[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 69 KB, 500x332, avrg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530532 No.6530532 [Reply] [Original]

I just realized it's more effay as a good looking /fa/ guy to have an average looking gf.

>> No.6530548

>>6530532
Nein, and your pic is not an average girl.
Having a unique and stylish partner who complements your style is always superior.
Your partner doesn't need to be some great beauty, but they should be above average in at least several ways. They should challenge you, inspire you to be the best that you can.
Average people? Well, they're average for a reason.

>> No.6530552

That girl is pretty far below average sorry
Besides, what's the value of your partner if she doesn't make you feel like you should maintain and better yourself?

>> No.6530593
File: 1.89 MB, 370x232, 1371784953042.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530593

No gf, but not single is most /fa/

>> No.6530608

it's more /fa/ to have a good looking gf with body image and daddy issues

>> No.6530638

>>6530608
90% of them have daddy issues anyway.

>> No.6530639

>>6530593
>no gf
>not single
pick one

>> No.6530647

>>6530639
married

>> No.6530652

>>6530639
bf

>> No.6530662

>>6530593

you mean like fucking a girl without being her bf?

>> No.6530661

>>6530639
I guess you could call it an open relationship.

>> No.6530667
File: 41 KB, 1280x720, [FTW]_Watashi_ga_Motenai_no_wa_Dou_Kangaetemo_Omaera_ga_Warui_-_01_[720p][84EDF505].mkv_snapshot_12.23_[2013.07.09_10.14.38].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530667

>>6530647
>>6530652

>> No.6530670

>>6530662
Yeah but also being able to chill & hangout together like a normal couple

Christ guiz its not rocket science

>> No.6530680

>>6530661
Well that's what it is called

>> No.6530704

>>6530661
>>6530670
having an open relationship is not 'no gf but not single'
it's having an open relationship
it's having a gf (or bf/wife/husband) but you and them agreeing to fuck other people if you want
you're right, it's not rocket science, but you still managed to get it completely fuckin wrong

>> No.6530716

>>6530593
What is going on there?

I mean, obviously, but how are we supposed to read the joke? "Haha, clever," or "oh, wow," or "oh, that's sweet, he's... wait a minute, holy shit?"

>> No.6530721

>>6530716
"top lel"

>> No.6530745

>>6530716
";_;"

>> No.6530756

>>6530670
>mfw this guy falls in love with a fuckbuddy who doesn't like him back
sux

>> No.6530823

>>6530756
>having only one fuccbuddy

>>6530704
lol
You're right doe
Fuckbuddy is the correct terminology