[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 1.25 MB, 1171x1050, 56d3h22zutk91.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17530484 No.17530484 [Reply] [Original]

If you aren't wearing high-raise loose jeans, you are pretty much seen as out of touch cringe millenial by prime zoomer sluts, is that correct?

>> No.17530489

>>17530484
Women don't give a shit about what you wear

>> No.17530500

>>17530489
Think this is the most retarded take I’ve seen on here in a while

>> No.17530525

>>17530500
I'm right tho. Women care about height, face, money, status and muscles. Whatever shitty pants you are wearing is irrelevant to them

>> No.17530526
File: 188 KB, 960x1200, FLQw3kUVQAUVs7h.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17530526

We wear truey jeans and bb belts, boy

>> No.17530530

>>17530500
Cry more wuss as i steal your gen z bitches in my spray paint pants

>> No.17530536

>wanting to look like a zoom zoom
We’re all in our 30s here, bud

>> No.17530575

>>17530484
30 years old boomennial here
when i go out in the weekend i wear sexcore but normally i wear high waist baggy pants with very cropped tops to show my w shape and yes, i noticed that younger girls are more into the current baggy trend but i honestly get under 30s female attention in either ways, stop overthinking, just get ripped and dress in a way that exalt your shapes independently of the style you choose

>> No.17530626

baggy trousers are for fat people

>> No.17530646

>>17530525
You morons have zero fucking idea how women work and all of your knowledge comes from other screenstuck dick cheesers who reinforce your echo chamber bullshit

>> No.17530652

>>17530646
>You morons have zero fucking idea how women work
Ironic coming from someone who thinks its certain kind of pants that will make you more attractive to women.
I guess fuck you are right, women dont care about a mans face or height or money, they care about pants

>> No.17530660

>>17530652
Idk what kind of dichotomous mental illness you’ve got running, but yeah what you wear will make you more attractive retard.

But ah yes of course if fashion has an impact on attractiveness that must mean nothing else is a factor. Caved in skull?

>> No.17530664

>>17530660
>but yeah what you wear will make you more attractive retard
Incorrect

>> No.17530719

>>17530484
They both look gay, what generation does that make me ??

>> No.17530776

>>17530719
Gen G: The Gayest generation.

>> No.17530804

>>17530484
i love not fitting into either of these categories because shitstains on 4chan can't mindlessly depict me and use me as a punching bag. feelsgoodman.jpg

>> No.17530817

>>17530484
Zoomettes have daddy issues
I tried to get into the modern baggy pants shit, didnt get any female attention, went back to my white sneakers skinny jeans (went out with old friends) and girls literally walked up to me and asked me out
Zoomer boys arent getting laid, why would you wanna look like them?

>> No.17530837

>>17530484
Lmao I was wearing yohji and vintage CDGH as far back as 2013 back when these faggot zoomers were little babies
Trend-hopping idiots can suck my uncut wee wee
Also:
FUCK social media
FUCK (((you))) who only dress for the attention of dumb whores
>Listening to womens opinions on menswear, ever
>Thinking that women know what they want
ISHYNDDT
but especially....
FUCK OP

inb4 incel
I am actually married with kids

>> No.17530842
File: 89 KB, 612x408, 167833863237081681.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17530842

>Look at that dude, ahahaha, he is wearing north face and ultraboosts ahahaha, look at his beanie, dude what is this 2021? Ahahaha!

>> No.17531107

>>17530484
>prime zoomer sluts

>> No.17531122
File: 96 KB, 640x640, 16779711005039559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531122

>>17531107
>ummm actually prime age girls are in gen alpha

>> No.17531140

>>17530646
you're both right. Being up-to-date with status markers (fashion) is important to women

>> No.17531176
File: 164 KB, 1083x1965, genX.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531176

>>17530484

>> No.17531188

I only see zoomer girls wearing baggy jeans. Most zoomer guys are wearing those tight fitting elastic cuff track pants.

>> No.17531225

>>17530536
nooooo shut up shut up!!!!!

>> No.17531507

>>17530525
I often see chads in plain or sporty clothes out with very well dressed young women

>> No.17531523

>>17530484
both look like idiots to me.

>> No.17531642

>>17531122
kek

>> No.17531650

>>17530525
Once I realized this I doubled down on working out and started wearing ratty fucking t-shirts on dates with shitty amazon basics pants or athletic shorts. For guys it's money, status and good genes, but being in shape and having a good personality helps. Clothes are an after thought

>> No.17531662

The only clothes women actually find attractive are suits
Because they display things that women find attractive: status, ambition, having a job, security
Other than that, just dress like their dad or their favorite idol and you might also score some points

>> No.17531673

>>17531650
Clothes are meant to help flatter your body and display your personality, dude.

>> No.17531679

>>17530646
women only care about whatever you tell them to retard. you can wear invisible man clothes but talk good enough they can only see you as sexy. get that wet, slip and slide boy

>> No.17531784

>>17530837
dude same. been wearing yohji pieces and adopted his philosophy toward fashion for going on 8 years now. seeing zoomies co opt this niche and blow it up into another disposable trend is so frustrating.

>> No.17531876

>>17530484
Jesus Christ I hate 2010s fashion.

>> No.17532230

>>17531673
Sure, but if you have a great body clothes are just an obstruction. Same with personality. If you are confident, interesting and fun to be around you don't need to rely on your clothes to do a poor job of communicating this.

>> No.17532272

>>17531876
Why? What is wrong with it?

>> No.17532273

>>17531662
> The only clothes women actually find attractive are suits
Wearing suit in 2023 is cringe and larp dumbass

>> No.17532287

>>17532273
Grow up tik tok tranny

>> No.17533434

>>17532272
Everything.

t. millennial

>> No.17533454

>>17533434
That's not an argument.
You know it.
I know it.
You know it I know it.
And any third party reading our dialogue will be able to conclude the same.

>> No.17533478

>>17530484
Neither of them looks great but if I had to choose one to fuck as a straight guy I'd go with right

>> No.17533480

>>17533454
To be fair and honest, fashion started to go downhill since the mid-2000s.

>> No.17533623

>>17533480
Why?
Be detailed and precise please. Avoid vague statements.

>> No.17533651

>>17530484
I see zoomer sluts all the time in my city with guys who are way older than millennials lmao. If you want to fuck 18-21 year olds, you can regardless of age unless you’re like 70. In fact, there are lots of women out there who specifically want an older guy.

>> No.17533660

i'm in tokyo right now and people definitely love their denim here. it's not uncommon to see people in full denim tops and bottoms. some of them wear loose light washes, some of them wear high quality raws.

you wouldn't look out of place with any style of denim here.

>> No.17533676

>>17531662
> status, ambition, having a job, security

Lol, stop this cope. Only matters if you’re very good looking or you’ll get goddiggermaxxers. Unironically the most broke mfs I know are the ones who get the most in terms of girls.

>> No.17533686

>>17533480
nah, 1920s

>> No.17533707

>>17530646
t. gay man

>> No.17533710

>>17530526
ghost mountain was the only thing this guy had going for him and he fucked it up

>> No.17533726

>>17533686
1960s* that's when everything started becoming so casual thanks to hippie bullshit.

>> No.17533736

>>17530484
Even when the left was popular like 10 years ago, this board would shit on anyone wearing that. People were actually into comfycore. Remember? Remember when this board was bearable and had guides and people actually trying? Fuck you.

>> No.17533744

>>17533736
>reeee the board isn't the same as 10 years ago wtf???
How sheltered and retarded are you

>> No.17533757

>>17530526
Why does this have so much soul compared to op pic?

>> No.17533840

>>17533736
don't worry anon. i'm mentally still permanently stuck in "4chan but 10 years ago". everything seems so new now yet so old. sucks being a millenial boomer.

also niggas just jelly they can't afford good jeans.

>> No.17534012

>>17531176
straight leg best cut
>captcha: s8tan

>> No.17534024

>>17531176
left one looks like he wears a special needs trousers masqueraded as a "jeans" to deal with his congenital incontinence whereas the one on the right looks like he needs some extra room after getting circumcised after having discovered Islam on TikTok.
The only true jeans in this pic is being worn by the wingless angel on the beach.

>> No.17534095

>>17533757
Because you can tell they're wearing it because they genuinely thinks it looks cool even if its outlandish, and are expressing a style they've been developing probably for years

>> No.17534125

>>17530484
>i don't have 0 fashion sense, i'm wearing it le ironically!
zoomers are beyond embarrassing

>> No.17534313

>>17530525
You can condense this down to "women want to be protected". This is the underlying truth behind every sexual or romantic interaction with them.
You can be a fat fuck with a shit face, but so long as you have decent hygiene and a personality that'll make her feel safe, you'll be able to get a woman.
Women need to be treated like rabbits.

>> No.17534686

>>17533736
>4chan shitting on anything current
Sure hasn't changed.

>> No.17534697

>>17533623
The return to fitted clothing creates an ugly silhouette on men.

>> No.17534737

>>17534697
I thought we just departed from fitted clothing over the last few years

>> No.17534746

>>17534737
Yeah and the new decade also started a few years ago.

>> No.17534755

>>17534746
So its going uphill now? What year was the rock bottom, 2015?

>> No.17534758

>>17530646
Based
>>17530525
You Will Never Be Loved

>> No.17534781

>>17534755
I guess yeah.

>> No.17534898

>>17530484
Uh bruh ... the millenial wore loose baggy jeans during high school years. Gen Z is literally COPYING Millenial fashion

>> No.17535033

>>17534898
Yeah and they ditched it so zoomers picked it up. If millennials weren't idiots and kept the baggy fit, there wouldn't be a generation war.

t. millennial who never ditched baggy jeans

>> No.17535037

>>17530484
>jeans
Plebswear.

>> No.17535123

>>17535037
So what do you suggest?

>> No.17535526

Zoomers dress like such faggots.. sorry zoomzooms itt but you know it's at least partially true. You guys are all inundated with blackpill and lookism doctrine so you're all obsessed with height frauding. The platform shoes and boots look ridiculous. The only reason you're wearing high waisted jeans is to make the legs look longer. You guys all select the 0.5x lens on your pictures to create an illusion of a longer bottom third. I can't tell you how many times I've caught undergrad zoomers on campus adjusting the lifts they put in their Jordans which already boosts your height by like 2 inches lmfao. Couple all this with either a broccoli-cut or a 90s backstreet boys cut and yeah... faggots.

>> No.17535529

>high rise loose jeans
>post a pic of millennial in joggers/skinny jeans/ skinny chinos or whatever those faggy pants are

>> No.17535533

>>17533651
You described women over all history
Women prefer older men period, more likely to have life experience and be financially secure.

Post-30 dried up roasties, and uggo zoomers on twitter want you to believe differently

>> No.17535536

>>17535529
Imagine being this fucking retarded

>> No.17535540

Most zoomers guys I see dress still dress like left. I see more dressing head to toe in under armour just like the average dude has been for the 10 years. But I don't live in suburbia or around a super liberal college campus.

And if they aren't just athleisure 24/7 they dress like >>17530526

>> No.17535568

>>17534755
Yeah thats when it felt like everything converged and you got homogenized fashion its like that thing - hipsters never died everybody just became hipsters and shit went downhill after that 2015 was the point where it got ultra trash hipster fashion should have stayed with hipsters instead it meshed in everything else for some reason even hip-hop and everyone even fat asses were walking around in skinny jeans and stan smiths

>> No.17535610

>>17530484

Why does no one just you know wear pants that actually fit?

>> No.17535625

how do you develop an eye for this type of thing? You see enough people in real life and figure out their age based on their physical appearance (face, gait, etc.) and then also pay enough attention to the small differences in the cut of their clothing to form a significant understanding of the percentage of how zoomers dress this way vs millennials dressing another way? how can you tell the difference between a 27 year old (youngest millennial) vs a 26 year old (oldest zoomer) based on their physical appearance (separate from clothing)? and how do you know the 27 year old wearing slightly looser jeans isn't younger than a 26 year old zoomer wearing slightly tighter jeans? these generation distinctions seem so arbitrary that they've gotta be completely meaningless. it seems like it's just a marketing ploy to sell more clothes i.e. "dress in these new baggy jeans or else you will appear old and out of touch." i sorta get the generational distinction between baby boomers and a younger generation, to explain things in the socio-politcal-economic environment a person grew up in, but how much could possibly change every ten years to fundamentally alter the behavior of an entire generation of humans? like in roman times did they make generational distinctions every ten years? or in the medieval ages? i just feel like young people act like young people, middle aged people like middle aged people, old people like old people, and drawing some boundary every ten years or so is just a marketing scheme

>> No.17535634

>>17535625
Learn to write in a coherent manner first

>> No.17535639

>>17535634
quote an example of incoherence

>> No.17535649

>>17535625
>how can you tell the difference between a 27 year old (youngest millennial) vs a 26 year old (oldest zoomer) based on their physical appearance (separate from clothing)? and how do you know the 27 year old wearing slightly looser jeans isn't younger than a 26 year old zoomer wearing slightly tighter jeans?

um what? how do you tell a one year age difference?? you cant...

>> No.17535654

>high raise
>pic shows two guys wearing low rise/sagging jeans

>> No.17535662

>>17535526
Whoa you sound like a fucking psycho
I'm imagining an old weird guy confronting some zoomer kids and yelling shit at them about "height frauding" and "lower bottom third" and they're just looking at you like you're some autistic retard lol

>> No.17535676

>>17535649
>how do you tell a one year age difference?? you cant...
so you'd agree the boundary between zoomer and millennial is arbitrary? and thus any distinctions between the two "groups" are also arbitrary?

>> No.17535694

>>17535676
it's neither arbitrary or something set in stone... it's called a generalization

>> No.17535705

>>17535676
Think of it like a gradient, I know you are deeply autistic and retarded but even you a subhuman imbecile like yourself should be able to understand such a simple concept

>> No.17535733

>>17535694
almost as though it's functionally meaningless but is good for marketing
>>17535705
>but even you a subhuman imbecile like yourself
how old were you when you were taught english? lol

>> No.17535789

>>17535662
Na I'm just a masters student with a zoomer fwb. We talk about trends and I notice things. Pattern recognition, amigo. Pattern recognition.

>> No.17535850

>>17530484
>left
>vibrant yet tasteful, actually fitting clothing

right
>only considered "Cool" because of youth and collagen

>> No.17535869

>>17530484
Prime zoomer sluts will be more attracted to the house the millennial owns than the jeans anyone wears

>> No.17535896

>>17530525
oh look, another Incel

>> No.17535904

>>17535850
Left looks far worse than right even with the zoomers gay pose

>> No.17535951

>>17535733
If it was functionally meaningless then marketers wouldn't use it to sell shit. You're dumb.

>> No.17535952

>>17535904
They both look awful m8

>> No.17535956

What brands of jeans have good athletic fit styles?
I have a fat ass from deadlifts

>> No.17535958
File: 18 KB, 375x281, la_grande_bellezza--400x300.jpg--european_film_awards__servillo_miglior_attore_per__la_grande_bellezza_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17535958

>>17530484

zoomerfags get away with dressing like that obecause of YOUTH, the fact that society literally treats young people like the salt of the earth where everything is permitted for them. in societies eyes: young people dressing like retards = "younglings rebelling norms aww how sweet", now imagine a 30something year old with nasolabial folds dressing like the pic on the right and everyone would be sus he's some virgin creep that flashes his dick at teenage girls on the midnight train.

zoomershits your 15 minutes of fame will be over the moment your collagen levels start depleting and you'll get holoucausted out of the lime-light in favor of the next gen of plump faced tight-assed little rascals Hollywood pedos will decide to putt on a pedestal.

>> No.17535984

>>17535958
That's what filler is for, anon! No nasolabial folds = young plump face forever

>> No.17536034

>>17530500
i think this is the most retarded take i've seen here in a while

>> No.17536070
File: 8 KB, 275x183, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17536070

JNCObros...
we finally made it...

>> No.17536075

>>17535951
>how will someone who grew up using windows XP ever relate to someone who used Windows 8...
the chasm between gen z and milennials is unfathomable

>> No.17536129

>>17536075
millennials grew up with windows 3.1 and windows 95

>> No.17536135

>>17530484
Both of those are gay and retarded

>> No.17536144

I'm over 30, tall, not ugly, not fat, self employed rugged tradesman. Zoomie sluts will mire regardless of how tight my jeans are.

>> No.17536175

35 yr old millennials are so mindbroken over the prospect of not being young anymore that between pretending they were part of some cultural phenomenon bc they tried skateboarding for a week and listened to 1 deftones song they LARP as le rugged old men where every girl just gushes over their old navy jeans and 2002 silverado lmao

>> No.17536618

>>17536175
Schizo post projecting an image in your head that translates to absolutely nobody. We skateboarded bc it was cultural and deftones were always gay af. You citing them as something to know tells me everything I need to know about you

>> No.17536619

>>17536129
Nigga we had 98 2000 and XP and vista. These generational topics are stupid. Zoomers are objectively the most faggoty generation

>> No.17536634

>>17536619
>t. pretending on the internet
if you were a millennial, you fucked around with 3.1 occasionally and had 95 on all your school computers til the end of middle school, if your elementary school even fucking had computers

>> No.17536702

>>17535958
You sound bitter

>> No.17536922

yeh stupid girls eye fucking levis with a orange tag its poor man's logo mania

>> No.17536925

>>17535869
>the house
>the millennial owns
jej

>> No.17536976

>>17530500
No, it just means you are a child. Women don't give a shit what a man wears. Women care about income and status. Clothing is irrelevant, there will always be exceptions, but in general no.

>> No.17536981

>>17530660
You've never been out on the weekend and seen a fine woman with a guy in a baseball cap and sweat pants? They don't give a shit. Of course fashion chicks do, but they are .0001% of women. DESU women don't know how to dress either. My gf once bought me light yellow jeans thinking I would wear that shit.

>> No.17536984

>>17531662
>The only clothes women actually find attractive are suits

Not only suits, uniforms, like cop, fireman, construction. You are right though, they all signify, a job and competency.

>> No.17537243
File: 7 KB, 212x238, 1666198199773973.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17537243

you guys talking about
>women like a man with a job! a house! financial security!
have no idea how easily women are pulled into whatever thought-trends they see on tiktok or their friend group is pushing them towards

females will literally work together as a group to identify specific qualities in order to game certain types of guys they have targeted in their group. it's like they're tracking and hunting down a specific type of animal, the five savage women looking at the tracks in the dirt, finding clues of where the beast has been. then one of them surprises the guy, wiggles her body at him, and reports back to the hunter women the results. they all work together to figure out how the 2nd capture attempt should go and then adjust their plans.

it's all a lot more fluid and at the same time premeditated than "women only want stability!" nonono there are more insane factors at play and they are working their ASSES off to get exactly what they want, freedom for themselves and control over you.

>> No.17537263

>>17536619
Yes and they started with 3.1 and 95, millennials started in the early 80s retard. I still have shit that I made on shitty Windows 3.1 programs in '93.

>> No.17537471

>>17535958
I didnt know men could be crones

>> No.17537732

>>17530575
All of my this. Seriously, just get in shape + wear what complements your frame. You’ll be swimmin in poon, trust me

>> No.17537767

>>17537732
I'll get in shape. I'll also still keep wearing baggy clothes because I like the fits. Zoomie girls eyefucking me because I wear baggy stuff is just a bonus.

>> No.17537771

As a 27 year old who doesn't follow trends, skinny jeans objectively look dated. I still see people wearing them on the streets and I don't know if that immediately tells me they're out of touch, but if they're styling them like a millennial then it does seem like they're living in the past. It'd be like someone wearing hypebeast shit head to toe or something.

>> No.17537843

>>17536981
That’s called a shit test stupid

>> No.17537847

>>17530500
This. Everyone who disagrees with this has never seen a real pussy irl

>> No.17537863

>>17530525
They care, but it is far from the most important thing. It would never be a deal breaker or maker. They will latch on to a guy they like for his looks/status, and then slowly buy him clothes she likes.

>> No.17537889

>>17530484
Yes but that doesn’t mean shit, they still rather date some well off 30 something year old with a nice car than a lord farquad hair having ass twink, I have not met anyone in my life with that haircut that isn’t some insufferable little twat.

>> No.17537897

>>17531662
And medical scrubs, woman literally stutter when I talk to them, it’s literally a cheat code.

>> No.17537980

>>17537897
those are elderly patients anon
please treat them instead of flirting and trying to do the needful

>> No.17538007
File: 2.00 MB, 200x200, 1585806233038.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17538007

>>17530484
how about you eat my cock

>> No.17538013

>>17531662
based. smokers jackets and dark blue dirty jeans. hawaiian or paisley with oxfords. threaded belt and greased hair. don't @ me with that XYZ 'what do women want' shit. your styles are wack.

>> No.17538020
File: 6 KB, 257x226, 1514893853376.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17538020

>>17535033
thank you for your surfice

>> No.17538078

>>17537889
Let me be that 30 years old with a nice car and a Lord Farquaad haircut then.

>>17538020
My pleasure.

>> No.17538163

>>17530575
fit pic?

>> No.17538167

>>17535850
>>17535952
>>17535958
This.

>> No.17539327

>>17535033
>t. millennial who never ditched baggy jeans
hell yeah brother. i got critisized so hard in circa 2010 for wearing baggier wranglers, my friends would say "we have to do something about his jeans" behind my back. i still wear the same jeans to this day, trends be damned. my dad wore the same jeans, my grandpa wore the same jeans, and im sure my great grandpa would have worn the same jeans except they werent invented yet in his lifetime

>> No.17539556

>>17539327
>wranglers
To be honest I'm not even sure baggier Wrangler would look good on me. Aren't they just cowboy jeans? I don't like how they look normally. Not sure how a bigger size would change anything.

>> No.17539668

>>17530484
lmao why would I want to look like a retarded zoomer? I still rock my skiny jeans and muscle tees, v necks, and other "millennial" clothes

>> No.17539703

>>17539668
Post fit

>> No.17539823

>>17539703
I know he gets a lot of flak here, but this is pretty much how I dress to work. On the weekends I simply use white leather sneakers instead.

>> No.17539827
File: 233 KB, 1080x1080, 45e95988981f56890b078e45dc12865d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17539827

>>17539823
>>17539703
Forgot to post pic lol

>> No.17540754

>>17530484
not sure what's worse

>> No.17540756
File: 54 KB, 474x663, OIP-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17540756

>>17530484

>not taking the path of enlightenment

>> No.17541155

>>17539827
Good morning sirs.

>> No.17541171

>>17530526
Holy cringe

>> No.17541413

i bought a really nice pair of 1955 (i think) LVC 501s recently but they are just too skinny. the colour is perfect but it feels weird to wear them, like i am exposed or something
i also really, really hate the look of slim trousers and baggier top which doesnt help

>> No.17541556

>>17539827
I've only seen Pakistanis and Indians wearing these shoes.

>> No.17541807

>>17530484
>tfw gen z but remember the time the only people who dressed like right were high schoolers who couldn't dress themselves
you can take my slim fit jeans out of my cold dead hands

>> No.17541889

>>17530484
I hate ill-fitting clothes, I just happen to be a millennial.

>> No.17542792
File: 301 KB, 661x667, 1393646781157.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17542792

those aren't high "raise" jeans.

>> No.17542808
File: 176 KB, 857x979, 1670290680219222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17542808

Wide pants are not a trend that will age well, I am going to die on this hill.
Pants tapering down will always look better, not tight ones like in OP image tho

>> No.17542812

replace the harrington on the right with a leather/jean jacket or flannel shirt and it just looks like the 90's

>> No.17542929

>>17542808
Wide pants tapering down are the best.

>>17541807
>tfw 90s kid who remembers the time the only people who dressed like left were dorks who couldn't dress themselves

>> No.17543121 [DELETED] 
File: 292 KB, 1073x1606, A39BDFA6-0240-4F01-A1CD-5D0C8E3B0524.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17543121

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NyGudId6mJU

>> No.17543130
File: 481 KB, 1560x1540, 28530975-62CA-4630-A94D-31CDB3AA90F6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17543130

Gen Z and Gen 1 are like this.
But all gens can join.

I love hippy hipster millennials and gen x and gen y etc forever.

>> No.17543133

>>17535676
Look up Platonic Forms. When you see a zoomer you know.

>> No.17543192

>>17531650
>Once I realized this I doubled down on working out

Blackpill, girls don’t care about you working out either gymcel.

>> No.17543225

>>17530484
Not if you're not an insecure little bitch. They don't give a shit about your clothes.

>> No.17543234

>>17530817
Based take. Baggy clothes make you look either really skinny or really fat. I’m both cases they make you look feminine and prepubescent. I bought some to wear during the lockdowns but they just look retarded out and about

>> No.17543248

>>17530484
Zoomers dress like millennials when they were kids in the 90s. They'll probably switch to skinny in a few years.

>> No.17543262

>>17530526
Does Sematary have FAS?

>> No.17543329

>>17535850
left looks cringe
"look ma' I can layer and fit my clothes right, look, I'm not fat"
lame, what an incel trying to appear cool
guy on right is actually cool

>> No.17543654

>>17530526
Zane Steckler is a trust fund kid faggot

>> No.17543706

>>17543329
right looks feminine, so does left with the skintight pants

>> No.17543709

>>17530484
I’m a millenial and we dressed like the kid on the right in the 90s. I guess the 90s are back in style, but I get mistaken for a middle-aged Gen Xer because lmao I am middle aged.

>> No.17543762

>>17543706
The only reason right one "looks feminine" is because of the handbag. There is nothing feminine by baggy pants. Gangsta rappers have worn them since forever

>> No.17543765

>>17543762
The guy himself looks feminine, like he's lacking testosterone. I don't care about the baggy pants, I wore them for years when that kid was in diapers still. I still have pants ruined by heel drag.

>> No.17543843

>>17530484
I'm 36 and to this day I've never understood how anybody thought skinny jeans looked good on men. I bought a pair once just because everybody was wearing them and felt like some disproportionate cartoon character in them. Not that I'm into the baggy shit either though, mid rise straight cut is where it's at.

Girls, on the other hand, look best in jeans that look like they're painted on and are cut so low you can tell if they shave or wax.

>> No.17543857
File: 65 KB, 470x649, 52639585-10377251-Romantic_getaway_Leonardo_DiCaprio_47_made_the_rare_move_of_pack-a-30_1641555413201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17543857

>>17530489
He's right. When you're fit, good social, well spoken nature, alot of ressources you're the chad. Zoomies are "well dressed" left and right, but can't get laid.

>> No.17543862

>>17535958
you sound old & bitter AND projecting

get a life ngga

>> No.17544109

>>17531176
God my parents were so effay and it took me growing up to realize how based they are. Chad image

>> No.17544112

>>17533651
You (and I) wish this was actually true. Cope harder. Any age gap more than 3 years is “cringe” according to actually valuable teen whores these days

>> No.17544223
File: 971 KB, 319x144, this-anon-knows.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17544223

>>17531176

>> No.17544224

>>17530484
Dress your age.

>> No.17544439

>>17544112
Man, what a shithole lmao

>> No.17544455

>>17535850
>fitting clothing
His pants are are so tight I wouldn't be surprised if his sperm count is down by 50% or more.

>> No.17544460

>>17530484
Zoomer sluts all have daddy issues, so looking like an ‘out of touch millennial’ (i.e. older than them) is a much better strategy than trying to compete with broccoli-headed zoomer guys on their own turf.

>verification not required

>> No.17545511

>>17530817
>>17543234
>>17544460
Zoomettes been asking me out since I went back to baggy pants. You can still exude daddy energy if you have the attitude, confidence and personality of it. Checkmate.

>> No.17545665

I'm ahead of the curve because I already wear bootcut jeans.
Because they fit over my sexy ass cowboy boots.
Western wear (not country)
Is gonna make a comeback

>> No.17545681

But I am an out of touch cringe millennial?

>> No.17545682

>>17542808
The "wide" pants in OP's pic are tapered as fuck, thats what makes them look dumb, look how they sit on the boots.
Actual wide pants look fine.

>> No.17545684

>>17545665
Sorry, you aren't ahead of the curve, bootcut/flared jeans and trousers have been trending for a few years now.
Stop thinking about trends and being ahead of the curve and just wear it if you like it.

>> No.17545691

>>17545684
What makes you think that's not what I'm doing?
I'm just happy that some trends are following what I like.
Bellbottoms, and mens shortsleeved jumpsuits probably won't come back though :(

>> No.17546008

>>17545681
yes
but its not because of your clothes

>> No.17546033

>>17545682
Tapered wide pants are the best though. When they bunch up at the feet, they don't give that bell-bottom pants look that baggy straight pants do. They sit fine in OP's pic.

>> No.17546355

>>17530484
Don't care. I'm just glad fat shaming and heroin chic is back. Really tired of skinny-fat women hiding their rolls in high waist jeans

>> No.17546399

>>17530484
It depends. You can only dress like right in pic related up through college because you’ll have to look like a real adult to get an actual job. You couldn’t even go to a bar dressed like that because it screams underage. As a man, you want to look more mature anyway because women want someone with higher status than them anyway. If you’re not getting early 20’s girls it’s not because you look too old. You’re either ugly or too much of a loser.

>> No.17547158

>>17530626
>trousers
lookit dis dood

>> No.17547191

>>17547158
ample legged pantaloons

>> No.17547210

>>17546399
If you dress like left pic and you're over 25 you're 100% beyond salvageable homosexual faggot. If you dress like left pic and under 25 there's still a chance, albeit small.

>> No.17547365

>>17530484
Right looks like a child that doesn't know his body sizes or where to cop nice clothes at. Looks like some poor hick. It looks ao cringe. And tote bags are guaranteed ways to turn any straight female off.

>> No.17547517

>>17547210

If you dress like the right then you are poor because you can't afford to have clothing tailored to your body and shop at crusty disgusting thrift stores with someone else's sweat and fluids on used rags. Poverty fit as well, screams you've given up on life

>> No.17547527

>>17539827
he looks like a midget sized pitbull

>> No.17548048

>>17531176
Damn gen x is the perfect balance. That's a good looking fit desu

>> No.17548050
File: 207 KB, 800x1200, img_1787[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17548050

c'mon zoomers bring back acid wash, DO IT

>> No.17548090
File: 469 KB, 607x632, Screenshot_20230325-140300_kindlephoto-13322064.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17548090

>>17542808
You obviously skip leg day