[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 1013 KB, 758x1140, deckard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17431282 No.17431282 [Reply] [Original]

Is there any merit to this? I've always had a soft spot for this 70s kind of look

I thought it might be kinda sleazecore but who knows. I didn't really think of this as something that anyone would take serious as daily wear, but figured it was worth asking about

>> No.17431285
File: 153 KB, 667x1024, deckard2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17431285

>>17431282

>> No.17431289
File: 3.28 MB, 1708x1138, Screen Shot 2023-01-07 at 9.55.48 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17431289

>>17431285
>>17431282

>> No.17431300

It would be sleazecore now but for its time it would've been only just out of style. It's an overall good winter fit if you live in a large city, but I wouldn't wear it in any other area or season.

>> No.17431337

>>17431282
God please dont be that guy

>> No.17431566

>>17431282
Most uniqlo u the past few years has been 70s inspired, or just lemaire. Not as hard as you'd think.

>> No.17432062
File: 36 KB, 640x360, luv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17432062

Blade Runner 2049 is fashion wise more compatible with our times and easier to pull off

>> No.17432078
File: 210 KB, 1456x2049, royB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17432078

>>17432062
unlike the original Blade Runner, that features outfit that might elicit a smile if you met someone in such clothes in real life.

>> No.17432085

>>17431285
>>17432078

Why did they opted for such ridiculously wide trousers? Thank God, Blade Runner is shot with so much shadows to hide these monstrosities.

>> No.17432088

>>>/cgl/

>> No.17432691
File: 56 KB, 618x948, gaff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17432691

>>17431300
noted
>>17431337
hey that's why I asked first
>>17431566
doesn't /fa/ shit on uniqlo for a reason? I thought their whole selection was low-quality and not worth it
>>17432062
>>17432078
True. I guess the original costumes appealed to me more because I generally enjoyed 70s/80s fashion a little more than stuff today. 2049 seems way more minimalist which doesn't appeal to me. Point taken wrt compatibility though
>>17432085
Not well versed w/ fashion history but probably has to do with whatever fashion scene they took inspiration from? /shrug

>> No.17432982

>>17432691
I think you could adapt elements from this, just not all of it at once. It's hardly as if geometric patterned shirts, skinny ties, and winter coats with a lot of pockets/toggles are unheard of in modern fashion.

>> No.17433203
File: 48 KB, 563x352, e732c33ddae27c3b2481d61c03a9a51f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17433203

>>17432691
>>17432982
yeah, you can really get most of that shit on eBay.
for bowties, just look for clip on bowties or bowtie lots, most of them are already in that sort of thin style with quirky designs
weird quirky frock coats and tuxedos are always being sold by some formalwear ex-hire store on eBay too
geometric shirts too
waistcoats will be harder to find, but they're easier to find on eBay's uk variant (ebay.co.uk) than in the US
hope this helped.

>> No.17433277

>>17431282
>Is there any merit to this?
as cosplay? Sure.

>> No.17433361

>>17432062
this is awful. looks like allsaints. the original mogs the 2017 shit

>> No.17434758

>>17432062
queen

>> No.17435860
File: 19 KB, 200x252, C0B5C82B-4B29-4825-8CDF-255068156576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17435860

I always think of clothes like this when i think of the 70’s.

>> No.17435964

>>17431289
I'd buy the shit out of the sportcoat.

>> No.17436302
File: 103 KB, 960x960, 1610764093100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17436302