[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 121 KB, 959x653, vans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015781 No.6015781[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why don't you /fa/gs like vans? Just built me some and ordered em up.

>> No.6015789

juvenile
shoddy
#tumblr

>> No.6015792

>>6015781
if you like looking the same as a million others then that is fine but many don't

>> No.6015826

Poor quality shoes that have unattractive stitching and a terrible logo in my opinion. They also generally look bad and come in ugly colors, except for occasional special pairs.

You can get better quality canvas shoes that look better and don't have that stupid tag for cheaper.

>> No.6015832

i wear my plain black/black/black ones a lot

>> No.6015833

>>6015789
>>6015792
I'm simply talking about a comfortable shoe that one walks around in. Not those platform, chainlink, knee-high, combat stilettos that you wear to take pictures of that everyone here seems to be buying.

>> No.6015843

>>6015826
Such as?

>> No.6015844
File: 78 KB, 665x598, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015844

>>6015833
>platform
>chainlink
>knee high
>combat stilettos

>> No.6015861

>>6015844
Ok snow boots is what I meant. What is wrong with you people?
>>6015312
>>6015457
>>6015515
>>6014133
>>6012989

>> No.6015855

>>6015843
Just off the top of my head, Emericas. You can get shoes in a very similar model that are much higher quality and could be used for casual skating. Copped mine for $40 with free shipping

>> No.6015857

>>6015833
post an example of a shoe you think looks good fuccboi

>> No.6015875
File: 38 KB, 480x360, 6491-p-MULTIVIEW[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015875

>>6015826
they're $39.99, did you expect a high quality shoe? if so, that's your own fault for being autistic.

let the haters hate OP, pic related i wear these without socks in the summer and they're comfortable as fuck. also you should look elsewhere, $65 is pretty steep even if they are custom. i own a few pairs and i've found $20 on ebay etc

>> No.6015880

>>6015855
>Emericas
>Implying regular vans arent 40

>> No.6015885

>>6015875
Yeah, and you can get shoes with a similar design for the same price that are of much better quality.

>Someone doesn't like what I like, therefore I should respond angrily

>> No.6015889

>>6015875
Yeah I know but I don't buy shoes that often and I wanted the specific color.

>> No.6015898

>>6015880
>Implying regular Vans aren't lower quality and don't look shitty

>> No.6015895

>>6015833
>a comfortable shoe that one walks around in
shouldn't that be every shoe you wear? If a shoe isn't comfortable it doesn't fit

besides that, a comfortable shoe conforms to your foot and isn't a cheap canvas with a flat sole

>>6015861
those are hi tops

>> No.6015912

>>6015895
I know what hi tops look like. The same shoe design that's spammed on this board is the same one seen in 50s movies about the year 2000.

>> No.6015922

>>6015885
no, because your argument was based on 'poor quality' which doesn't make sense since they don't cost very much.

and have you considered the possibility that maybe different people like different designs? is it outrageous to think that people might like something that you find particularly unattractive? fucking dunce

>> No.6015930

>>6015912
i don't follow your wording
are you saying the shoes you linked to are not hi top sneakers?

>> No.6015947

>>6015922
I understand that, but I was making a point that you can get much better quality shoes for the same price that I think look better.

>and have you considered the possibility that maybe different people like different designs? is it outrageous to think that people might like something that you find particularly unattractive? fucking dunce

Notice that my first statement in the thread was "Poor quality shoes that have unattractive stitching and a terrible logo in my opinion." How exactly does that not make it clear that this is my own personal opinion that no one else has to agree with?

>> No.6015952

>>6015930
I'll agree that they're hi tops. The highest tops of them all. Why would I want a shoe that irritates my ballsack? At a certain point, they're campy spaceage boots.

>> No.6015971

>>6015952
are you just posting for the sake of reading your own text?

>> No.6015983

>>6015952
your autism is showing

hitops go past your ankle, that's it. you must be the shortest manlet of all time or some amputee if hitops go up to your sack

>> No.6016008

>>6015983
>>6015971
Aside from exaggerations, they really look so /fa/ like a lot of things here, that they've gone full circle into stupidity. Just my opinion. Vans are comfortable and cheap. And I like how they look.

>> No.6016019

>>6016008
congrats

>> No.6016029

>>6016019
thx :)

>> No.6016151
File: 28 KB, 618x386, vans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016151

>> No.6016166

>>6016151
i like that one a lot, might steal it

>> No.6017277

>>6016151
Those are pretty nice.

>> No.6017285

This thread is dildos.