/WT/ - WATCH THREAD

[Anonymous No.18082830]

The Richemont formula edition.

Guides and Info:
>Classic Meme
https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8
>Poorfag guide:
https://www.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
>Watch essentials 102:
https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
>Purchasing used watches:
https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
>Purchasing straps:
https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

"Suggest a watch for me."
>Your budget
>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz
>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone
>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
>Wrist size or desired watch size

Previous thread : >>18081460

[Anonymous No.18082833]

[Anonymous No.18082835]

I do not like the Overseas very much.

[Anonymous No.18082839]

>>18082835
I hate it. It's trying too hard.

[Anonymous No.18082841]

>>18082835
>>18082839
It's amazing, especially in the flat black lacquer dial.
But they really need to do something with it other than the fucking sunburst dial pattern.

Why not a vertically brushed dial texture or something.

[Anonymous No.18082843]

>>18082841
This pebbled texture was great, but
>thicccc gmt and chronograph versions only
>extremely limited edition

Other than the pebbled and black lacquer dials, literally every single Overseas iteration has a sunburst dial.

[Anonymous No.18082844]

>>18082835
I watched an objective review today of a guy who has super macro lenses and stuff. The watch was gen 3 overseas, 4500v in Blue. And like I said, he was objective and tore that thing a new asshole. Scratches on the Dial, the Hands had scratches, the date Numbers' print is worse than low 3 digit watches and they're uneven (!) in width. The right side of the 8 for example is almost twice as thick as the left side. And to top it all off, it does NOT have antireflecting properties on the glass or dial in general so it constantly reflects lighting from any source.
Which got me thinking, it really does seem like a non worthy competitor to the other 2 steel sports watches. It's overpriced but then you turn the watch around and it makes sense. And yet still, I don't think it's worth the pricing if the QR isn't on par.

[Anonymous No.18082846]

>>18082844
kek you watched that rich Arab who keeps saying "the luxury".
fyi, the Overseas came out of his macro inspections better than most competitors, especially the RO.

[Anonymous No.18082847]

>>18082844
The review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgrutV6dYIc

[Anonymous No.18082848]

>>18082846
'Sthat true? Let me check them out. Then I guess GS really is top notch when it comes to dial finishing

[Anonymous No.18082850]

I just don't see the point of integrated bracelets. Just make a normal watch on a bracelet with solid end links. What's the benefit of an integrated bracelet over pic related? None. Stop falling for that crap, the whole point is to sell you proprietary bracelets and straps.

[Anonymous No.18082851]

>>18082847
called it >>18082846

>>18082848
Here's his macro review of the RO, he even expresses his disappointment in the title: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUOA-l5Y0SY
And here's his direct comparison between the two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-V-h4MdiUk

He's honestly a pretty based reviewer.

[Anonymous No.18082854]

>>18082851
Can't believe this guy got away from me for so long. Been watching watch youtubers for a year now.
Thanks for the links. It's fresh to find someone who isn't recommending and liking every single watch on the market.

[Anonymous No.18082857]

>>18082850
it looks cool

[Anonymous No.18082858]

>>18082848
Not always, he examines a GMT and the print is all over the place.

[Anonymous No.18082859]

>>18082848
>Then I guess GS really is top notch when it comes to dial finishing
GS hands and markers (not to mention dials) are probably slightly ahead of the hands and markers on an RO or Overseas.
On a GS the geometries on the hands and markers are typically more complex, while on the RO and Overseas they're more simple.

Also, here's an interesting fact: the Royal Oak is one of the very few Swiss watches that are finished with a Sallaz (spinning tin plate) machine, which is the same as GS' zaratsu.
So essentially any GS has the same level of case finishing as an RO. And movement finishing btw.
So compared to a GS, you're paying more than twice for an RO just because of the name and prestige.

The Overseas on the other hand has a movement finished to haute horologie standards.

[Anonymous No.18082863]

>>18082859
Sssht not so loud.

[Anonymous No.18082864]

>>18082859
Too bad every GS ever made looks like utter shit.

[Anonymous No.18082865]

>>18082859
>The Overseas on the other hand has a movement finished to haute horologie standards.
lmao kek

[Anonymous No.18082867]

>>18082865
>Geneva Hallmark/Seal
Vs
>"lmao kek"
Who would win?

[Anonymous No.18082868]

>>18082859
>On a GS the geometries on the hands and markers are typically more complex, while on the RO and Overseas they're more simple.

Here's an illustration: the RO hour marker has three planes: top and two slanted sides. Not counting the vertical edges.
While this GS hour marker (snowflake) has five major finished planes: top and four slanted sides.

But there's more: if you look closely, the GS hour marker in pic even has a minute stepped box section on top of it.

[Anonymous No.18082869]

>>18082867
I'll side with "lmao kek" just to spite off the Shitemont shills in this thread.

[Anonymous No.18082870]

>>18082869
>I can't appreciate watches on their merit
>I must always revert to tribalism and fight windmills

[Anonymous No.18082871]

When did this specific hatred of Richemont in this general start? It wasn't like this a few weeks or months ago.

[Anonymous No.18082872]

>>18082871
It's probably a very lonely little sperg with a strong basal tendency towards tribalism that is characteristic of the mentally feeble (sportsball fans etc.)

[Anonymous No.18082873]

>>18082871
>When did this specific hatred of Richemont in this general start?

Richemont has never been particularly beloved and we've been complaining about them for years (same with Swatch) but I'm guessing some newer anons started looking into their portfolio a little deeper.

It's kind of like the opposite of the Rolex evolution.

[Anonymous No.18082876]

>>18082863
Post some webms m8.

[Anonymous No.18082877]

>>18082864
>Too bad every GS ever made looks like utter shit.

Can you imagine if they hired a competent designer and marketing team?

[Anonymous No.18082878]

>>18082871
Honestly if you're a vintagefag there are countless reasons to hate Richemont, especially for what they have done to IWC, JLC and VC. The only brands that are managed properly are Cartier and unironically Panerai.

[Anonymous No.18082879]

>>18082873
I like a lot of the recent evolution of Richemont brands.
The 3rd gen Overseas is amazing, Lange hasn't lost one iota of their finishing prestige, even Montblanc is doing some amazing things with their 1858 and especially Minerva models.

[Anonymous No.18082880]

>>18082830
Lol

[Anonymous No.18082881]

>>18082876
In his own blogposting thread, though.

[Anonymous No.18082882]

>>18082867
Honestly though, the Geneva Stamp loses a lot of its luster once you've seen a factory operator doing perlage for a full baseplate in under a minute, and when you keep in mind that machine beveling is allowed.
It's more useful as a geographic control than a mark of high quality. Like all quality standards in watchmaking, its worded so corners can be cut.

[Anonymous No.18082884]

>>18082882
I read the requirements recently, it's quite a hassle.

[Anonymous No.18082885]

[Anonymous No.18082886]

Suggest a watch for me

>Your budget
max €1000 - doesn't need to be, a good looking €150 watch is also fine.
>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
Dress, Fashion
>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz
Quartz or automatic, don't really care too much.
>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone
no
>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
interchangeable, leather.
>Wrist size or desired watch size
small wrist, 34mm watch width if what I wear now and looks good. (skagen 572lsxm)

[Anonymous No.18082889]

>>18082871
A few days ago. And ever since some anon posted his newly acquired VC Overseas a few weeks ago there has been constant shitting over it.

[Anonymous No.18082890]

>>18082878
>Cartier
They turned Cartier from the premier name in luxury jewelery into steel quartz shitters and Love bracelets for middle-aged housewives.
Yes, I know they still have their exclusive lines but the brand cachet on the whole has been irrevocably watered down.

[Anonymous No.18082891]

>>18082885
Go away you fucking irritating little twerp.

[Anonymous No.18082892]

>>18082878
>The only brands that are managed properly are Cartier and unironically Panerai.
Not Lange or Vacheron?

>>18082882
>once you've seen a factory operator doing perlage for a full baseplate in under a minute
This has always been the case.

>machine beveling is allowed
You can't machine polish a bevel.
You can cut the 45-degree angle for a bevel with a router, but the actual polishing has to be done with handheld dremel tools.

[Anonymous No.18082893]

>>18082889
Ah, Trinity anon vs bittercel.
My new favourite /wt/ plot line.

[Anonymous No.18082895]

>>18082878
>Panerai
And then they managed to ruin themselves.
It's actually impressive that they got worse after they stopped using ETAs.

[Anonymous No.18082896]

>>18082891

[Anonymous No.18082897]

>>18082886
I can sell you this hand wound Seiko from 1961. 33mm.

[Anonymous No.18082899]

>>18082897
Catch these hands, I don't want hand wound >:(

Thanks for the offer :-)

[Anonymous No.18082900]

>>18082896
>Starts discord
>No one joins
>Tries to thread split
>No one joins

Are you getting the fucking hint? You're lonely because you're annoying. If you were a nice person, you'd have fucking friends. You'd be exploring Tokyo with them instead of sitting alone in your room shitposting on 4chan, just like you did when you lived in Germany and back home in Greece.

[Anonymous No.18082901]

[Anonymous No.18082902]

>>18082900
>Starts discord
What discord?

[Anonymous No.18082903]

>>18082900
It's not me posting them. In fact I never made a webm, I only use catbox. It's a falseflag or just you samefagging.

[Anonymous No.18082904]

>>18082900
>Tries to thread split
This is the thread split, idiot.

[Anonymous No.18082905]

>>18082893
>Ah, Trinity anon vs bittercel.
>My new favourite /wt/ plot line.

It's not as much fun because the guy with the vacheron admits he likes to fight and stir up shit. It's basically just two bitterposters squawking at each other.

Bittercel vs Reversocel was fun because it one clearly didn't want to fight.

[Anonymous No.18082907]

>>18082900
It's worse when he gets a little pissy and just starts spamming his stupid watch over and over again to make sure no one can enjoy the thread.

Whatever, here's a watch pic. (Not mine)

[Anonymous No.18082908]

Thoughts? I think the dial is too crowded.

[Anonymous No.18082909]

fucking lol

[Anonymous No.18082910]

>>18082907
>>18082903
Saddest part is the guy false flagging as me.

[Anonymous No.18082911]

>>18082903
>In fact I never made a webm
Why though? It's better than catbox links.

[Anonymous No.18082912]

>>18082909
I will never understand how they got away with a printed dial and charge 5K for it.

[Anonymous No.18082914]

>>18082895
>And then they managed to ruin themselves.
>It's actually impressive that they got worse after they stopped using ETAs.

Business-wise, they're probably doing better now. In terms of making money for Richemont. Their quality, which has never been all that great, is in the toilet now.
The brand fans almost universally prefer the old watches.
Sure, they were wildly overpriced but they were unique. They were a like a little secret not everyone knew about. They were also pretty tough.

[Anonymous No.18082915]

>>18082911
Catbox has sound and much better quality.

[Anonymous No.18082916]

>>18082910
We need IDs here.

[Anonymous No.18082917]

>>18082908
Way too crowded, yes.

Using something like the JLC Hometime Aston Martin's movement would have been a better choice.

[Anonymous No.18082920]

>>18082916
Sad but true.

Of course, our avatarfags would probably kill themselves.

[Anonymous No.18082921]

>>18082916
Go back to Redd*t.

[Anonymous No.18082922]

>>18082920
In reality it'd be you killing yourself lmao. No samefagging, falsflagging, seethe & bitterposting for you lmfao kek lol.

[Anonymous No.18082923]

>>18082922
>lmfao kek lol
Ah, it's you again. Where do you get the energy for the constant shitting of these threads? All you do is berate others and you don't contribute anything valuable to these threads.

[Anonymous No.18082925]

I keep lusting after this thing more and more with each passing hour.

>classic timeless overall look
>quirky date complication and moonphase so not too boring
>nice details like tiny applied domes for the minutes
>very thin case, but 41mm so both sporty and dressy at the same time
>champagne dial leans more towards the whiter side than the gold side, so not too flashy or garish

Also, that green crocodile HNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG
The ideal summer watch to go with green/khaki pants and linen shirts.

[Anonymous No.18082926]

>>18082923
>Ah, it's you again.
I am merely parodying your writing style lmfao.

[Anonymous No.18082927]

>>18082925

[Anonymous No.18082932]

>>18082926
>I'm not anon, I'm the other anon
Exactly why we need IDs

[Anonymous No.18082935]

>>18082932
You're schizoposting, but I fully agree about the IDs.

[Anonymous No.18082936]

>>18082925
>>18082927
Nice Baume & Mercier.

[Anonymous No.18082938]

>>18082936
Are you blind? That's obviously a JLC.

[Anonymous No.18082940]

>>18082925
>>18082927
Why don't you buy it, then?

[Anonymous No.18082942]

>>18082938
Looks like an IWC Portofino to me.

[Anonymous No.18082945]

I am an aspiring watch designer, rate my work.

[Anonymous No.18082946]

>>18082945
Picrel is the original. Which one is better /wt/?

[Anonymous No.18082947]

>>18082945
>>18082946
Retard.

[Anonymous No.18082948]

>>18082942
>sub 45mm diameter
Looks nothing like an IWC.

[Anonymous No.18082950]

I don't care what everyone says, this is the best watch from Watches and Wonders 2024.
And by "best" I mean "the least worst".

[Anonymous No.18082951]

>>18082947
Watch design is saturated, someone will eventually make my version. Screencap this.

[Anonymous No.18082955]

>>18082843
>>18082841
Gen II is where you should be buying. It's the best of the model line. All models are reasonably thin, the time only especially so.

[Anonymous No.18082956]

>>18082947
How would you do a double retrograde pointer day date? I dare you to post your original design.

[Anonymous No.18082957]

>>18082955
2nd gen has that kooky XXXtreme 2000s styling that will probably be fashionable in about 20 years, but I still prefer the 3rd gen overall. It's more refined.
2nd gen feels like it's trying too hard to be distinctive and not trying hard enough to be attractive.

They are decent buys right now, though. Not undervalued like they were a couple years ago, but any piece you buy will appreciate in value until the integrated sports watch bubble pops.

[Anonymous No.18082958]

>>18082843
>>18082955
>>18082841
These look like utter shit for retards called Hunter and Zimbabwe.

[Anonymous No.18082961]

>>18082841
>Why not a vertically brushed dial texture or something.

Or they could try no texture at all. The thing that makes the FPJ Chronometre Bleu's dial so beguiling is that it doesn't have any texture. It's just perfect layers of lacquer on a gold plate.

They did the dial texture thing in the 90's and 00's. It's played-out for them, since they could never settle on a design and stick with it, like AP with the tapestry or PP with the horizontal channels.

[кaни No.18082976]

watches are bracelets for faggots too scared to admit they just want to wear bracelets, it is so fucking sad and pathetic

[Anonymous No.18082989]

>>18082902
Exactly.

[Anonymous No.18082992]

[Anonymous No.18082994]

>>18082992
focusing on the view. I like it.

[Anonymous No.18083001]

>>18082994
Well yeah, you've seen the watch a hundred times.
Last days of sakura blossoms.

[Anonymous No.18083004]

>>18082955
idk i hate the crown seating

[Anonymous No.18083005]

>>18082945
>>18082946
You already did this a few weeks ago

[Anonymous No.18083006]

>>18082908
The new version looks so much better

[Anonymous No.18083014]

>>18082850
This is true with almost all watches except the Royal Oak and the 222, with these watches the integrated bracelet looks great.

[Anonymous No.18083015]

Here's my idea...
Jacob & Co watch but as a table clock and affordable.

[Anonymous No.18083016]

>>18083001
Beautiful

[Anonymous No.18083029]

>>18082925
>very thin case, but 41mm so both sporty and dressy at the same time
No. You can't have it all. This watch looks bad with a size larger than 36mm.

[Anonymous No.18083034]

>>18082945
>>18082946
Absurd complications. A Day Date reads better. This is almost as stupid as a tourbillon

[Anonymous No.18083038]

>>18083029
>This watch looks bad with a size larger than 36mm.
I love this satire.

[Anonymous No.18083041]

>>18082950
Every shade of color on that watch is just wrong.

[Anonymous No.18083042]

>>18082950
It's true. Roxel humiliated by Tudor. The gold back bay and green dial looks good.

[Anonymous No.18083045]

>>18082950
Is it still 16mm thick?

[Anonymous No.18083046]

>>18082992
>>18083001
Do you live in Japan now or something?

[Anonymous No.18083048]

>>18082850
>What's the benefit of an integrated bracelet over pic related? None.

Wrong.

>no flaps or ears or anything else that is metal rubbing against metal in order to keep the endlink in place
>tolerances can never be tight enough that end links don't have play otherwise the case gets damaged
>moving parts means wear, wear means stretch, take a look at old pieces and how their solid end links wobble around
>integrated bracelet usually has screws holding it in place instead of friction fit metal parts
>cant wear out because it's screwed in, totally solid, no moving parts

Integrated bracelets are superior for build quality and longevity. They also look better. The downside is complexity of construction. Except for the 3rd gen Overseas, you have to visit a certified watchmaker to swap bracelets / straps on them. Trying it yourself is a bad idea.

[Anonymous No.18083050]

>>18083042
>gold back bay and green dial looks good
it's a majestic color combination but do you really want a 30k+ Tudor

[Anonymous No.18083051]

>>18083004
Why? It matches the lug extension at 12 and 6. I think the watch would look worse without the crown guard.

>>18082957
Yeah the 3rd gen is more refined. I'm not super thrilled about that. I get that it's supposed to match the level of luxury but an integrated sports watch should look robust and industrial, while being over engineered to hell. I prefer the brutal look of the 2nd gen mainly because of that. It looks like something that can survive nuclear bombs, while the 3rd gen looks like it will melt in the sun.

[Anonymous No.18083057]

>>18083045
It's 12,9mm thick.
The only downside are the faux rivets on the bracelet.

[Anonymous No.18083063]

>>18083050
>it's a majestic color combination but do you really want a 30k+ Tudor
No. But it looks very good. I'll be honest with you, I never buy gold sports watches.

[Anonymous No.18083065]

>>18083048
>They also look better.
Only a few of them look good. The Royal Oak obviously, since it's iconic. The 222 maybe. And a few others like the Rolex Midas, because it was part of the design. I also like the H. Moser Streamliner because of its organic look. Everything else is unnecessary and stupid.
>Integrated bracelets are superior for build quality and longevity.
Nigga you can't beat Rolex quality and longevity wise. People are still wearing 70 years old Datejust on their original bracelet.

[Anonymous No.18083067]

>>18083057
This one would look great with the Tudor’s jubilee.

[Anonymous No.18083069]

>>18083065
>The Royal Oak obviously,
I think it looks boring.
>since it's iconic.
This is the shittest reason to call something good looking. Phuck me dead.

>Nigga you can't beat Rolex quality and longevity wise.
NPC take and wrong.

>People are still wearing 70 years old Datejust on their original bracelet.
Sure they are. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.18083072]

>>18083069
>muh Rolex stretch
Doesn't stop you from wearing it. Can be fixed by any jeweler.

[Anonymous No.18083074]

>>18083046
Yeah since late February.

[Anonymous No.18083075]

>>18083072
>Doesn't stop you from wearing it.
What the fuck kinda cope is this?

>watch / bracelet are worn to shit to this point
>well you can still wear it
No fucking shit, you can also wear a dive watch without water resistance and swim in it, what's the point?

>Can be fixed by any jeweler.
No it can't. What happens in these older bracelets is friction fit pins are rubbing against their sleeves in the bracelet and widen the holes they are inserted into. The only fix is replacing the bracelet.

Wobbly end links will never happen on an integrated bracelet, and stretch can't happen with screw in pins either.

[Anonymous No.18083079]

>>18083074
Bro, too big for you. Friendly advice. Next time try something < 38

[Anonymous No.18083082]

>>18083075
>No it can't.
That pic you used in your previous post >>18083069 comes from this video where a watchmaker repairs a stretched out Rolex bracelet :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov3JerkpoVQ

[Anonymous No.18083083]

>>18083079
Μy 38mm fits perfectly actually. You're right.

[Anonymous No.18083085]

>>18083005
Maybe there are some new people here.

[Anonymous No.18083086]

>>18083082
Bracelet stretch is not bent pins. Stretch is when the grooves that the pins go into are >>stretched<< by the pins. Constant wear and movement causes the grooves to widen so the pins have play and can move sideways.

Bent pins inside your bracelet are obviously fixable but if you have stretch you're fucked. Technically you can laser weld the links back but usually you don't bother and swap out the bracelet.

Read about it here
>https://dixonwatchco.com.au/product/rolex-bracelet-stretch-repair-fixing-band-restoration/

[Anonymous No.18083087]

>>18083083
Yes, the smallest Credor looks good on you.

[Anonymous No.18083089]

>>18083067
>This one would look great with the Tudor’s jubilee.
Wait until next year. It's probably coming out, with some more color combinations too.

[Anonymous No.18083090]

>>18083074
How long before your visa expires?

[Anonymous No.18083091]

>>18083074
With citizenship?
How did that go?

[Anonymous No.18083095]

>>18082992
nice sallaz

[Anonymous No.18083101]

>>18083086
>YOU CAN'T FIX A STRETCHED OUT BRACELET, YOU HAVE TO THROW IT AWAY!!!!!
>o-okay you can fix it, but nobody does it and it's easier to replace the bracelet. Here, check out that link from a watch repair shop where they explain how they do it for only 350 eurobucks. See? I was right.
Why are you like that?

[Anonymous No.18083102]

>>18083095
>Lake Sallaz
Has a certain ring to it.

[Anonymous No.18083105]

>>18083101
>strawmanning

[Anonymous No.18083107]

>>18083101
kek
That’s Overseethe anon. He bought a shit tier VC Overseas a while ago, realized his mistake and now he’s angry all the time.

[Anonymous No.18083108]

>>18083107
>Overseethe
kek

[Anonymous No.18083109]

>>18083107
Can you post Your 5 Digit watch? I'd like to see it.

[Anonymous No.18083116]

>watch won't be delivered until tomorrow now
I literally can't even today

[Anonymous No.18083117]

>>18083079
It looks fine. Camera lens can really distort the size. I just wanted to let you know this information friend :)

[Anonymous No.18083119]

>>18083109
>5 Digit watch?
Do you mean 5 digit Rolex or a watch worth "5 digits" (i.e. more than 9,999.-)?

[Anonymous No.18083121]

>>18082863
Go back to Germany and the wife you abandoned.

[Anonymous No.18083122]

>>18083119
Your timex or casio

[Anonymous No.18083123]

>>18083101
Why are you misunderstanding terminology and blaming it on me? Fucking deranged idiot.

[Anonymous No.18083124]

>>18083119
Why not both?

[Anonymous No.18083125]

>>18082950
Every time I see a new Tudor it feels like I've seen it years ago. I'm glad you like it but their designs seem intentionally lacking.

[Anonymous No.18083127]

The AD I emailed for a bb58 replied to me and told me they don't have the blue one.
They have the black one though.
I don't know, I wanted to try both before making a decision, but I think I had a small preference for the blue one :(

[Anonymous No.18083129]

>>18083127
Neither model is rare. They'll probably have both in a couple weeks.
If you really want a blue one, I'd wait for it.

For what it's worth, though, the black one actually does look a lot better. I owned the blue one and flipped it pretty quickly. It's not as interesting or versatile a watch.

[Anonymous No.18083131]

>>18083127
Fuck them then and go to a different store.

[Anonymous No.18083132]

>>18082955
I knew the big ugly Tissot 90s-00s style would come back.

[Anonymous No.18083133]

>>18083109
How does it feel to spend 15k on a watch that nobody likes?
>inb4 "DURRRRRR you're all jealous"
Some anons have posted their ALS, VC, JLC or Rolexes in the past and got mostly positive comments.

[Anonymous No.18083135]

Big watch on small wrist can look good and I am tired of pretending they don't. Except when it is 60mm lug to lug then it looks like shit.

[Anonymous No.18083136]

>>18083086
You can also just replace the existing pins with wider-diameter pins. Very cheap to do.

[Anonymous No.18083137]

>>18083129
I felt like the blue was actually the more versatile one.

[Anonymous No.18083138]

>>18083086
how can a pin stretch metal bro
doesn't make any sense

[Anonymous No.18083140]

>>18083138
Friction, retard.

[Anonymous No.18083141]

Last night I dreamt my Chinese wooden watch started smoking and catching fire from the quartz movement inside.

[Anonymous No.18083143]

>>18083140
it's a tiny little pin it can't destroy the holes

[Anonymous No.18083146]

>>18083138
>>18083140
It’s wear. The metal just get sanded away basically

[Anonymous No.18083147]

Why are you guys being so mean to each other?

[Anonymous No.18083148]

>>18083146
i don't believe my wrist could sand metal just from moving

[Anonymous No.18083149]

>>18083148
No, but the bits of dust, dirt, sand, grime etc will grind away the metal bit by bit over years

[Anonymous No.18083150]

>>18083135
Post examples then.
Pro-tip: you can't.

[Anonymous No.18083151]

>>18083138
based

[Anonymous No.18083152]

>>18083138
>how can a pin stretch metal bro
>doesn't make any sense
take apart an old bracelet that has never been cleaned and you'll be shocked by the amount of dirt in there.

Skin oils get on the bracelet and, over the course of the bracelet flexing move into the moving hinges, i.e. the pins. Dirt and dust sticks to those oils and turns into an abrasive paste collects in those areas and gradually, over the decades, wears away the metal.

Where once there were tight tolerances, now all the holes are enlarged, providing even more room for dirt to collect.

[Anonymous No.18083154]

>>18083109
Sure thing bub

[Anonymous No.18083156]

>>18083154
Not a 5 digit. It's a 5figure watch

[Anonymous No.18083157]

>>18083154
Very cool Patek anon. Looks great.

[Anonymous No.18083161]

>>18083154
Absolutely hideous watch. If it didn't say Patek on it I wouldn't pay $10 for it. Why did you buy the least desired and most hated Patek in history? The Ellipse are LOATHED by everybody everywhere.

I guess you couldn't afford a real Patek and you bought the Copelipse instead.

[Anonymous No.18083162]

>>18083161

[Anonymous No.18083163]

>>18083133
>How does it feel to spend 15k on a watch that nobody likes?
Feels like I'm not an NPC, actually.

[Anonymous No.18083166]

>>18083162
Says the Copelipse owner. Truly awful watch, most people would be embarrassed to own it. I sure would.

[Anonymous No.18083169]

>tfw the hooker KEKS at the size of your wrist

[Anonymous No.18083173]

>>18083154
>that jungle ape tier of hairy arms
>that skin color
>that ugly gold least desirable Patek ever made
>looks like a women's watch in the first place
>barely fits your wrist
>can be had under 10k

He said 5 digit watch btw.

And holy shit will that picture get reposted. Now I understand why you're all mad about the Overseas anon. This is what you're forced to wear and this is what your arms look like. Jeebus.

[Anonymous No.18083175]

>>18083161
mad overseethe anon is mad

[Anonymous No.18083176]

>>18083175
Get a wax for your arms bro, it's disgusting.

[Anonymous No.18083177]

>>18083163
You bought a stainless steel integrated bracelet sports watch in 2024. You can't get more NPC than that.

[Anonymous No.18083179]

>>18083177
Copelipse has spoken I guess. Imagine spending 10k on a watch that not even Patek fanboys want. The Pontiff fucking hates that watch and he knows why.

>Copelipse

[Anonymous No.18083180]

>>18083177
Correct me if I'm wrong, but NPCs would be buying SS integrated bracelet watches during the hype at their peak, which has died off. Since all they do is follow trends. So buying before or after is actually non NPC. But to each his own.

[Anonymous No.18083181]

>>18083154
>buying dress watches in current year

TGV is that you?

[Anonymous No.18083183]

>>18083181
Yes.
I will forever lament the absence of a Squale dress watch.

[Anonymous No.18083184]

>>18083179
>Copelipse
Still not as catchy as Overseethe, though.

[Anonymous No.18083188]

>>18083166
Post your watch with a timestamp.

(You won't. Cowards never do.)

[Anonymous No.18083190]

>>18083184
That may be, but I'd rather be called Overseethe than have wasted my money on a Copelipse. Of all possible fucking options, he had to get that. He couldn't get a tiny Royal Oak, or a tiny Calatrava, or a fucking Quarz AP, no, he had to get the most hated watch Patek has ever made.

Just set your money on fire.

[Anonymous No.18083193]

>>18083154
BTFO'd the fuck out.

Can you take some more shots of that beauty? Perhaps in better light?

[Anonymous No.18083195]

>>18083188
Ape haired wristlet, be quiet while we're discussing your failure as a watch collector.

If I'd known people like you were criticizing the Overseas I would have switched sides earlier.

[Anonymous No.18083197]

>>18083190
>he had to get the most hated watch Patek has ever made.
Could you please point out where you got this idea? I've only been looking for a couple minutes, but all I see the Ellipse described as is "iconic". It's a Genta original design.

[Anonymous No.18083199]

We should stop the fighting and shitposting and just enjoy our niche hobby. Only we can truly understand each and learn from each other.
I recently found out for example that ETA won't sell you parts so you can't fix the watches yourself.

[Anonymous No.18083200]

It sure has gotten bitter in here.

[Anonymous No.18083201]

Overseethe's jealousy is off the charts.

Can you imagine if someone had posted a Journe? He'd literally be drinking bleach at this point.

[Anonymous No.18083202]

>>18083150
Yes because wide angle smart phone cameras make it look worse than it is.

[Anonymous No.18083203]

>>18083199
Fuck off you bald faggot. You're worse than Copelipse and Overseethe put together.

[Anonymous No.18083205]

>>18083197
It's the cheapest Patek dress watch in the world. It's half the price of a Calatrava. He didn't buy it because of Genta he bought it because he could afford it. It's the very definition of cope. At least the Overseas guy didn't pretend to be buying Vacheron dress watch high horology. He bought an entry level sports watch. This guy is trying to look like big money on a small budget. Super cringe.

Just do a quick search.
>I think that the Golden Ellipse is the most overlooked Patek Philippe model.

Nobody wants it.

[Anonymous No.18083206]

>>18083203
Who's copelipse?

[Anonymous No.18083208]

>>18083195
>we
OK, Overseethe.

[Anonymous No.18083209]

>>18083206
The ape with the $8000 "Patek dress watch" here >>18083154

For the record I am stunned that the people shitting on you are wearing these utter pieces of shit. No wonder they never post wrists or watches.

[Anonymous No.18083211]

>>18083205
No, I meant more like articles, not headcanon.

The watch no one wants is the Twenty-4.

[Anonymous No.18083212]

>>18083205
Aaaa ellipse/copelipse. Sorry for asking.

[Anonymous No.18083213]

>>18083206
Is that cum in your hair?

[Anonymous No.18083214]

>>18083211
That greentext was a quote from an article.

[Anonymous No.18083217]

>>18083213
What hair? I'm bald, remember?

[Anonymous No.18083222]

>>18083217
Jokes aside, I was meaning to ask, but how and why did this meme start that I am bald? Did I say or imply something?
I'm very confused. I didn't wanna ask because I thought it was funny, I just want to know how it started.

[Anonymous No.18083224]

>>18083200
>It sure has gotten bitter in here.
It's literally the guy who spams the Overseas. He's flat-out admitted like enjoys trolling.

[Anonymous No.18083225]

>>18083222
>I was meaning to ask, but how and why did this meme start that I am bald
Because your hair is very obviously thinning on top. Why else?

[Anonymous No.18083226]

>>18083127
The blü one is much better. I'm glad I didn't get the black and gold, I would have gotten tired of the vintage feel.

[Anonymous No.18083229]

>>18083154
>what you buy when you cant afford a real Patek

How much did you pay? I am seeing these for around 5k online. A Calatrava is what, 20k? 30k?

[Anonymous No.18083232]

lmfaoo you won't be safe wearing watches even in monaco any more

[Anonymous No.18083235]

>>18083229
Where are you looking? The cheapest ref.3738 I can find is 14k USD.

[Anonymous No.18083236]

>>18083232
https://www.richardmille.com/friends-and-partners/sebastian-korda

[Anonymous No.18083237]

>>18083232
>even in monaco
On the contrary, that's precisely where it makes the most sense to happen since that's where a pair of basketball-europeans would be almost sure to snatch something pricey whatever it is.

[Anonymous No.18083239]

>>18083232
It's worth a house can you really blame them?
Just face facts they will get a lot more out of selling that and buying a house than he got out of it as a watch.

[Anonymous No.18083241]

>>18083131
It's the closest one and it's a 45min drive away already...

How far do you usually go to buy a watch, Anons?

[Anonymous No.18083243]

>>18083154
You got tricked into posting a wrist-shot. Congratulations, retard.

[Anonymous No.18083244]

>>18083237
to be honest it was probably planned trip there, there's big tennis tournament in mc at the moment with nearly all top players
well most of them live there anyway, not korda though, think he resides in florida

[Anonymous No.18083249]

Morning needs
Wearing my illustrious Seiko today

[Anonymous No.18083248]

>>18083241
I'm such a traumatize wristlet I thought this said 45mm and had a mini panic attack.

[Anonymous No.18083261]

>>18083232
They did him a favor.

[Anonymous No.18083262]

>>18083249
Based Fellow Grand Seiko enjoyer.

[Anonymous No.18083274]

>>18083262
>of course he's got a hairy back too
Bet the Japanese hookers struggle to pretend to be attracted to that, or do you only go for the ones that are _completely_ dead inside?

[Anonymous No.18083283]

>>18082833
is that a chastity cage

[Anonymous No.18083286]

>>18083283
I think it's the vagina examination thingy.

[Anonymous No.18083287]

>>18083239
>advocating redistribution of wealth through crime on the streets
LOL

[Anonymous No.18083303]

>>18083201
Mort hasn't been here in a while.

[Anonymous No.18083304]

Wristlet here, what's an appropriate upgrade for me. I like my F-91w a lot but I need something a little nicer when I dress up

[Anonymous No.18083307]

>>18083303
He was here just yesterday.

[Anonymous No.18083312]

>>18083303
He was here one or two threads ago.
>>18080527

[Anonymous No.18083316]

>>18082902
https://discord.com/invite/r8JtQ2DU

[Anonymous No.18083317]

>>18083307
>>18083312
Fuck. I missed him. :^(

[Anonymous No.18083329]

>>18083317
He was only around for one post, flexed a little, realized the discourse what still 100% bitter trolls sniping at one another and left.
He simply doesn't have OmegaDrunk's ability to post walls of banal text like an alcoholic ChatGPT.

[Anonymous No.18083351]

>>18083173
>you didn't pay enough for it!
Seethe
>your arm is ugly!
Cope
>Archie said he doesn't like it!
Dilate

[Anonymous No.18083352]

>>18083351
Based

[Anonymous No.18083354]

>>18082900
kek that other thread he created having low and slow responses shows we mostly find him annoying

[Anonymous No.18083355]

Ellipse anon absolutely mogs Overseethe anon.

Ellipse:
>classic and iconic
>timeless
>can be worn with pretty much every outfit, including jeans and hoodies
>hasn't left the Patek catalogue since 1968

Overseas
>obvious cope watch
>Richemont
>design has change 3 times in 20 years
>looks already terribly dated
>4:30 date window

Even >>18083304 mogs Overseethe anon.

[Anonymous No.18083364]

>>18083206
>>18083262

[Anonymous No.18083377]

>>18083355
Even the unflattering names work better.
>Overseethe
>Coperseas
better and funnier than
>Copellipse

[Anonymous No.18083379]

>>18083351
>>18083355
>>18083377
>brown ape steals his grandmas wristwatch on her deathbed and tries to flex on /fa/ with it
>using a timestamped wrist shot I might add, genuinely thinking his Copelipse will impress anyone
>proceeds to samefag and rage his way out of it

Hate to break it to you but that pic will get reposted in every thread until the end of time. Congratulations. By the way, calling yourself "Ellipse anon" is a dead giveaway.

[Anonymous No.18083386]

>>18083355
There's nothing classic about the Patek Ellipse. It's a Genta designed watch for people who can't afford a Genta designed watch. Nobody holds his dress watches in high esteem and for good reason. The Ellipse is the cop-out Patek to get if you can't afford a Calatrava let alone a complication by them.

Your inexplicable bitterness over a steel sports Vacheron versus a dated, small, ugly old ladies watch tells me that you're just shitposting for the sake of it. Which is not surprising for someone too dumb to properly spell words like "changed".

That's cope.

[Anonymous No.18083401]

>>18082830
Does anyone know how to change bracelets without scratching the fuck out of the lugs?

[Anonymous No.18083402]

My new automatic has a slightly misaligned hour hand. It's lining up 2-3 minutes behind the minute hand passing 12. Shouldn't be a big deal to get fixed under warranty?

[Anonymous No.18083405]

>>18083401
Yeah get a Bergeon spring bar tool whose head fits your watch and get practice on a cheap shitter before you go to your big pieces. The trick is to grab the pin, pull it inward, and keep your finger pressed against the end link at the opposite side to prevent the pin from slipping upward to fuck up the face of your watch. Push it towards you so it is stuck against the inside of the lugs, then carefully turn the watch around and do the same with the other side so it pops out.

Even doing this you will put minimal scratches between the lugs (hidden by bracelet) or the underside of the lugs when the bracelet comes off. But if you're careful it won't be noticeable at all.

[Anonymous No.18083406]

>>18083386
There's nothing classic about the Overseas. It's a Genta-ripoff designed watch for people who can't afford a Genta designed watch. Nobody holds the Overseas in the high esteem of the Royal Oak or Nautilus and for good reason. The Overseas is the cop-out Richemont order them to make to capture those customers who couldn't a afford a Royal Oak, let alone a Nautilus .

Your inexplicable bitterness over a simple, gold Patek versus a dated, oversized ugly old ""sports"" watch tells me that you're just shitposting for the sake of it.

That's cope.

[Anonymous No.18083407]

>>18083406
Haha ultimate butthurt. You're blown the fuck out, just stop dude.

[Anonymous No.18083408]

>>18083386
>There's nothing classic about the Patek Ellipse.
Well you're wrong.
>introduced in 1968
>hasn't changed ever since
>never discontinued by Patek
>instantly recognizable
That's a classic. I don't think it's as iconic as a Cartier Tank, but it's certainly as timeless and tasteful. Also it was not designed by Genta, but by Jean-Daniel Rubeli.

[Anonymous No.18083409]

>>18083379
Why don't you call him Ellipcel, Bittercel? Rolls off the tongue better than Copelipse, don't you think?

[Anonymous No.18083412]

>>18083406
>There's nothing classic about the Overseas. It's a Genta-ripoff designed watch for people who can't afford a Genta designed watch. Nobody holds the Overseas in the high esteem of the Royal Oak or Nautilus and for good reason. The Overseas is the cop-out Richemont order them to make to capture those customers who couldn't a afford a Royal Oak, let alone a Nautilus .
This is absolutely true, though, not shitposting.

[Anonymous No.18083413]

>>18083409
I was thinking Ellipseethe, actually. It's even better.

>>18083408
Stick your head canon up your gold plates ass. That watch is a complete shitter, to call it classic is truly evil because you're making him believe he did well. He fucked up, hard. He's here shitting on sports watches because he realized his gold shitter doesn't get him noticed because everyone thinks he's wearing a ladies piece and is a flaming homosexual.

[Anonymous No.18083417]

>>18083405
Alright. I don't currently own any high end watches yet. I already boogered a few of my cheaper watches, only on the inside of the lugs anyway.
I noticed a few straps have that tool-less spring bar design with a small lever underneath the base of the bracelet.. Those are much easier to get in/out.

[Anonymous No.18083418]

>>18083412
It's factually wrong actually. The Overseas list is the same as the Nautilus and AP, but it's worthless on the secondary market. Clearly that's not because Richemont want it to be cheaper and more affordable, it just happened that way. If it was an affordable cop out it would have a far lower list price than the other two.

[Anonymous No.18083419]

>>18083379
>Hate to break it to you but that pic will get reposted in every thread until the end of time
This is why Overseethe is smart to never actually post a picture. He can simply say he has an Overseas and flood the zone with shit.

If he were actually to post a pic, it would open him up to the same pummeling that Ellipcel (good one, >>18083409) is receiving.

[Anonymous No.18083420]

>>18083405
I'm sure the good Bergeon spring bar tool helps.

[Anonymous No.18083421]

>>18083418
>The Overseas list is the same as the Nautilus and AP, but it's worthless on the secondary market.
...because no one wants them. Obviously.

[Anonymous No.18083424]

>>18083421
It's a desired piece. It's not black and white. Just because the AP and Naut are more desirable, doesn't mean the Overseas is undesirable. It's a rank down, sure, but it has a large following.

That's more than I can say for a Patek Ellipse. When was the last time you even saw one before today? I'm betting years ago. Meanwhile, everybody is talking about the new Overseas Hulk.

[Anonymous No.18083425]

>>18083419
wait im getting confused is overseethe the one who posts the cheap old overseas?

[Anonymous No.18083428]

>>18083304
Man, I have the walmart special. It's just so much watch for $16.88. It's a survival tool. It's even great on a jobsite. If the watch gets caught in machinery it will easily be ripped of your wrist, sparing your arm thanks to the crappy plastic bracelet. It's probably the most manly watch ever conceived.

[Anonymous No.18083429]

>>18083425
>cheap old overseas
They're listed for $20k at the moment. Have you ever worked a day in your life? You come off as pathetic with this kind of talk. I bet you're underage.

[Anonymous No.18083432]

>>18083425
Yeah. the only other Overseas owners ITT are Mort and Nobullychan. Mort has a big date chrono and Nobullychan's Overseas is a blue dial 3rd gen.

[Anonymous No.18083433]

>>18083402
It shouldn't.

[Anonymous No.18083434]

>>18083432
>Nobullychan's Overseas is a blue dial 3rd gen.
Is that confirmed? Got a pic?

[Anonymous No.18083435]

>>18083424
>It's a desired piece.
Sure, by people who've abandoned the idea of owning a Royal Oak or Nautilus or 222.

[Anonymous No.18083436]

>>18083435
Or maybe those watches don't appeal to them from a design, brand or price/performance point of view. Do you own a Panda Daytona? Would you pay $50k for it?

[Anonymous No.18083437]

>>18083434
I don't have a pic, but check the archives for the EDC threads. They usually post there.

[Anonymous No.18083440]

>Audemars Piguet Royal Oak
same design since 1972
>Patek Philippe Nautilus
same design since 1976
>Shitemont Constantin Overseas
4th attempt at making a VC sports watch, design has changed 3 times in 20 years

Even the Tissot PRX is more legitimate and iconic in the integrated bracelet sports watch genre than the Overshit.

[Anonymous No.18083442]

>>18083440
Keep seething with your made up head canon arguments, I'm enjoying it you Eastern European fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.18083444]

>>18083433
Cheers! With sharp ended hands and accurate indices it's too obvious to not be annoying.

[Anonymous No.18083445]

>>18083429
>They're listed for $20k at the moment.
You can find them on C24 around 17k and can probably negotiate at 16k.

[Anonymous No.18083447]

>>18083445
Find me a big date Chrono at 17 please. Box papers only because we're not retarded.

[Anonymous No.18083448]

>>18083440
>4th attempt at making a VC sports watch, design has changed 3 times in 20 years
I think it's more.

Royal Chronometer (ref. 2215), 222, 333, Phidias, and 3 generations of Overseas.

[Anonymous No.18083449]

>>18083448
...and the Overseas is the only design that stuck around, soon going into its 4th iteration. That's success.

[Anonymous No.18083453]

>>18083449
No it isn't. The Royal Oak not needing to change for 50 years is success. Changing every few years is flailing.

[Anonymous No.18083454]

>>18083447
The anon you're quoting was mentioning the one you bought. The asking price is around 17k.
https://www.chrono24.com/vacheronconstantin/vacheron-constantin-overseas--id31364218.htm?searchHash=6ce610e9_VFA0pw&pos=4

But okay, here's a big date chronograph for 14k:
https://www.chrono24.com/vacheronconstantin/vacheron-constantin-overseas-chronograph--id28169238.htm?searchHash=6ce610e9_p4wsLK&pos=3

[Anonymous No.18083457]

>>18083454
>But okay, here's a big date chronograph for 14k:
Fucking disingenuous faggot. You'll lie to your mother to get out of an argument. We're discussing the 2nd generation Overseas you goalpost shifting brown ape.

>>18083453
The Royal Oak has seen several design iterations over the years.

[Anonymous No.18083460]

>>18083454
>The anon you're quoting was mentioning the one you bought. The asking price is around 17k.
The difference between $20k and $17k is obviously gigantic. You totally proved him wrong dude. I can't afford a $20k piece but $17k is fucking peanuts, amirite?

By the way, I just looked at the one you linked. It looks like it has been barbecued. Is this the level you stoop to now? At least find a good condition piece not a destroyed one.

[Anonymous No.18083463]

>make fake Rolex
>put Seiko on it
Do people actually?

[Anonymous No.18083464]

>>18083463
Yeah it's done with all the famous watches for some reason, it's a whole niche in modding Seikos. I hate it.

[Anonymous No.18083465]

>>18083448
>Royal Chronometer (ref. 2215), 222, 333, Phidias, and 3 generations of Overseas.

The 222 is a classic.
The Phidias has a cheesy 80s charm (but it's still shit)

The rest are shit.

[Anonymous No.18083466]

>>18083464

[Anonymous No.18083467]

>>18083466

[Anonymous No.18083472]

I wear an IWC Pilot every single day of my life and have been for years and haven't bothered with watches since
That's all

[Anonymous No.18083474]

>>18083472
Which one?

[Anonymous No.18083475]

>>18083467

[Anonymous No.18083482]

>>18083454
>The asking price is around 17k.
It's closer to 14k. Much less if you don't insist on boxes and papers. Then it's around 12k.

https://www.chrono24.com/vacheronconstantin/---47040b01a-9094----id33831293.htm?searchHash=18d45720_M78dsr&pos=15

>B-b-but boxes and papers.
You want to pay 3 grand for a box, be my guest, but don't think that B&P are some guarantee of authenticity.

[Anonymous No.18083484]

>>18083482
>It's closer to 14k
Plus duty, you lying fucking faggot. Do you live in Japan? If not, add sales tax to it and you're at $20k.

>buying watches without papers
lmao brokefag.

[Anonymous No.18083488]

>>18083482
This is so typical. Someone who has never purchased a watch tells us the worth of a watch but without import fees, sales tax and shipping because he doesn't have a clue. Try again.

[Anonymous No.18083489]

>>18083484
>>18083488
samefagging.

[Anonymous No.18083490]

>>18083489
Does it hurt that I blew you the fuck out? You just outed yourself brah. You're a pathetic broke ass nobody who has never even bought a watch. You thought you could buy this piece at $14k final price. Cute bro. Cute.

[Anonymous No.18083493]

>>18083490
I don't see a denial, pathetic samefagger.

Go pay your taxes like a good triple-vaxxed goy.

[Anonymous No.18083494]

>>18083493
>i can import without taxes
>why wont you believe me

LMAO this is delicious. Screencapped.

[Anonymous No.18083496]

>>18083494
>Screencapped

[Anonymous No.18083498]

>>18083496
>please stop humiliating me

So you paid $14k for that watch after duty and taxes? Interesting. What's your secret?

Not buying, I guess. Never even having bought anything, I guess.

[Anonymous No.18083499]

>>18083490
relax, overseethe. we all believe you paid an awful lot of money for the watch you claim to own.

[Anonymous No.18083500]

>>18083498
When I bought my Daytona, I just wore it at the airport. No one questioned it. I shipped all the boxes and other AD goodies to my house via FedEx. No one questioned it.

Paid no sales tax, paid no import fees, and I got a nice vacation out of it.

[Anonymous No.18083501]

>>18083500
>flying to Japan to buy a watch and save a few thousand bucks

Want my opinion? You're wearing something you can't afford.

[Anonymous No.18083504]

>>18083501
>Want my opinion?
Nah. It doesn't matter to me.

Also, it wasn't Japan.

Keep seething.

[Anonymous No.18083507]

>>18083501
>Uh, you couldn't afford something so you paid even more to take a vacation and buy that thing

Someone cool this hot-head off. He's getting so mad his logic circuits are failing.

[Anonymous No.18083509]

>>18083472
Very expensive watch with ETA movement, it's not worth it to me, but if you like the watch i have nothing to say.

[Anonymous No.18083510]

>>18083504
I think it's pathetic as fuck that you're even proud of this. Like being proud of theft. You have to break your back to buy a piece at a discount because you can't play in the man's game.

Jesus man. Have some dignity, Copetona fag. I bet it's not even the desirable Panda.

[Anonymous No.18083511]

>>18083507
What? I didn't say that. What he claims makes no sense. Either he paid less including vacation, or he paid MORE which means he voluntarily overpaid for a watch versus buying it locally or importing it. Both are stupid as fuck.

The fact that you're praising someone for overspending on a watch really tells me what kind of low life fucking retards I'm dealing with here. That's a way to get really rich isn't it?

[Anonymous No.18083515]

Your 14k watch is really worth like 350 bucks bro.

[Anonymous No.18083517]

>>18083515
keking.

[Anonymous No.18083518]

>>18083510
Yeah dude. You fucked up. I'm sorry. Just be smarter next time. Live and learn.

And it actually is the white dial Panda. How'd you guess?

[Anonymous No.18083520]

>>18083518
>Yeah dude. You fucked up. I'm sorry. Just be smarter next time. Live and learn.
I sure hope to learn how to be so pathetic that I fly to another country and commit tax fraud in order to get an NPC hype watch like the Daytona. You sure showed me.
>And it actually is the white dial Panda. How'd you guess?
Prove it. Oh wait, you won't because you're making up shit again.

[Anonymous No.18083522]

>>18083511
>Go on vacation
>Hey, I'm going to get a souvenir to remember my vacation
>A watch is a nice way to remember a good time

That's normal, buddy.
You don't take vacations? Are you American or something?

[Anonymous No.18083523]

imagine being upset

[Anonymous No.18083524]

>>18083522
This guy flew across continents to purposely smuggle a wristwatch through customs, he admitted as much. Perhaps you should read his posts you lying faggot.

[Anonymous No.18083526]

>>18083520
Tell you what. You post a timestamped wrist shot of your Overseas and I'll post one for my Daytona.

Seeing as how the guy with the shitty Patek made you his bitch, though, I'm not expecting much out of you.

[Anonymous No.18083530]

>>18083526
Calling others a bitch when you openly admit to commit federal crimes in order to get internet credibility for an NPC hype piece like the Trashtona.

That's fucking rich, you Slavic turd.

[Anonymous No.18083531]

I really like the Golden Ellipse, I think it is a beautiful watch. However, I'll be honest with you, this watch looks feminine to me.

[Anonymous No.18083532]

>>18083524
>This guy flew across continents to purposely smuggle a wristwatch through customs,
And? You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

[Anonymous No.18083533]

>>18083523
>christine weston chandler watch

[Anonymous No.18083537]

>>18083532
And that's the most pathetic shit I've ever heard. One rung above a common shoplifter. No wonder I am intellectually superior to you jealous copers. You're literally committing crimes for a living.

Fucking lel.

[Anonymous No.18083538]

>>18083533
I honestly didnt understand the joke everyone was making at first, but it humours me now lol.

>>18083531
>this watch looks feminine to me
and there is nothing wrong with that

[Anonymous No.18083539]

>>18083526
>>18083530
>less than 90 seconds for him to tuck his tail between his legs and punk out
it's like this guy has no pride whatsoever

[Anonymous No.18083540]

>>18083523

[Anonymous No.18083541]

>>18083539
Hey Daytona shoplifter, where's that wristshot? I want to see your illegally imported Panda. Is this how you try to impress people?

>yeah dude I bought it on the grey market and paid a fortune

[Anonymous No.18083542]

fucking lmfao @ bittercel kek!!

[Anonymous No.18083543]

>>18083540

[Anonymous No.18083544]

>>18083537
Good goy. Go stop by the cops and report him while you're on your way back to your pod.

[Anonymous No.18083545]

>>18083543
>>18083540
lmao

[Anonymous No.18083546]

>>18083544
>being proud of shoplifting for a wristwatch

Lower than the lowest scum I've ever seen. You lowlife. And you dare not even post a wristshot when you're called out. I bet you made the whole story up.

[Anonymous No.18083548]

NEW THREAD
>>18083547
>>18083547
>>18083547
>>18083547
>>18083547

[Anonymous No.18083549]

>>18083541
See >>18083526

Now continue to cope, seethe, and dilate.

[Anonymous No.18083557]

>>18083538
>and there is nothing wrong with that
It's true. I like the Piaget's from the 70s more and more. And Piaget watches also seem effeminate to me.

[Anonymous No.18083574]

>>18083248
I read my post and I thought the same thing too.
My wrists are so small I'm unironically considering the bb54 too.

[Anonymous No.18083602]

>>18083463

[Anonymous No.18083612]

Jesus Christ, what the fuck?
Who the fuck thought this mess of a dial was a good idea?

[Anonymous No.18083623]

I'm sorry guys, but I find Jenni Elle really cute.

[Anonymous No.18083626]

>>18083612
soiko consumers love it

[Anonymous No.18083876]

>>18082830
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I'm a poorfag who wants an analogue moonphase watch. Help. What do I buy?

[Anonymous No.18084649]

>>18083304
if you just want a low cost Casio that looks clean, try these small ones.