... just gotta build up to it, ya know...

>> No.6601321

>>6601188
w2c?

Go for it

>> No.6601348

>>6601321

nowhere yet

>> No.6601355
File: 93 KB, 900x647, nike-blazer-mid-premium-vintage-suede-teamred-sail-538282-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601355

60 Euro. Does anyone know what the difference between all the labels for Blazers is? I've seen some labeled as hi, some as premium vintage mid, some just as mid. Are they different shoes or just different names? Also is this in the pic the maroon version?

>> No.6601518
File: 33 KB, 377x390, 111 telnashka s dlinimi ruk. 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601518

I saw some of these in a surplus store, the other day.

>> No.6601523

>>6601518
Prisonmime core is in, cop

>> No.6601564

They also had a Romanian overcoat. I wouldn't buy it, but it was the most course material I have ever felt, on clothing.

It must be like wearing one of those hair shirt things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cilice

>> No.6601572
File: 145 KB, 800x514, IMG_4608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601572

>>6601163
They seem to be in ok condition, so why not

>>6601188
Yes

>> No.6602155
File: 105 KB, 640x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6602155

Thinking about copping these if I can't find a nice leather version that isn't made of a fucking paper bag. Cop? Or can anyone show me something like these?

>> No.6602304
File: 1.14 MB, 1837x1108, aaaa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6602304

i suppose it's a bit late for cop or not but i'll see what i'm going to keep and what not. also, the bomber is black but i couldn't find a better picture.

>> No.6602342

>>6597913
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/context+clue

>> No.6603599

>>6601355
Trying to cop a pair myself haha

>> No.6603966

>>6598627
black pants, sand jacket?

>> No.6604045

>>6601572
i have an ecodrive on the way (leather/gold one)

i like that one though. i will look into it for more a more casual style watch maybe

>> No.6604753

>>6598854
>N&F uses no zippers so it is all button up.
not true, black power stretch use zippers

>> No.6604865
File: 84 KB, 640x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604865

Cop?

>> No.6605512
File: 299 KB, 1024x1024, hat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6605512

i'd really like a hat but i don't know anything about hats pls help

is this good???

>> No.6605944

>>6598485
how much and w2c

>> No.6605948

>>6598520
w2c?

>> No.6605966
File: 24 KB, 418x418, cop1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6605966

Which to cop?
These:
http://www.jcrew.com/mens_category/shorts/stantonshorts/PRDOVR~75488/75488.jsp

>> No.6605974

>>6605966
or these (in khaki):
http://www.jcrew.com/mens_category/shorts/stantonshorts/PRDOVR~23863/23863.jsp

can't decide rather to go long or short

>> No.6605977
File: 23 KB, 418x418, cop 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6605977

>>6605974
Oops forgot pic

>> No.6605982

I've got a 25 dollar giftcard to Amazon, whats something relatively inexpensive ($50-100) that I could pick up? Looking specifically for socks, shorts or shirts.

>> No.6606174

>>6605974
go short

>> No.6606477

>>6600271
w2c shirt?

>> No.6606879
File: 104 KB, 465x700, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606879

w2c guy on the lefts entire outfit?

>> No.6606912
File: 32 KB, 500x500, 511zCtj5BPL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606912

How much of a fuccboi will I be if I cop this instead of the actual Supreme one?

>> No.6606924
File: 12 KB, 300x300, bathoryu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606924

>>6606912
this is much trendier.

>> No.6606935
File: 111 KB, 400x432, logo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606935

>>6606924

As much as I love Bathory, Darkthrone is way cleaner

>> No.6606942

>>6599390
saint laurent

>> No.6606940
File: 66 KB, 380x570, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606940

Mainly as it reminds me of r crumbs work

>> No.6606944
File: 10 KB, 300x225, $(KGrHqR,!gwE+HIYW15MBP2V)oCzhQ~~60_35.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606944

>>6606935
Yeah but cleanliness isn't what we're going for here.
Also, play up the yuropean classiness, go Peste Noire.

>> No.6607102

>>6593237
yus

>> No.6607188
File: 18 KB, 338x507, 27565142_001_e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607188

>> No.6607191

>>6601188

looks so warm and comfy

yes

>> No.6607852
File: 317 KB, 902x423, 2con.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607852

alright, someone gave me two 5 euro H&M giftcards, so i thought why the fuck not

c or not?

>> No.6607870

>>6598719

come on, these are so girly. i like that they cleaned up the design but that makes them look even more cartoony.

>> No.6607874

>>6607852
why are you buying womens clothes?

>> No.6607881

>>6607874
cuz i grill

>> No.6607900

>>6607881
>not wearing an apron

that was a really good joke i just made, because it has multiples puns within one short green text.
firstly, as a woman you should be focusing on buying aprons and cooking utensils, because you will be in the kitchen most of the time.
secondly, and the main reason i made the joke, was because of your use of the word "grill". If you were grilling, say burgers, or steaks, you would need an apron.

hope you enjoyed this cool post! :D

>> No.6607908

What in the actual fuck is cop?

>> No.6607916

>>6607908
Why do people use trips for these kinds of questions?
It's like everyone wants to be Eeyore now.

>> No.6607918

>>6607908
a police officer

>> No.6607920

>>6607900
10/10 nice and cool joke

>> No.6607940

>>6607908
>>>/sp/

>> No.6607970
File: 239 KB, 1092x1638, 5421439197854_Purple_z1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607970

Thinking about buying this, I think it would look better on me if it was oversized like the pic, but the only size they have it in is small

>> No.6608034

>>6607916
haha #wrekt
i actually laughed out loud when i read that.

>> No.6608110
File: 399 KB, 1280x1024, policeornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608110

Help me pick 2.

I need new everyday shoes (thinking NB for this but idk).

>> No.6608120

>>6608110

1 and 4

3 is a little too running shoe style

NB's would be my last choice, pretty ugly and boring

>> No.6608156

>>6608120
Does Our Legacy fit tts?

>> No.6608162

>>6608156
Didnt mean to respond to someone.

>> No.6608217
File: 107 KB, 1571x2000, krisvanassche-blacksurgery.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608217

Instead of posting a new thread I'll just ask here. Looking for black/white, bulky high tops. You know the kind. Which brands make em except for Rick/KvA? These would be perfect if they had regular lacing.

>> No.6608224

>>6608156
I would say so, but their fits can be pretty unconventional at times so I'd recommend trying it on before copping

>> No.6608254

>>6608217
Having just bought a pair of Rick's hightops I would say the Ramones sneaker (not so much the super high one) is a good choice, can work really well with black, white or no laces depending on how much contrast you want.

KVA are also nice, handled some similar recently, like Rick's they're heavy, but chunkier than they look in photos and with a thinker sole that say, Rafs or CPs.

You could look at Cinzia Araia (probs spelt wrong) or lots of other KVAs, Rick obvs but you'll only really have Ramones, the new Dunks or Geos to easily find, you could maybe also try classic Nikes like vandals or af1 highs in nice colourways, though I'm not much of a nike fan.

>> No.6608256

>>6608217

Diet Butcher Slim Skin
Cinzia Araia
Ato
Y-3 (somewhat)
Balmain/Pierre Balmain
Wings + Horns
Alejandro Ingelmo
Ann Demeulemeester
Margiela
Damir Doma/SILENT

>> No.6608278
File: 19 KB, 440x308, Kris-Van-Assche-Top-Extended-zip-Black-sneakers-UpscaleHype-440x308.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608278

>>6608217
what about these KVAs then, in case you havent seen them

>> No.6608285

>>6599390
Not sure if they're still for sale, but a guy at sufu was selling saint laurent high tops for 225usd in size 43

>> No.6608289
File: 25 KB, 364x308, Kris-Van-Assche-Top-Extended-zip-Black-sneakers-UpscaleHype-440x308.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608289

>>6608278

>> No.6608296

>>6608278
Not a big fan of all black sneakers, feel like they need some contrast.

>> No.6608301

>>6608296
replace the laces with white ones

>> No.6608494
File: 98 KB, 1589x1192, nike hi-top.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608494

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/231024337403?var=530183396981&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

£45.
Effectively half price.

>> No.6608501
File: 135 KB, 1190x1600, 816Sol5MsAL._SY1600_CR0,0,1190,1600_[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608501

Are ben sherman boots decent quality?

Realize its not the best but don't want to get a jc penny-tier boot.

>> No.6608507

>>6608501
They're $60. You're not going to find a better boot for that price. Just cop them before they're gone

>> No.6608521

>>6608507
getting for free since I got shit ton of credit.
Just want to use it wisely since they have some more high end shit I can cop as well.

>> No.6608522

Which pair from this list should I get?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/soletrader_outlet/m.html?_nkw=Mens+Red+Tape+shoes+-+dl&LH_BIN=1&_in_kw=1&_sop=1

>> No.6608532
File: 271 KB, 760x1000, 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608532

real leather. $24

>> No.6608533

>>6608522
holy shit please do yourself a favor and not cop anything until you've lurked a lot more.

>> No.6608535

>>6608532
at $24 I'd prefer plastic, the leather will most likely be terrible quality.

>> No.6608537

>>6608532
haha looks terrible. Unless you tailor it afterwards, save it.

>> No.6608539

>>6608533
holy shit are you 14 because not all of them are dreadful

>> No.6608545

>>6608535
its from a thrift/vintage shop

>> No.6608551

>>6608539
yes they are.

>> No.6608841

>>6608494
BUMP