[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 994 KB, 862x732, ggyyui.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936063 No.15936063 [Reply] [Original]

ITT: 10/10 sneakers

>> No.15936141
File: 180 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936141

>> No.15936315
File: 43 KB, 525x525, 22296 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936315

Forum wrap is superior. No unnecessary logos, high quality leather, bounce foam instead of EVA.

>> No.15936321
File: 344 KB, 1065x1065, 203625_Main_Thumb_0576886 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936321

And rivalry is superior to all shoes.

>> No.15936771

>>15936321
These look too high. Cool though

>> No.15936781
File: 93 KB, 800x533, lidl_sneaker_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936781

>> No.15936794

>>15936315
Looks like a knockoff version of OP's

>>15936063
ID please?

>> No.15936803
File: 190 KB, 1500x1125, livergy-herren-lidl-sneaker-zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15936803

>> No.15937168

>>15936794
Adidas Forum Hi

>> No.15937267

>>15936794
The ones in OP are cringe with that faux vintage look of mismatched colors.

>> No.15937526
File: 226 KB, 940x660, adidas-y3-qasa-high-black-white-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937526

>>15936315
leather is good for it's price.

>> No.15937547

>>15936063
velcro strap is for children and invalids

>> No.15937616

>>15937267
It’s just the shoestrings. Replace them with white ones and they’re better than the forum wraps. And imo retro sneakers are an item when branding looks good. Nobody was against rocking logos in the 80s and 90s

>> No.15937632
File: 313 KB, 1440x1920, a3eab0203aa950592b18175d13094234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937632

>> No.15937647
File: 33 KB, 1000x1000, feiyue-martial-arts-shoes-white-97.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937647

>>15936063

>> No.15937662
File: 29 KB, 480x480, dnasamplez_blog-_nike_air_force_1_history1_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937662

>> No.15937843
File: 2.64 MB, 2304x2305, P0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937843

>>15936063

>> No.15937847

>>15936781
Based

>> No.15937852
File: 1.21 MB, 1960x1644, 20210122_193524.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15937852

>> No.15937857

>>15937662
AF1s are fucking ugly
I have no clue what people see in them

>> No.15937902

>>15937616
No it's not the panels of white and blue are different shades.

>> No.15937906

>>15936771
They're literally the same height as the shoes in OP

>> No.15937912

>>15936141
ID?

>> No.15938008

>>15937906
I have since realized this lol

>> No.15938015

>>15937662
Every person under the age of 18 has a pair of these. Overrated as fuck.

>> No.15938050

>>15936063
>>15936315
>>15936321
I really like the way 80s-inspired basketball shoes look and I don't care what brand of them I get- Nike, Puma, Adidas, Reebok, etc. I don't have to have a specific player's shoe.
That being said, what's the cheapest pair of shoes I can get in this style? Thanks

>>15938015
Weird how you only think about kids when you see AF1s. Every sneakerhead alive in the 90s-2000s has owned them too. Just because gen Z is rocking them for the 1st time doesn't make them any more or less of a classic.

>> No.15938073

>>15938015
I'm a meleniall and all of us had them too newfag, it's called a classic for a reason.

>> No.15938133

>>15938050
>>15938073
Lol you guys clearly have all white AF1s and are butthurt about the truth. There’s a difference in having a classic and wearing the most basic ass shoe in existence.

>> No.15938238

>>15938133
>you guys clearly have all white AF1s
I had them when I was 17, eleven years ago.
I don't hate on teenagers for wearing classic trendy sneakers for the same reason I don't hate on 2nd graders for watching Spongebob- it's appropriate. You sound like a kid trying too hard to hate on the mainstream.

>> No.15938272

best shoes for wide feet?

>> No.15938287

>>15938133
the most basic ass shoe is CPs

>> No.15938297
File: 32 KB, 800x533, https___hypebeast.com_image_2017_09_y-3-ryo-moss-green-sneakers-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15938297

>>15936063
>most understate model
>can't buy it anymore y-3 adidas refuse to remake it
>velcro straps for style.
>comfy as fuck
>decent price point for a luxary and regular consooomer.
Ryo best Y-3 of all time change my mind.

>> No.15939221

>>15937912
supercourts in the home of classics colorway

>> No.15939261
File: 36 KB, 513x655, 14686673-1-grey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15939261

Yes or no?

>> No.15939281

>>15937647
bretty good

>> No.15939284
File: 65 KB, 570x428, 45666896797ee2bf1dcc1a00c15104a1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15939284

>>15938050
>That being said, what's the cheapest pair of shoes I can get in this style? Thanks

Definitely Reebok high tops right now. Brand has fallen from grace compared to its epoch in the 90's/early 2000s, but they're still pretty nice looking. Plus, Reebok has always been one of those brands that you get compliments for simply by not being Adidas or Nike (they're still nice looking, but not as aggressively mainstream).

>> No.15939300

>>15939284
Thanks a lot man

>> No.15939496
File: 124 KB, 1200x800, https___hypebeast.com_image_2019_07_11-by-boris-bidjan-saberi-x-salomon-spring-summer-2020-footwear-009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15939496

>> No.15939997

>>15938287
Mad poorfag. Most basic shoes are vans.

>> No.15940638

>>15939997
>Mad poorfag
I have more expensive sneakers than that. CP aka Rod Lavers are the most basic silhouette.

>> No.15940645

>>15937526
God damn, this brings back memories of this board circa 13/14. Incredibly ahead of it's time.

>> No.15940745
File: 51 KB, 640x480, images (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15940745

Outta my way, plebeians

>> No.15940766

>>15940745
beaner shoes

>> No.15940775

>>15939261
id on these?

>> No.15940818

>>15940766
They were worn by upscale whites in the 80s and were widely imitated by upwardly mobile collared classes leading to the brand's current stratification in the urban niche

>> No.15941311

>>15940638
Vans eras are much more basic.

>> No.15941325
File: 77 KB, 1100x792, D8dPuE3WsAE_Aop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941325

>>15936063
>end thread

>> No.15941328
File: 40 KB, 650x650, 435200197_1-650-650.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941328

>> No.15941334
File: 367 KB, 1600x1600, D451FD67-2DC5-42F4-BEB7-D144CB7DF258.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941334

Just got the cons erx 260. I already have the adidas rivalry Hi and the cons kick their ass in terms of comfort. Definitely way chunkier but I dig the look

>> No.15941338
File: 32 KB, 480x480, B429C2F0-9B94-4585-AF3B-F0110E411016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941338

>>15941334
My gf has the soloist version. They look kinda try hard but the leather and paneling is way nicer, and the zips are super convenient

>> No.15941351

>>15936063
what fucking shoes are these

>> No.15941405
File: 1.61 MB, 4128x1908, 20201015_210943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941405

>>15941334
Superior choice is pic related.
>>15941351
Read the thread retard.

>> No.15941461
File: 37 KB, 575x346, 2E53C0FE-3102-4267-B76B-88D1B49A6901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941461

>>15941405
I’ve seen those around. Love that they’re the new “Bill and Ted shoes” after the rivalry hi, but I’m not totally sold on the torsion soles. Maybe cuz of all those torsion lows that got rlly popular way back in like 2014

>> No.15941465
File: 109 KB, 858x571, 69E58E3A-37C9-425E-AFFB-1E07F0199D2D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941465

>>15941461
The torsion dimensions however look cool as hell. Maybe not my style though

>> No.15941478

>>15941461
>the new “Bill and Ted shoes
They're the original bill and ted shoes, wtf are you talking about? The torsion sole on the artilleries is one of the most comfortable soles I've ever worn. Zx fluxes aren't even in the same realm.

>> No.15941486
File: 807 KB, 750x750, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941486

>> No.15941488

>>15941478
Lol you’re right idk where I got that from. And I’m sure they’re comfy. Just bad mental association with the look for me. I still wanna try em out, but I might have too many of the same shoe then

>> No.15941491
File: 167 KB, 600x600, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941491

>>15941486

>> No.15941496
File: 746 KB, 1024x683, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15941496

>>15941491
my current holy trinity

>> No.15941500

>>15941486
P boring honestly.
>>15941491
These are dope but they feel like they’re missing something to me idk

>> No.15941639

>>15937843
what shoe is this?

>> No.15941836

>>15941639
2 second reverse image search and I know the name. Kill yourself.

>> No.15941936

>>15936321
>>15937632
>>15937647
>>15937852
>>15939261
>>15939284
>>15939496
>>15941325
>>15941328
>>15941461
No

>>15936063
>>15936141
>>15936315
>>15937526
>>15937843
>>15938297
>>15941338
>>15941405
>>15941465
>>15941486
>>15941491
>>15941496
Potential

>> No.15943481
File: 42 KB, 490x326, IMG_1627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15943481

>> No.15943502

>>15936141
I'm with you, but Club C 85's are the moooost delicious classics

>> No.15943565
File: 258 KB, 750x552, New Balance J Crew 997 Butterscotch-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15943565

>> No.15945100

>>15940745
cringe

>> No.15945167

>>15943565
New balance are trash.

>> No.15945225

>>15937662
man this is the most wack cliché thing of all time

>> No.15945252
File: 153 KB, 2000x2500, 11943808sb_24_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945252

>>15936063

>> No.15945726
File: 99 KB, 1500x1000, diadorami-basket-h-leather-mds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945726

>> No.15945732
File: 50 KB, 767x767, 1600533892466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945732

>> No.15945964

>>15945252
What's the brand and model?
>>15945726
The paneling here is too basic and that sole just isn't it
>>15945732
Vomit

>> No.15945975

What's your favorite sneaker under $120?

>> No.15945997
File: 78 KB, 1000x1000, Arcteryx-Konceal-AR-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15945997

dead bird

>> No.15947006

>>15945167
lol

>> No.15947016
File: 257 KB, 1200x1190, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947016

>> No.15947032
File: 302 KB, 1960x772, noui.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947032

Comfy

>> No.15947046

>>15947006
They're some of the worst looking popular shoes. I have no idea how garbage like NBs caught on.

>> No.15947562

>>15945964
Isabel Marant "Alseeh"
Easily my favorite leather sneaker

>> No.15947798

>>15941496
Who the fuck would wear these?

>> No.15947822

>>15943565
>>15947046
Pretty much the cleanest looking pair of kicks on this entire thread..

>> No.15947832

>>15947032
literally all you need

>> No.15947834

>>15947798
begone zoomer

>> No.15947857

>>15947834
I'm 27..

>> No.15947859
File: 55 KB, 640x419, FBCE9FE6-FE18-4F4E-BC27-CB984A40D6DD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15947859

>> No.15947875

>>15947857
that somehow makes it even worse
you're either a newfag or have a taste shit enough to bar you from appreciating ricks best collab

>> No.15948079

>>15947822
>Pretty much the cleanest looking pair of kicks on this entire thread..
What the fuck are you smoking? What the fuck does clean even mean to you. They're fucking garbage and some of the worst shoes in the thread. New balance fags are a cancer.

>> No.15948240

>>15939284
based n megadeath pilled

>> No.15948266
File: 83 KB, 800x600, icecream.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948266

>> No.15948283
File: 25 KB, 550x376, d3000a6681967b10a2d782e30f463a30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948283

skrait ^ lux

>> No.15948341
File: 226 KB, 620x440, 781FB83C-EB4F-493F-83F4-48D84A021A55.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948341

>> No.15948355
File: 58 KB, 570x379, 980F18E4-9AAB-4DC4-A81E-81FD4D3B47BB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948355

>> No.15948359
File: 46 KB, 795x529, 80285D41-ACD1-43F5-8F01-B2D90604D71B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948359

>> No.15948365
File: 67 KB, 1200x630, 45D115DB-76B9-44C9-9C57-2E82A6579357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948365

Most of the sneakers in this thread are freakin clown shoes. Whats wrong with you people?

>> No.15948370
File: 199 KB, 1000x667, B1BAF3EF-B843-4B25-A883-BF80570ADDAB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948370

>> No.15948380

>>15948365
I take that back. Not most, the old basketball sneakers and a cuple of others are ok. But theres some shockingly ugly shoes in this thread.

>> No.15948392

>>15947032
shit tier leather

>> No.15948406

>>15948392
Really? I havent seen them irl but Syndicate usualy had good quality fabrics. The Zero Lo’s above them uses really nice, buttery suede and calf leather

>> No.15948579

>>15937912
Adidas SC Premier

>> No.15948582

>>15936141
If anyone is looking for 9.5 US I’ll put em on grailed

>> No.15948600
File: 187 KB, 1114x797, Work Shoes 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15948600

>>15936063

>> No.15948917

>>15947032
rod lavers aren't /fa/

>> No.15949022

>>15940775
adidas sl-72

>> No.15949052

>>15936141
i fucking hate the tongue in this version, but it's a very nice shoe otherwise, especially once a little dirty.

>> No.15949505

>>15941311
Nope. Rod Lavers are the most boring looking sneakers of all time. the white tee/iceberg lettuce of sneakers. club c reeboks are the only 10/10 sneaker

>> No.15949675

>>15949505
Eras are literally a more basic design you moron.

>> No.15949875

>>15949675
There's more in the era design than rod lavers.

>> No.15949881

>>15949875
You're really dumb if you're not just being thick on purpose.

>> No.15949888
File: 126 KB, 620x534, dave-mustaine-megadeth-nike-air-tech-challenge-ii-hot-lava-group[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15949888

any shoes like this that are attainable still? I've never owned a pair of high tops aside from my pair of PF flyers, but I really like the way these 80s high top sneakers look. just not interested in scouring ebay and paying $500 for a pair

>> No.15949890

>>15949888
Most in this thread are widely available

>> No.15950053

>>15938297
It's not even the best Y-3 sneaker, what the fuck are you on about? That colorway is atrocious too

>> No.15950198

>>15938050
Reebok exofit hi

>> No.15950237

think rod lavers are a decent simple sneaker myself

>> No.15950239
File: 615 KB, 1080x1016, Screenshot_20201127-232809_Lite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15950239

I prefer canvas sneakers

>> No.15950242

>>15947046
>>15948079
lol

>> No.15950282

>>15950242
explain how a busy looking shoes with lots of different color panels in the color of shit is clean.

>> No.15950473

>>15936803
these are great in a playplace

>> No.15951503 [DELETED] 
File: 307 KB, 902x1187, 3BA120B6-4747-43F4-96AA-4DADB643B365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15951503

>>15936063
There is no need for dishonest sneaking

>> No.15951514
File: 125 KB, 1200x800, highsnobiety-german-army-trainers-01-1200x800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15951514

gats without a question

>> No.15951559

ITT: zoom zoom autismo goes fast

>> No.15951840
File: 11 KB, 395x205, 71XF-MLiFiL._AC_UX395_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15951840

>>15936063

>> No.15951851

>>15949675
Wrong

>> No.15952197
File: 182 KB, 1170x780, https___hypebeast.com_image_2020_07_puma-unity-collection-future-rider-rs-x3-ralph-sampson-release-information-04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15952197

>> No.15952627
File: 134 KB, 774x968, D043126A-D4F8-4562-A385-CE60A2C89A27.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15952627

>>15936063
I’ve been on grail eyeing on this piece.

>> No.15952637

>>15952627
Why would you waste 2k for some vans?

>> No.15952660

>>15949022
thanks

>> No.15952834

>>15943481
yes

>> No.15952838

>>15939284
I like these. Should I stay away if I have feet on the wider side of normal?

>> No.15952841

>>15947016
ew no

>> No.15952844

>>15947032
you literally by stan smiths and save 100s of dollars but stans are a normie show now so idk

>> No.15952852

>>15947798
right lmao

>> No.15952865

>>15948266
really nigga

>> No.15952928

>>15952844
Not at all the same silhouette.

>> No.15952944

>>15952928
it gets the point across enough

>> No.15952949
File: 98 KB, 1242x810, OD-BC884_SNEAKE_GR_20140627144843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15952949

>>1595292
you sure

>> No.15952961

>>15952944
What the fuck does that even mean? It's not the same silhouette, that's it.

>> No.15952971
File: 93 KB, 1500x1101, 71S-NAmd+TL._AC_UL1500_[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15952971

as a white man in his early 20s, what am I supposed to wear with this?

>> No.15952974

>>15952971
They're all white sneakers. How fucking hard is it to figure out?

>> No.15953039

>>15952971
jeans and a leather jacket

>> No.15953209

>>15937662
WINNER

>> No.15953252

>>15948380
>But theres some shockingly ugly shoes in this thread.
Like the boring shit you posted

>> No.15953261

>>15953252
Anon often confused simple and plain with great sneakers.

>> No.15953293

>>15952971
>>15952627
>>15952197
>>15948600
>>15948370
>>15948365
>>15948359
>>15948355
>>15948341
>>15948283
>>15947859
>>15947016
>>15945997
>>15945732
>>15945726
>>15945252
>>15943481
>>15941496
>>15941486
>>15941465
>>15941461
>>15941405
>>15941338
>>15941334
>>15941328
>>15941325
>>15940745
>>15939496
>>15939284
>>15938297
>>15937852
>>15937843
>>15937662
>>15937632
>>15937526
>>15936803
>>15936781
>>15936321
>>15936315
>>15936063
no

>>15936141
>>15947032
>>15950239
>>15951514
>>15952949
>>15948266
could be

>>15937647
>>15939261
>>15943565
>>15941491
>>15951840
yes

>> No.15953308

>>15953252
Syndicates are boring, clownshoes and ballet shoes are effay. Lol

>> No.15953379

>>15953293
Awful taste. Tripfag so no surprise.

>> No.15953389

>>15953379
YO DRIPPY NIGGS WITH MY NIKE

>> No.15953560

>>15953389
Speak english.

>> No.15953663

>>15953560
*shoots you with my glocky*
*bites a kfc chicken*
*bitch sucks my cocky*

>> No.15953724

>>15953663
I don't understand what you're trying to achieve with these posts. This can't even be called trolling.

>> No.15953789

>>15949888
the ones on the far right are the Nike Air Tech Challenge 2 in the lava colorway, they're still available I think, or they were released again recently. A lot of metal bands like that used to wear jordan 1 highs as well, so those are another option.

>> No.15953820

>>15940766
and the rest of the posts in this thread are negro shoes being posted by white boys

>> No.15953838

>>15953820
You problem is a short understanding of history.

>> No.15954000

>>15941405
What does one wear high tops with? I feel like they look silly with jeans and a tee but maybe I just have shit taste

>> No.15954006

>>15954000
I pretty much dress in a late 80s early 90s style. Zubaz pants are always a go to, baggy tapered mid rise jeans. Vintage jackets. I also have a mullet.

>> No.15954022

>>15941405
what's the fit like on these? do they run narrow?

>> No.15954028

>>15954022
Not really. Toe box is really spacious. I half a size up because I'm autistic about keeping my sneakers looking fresh and use those wearable shoe trees, I don't feel them at all in these shoes.

>> No.15954029

>>15954028
most excellent

>> No.15954039

>>15954028
do they run long?

>> No.15954082

>>15954039
Average sizing of leather adidas sneakers

>> No.15954225

>>15954006
>Zubaz pants
fuck yeah I need to get a pair of these for golfing.

>> No.15954239
File: 33 KB, 596x395, thebest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954239

>> No.15954250
File: 149 KB, 585x364, 400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954250

torsion artillery or rebook exofit, which to cop?

>> No.15954293

>>15954250
Torsion artillery. Exofit just isn't as nice of a shoe but it's also about half the price or the adidas. Artillery also has a nicer sole.

>> No.15954307
File: 382 KB, 1016x579, Nike-SB-Dunk-Low-PRM-Sashiko-1 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954307

>> No.15954324

>>15954293
I'm just doubting if I can pull off the torsions. feel like I'd need a few pairs of acid wash jeans or JNCO pants to not look like I got lost on the way to a halloween party

>> No.15954330

>>15954324
Then get bb4600s rather than exofits
>>15952971
Exofits look too much like a girl shoe.

>> No.15954336
File: 60 KB, 800x533, Simpsons Vans Collection.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954336

>>15936063

this shit right here.

>> No.15954573

>>15954336
w2c?

>> No.15954602

>CLOSE THIS THREAD

>> No.15954604

>>15954602
Hehehehheh iibee Forggot The pic lmao

>> No.15954608
File: 23 KB, 486x631, images (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954608

>€ŃD$ THÎ$ THR˪D

>> No.15954701

>>15954239
/thread

>> No.15954728

>>15954336
Sneed

>> No.15954750

Sneakers are for sport. If you wear them in any other context, you're either a white trash kid or a nigger.

>> No.15954916
File: 257 KB, 774x438, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954916

?

>> No.15955100

>>15953838
thats a weird and pretentious conclusion to reach

>> No.15955419

>>15953724
the boosts...

>> No.15955502

>>15955100
If you had a deeper understanding of history around sneakers you would'nt think of them as just nigger shoes.

>> No.15955504

>>15954750
None of the sneakers itt are suitable for sport anymore.

>> No.15955507

>>15955502
oh that's what you mean
i actually agree
not the anon who said that btw

>> No.15957218
File: 98 KB, 1080x810, blnc1102-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15957218

>blocks your path

>> No.15957408
File: 31 KB, 460x300, cd54e82d0376438fd76836b9d05da04f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15957408

Awful tastes around here

>> No.15957445

>>15957408
You might aswel just post converse. Your tastes are basic as fuck but you try to masquerade them as being more by posting those instead of chucks.

>> No.15957446

>>15957218
A dead trend. Sock shoes are cringe material. They will never achieve timelessness.

>> No.15958280

>>15957445
Don't compare that to the Nike monstrosities.

>> No.15958287
File: 43 KB, 600x446, prophere.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15958287

my go to for spring n autumn

>> No.15958526

>>15958280
Converse isn't originally a nike shoe dick brain.

>> No.15958580

>>15958287
Still kinda regret not getting the triple whites, even though I probably would never wear them.

>> No.15958640

>>15936771
i have long legs so thats a good thing

>> No.15958648 [DELETED] 

>>15958640
Rivalries have a very narrow toe box. I would recommend trying them on if you can. I found I need to half size up on them.

>> No.15958650

>>15936321
fresh af i needed new sneakers thx

>> No.15958669

>>15958640
Rivalries have a very narrow toe box. I would recommend trying them on if you can. I found I need to half size up on them.

>> No.15958819

>>15958580
they're extremely comfortable my man.

>> No.15959775

>>15958819
I just never feel like sock shoes would be the superior choice in a fit when I could always opt for leather shoes. I have so many sock sneakers that I just don't wear anymore.

>> No.15959977
File: 616 KB, 750x895, converse29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15959977

chuks are rad

>> No.15960000

>>15957446
we'll see

>> No.15960011

>>15960000
They're already a dead trend. The only people who still wear them are pajeets

>> No.15960034

>>15941496
post fit?

>> No.15960805

>>15960000
checked

>> No.15960822
File: 60 KB, 828x738, IMG-20210214-WA0005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15960822

>> No.15961104
File: 145 KB, 800x533, cd88011c-eda1-4f0c-8dde-1e6403e4c219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961104

id?

>> No.15961118
File: 50 KB, 900x600, new-balance-850-ml850ysc-mood-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961118

Best overall Sneaker in the last few years. Love them so mich.

>> No.15961125
File: 33 KB, 433x512, unnamed-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961125

time to bring these back? had a handful of these in highschool, still one of the best silhouettes on a skate shoe.

>> No.15961130

>>15961125
They should stay in highschool.

>> No.15961210
File: 65 KB, 1000x1000, corsair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961210

>>15936321
>>15936781
>>15940745
>>15941486
>>15941496
>>15961118
based

>> No.15961237

>>15961125
I personally love janowskis bring them back

>> No.15961238

>>15936063
Fuck this mudslim thread

>> No.15961280

>>15958640
I do too and high tops make them look extra skinny :/

>> No.15961350

>>15960000
We've seen, nobody wore/wears them except fashion victims who were rused into buying socks with vibram pieces glued onto them with a $1000 price tag

>> No.15961399
File: 123 KB, 1200x540, tech-runners.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961399

>>15941496
Love the Tech Runners, love the obvious architecture influence and wow they're comfortable. Been wearing my pair for almost 7 years and despite taking good care of them, it shows. Wish there was a way to get my hands on a deadstock pair again.

>> No.15961621

>>15943502
Fuck yes anon, found a pair in the wild a few months back and I gotta say, alrighty one of my favs

>> No.15961818
File: 68 KB, 480x640, 44F39830-00B5-4817-9617-BE85002C0D6B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15961818

Deez still cool?

>> No.15961908

>>15941405
ID please?

>> No.15961997

>>15961908
Adidas torsion artillery

>> No.15962637
File: 440 KB, 1000x629, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15962637

>tfw you'll never own a pair

>> No.15963572

>>15941639
Nike Air Forces

>> No.15963581
File: 142 KB, 1000x1333, 1603053107050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15963581

My Holy Trinity
1/3

>> No.15963586
File: 109 KB, 1118x746, 1592822202356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15963586

>>15963581
2/3

>> No.15963590
File: 135 KB, 1600x1600, 1598059651627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15963590

>>15963586
3/3

>> No.15963639

>>15963581
are those skechers?

>> No.15963701
File: 348 KB, 1600x1067, nike-killshot-2-jcrew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15963701

Reddit coming through

>> No.15963842
File: 110 KB, 1500x881, 71uyaSwWhxL._AC_UL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15963842

>> No.15963928

>>15963590
>>15963586
>>15963581
True fashion victim shoes

>> No.15964001
File: 28 KB, 900x900, cnh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15964001

Peasants. The whole lot of you.

>> No.15964017

>>15964001
>10/10 sneakers thread
>post unremarkable white low tops
Just leave you fucking pleb.

>> No.15964021

>>15961104
looks like Adidas Samba

>> No.15964039

>>15960805
whoa nice i didn't even notice
>>15960011
>>15961350
i'm not concerned with popularity. i posted them based solely on a design standpoint

>> No.15964129

>>15963928
I love em

>> No.15964207

>>15964039
It's a sock with glue one soles. What fucking design?

>> No.15964233

>>15939261
Comfiesst fucking shoe

>> No.15964932

>>15964017
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
The only argument left for you is to quote me with a basedjak image.

>> No.15964968

>>15937662
people say no to these but make u wear some fucked up pair of 990's because they want you to scare bitches away the same way they are

>> No.15965412
File: 692 KB, 664x668, 1612490766201.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15965412

>>15954916
I want these so badly

>> No.15965841

>>15964932
You're just trying to masquerade your boring tastes to be something more. You wouldn't know sophistication if it slapped you across the face and challenged you to a duel.

>> No.15966800

>>15965841
Nice retort, now show me what you think is a 10/10 sneaker so I can be BTFO once and for all.

>> No.15966851
File: 287 KB, 1140x800, sambas og ms yellow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15966851

>> No.15967319

>>15966800
It doesn't matter what I post you'll just shit talk it out of spite. You're pitiful.

>> No.15967390
File: 403 KB, 600x600, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15967390

>> No.15968110

>>15967319
I haven't insulted you once anon. I'm just looking for inspo to be honest.

>> No.15968174

>>15964001
>>15952949
>>15947032
Boring and tasteless

>> No.15968892
File: 226 KB, 903x903, Jano.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15968892

>>15961125
+1 love janoski's, they are Nike Skateboarding's most successful model since the dunk/blazer/bruin originated for basketball.

>> No.15968971

>>15967390
only people that wear rick owens are dickriders

>> No.15969007

>>15968971
why

>> No.15969077

>>15943565
if the big 'N' wasn't there, they would be great

>> No.15969192

>>15968892
oofda. Peak ugliness

>> No.15969604

>>15937647
yes

>> No.15969613

>>15968892
ugly and looks super cheap

>> No.15969627

>>15945252
what are these called?

>> No.15969644

>>15968971
welcome to /fa/, retard

>> No.15969710
File: 20 KB, 406x508, 162058C_D_08X1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15969710

sneed

>> No.15969936

Are Pony sneakers known in US? I've had 2 dufferebt pairs for years in eastern EU and Converse-like pair has a much better construction than my actual Converse 70's. Blazer-like pair was meh