/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.6531716]

Are cargo pants still fa? W2C decent tapered cargo pants for under 100

[Anonymous No.6531740]

>>6531716
>still effay
top kek, no. They never were, so "still" shouldn't be used. Go for some tapered chino's OP, you're not 5 years old or a border patrol agent

[Anonymous No.6531764]

>>6531716
Interesting cargos will usually cost you more than 100. I feel that in order to really make use of the look in a way that stands apart from the proverbial unwashed masses you're going to have to shell out some time and some money.

[Anonymous No.6531783]

>>6531740
hmm I have a few pairs of skinny fitting chinos from j.crew, but they're not tapered.. should I get them hemmed? w2c already tapered?
>>6531764
mm.. any brands to name?

[Anonymous No.6531786]

>>6531740
cargo pants are /fa/ as fuck tho

i remember in middle school i had these ones that had like a zipper so i can make them into shorts looking back that was dope af B)

[Anonymous No.6531891]

>>6531783
My favorites always seem to come from PRPS, Julius, Rick Owens and sometimes G-Star (on those rare moments they see fit to release something I can de-brand on my own time.

Pic Related is Rick Owens DRKSHDW. Probably not what you're after but I include it to show you a very different take on the cargo short.

[Anonymous No.6531910]

[Anonymous No.6531924]

Just got these in the mail yesterday. They are amazing. So many little features, I kept discovering new ones for an hour. They tuck into Geos beautifully and form an incredible bloused look, while the pockets sit mostly on the front of the leg.

[Anonymous No.6531930]

>>6531924
those look pretty lame, got a fit pic

[Anonymous No.6531939]

>>6531910
bro bro bro!
where my bud lights are bro?
yo lets hit the club bro

[Anonymous No.6531945]

>>6531910
"420 blaze it fajjit" the julius line

[Anonymous No.6531960]

>>6531924
>>6531910
OP here... tapered pls.

[Anonymous No.6531992]

>>6531930
When I'm done assembling the outfit I'll be glad to offer you all some keks. Until then, just take my word for it - they look a bit different on the body.

[Anonymous No.6532005]

>>6531960
Julius cargos are usually tapered, but my bad - just throwing out some oddities.

[Anonymous No.6532029]

Debrand with seam ripper.

[Anonymous No.6532062]

>>6531910
Has hobocore gone to far??!
Is this image real or fake?
Y/N

[Anonymous No.6532071]

>>6531740
w2c tapered chinos?

[Anonymous No.6532091]

anybody know if the uniqlo slim fit cargos are good?

[Extreme Danny No.6532099]

>>6532029
why the fuck would you do that
go on explain to me
lets hear it Mr.Big Shot

[Anonymous No.6532129]

I really like the look of these, I think they're still in stores.

[Anonymous No.6532140]

hang on, I'll post a pic of the amazing pair of tapered cargos I picked up from roots for like, 25 bones. I just got them tailored so that they actually fit my waist (they only had one pair and they were like size 32 or something)

[Anonymous No.6532142]

[Anonymous No.6532241]

>>6531716
The uniqlo cargos? They aren't tapered, but for their price you could get two and tailor them. Dunno.

[Anonymous No.6532469]

>>6532140
25 bucks and I got these, they're nice quality too. They have a really neat stitching pattern above the knee, also they have small little leather tabs in above the butt pocket, I really love them.

[Anonymous No.6532473]

>>6532469
what's roots?

[Anonymous No.6532479]

>>6532469
2/3

[Anonymous No.6532495]

>>6532479
3/3
sorry for bad quality/flipped photo.

[Anonymous No.6532498]

>>6532479
this is what I'm looking for..

[Anonymous No.6532510]

>>6532473
I don't really know what you mean. Roots Canada? It was a mallstore too, I was surprised I found something nice.

Oh yeah and there are zippers on the sides of the leg.

[Anonymous No.6532754]

>>6531716
>>6531764
Both fucking horrible.

The best cargos are plain, slim, tailored, and without a lot of extra stitching or other shit on them.

[Anonymous No.6532770]

>>6532754
those look like dockers

[Anonymous No.6532789]

>>6532770
Suitsupply.
How are you familiar with Dockers?

[Anonymous No.6532800]

>>6532754
I guess I just like the occasional extravagant garment. Those always strike me as middling chinos with aesthetically out-of-place pockets stuck on the side.
The cargo is about history and military/tactical design, for me. Sometimes I'll look at a really well made far out piece and I can see the functions that come out of the form, I can see foreign armies moving under canopy or pilots rising to the flight deck from an angular metal tomb. I see a story, and I like a garment that can tell a story, regardless of what papa Ricky says on the matter.
You have to couch garments like this within the context of fits that give them the license they need to exist and flaunt their detail. If the rest of your fit is an interlocking piece with a singular mind, you can take these risks with less fear. When you pull it off, your rewards will justify your initial failures.

[Anonymous No.6532862]

>>6532754
>>6532770
He has a point.

I'm generally- or I have been, most of my life, anyway, though that might be changing- partial to cleaner lines, but isn't there something a little hedged and cautious about those? Why do they have the extra pockets? Sure, they might be SuitSupply, but on a certain level they *do* read as Dockers + Pockets.

I *do* really like the idea of discreet cargos, but those aren't it: heavy stitching and fabric, without the sort of other construction to back it up. Giant flaps.

The Prps stuff poet really likes doesn't do terribly much for me, because I find myself mentally tweaking them to be less heritage-y and more utilitarian. I get and appreciate what they are on their own, but they're not my cargo of tea.

My idea of a perfect cargo? The kind of panel construction you see on women's bike pants (why is it like that on women's, and not mens?), with a gusset and everything. The standard four (slant, welt) pockets all look entirely open, but they're sealed with small zippers. Both have deep "coin" pockets, actually meant for cards, a SAK, etc. Lower down, the cargo pockets are nearly flush, mostly internal, like on the pants you posted, except they're subtly but unhiddenly sealed with thin, matching-color zippers.

Low rise carrot fit, just a smidge of extra fabric in the crotch, with the calves being *just* loose enough to fit a small hidden pocket on the inside, on both sides, just big enough for a small, thin wireless hotspot or such.

Separate, subtle, reenforced knee panels. Tab waist, with semi-vestigial "belt loops" to hook equipment on, not sure if one on each end of the hipbones or just two off at the sides.

Done in either a nylon-wool-elastene or hemp-wool-elastene blend; not sure which.

I just copped some a pair of surprisingly nice '80s catalog craze core travel cargos at a thrift shop. Brand is actually called "Travelsmith," and the logo is an little plane sketch that looks like a monoplane AN-2. I'll post pics later.

[Anonymous No.6532890]

Levi's Commuter Cargos are about $105 or something and the quality is great. Mine are at the tailor's but I'll post some fits when I get them back.

The seams and stuff are really cool looking and the fit's pretty slim (calves too baggy for me though, that's what I'm changing).

[Anonymous No.6532891]

>>6532800
What's the functionality behind the round inner knee panels?

I always see this stuff and wonder what it's about.

>>6532129
Or the unique pocket configuration here.

[twerk it No.6532909]

>>6532754
>>6532800
>>6532862
most designers create blocks, which are basic patterns to which elements are added or subtracted to create new designs. that's very economical and it helps ensure consistency of fit, but sometimes it results in just what you described, where it feels like the detailing is an afterthought. because it totally was. and it's kind of obnoxious when you go through a line and realize that all the jackets are the same pattern with different lapels.

[Anonymous No.6532911]

http://www.clubmonaco.ca/product/index.jsp?productId=17072676&prodFindSrc=search

what do you guys think of this

[that nig with an E30 No.6532928]

http://www.autographmenswear.com/trousers-c17/julius-7-banana-fit-trouser-p11576

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6532947]

>>6532909

>sometimes it results in just what you described, where it feels like the detailing is an afterthought. because it totally was.

id like to note, this means the designer/patternmaker is using their blocks badly/not to their potential.

generally blocks are basically just a set of someones body measurements in the form of a piece of paper...like you said, you just use it to preserve a few measurements and it will essentially allow you to be as creative as you want in terms of constructing new garments from it.

[Anonymous No.6532950]

>>6532909
Even so, you can tell times where that's the case and it works and times where it doesn't. But you know that.

I just wish when it doesn't they'd quietly let it off at a sample sale instead of rolling it out.

>>6532911
Like the concept very much, but the proportions don't seem right in the front. The top pockets fall in a wrong spot.

The back is great, though.

Also could use a little bit of tapering right at the knee.

>>6532928
Nearly perfect, but needs 5-10% less thigh stacking.

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6532959]

>>6532947

[twerk it No.6532965]

>>6532947
imo the best/most iconic stuff comes from gettin crazy with fabric on the draping mannequin, but the r&d is too high even for rickky or sissy p to bankroll on that. which is why rick sells mountains of tanks and pods and why some of the best designs get reissued perennially. but you can look at say, the line of rick's leathers and see where he's made totally new blocks to fit the design, and sometimes when he takes the back half of a block and recuts the front half etc. that's good use of blocks imo.

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6532966]

>>6532959

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6532986]

>>6532965

idk the more i see really skilled pattern makers work, the more i realize that its not like they are only draping or only doing flat patterns, they have a really well established workflow that blends draping with flat patterns depending on the shape theyre trying to create. im not really that experienced at creating garments like that, but i feel like its something you develop with time spent figuring out what works for certain things and what doesnt.

but yeah almost all of ricks leathers are based off one original block, except probably the bauhaus and the other more free/drapy ones for sure. i think the way blocks are used on his jackets are pretty clever.

[twerk it No.6533002]

>>6532986
it's really apparent in the women's jackets because it seems that the various bikers, the perennial denim exploder, and some of the seasonal stuff all uses the same back panel but drapes freely for the front panel. and sometimes he recuts the panels in the back for peplumcore drapery but they still use the same shaping seams. i was trying on women's bikers at barneys once and they basically had the same jacket, recut with tails in the back, in a few different leather fabrications but it filled out their racks like woah and cross merchandised with everything like a beast.

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6533017]

>>6533002

which i think is a brilliant way to go, because you can cut a stack of blocks, put them on dress forms, and just cut parts of them and drape onto them, its a super fast way to get a lot of different ideas into garments. im kind of curious how the patterns are altered when he uses like a shearling or something really bulky.

[Anonymous No.6533025]

>>6533002
yo twerk i was looking through the site that dude with the green cargos linked and I found this in the woman's section

http://www.clubmonaco.ca/product/index.jsp?productId=13266277&cp=12266412.12280896.12280899.13030077&ab=ln_sale_apparel_knitstees

is this shit quality i figure you know about womens stuff

[twerk it No.6533052]

>>6533017
idk. some of the hardcore rick fans i know complain about inconsistency in sizing from season to season and material to material which suggests that they're insufficiently prototyped.

otoh i noticed that the zipper and seams on my gimp were skewed... but the zip matches the inverse of the back spine seam and each gimp is identically skewed regardless of fabric or color which suggests that they were all drafted to be skewed. which is hilarious if it's the case, 10/10 design humor on an already hilarious garment

[twerk it No.6533057]

o rite
>>6533025
i have some club monaco trou from yeeaaaars ago, they're alright tbh, solid construction and decent fit. i dont really like that shirt tho

[Anonymous No.6533062]

>>6533057
ok thanks twerk ur the bestest

[Anonymous No.6533295]

>>6532891
You know, I can't rightly tell you off the bat, But I will say that I've seen catalogs of strange military uniforms, books with pieces of armies throughout the world... and I've seen a lot of stuff like this. There are so many specialized jobs being done in so many different navies and armies all over the world that many times really bizarre configurations pop up. Unexpected things.

It doesn't matter so much what some of these configurations are really for - that odd pocket could be for a specialized socket wrench used in the repair of a late model soviet tank. It could be for an extra few shells or a field dressing kit that's worn by medics.
The garment might not even be military at all - it could be an old-school fisherman's pant with a spot for old lures and their uniquely sized cases. These are the sorts of garments you might have found at abercrombie in the 1920's-50's, too.

So I guess we can't always be sure, but if it's a well made garment (and these usually are) then it's open season on recontextualization, and they offer us a lot of opportunities to have fun with fashion (which is kind of the point, imo)

So many great posts around me, I want to reply to them all! Excellent reads all around, everyone.

[Anonymous No.6533308]

>>6532862
>'80s catalog craze core
I love this word.

[Anonymous No.6533432]

These have zippers up the ankles.

[Anonymous No.6533444]

>>6533432
lol, so do most trackpants, no offense

[Anonymous No.6534860]

>>6533444
It's a nod to flight pants. They're shortened and placed on the ankle to tone down the look.

[basedprophet !IFJ/2SLAGo No.6534869]

>>6534860
>>6534860
really? i thought they just did it to allow a smaller hem so that you could get a narrower fit down the calf on pants non stretchy fabric

[basedprophet !IFJ/2SLAGo No.6534877]

>>6534869
or did you mean just for this one pair of pants in particular

[Anonymous No.6534897]

Yeah I would recommend the Uniqlo slim fit cargos. Nothing else in the <$100 range even comes close. You could try the Levi's Commuter Cargos but I don't think they look as clean.

[Anonymous No.6534899]

>>6534877
Just for this one pair of pants. But the original purpose of this zipper on flight pants was so you could be waiting in uniform on the base and then just slip your flight pants over your pants and boots and zip them up when you got scrambled. It was a readiness thing, a time saver.
They kind of gave us a detail that we expect on those tight small hem pants because its cultural footprint is pre-existing, but because it's the "chuck flight pant" it's safe to assume that the detail implies the utility that we associate with flight pants - the zipper up the side of a pilot suit (which also has cultural weight, we've seen it on pilots for years).

[Anonymous No.6534906]

>>6534899
ETA: "Chuck flight pant" might be the wrong name, I'm pretty sure the filename rules the day here.

[Anonymous No.6536140]

Bumping.

[Anonymous No.6536191]

>>6531891
Rick Cargos are probably one of the sickest bottoms I've ever seen in my life
Why I've never saved up and copped baffles me

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6536260]

>>6536191

u should

no remorse

no regret

[Anonymous No.6536324]

>knowing these exist
>even considering other cargo pants

I wish I didn't know about these considering I will never have them

[Anonymous No.6536339]

>>6536324
Pretty effay w2c?

[Anonymous No.6536367]

>>6536339
ndg circa 2008

[Anonymous No.6536390]

>>6536324
>I wish I didn't know about these considering I will never have them
same : (

[Anonymous No.6536395]

>>6536339
filename

[Anonymous No.6536555]

>>6536324
These?

[Anonymous No.6536559]

>>6536555
i assumed those were asian knockoffs, either way im currently trying to recreate them using some fabrixquare pants and some climbing webbing

[Anonymous No.6536591]

>>6536559
those are real he just doesnt have the ankle strap fastened

[Anonymous No.6536610]

>>6536324
I hurt every time I see those.

[Anonymous No.6537570]

The IDF has some interesting pants.

[Anonymous No.6537579]

>>6536610
Why, too tapered?

[Anonymous No.6537697]

>>6537579
Nah, will never own.

[Anonymous No.6538071]

Uniqlo fit is amazing pic related

[Anonymous No.6538145]

>>6532862
i didnt understand half of that but please post more

[twerk it No.6538159]

>>6536260
how many sandwiches do they hold
say, 6" baguette

[twerk it No.6538164]

>>6538159
actually, just make that the maximum sandwich capacity, whether you use baguettes or triangled slices or w/e

imagine all the sandwiches that would fit in here tho o: o: o:

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538168]

>>6538159

umm 1 in each of the back pockets, 2 in each of the front pockets cuz they have so much volume

[Anonymous No.6538169]

>>6538159
U naughty bwoy!

[twerk it No.6538182]

>>6538168
>you will never show up at a party where all ur friends are bored and hungry and produce piles of munchies and weed and flasks of liquor from the two dozen pockets split between all ur rick garments and be hailed as a hero

rick needs to make a pocketed hat btw

[twerk it No.6538187]

>>6538182
>last night
>walkin home from da club
>mugger jumps out and hes got a knife
>"gimmie ur wallet"
>act all scurred and pass him the wallet from ur pocket
>it was a decoy
>empty j.g. hook bullshit
>get home and take ur real rick toad leather wallet out of ur cargobaskets

thanks rick

[twerk it No.6538198]

>>6538187
>late for work
>can't find your keys
>pat your handwarmer pockets
>pat your chest pocket
>check your front pockets
>back pockets
>thigh pockets
>the pocket on the back of your jacket
>the pocket on your bicep
>both pockets on your forearms
>the bicep and handwarmer and cargo and interior pockets of your overcoat
>no keys
>keep searching the house for thirty minutes
>remember they're in your cargobaskets
>you're late
>get fired
>have to sell all your rick to survive

:'c

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538205]

>>6538187

>still dont have a rick goatskin cockring

u still need cargobasket so u can be a local hero

:(

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538213]

>>6538205

goat hair**

>sell your rick to survive

my worst nightmare

[Anonymous No.6538214]

>>6538205
Random question User, what size do you wear your Rick Cargos. S or XS?

[twerk it No.6538222]

>>6538205
>go out to dinner with rick
>time to pay
>he can't find his wallet
>checks the pockets on his pod shorts
>checks the pockets on his layered sweats
>checks the pockets on his blazer
>checks the pockets on his sweater
>checks the pocket sewn into his boxers
>he forgot it
>you pay
>lol it was in his cargobaskets all along

FUCKING RICK

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538227]

>>6538214

1 sec

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538244]

>>6538222

jokes on u he has his wallet attached to his bucket bag!!!!!

FUCKING RICK

>>6538227

here u go

[twerk it No.6538238]

>>6538227
>count the pockets
chest and front and back and coin pockets on the overalls
front and back pockets on the pods
>that's it
4/10 where do you even put the sandwich
redeem yourself with a rick pack

[turnleft !!t/GvfGACpW7 No.6538248]

>>6538182
the crust hats are super roomy
threw my wallet and camera in it while wearing it B)

BTW there's a rick pyton leather bag going for 500USD~ you could prob haggle it to 450ish.
Anyone interested, i could post dets.

[Anonymous No.6538253]

>>6538244
Thanks a lot! If it isn't too much, could you measure the waist laid flat? Last request I promise ;~;

[twerk it No.6538264]

>>6538244
real talk tho imagine all the shit rick could carry
>1ft bong & ps2 + controllers & star wars battlefront in the bucket bag
>2 oz weed + lighters in his cargo pants
>arizona and funjions in the pocket on his back
>rolling papers and ipod + input in the forearm pockets
>his phone wallet etc

10/10 would hang out w/

>u^4h^4 invites thom over
>doesn't bring shit
>"nothing fits in my pockets"

#smdh

[Anonymous No.6538267]

>>6538264
dont you mean ux4hx4?

[Anonymous No.6538277]

>>6538267
what are you doing

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538294]

>>6538253

34cm/13.4"

>>6538264

pls what if he use a blistered leather carryall

could fit all that+lebanese food takeout

[basedprophet !IFJ/2SLAGo No.6538303]

>>6538264
arizona iced out boys 2002

[twerk it No.6538304]

>>6538294
lol wtf is that from
>rick likes gray kittens
>you have gray kittens
omg c:

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538313]

>>6538304

lol

june 2012 dazed and confused

this one

[Anonymous No.6538318]

i can fit cargobaskets into my cargoneckflap

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538328]

>>6538313

here are more good bits

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538332]

>>6538328

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538335]

>>6538332

the fuck?

[twerk it No.6538353]

>>6538335
>rick's statue will never flash you

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538367]

>>6538353

[twerk it No.6538374]

>>6538367
>RICK WILL NEVER POLE DANCE FOR YOU

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538392]

>>6538374

>ricks crew

[Anonymous No.6538405]

>>6538392
HAHA.

HOLY SHIT. THEY ALL DRESS IN RICK. THIS IS FUCKING WONDERFUL.

[Anonymous No.6538418]

>>6538392
he looks very, godfathery, in that pic

[Anonymous No.6538424]

>>6538405
why wouldn't they? they are the rick army

[Anonymous No.6538428]

>>6538418
It looks like a Bujinkan annual festival.

[Anonymous No.6538438]

>>6538294
>My better half, the Hun

Aww... plus embedded pun?

[tomato No.6538450]

>>6538392
how would you get a job with him anyway?

[User !4JmiEPm2.s No.6538470]

>>6538450

aesthetic sense+right place at the right time+be really fucking good at what u do

[Anonymous No.6540325]

>>6533295
I don't really have my thoughts entirely together yet, but the thread's close to dying, so here goes:

For me, a lot of these specialized configurations don't hold up outside their original context, or don't seem right for recontextualization into general use.

Or maybe I should say absent their context? I recently copped (still waiting on getting them) a pair of WWII British officer's desert shorts with a really interesting construction (a huge, asymmetrical waistband, for one) that had been put off the line and issued with a hodgepodge of non-matching buttons, due to production rushing. It's got this almost Margiela x Acronym-if-it-was-1940 vibe. (I'll post pics whenever I get it, which should be sometime this week.)

Something like >>6532129 comes, for me, really close to working brilliantly, but just doesn't come together, or seem ripe: I'm left wondering why the pocket configuration isn't more symmetrical, figuring I'd rather have it be more fully loaded out or cleaner. The truly inexplicable ones, like >>6532800, just leave the designer in me thoroughly wat'ing: why one leg with a large zip pouch pocket and the other with a small one, with an actual pouch just sewed onto it? What the hell are there different material panels on the *inside* of the knees for? How would I possibly *use* these and not be wishing they were different?

But then, >>6533295 just seems to come together aesthetically so well. I'm not quite sure why. Maybe because I can imagine myself hanging off a rock wall with them? That's definitely part of it. But their imbalance seems balanced somehow that's marvelous.

I think maybe I just don't get Prps and their language yet, because my only real exposure to them is through your posts. Their website just seems innavigable, illegible. If you can point me towards something I'd appreciate it.

>>6533308

And thanks. I'll be posting them sometime in the next 24 hours or so.

[Anonymous No.6540328]

>>6540325
>>6533432

I like the zipper ankle detail on these, but that's the only interesting thing about them for me. The shoes remind me of these, which I found recently. Czech army trainers. I think you'll like them, as remixed Converse with a chunkier sole.

>>6538264

Lol'd at this sequence of posts. I wish more designers would approach schlepping like Rick does.

Does loading up Cargo Baskets throw off walking at all?

[Anonymous No.6543094]

Bump.

[Anonymous No.6543120]

>>6531740
butt mad.

[Anonymous No.6543152]

>>6538392
what different jobs do all these people have?

[Anonymous No.6543158]

>>6532469
looks good

[Anonymous No.6543211]

>>6540325
Thanks for a great post. I guess the notion of yesteryear's techwear excites me - please post those desert shorts when you get a chance.
Prps is a funny brand. Their website is shit, they haven't updated it in a while (last i checked) and while they keep rolling inspired new pieces to market every season (those shorts you liked are SS13) I get the impression that they've been starting to dumb down their designs and I know they've shipped some production to china (from Japan). I have some of their newer stuff, and the quality is great, the construction is full of details, but after copping some of their older, Japan made cargos I discovered a totally new 'feeling' at work in the garment. So much more detail, so sturdy feeling, such subtle distressing. So part of me wonders if they're running out of cash, and part of me thinks that they just decided to stop marketing themselves and focus on appeasing their fans.

[Anonymous No.6543219]

>>6543211
A lot of Donwan Harrel's personal mythology is tied up in veterans returning from WW2 and coming home to create the foundation of underground car culture. That's where the workwear roots come in, the oil stains and pin holes and the mission to finally do distressed denim right by leaving parts of the jean raw so that the natural fades blend into the pre-existing ones.
By delving into heritage and workwear, Harrell's come across a lot of strange designs. He lifts stuff from utilitarian garments that the average person doesn't see. I think the brand has a language all its own, or at least one that stands out enough to warrant further inspection. Every season seems to be a take on a different profession, with nautical and diving themes for this SS13. I also see older themes being revisited - SS12 was all about vintage fly fishing apparel and the shorts you noticed would have fit right in.
Have you ever heard about what Abercrombie & Fitch was like back in the day? How they had a huge store with a floor for each different type of terrain? Thousands of jackets and pants for specialized situations, manufactured using the methods of a bygone age. They sold the techwear of that era. That is the very specific sort of niche that Prps is exploring, and I think the foundation for some of their visual language.

[Anonymous No.6544000]

>>6532129
OP here.. w2c? thanks

[Anonymous No.6544017]

>>6544000
filename you retard

[Anonymous No.6545535]

[TroalPost !!M/8ntLE+we3 No.6546513]

SHELL TOES YES?
PRPS,
THERE'S A MAN WEARING A SKIRT ON TOP OF MY DREAMS

[Anonymous No.6549180]

Nau Motil Cargo.

[Anonymous No.6549188]

>>6549180
>We intentionally added some workwear details — usable pockets, zipper garages for an added sense of discovery, a coin-catcher pocket detail and modern cargo design. Double weave organic cotton twill fabric with spandex for stretch.

>Organic cotton and spandex blend for comfort, durability and stretch.
>Zip fly with button waist.
>Two front hand pockets, two front thigh zip pockets with zipper garages, two back drop-in pockets, one back zip pocket.
>Double needle top-stitching.

>Fabric Details:
>Organic cotton 10 oz. double weave twill fabric with 4% spandex for unrestricted movement.

Also in black and khaki, $140.

[Anonymous No.6549195]

Oversized Y3 stuff. Would actually be a lot of fun with the right long tee, maybe something that had a bit of a tail in the back.
I kind of love the pen holders.

[Anonymous No.6549202]

>>6549188
They look comfy as fuck.

[Anonymous No.6549231]

>>6549195
>pen holders
whoops, I misjudged, I was thinking of something else.

[Anonymous No.6549355]

>>6532966
where the fuck do you even cop rick cargoes any more

[Anonymous No.6549363]

>>6549355
Rick Owens store?
That's where I got mine.

[Anonymous No.6549368]

>>6549363
i meant like

online

[twerk it No.6549374]

>>6549355
i dont think theyve ever been out of production, it's just a question of stockist's buys.
new cargos 4 fall btw

[Anonymous No.6549381]

>>6549374
and i can never find them online

:c

[turnleft !!t/GvfGACpW7 No.6549392]

>>6549381
ratuken.
they dont go cheap tho

no personal exp but i would think julius cargos might be a nice alt and there's HEAPS on ratuken

[Anonymous No.6549396]

>>6549392
are the julius cargos just as expensive?

[Anonymous No.6549397]

>>6549392
Tell me, Turny - You know Julius - Do they ever put out stuff with a 34" inseam? Everything I can find never gets past 32.

[Anonymous No.6549402]

>>6549392
i've actually been looking at a lot of julius shit lately so that's not a bad idea

[Anonymous No.6549412]

>>6549397
lol julius makes pants up to 45" inseam where u at brah

[turnleft !!t/GvfGACpW7 No.6549413]

>>6549396
not on home computer, if i was i would drop some links of them going around 180USD? (w/e equiv of 220NZD is)

>>6549397
famous for their long inseams on some older models of denim (up to 40") i dont know if theyve done reproductions or reiterations as they've never quite sparked enough interest
in short, yes they have and i wouldnt be suprised if it's continued.

[Anonymous No.6549433]

>>6549412
The cargos never seem to pass 32, though. I know the jeans are another story.