/wt/ Watch Thread

[Anonymous No.15471524]

Made In America Edition

This thread is about the appreciation of watches and their design, their history, and the engineering and materials that are required to make a functioning timepiece.

Guides:
> Poorfag guide: https://m.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

Old bread >>15468818

[Anonymous No.15471536]

1st for looking after watches for the next generation

[Anonymous No.15471539]

nth for tuning forks.

[Anonymous No.15471545]

>>15471515
not even 50 bucks

[Anonymous No.15471547]

>>15471536
faggot
>>15471539
faggot
>>15471545
faggot

[Anonymous No.15471554]

>>15471536
such a faggot advertisement

[Anonymous No.15471556]

>>15471545
Neat

[Anonymous No.15471564]

>>15471536
>playing tennis with a complication chronograph on his wrist
he's not looking very well after it, is he?

[Anonymous No.15471566]

>>15471564
Why?

[Anonymous No.15471576]

L U X U R Y

[Anonymous No.15471583]

>>15471515
Anyone?

[Anonymous No.15471590]

>>15471566
because it's not a good idea to subject a complicated mechanical device fitted with a rotor to sudden, rapid, and forceful arm movements, heavy force impacts on your wrist and sweat

[Anonymous No.15471593]

>>15471515
popewatch but with baton indices

[Anonymous No.15471599]

>>15471566
sudden shocks are not good for mechanicals

[Anonymous No.15471613]

>>15471599
>>15471590

[Anonymous No.15471617]

I know this board shits on "minimalist" watches, but i just pulled the trigger and bought this...how bad did i fuck up. it's my first watch >$50

[Anonymous No.15471619]

>made in america

SHITTER

[Anonymous No.15471621]

>>15470490
got any links to something like you described? only one I can find is an even more obscure blogpost from 2001

[Anonymous No.15471624]

>>15471619
I'd like to apologize on behalf of my country for allowing this man a workable internet connection

but I will not apologize for his aggressive support for lady boys. stay away TERFs

[Anonymous No.15471627]

>>15471617
oof

[Anonymous No.15471647]

>>15471627
is it that bad

[Anonymous No.15471653]

>>15471647
for 50 bucks I mean you'll live. it's just a quartz shitter but with an inoffensive dial layout.
my first watch was a fucking skagen, can't judge. now I have a 62mas and Seamaster. You'll develop taste as you go.
but you probably should have got an SNK809 for an extra 40 imo.

[Anonymous No.15471656]

Anyone have the new alpinist? Thinking I might make it my one watch through grad school.

[Anonymous No.15471668]

>>15471536

>"I want you to have this, son. It's very special to me. It's a watch."
>"Oh, thanks, Dad! You can keep it though, I have my phone that tells the time."
>"But son, this watch also tells you the date, day, and month!"
>"Ya, so does my phone. But I guess it looks cool? What happens if I travel to see Nana in London?"
>"Oh, you see the mechanics of this watch are intricate and beautiful. You just pull this knob here and twist it forward until you move this little hand 8 hours forward! Then Boom! You're in London time."
>"On second thought, I'll stick with my phone. It just does that automatically. Maybe take that heavy thing off your wrist next time and you can take a game off me you old fart, hahaha!"

[Anonymous No.15471670]

>>15471653
Oh its not $50, it was ~$170, I was just saying it's my first time buying a watch more expensiv than $50. My thought process was I wanted sapphire (im kinda clumsy so scratch prone) and since it's my first time I didn't want to risk being tacky/ shelling out too much money in a field im inexperienced in. I looked at citizen, orient, and seiko and the stuff i liked was either outside my budget range, not sapphire, or too cluttered for my taste.and tissot has a good rep and history so i was like w.e. fuck it. but yeah thx for the advice, i'll just see how this goes and buy another in a few months once im willing to fork out more cash

[Anonymous No.15471673]

>>15471613
Professionals like him are getting paid and gifted free watches by companies to wear their products for publicity. It's different from trashing up the internals of the watch that you've bought on your own money.

[Anonymous No.15471678]

>>15471617
What's the case diameter. If it's >40mm you bought a dinner plate.

[Anonymous No.15471680]

>>15471678
42 mm, my wrists are ~7.25 in

[Anonymous No.15471682]

>>15471647
>>15471670
it's hmm.. how do i put it
its not that /wt/ doesnt like minimalist watches, there are some nice ones
but that 1...well...A lot of brutal things I want to say but its not nice

eh, you'll learn, like the other anon said
>>15471656
>new alpinist
no
the old one can still be had for ~$470- $510 if you dig around and camp

the upgrades are minimal, the logo and cyclops is butt ugly, and its like 200$ more expensive than the old one even when the latter has risen so much in price

[Anonymous No.15471688]

the two friends hanging out. workout beater and daily sub.

[Anonymous No.15471690]

>>15471536
the difference between soulless and soul, cringe and cute. for me, it's HMT.

[Anonymous No.15471696]

>>15471524
>made in american
>cheap eta movement

lol

[Anonymous No.15471700]

>>15471678
Dumbass wristlet

[Anonymous No.15471704]

>>15471696
uh no. that particular model has a RGM made calibre. the non small seconds has an ETA movement.
like pic related

[Anonymous No.15471708]

>>15471624
based

[Anonymous No.15471709]

>>15471682
Yeah I'm considering the old one as well but I think I'm actually in the minority (or maybe contrarian) camp in that I'd rather not go for the green dial. SARB013 would be ideal for me so the cream and gold new one is attractive. The cyclops kinda sucks but at least looks better on the lighter dials because it's not magnifying the contrasting dial and datewheel. Could always fuck around and try to get it off myself.

[Anonymous No.15471746]

>>15471617
It's a functional swiss watch from an established brand with modern minimalist aesthetics made for normal people with normal sized wrists that most people will find non-offensive or outright nice. It's essentially a well made contemporary fashion watch from a traditional swiss brand that's a bit overpriced as all fashion watches are. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it, it gives the impression of a young guy who has his shit together.
/wt/ is just obsessed with cheap mechanical watches by unheard of brands from the darkest corners of the Earth (Belarus, India, "vintage" pieces from Communist Romania, etc) and displays pathological hatred towards everything Swiss (known as "mountain jews" in /wt/speak/) that costs less than $6k used.
I hope you'll enjoy your watch, get into watches, learn about watches and buy a quality mechanical piece when you've done your homework and you can afford to do so. Until then it will serve you faithfully.

[Anonymous No.15471752]

>>15471590
Modern mechanical watches have very good shock resistance.

[Anonymous No.15471760]

>>15471746
alright, thanks man. i see merit in objects like a vintage watch from communist romania and even have some of my grandfathers watches from the USSR, for craftsmanship historical value etc., but i dont think id ever wear something like that

[Anonymous No.15471762]

>>15471746
>absolutely nothing wrong with it
>defending tisshit, the bottom barrel of swiss

it looks like a cheap DW clone with empty space the size of siberia and awful plasticy stick hands, sold at msrp $230 because of the swiss name. Proportions are way off and look at the puny crown. Theres literally a Lorus that looks just like it for $70. And could have bought a Movado if one wanted a minimalist quartz fashion watch and still be far better off

[Anonymous No.15471765]

>>15471752
Sure, but why push the boundaries, why take a risk misusing and abusing a watch that was made with a lot of care and handwork but not for this purpose? To impress by upper middle class folks at the country club by being ignorant while knowing better?

[Anonymous No.15471767]

Too much charm for one arm

[Anonymous No.15471782]

>>15471524
>Your budget
not above $500
>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
i don't want to LARP unless someone here can convince me that is should, so dress
>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
i would prefer something accurate and durable, so quartz, even digital, but I guess digital dress watch is an oxymoron as I cannot find one
>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
some kind of water resistance so it doesn't die while washing my hands or spilling something on it
>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
I dislike all of them. Nothing is comfortable. I wanted a cotton strap but I guess they don't exist.
>Wrist size or desired watch size
~36mm, i want something understated and easy to wear

[Anonymous No.15471806]

>>15471765
But impressing others at the country club is the main reason people want membership.

[Anonymous No.15471809]

>>15471782
Perlon strap is the softest out there, or maybe the elastic parachute straps

[Anonymous No.15471823]

>>15471782
Junghans Milano or Max Bill Quarz (slightly above budget)

[Anonymous No.15471827]

>>15471690
Blessed HMT chad.

[Anonymous No.15471853]

>>15471782
more like a sports watch, but casio edifice EFV-110D-7AVUEF

38mm
100WR
quartz
$80-$100

this is the unisex version, the mens one is 42mm. At 38 its a perfect size to be a pseudo sporty dress, and look at that kino tier pointy seconds hand. It avoids the usual mall geek look that lots of edifices have. Also comes in blue / black

[Anonymous No.15471860]

>>15471700
It's not the wrist chucklehead, it's the style of watch. That style above 40mm looks like a dinner plate regardless of who wears it.

[Anonymous No.15471878]

>>15471746
the modern minimalist trend is just marketing shilling to sell the most cheaply manufactured watches at regular prices

details cost money, applied indices cost money, dials with detail and texture cost money. So hahaha why dont we just sell printed paper dials and call it minimalist and sophisticated and affordable luxury and watch people gobble it up

[Anonymous No.15471891]

>>15471746
This is the correct opinion except for

>buy a quality mechanical piece

I don't particularly care for mechanical watches if they're not vintage, pre quartz.
Quartz is better in every way, except the "muh soul" argument watch snobs pull. If you mind changing the battery, maybe get a solar watch from Citizen or Seiko.

[Anonymous No.15471894]

>>15471891
quartz just doesn't have the magic for me
i cant stand the TICK TICK TICK as the second hand misses every single indice

[Anonymous No.15471915]

Any Oris fans? The big crown pointer date 80th anniversary edition will be my next big purchase soon.

[Anonymous No.15471918]

>>15471894
Whatever floats your boat.
But quartz is more accurate, rugged, and reliable.
That's what I look for in watch besides things like looks and quality materials.
If you just browsed /wt/ you would think all quartz watches are "shitters" and inferior to mechanical movements in every way.

[Anonymous No.15471927]

>>15471915

Yes I like Oris. Both Oris and Longines are quite good watch brands for beginners

[Anonymous No.15471934]

>>15471690
this is way better than that patek cringe

[Anonymous No.15471941]

>>15471690
>21'600bph is high beat

Man things have changed. Cool add tho

[Anonymous No.15471959]

>>15471891
That's actually a really nice looking watch and I usually hate these styles

[Anonymous No.15471977]

>>15471536

https://youtu.be/vZAC2eq-zgg?t=1091

After being asked if a 50 years old untouched watch would have problems ''No...it's a Patek''

The dude even tells that meme marketing quote.

[Anonymous No.15472003]

why the fuck is a mudmaster twice the price of a pro trek with the same features

[Anonymous No.15472015]

>>15471576
>photo taken 1 second after being exposed to high intensity light.
Why can't casio get lume right? How much are they saving by not giving their watches atleast somewhat decent lume? Even a g-shock has crap lume.

[Anonymous No.15472024]

>>15472003
>same features

but it doesn’t?

[Anonymous No.15472035]

>>15472024
More features then, whatever.
Minus maybe the ability to get run over by a tank, but really I don't see the point in getting a G-shock over one of the more rugged pro treks.

[Anonymous No.15472038]

>>15471977
He says 15 years, not 50. Even sealed for that long surely the oils would have dried out by then?

[Anonymous No.15472048]

>>15471545
Now add a cool calender sticker to the band and get the envy of the whole thread.

[Anonymous No.15472050]

>>15471593
Pope is wearing a swatch because his old pedo eyes cant read the smaller casio. Also he had a dateless version when he wore the casio. But nevertheless it's a very neat little watch.

[Anonymous No.15472063]

>>15472015
You're not wrong, compared to the standard industry lame the Casio is weak and short lasting. Having paid $38 for the MDV106 I'm not complaining though. This little guy on the other hand lets you check the time at 0500 the next morning still. Super lume is great.

[Anonymous No.15472064]

>>15472048
>>15472063

[Anonymous No.15472070]

>>15472064
I'd elbow both of these cunts and sell their shit for some nice casio money.

[Anonymous No.15472082]

>>15471894
The singular of "indices" is index.

[Anonymous No.15472086]

[Anonymous No.15472114]

>>15471894
You've never seen oceanus?

[Anonymous No.15472123]

>>15472114
Different anon but why isn't Oceanus sold in NA?

[Anonymous No.15472150]

>>15471709
Get the new one, the movement in the old one is notoriously unreliable. People ITT will deny it but it's true.

[Anonymous No.15472151]

>>15471767
God damn! why didn't I buy one when I had the chance?

[Anonymous No.15472153]

>>15472123
Because most of them would never sell here, they are huge and busy and very much Japanese style, the one or two that always get posted ITT are the two that actually look good.

[Anonymous No.15472155]

[Anonymous No.15472158]

>>15472123
The edifice is cheaper and does a similar thing, except that it isn't the same level of finish

[Anonymous No.15472159]

>>15472150
It's literally the same movement but they changed the spring out

[Anonymous No.15472188]

Do you guys have your watches insured or do luxury brands have that included in their purchase?

There's so much marketing for luxury watches that has men taking them to exotic locations and going up mountains or into the rain forest or into villages in Uganda or India.

1) Would the watch survive a trip like this? Say it was a Rolex Explorer, as the name implies.
2) What happens if it's stolen? You're just out 10k?
3) Do people actually take their watches on excursions like this?

I ask because I travel for work. And I'll sometimes be posted in remote locations or in less economically developed countries. I'd love to bring my watches and use them as "intended", but I can't help but worry about them.

>Marketing
Ya, clearly I fell for the marketing. But at the same time, when I go around the world I have to bring my camera gear with me. My gear, in total is worth more than a Rolex Explorer, by quite a lot. But that shit is insured and comes with Professional Servicing and anywhere in the world replacement in the event of damage or theft.

[Anonymous No.15472195]

>>15472188
nigga fuck you

[Anonymous No.15472204]

>>15472188

yes, i use Jewelers Mutual + World Nomads travel insurance when i travel.

the watches i take depends on the destination. whenever i travel to asia (hk, japan, vietnam, thailand, singapore, indo) i will take any watch as those places are extremely safe. same for northern europe (nord/scandis).

anywhere else, especially large cities in europe and latin america i have just worn a gshock because in some places they will literally kill you for a watch. i dress down to the point where i look homeless.

[Anonymous No.15472244]

Shopping dress watches with a budget capped at $1,000, preferably closer to $800. Leaning heavily toward the SARX035. Thoughts, /wt/?

[Anonymous No.15472282]

>>15471524
long post incoming
I have around $1000 to spend and would like to buy 3 watches, a chronograph, a diver and a non complication watch. Don't really care if it is a quartz or mechanical tb h.

For chronograph, I have three options:
Dan Henry 1964
Seagull 1963
Bulova Lunar Pilot

Diver:
Zelos Swordfish
Glycine Combat Sub
Vostok

Non complication:
Q Timex Reissue Falcon Eye
Mondaine
Braun
Baltic HMS-01

Any other watches around this price range that I should consider, open to any suggestions.
I've already had a vintage Seamaster, Oris Aquis, and Casio AE1200 metal bracelet.

[Anonymous No.15472290]

>>15472282
>$1000 to spend and would like to buy 3 watches
no

[Anonymous No.15472294]

>>15472282
seagull, vostok, timex/mondaine

[Anonymous No.15472307]

>>15472188
>1) Would the watch survive a trip like this?
Absolutely, "expedition watches" appeared in the 1950's and were mid-range watches in barely waterproof regular two-piece steel cases, their run-of-the-mill 15 to 17 jewels movements fitted with primitive anti-shock technology by today's standards. Herzog climbed the Annapurna wearing a Lip Himalaya, Hillary climbed the Everest wearing a Smiths Deluxe, the members of Admiral Byrd's expedition worn Nivada Antarctics. Even ordinary modern mid-range watches use more advanced technology, materials and lubrication than that and are sturdy enough mechanically to take the challenge.

[Anonymous No.15472354]

>>15472064
except you can't get that watch as a young man. It's actually 65 year olds who have been on a waiting list for 7 years

[Anonymous No.15472381]

>>15472282
Dan Henry, Glycine Combat Sub and a Baltic.
I pick Dan Henry over a seagull because even thought it looks fucking cool, I've owned 3 watches with that movement and 2 of them ran like shit.

[Anonymous No.15472447]

>>15471536
Fuck you Patek I'm not giving my son shit

[Anonymous No.15472456]

>2020
>not taking your diver diving

I SHIGG

[Anonymous No.15472620]

>>15471894
I was so annoyed by the skewed second hand in one decently priced in-house quartz that I opened it and re-set the hands. Now it hits the indices... 50% of the time, because there's still so much play in the gears I guess.

[Anonymous No.15472630]

new seiko 5 sport blackout

[Anonymous No.15472638]

>>15471977
>>15472038
It's very clear they know next to nothing about watches except how much they can sell them for. Just like every "my watch is an investment" guy.

[Anonymous No.15472740]

>>15472630
>can't see the time for shit

Söysöy's will love it, they can add this to their black EDC set and look like the manchildren they are.

[Anonymous No.15472742]

>>15472282
Dan Henry
Vostok
Baltic

[Anonymous No.15472763]

>>15471593
so this is an upgraded version of the mq24?

[Anonymous No.15472770]

>>15471524
>>15471524
This is why I come to 4chan. Thanks, Timefag.

[Anonymous No.15472774]

>>15472630
>""""diver styled"""" watch without a working bezel and with corresponding oversized lume pips that are now useless due to the black coating
>$250

this is a shitter test of the highest order

[Anonymous No.15472776]

>>15472740
IMAGINE wearing a watch so you can tell the time

[Anonymous No.15472782]

>>15472630
I really dislike full-black watches for some reason.
Does anyone else feel the same?

[Anonymous No.15472783]

>>15472381
>I've owned 3 watches with that movement and 2 of them ran like shit.

why what went wrong
not that anon but im still looking to get the 1963 and deliberating whether to pay the $750 that (((seagull))) wants or the $200 for a 3rd party version

[Anonymous No.15472787]

>>15472782
>I really dislike full-black watches

do TACTICOOL gshocks get a pass?

[Anonymous No.15472791]

>>15472064
>t. Suffering from crippling credit card debt
If you can't buy a watch on a whim you're just larping as a rich fag

[Anonymous No.15472794]

>>15472063
W2c?

[Anonymous No.15472795]

>>15472282
toss up between seagull and DH
zelos
baltic (not even close lol)

you can still toss in a vostok with all the ussr kitsch because while zelos is definitely higher tier vostoks are pure russian kino and its cheap

[Anonymous No.15472796]

>>15472787
I think this looks really cool, just wish it was easier on the eyes to actually tell the time.

[Anonymous No.15472797]

>>15472796
It's really not hard to tell the time by looking at it. I never understood this complaint. How fucking bad are your eyes? You can get the one with white indices if you want, grandpa.

[Anonymous No.15472800]

>>15472796
i think for gshocks its fine as they actually have a lot of depth/protruding elements that catch the light

theres the normal black but its not as tacticool

[Anonymous No.15472801]

>>15472787
I think plastic-case watches are fine, I just prefer steel watches to be silver with a bit of color on the dial.

[Anonymous No.15472807]

>>15472796
you can always set the small screen to tell the time and use the illuminator to make it easy to read, old man

[Anonymous No.15472815]

>>15472791
The sky is blue and water is wet. Why state the fucking obvious?

I don't understand people who larp as rich, especially here.

[Anonymous No.15472871]

I'm gonna get fucking jacked just so I can wear 40+mm watches without looking like the kid from Ben 10.

[Anonymous No.15472876]

>>15471767
Based

[Anonymous No.15472880]

>>15471767
>>15472876
Mine's on its way.

[Anonymous No.15472884]

>>15472791
>getting triggered by ancient old kike bait, that is just used regularly to fuel the newly created thread.

[Anonymous No.15472885]

>>15472815
>people who larp as rich, especially here

Some are, some just do it to piss off newfags, like you.

[Anonymous No.15472887]

So, this came to my mail today.
Apparently, Raketa is trying to kilk its potential customers all at once with covid.

Who else is going? I don't want to die alone, fa.

[Anonymous No.15472892]

>>15472887
>its potential customers
So all 5 of them?

[Anonymous No.15472894]

>>15472887

>COVID

That's only a concern in developing countries.

[Anonymous No.15472908]

>>15472774
>Complaining about "diver styled" when 99% of diver watch wearing fags haven't dived to more than 2 meters depth in their life and most of them don't even swim with their watches because they don't want to damage them .

[Anonymous No.15472919]

Help I can't stop buying casio shitters on ebay.

[Anonymous No.15472927]

>>15472188
Would you wear a Rolex and casually stroll into the south side of Chicago or Detroit?
Would you park your brand new luxury car in these places with no insurance on it?
How the hell could you travel the world into sketchy locations for a living and not have any common sense about you?

[Anonymous No.15472936]

>>15472927
Wasn't there some famous explorer who said he always took a Rolex with him on his trips because he could use it to buy himself out of 'tricky' situations.

[Anonymous No.15472937]

>>15472919
switch to buying soviet shitters on ebay instead

[Anonymous No.15472938]

>>15472919
Buy more then talk to Bonhams to auction them all

[Anonymous No.15472939]

>>15472936
I remember hearing Archie saying that, but the only exploring he does is in the ladyboy quarters of Bangkok.

[Anonymous No.15472940]

>>15472937
Way ahead of you pal.

[Anonymous No.15472945]

>>15472908
I piss on mine regularly to make sure it's water resistant.

[Anonymous No.15472950]

>>15472945
gotta get that vintage patina

[Anonymous No.15472969]

>>15472950
Gonna be rich once i sell it on hodinkee.

[Anonymous No.15472978]

>>15471617
This was one of the first watches I looked at too when I was just "getting into" watches. It's by no means a bad watch or a bad brand, just a little bland and boring. Eventually your tastes will develop and become more specific but for now it's a safe choice. Will probably net one or two compliments.

[Anonymous No.15472986]

>>15471782
Dressy, slim, high accuracy quatz

[Anonymous No.15472999]

>>15472871
Good for you, Jack.

[Anonymous No.15473004]

>>15472282
Hked 1963
Baltic aquascaphe
Q timex falcon eye

A little over budget but worth it for the aquascaphe imo

[Anonymous No.15473022]

>>15472876
>>15471767
What is it?

[Anonymous No.15473030]

>>15472936
I'm sure this will work in detroit lmao

[Anonymous No.15473051]

>>15472936
How many decades ago did this happen? Because there's no sane person that would use that as a rational plan today.
If you're spending that kind of money and giving out Rolex watches like candy to get yourself out of trouble then maybe your money would be better spent on competent security to protect yourself

[Anonymous No.15473054]

>>15473022
Bocktock Neptune SE

[Anonymous No.15473073]

[Anonymous No.15473075]

>>15472188
They are just watches, if someone steals our rolex, you buy another and that's all.

[Anonymous No.15473083]

>>15472871
If you want a big wrist, you need to get fat, not jacked.

[Anonymous No.15473097]

>>15473083
How dumb are you, fucking weaklett?

[Anonymous No.15473105]

Spring drive is the ultimate watch movement. Change my mind

[Anonymous No.15473117]

>>15473051
Nah it was an article from last year iirc but I can't google for it. Searching for explorer rolex doesn't give the kind of link I'm after :)

[Anonymous No.15473123]

>>15471853
It's 35mm without the crown, you idiot.
The EFV-100D is 40mm

[Anonymous No.15473127]

>>15472787
I admire how Casio's marketing has managed to rebrand 'illegible' as 'tactical'.

[Anonymous No.15473131]

>>15473123
tell that to casio you asswipe
who shat in your cereal, get a grip
https://www.casio-europe.com/euro/products/watches/edifice/efv-110d-1avuef/

[Anonymous No.15473133]

>>15473097
What muscles are in the wrist?
I got really great forearms (climber...) but my wrist is thin and bony as ever.

[Anonymous No.15473156]

>>15471524
>>> Your budget
$200
>> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
business\office work
>> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
auto
>> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
no complications at all
>> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
leather
>> Wrist size or desired watch size
sub 44

[Anonymous No.15473191]

>>15473156
Chink watches ahoy
Get this pilots watch
https://sanmartinwatches.com/wp/product/sn030-g/
Or Cadisen for even cheaper chink watches that are a bit more dressy, poke around on ali express.

[Anonymous No.15473201]

>>15473097
Seething fatty.

[Anonymous No.15473206]

>>15473156
sterile seagull no logo no date BAUHAUS automatic watch display back
sapphire glass
$113

https://www.good-stuffs.com/The-5th-anniversary-of-Times-International-automatic-wrist-watch-OEM-by-Sea-Gull_p_236.html

[Anonymous No.15473210]

>>15473206
nice nomos...fuck china

[Anonymous No.15473221]

>>15473210
seethe
not even a nomos design.
it has been done by many brands.

[Anonymous No.15473241]

>>15473073
based and sovietpilled, but i prefer the ocean model

[Anonymous No.15473296]

>>15473221
I can't take seriously NOMOS because of that, everyone praising their tangente-similar models and all they did was making a ripoff.

[Anonymous No.15473364]

Are SARB prices fucked forever? Missed out on getting the SARB0065 before it got discontinued, and now it's $500 even secondhand where I live. The Cocktail Time doppelganger SRPB43 seems to be 90% of what I wanted from the SARB for $280 or so, but my autism is keeping me from accepting it as a SARB0065 replacement.

[Anonymous No.15473377]

Been obsessing a bit over the Tudor North Flag today. I quite like the design, but it’s certainly one of those watches that are bound to divide. If it was a few mm thinner I definitely would make the effort to try it on, but for now I’ll see if I go off it over the coming days.

[Anonymous No.15473419]

>>15473377
>chronometer
>officially certified

is that really needed

[Anonymous No.15473441]

[Anonymous No.15473450]

>>15473419
Well the dial would be a bit bare and top-heavy without something there

[Anonymous No.15473474]

>>15473191
Quality post, as I am saving to buy the Stowa classic.
>>15473206
Thanks for the reply anon, but the search continues. Pic-rel is what I'm going for and if it has to have a date, then fine as a clean one in this budget is difficult.

[Anonymous No.15473482]

Recommend me so watches:

•Casual dresser
•6.5 inch wrist
•£500-10,000 I'm not a snob
•No date
•If it's on a braclet, it must have micro quick adjust, like a guide lock.

[Anonymous No.15473488]

>>15473364
Does any of the presage cocktail times have the two part indices of the SARB one? Those really sell it for me.

[Anonymous No.15473498]

>>15471704
Looks like an Ingersoll, but worse.

[Anonymous No.15473505]

>>15473482
36mm oyster perpetual white dial

[Anonymous No.15473509]

>>15473482
>Scottish notes
Potential criminality detected

[Anonymous No.15473510]

>>15473474
>Stowa classic

Are you going for the A or B model?

[Anonymous No.15473525]

I think i ruined my vostok guys...

>worked fine out of the box
>went out biking with it shitload of times (yeah, i know)
>no matter how much i wind it up it stops after few hours, depending on the position
>loses time like it's nothing

I mean, automatic and manual winding are working but it seems like something is out of whack inside making it lose time like mad and stopping. Is it worth to tinker with it yourself or take it to someone, I like this little shitter...

[Anonymous No.15473557]

>>15473525

it needs vodka. submerge it in it for 30 minutes.

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15473560]

>>15473525
You can find videos on youtube, there is something inside you only need to push or pull or whatever that changes how fast or slow a watch loses time. It's pretty easy, I would look into that first.

[Anonymous No.15473563]

>>15473525
sorry to hear that anon
maybe something got knocked loose or misaligned

you can get 2414 movement for $20 off ebay and it should fit (never tried personally). Wouldn't have the rotor anymore though..not a biggie

not sure about servicing, it really depends on the watchmaker. Ive heard of stories where vintage vostoks got fucked up due to local guy not knowing how to do a vostok.

[Anonymous No.15473568]

>>15473377

I used to own one, they are very well made. But yeah, it’s as tall as a barn and unless they reduce the height significantly you should avoid it. It’s so tall that it’s visually jarring when viewed from the side.

[Anonymous No.15473571]

>>15473377
I have one, am about to sell it though. Together with the Pelagos their only watch that really works for me and doesn't have an obvious flaw.
Keep in mind that the bracelet or strap is integrated and that the watch is tudor tall. Not a sleek piece that goea easily under the cuff by any definition.
Movement and quality are great though.

[Anonymous No.15473574]

>>15472244
Thoughts are a lot of people think the SARX is overrated, mainly due to previous SARB pricing since they are arguably in the same grade of quality. The finishing on the SARX035 does look substantially better and more refined than the SARBs in my book. Between the detailed finish, crystal upgrade and better bracelet, it makes sense to see it cost more. The movement is very mediocre for its class, though common grade in the 500 to 1000 dollar range. End of the day it seems like a watch for people who are willing to sacrifice movement grade for luxury grade case and finish.

[Anonymous No.15473602]

>>15473568
>>15473571
Thanks guys. I really like the integrated bracelet. Wouldn’t want one on every watch, but would like to own one. Seems like the height really is a problem. That’s a bit of a shame, but I’ll probably take a trip to one of the big boutiques in my city later in the year so I can finally try on some of the things I’ve just been looking at on the internet.

[CecilDrakeInSeattle !effayRxItQ No.15473612]

>>15473525
This is what I meant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHnIwDLmLcE

[Anonymous No.15473644]

>>15473525
You might as well learn to take it apart and reassemble it, what better than an absolutely dirt cheap and fairly robust movement. Does it run differently depending on the position? Best case: there's something extra (dirt, old grease, hair) that has now gotten into the wrong place and jams it up time to time. Worst case: you've fucked up some part, like bent a wheel pivot, and get unnecessary friction somewhere.

[Anonymous No.15473649]

>>15473525
>>15473644
I'm dumb, you did say it stops depending on position. Does it run worse on its side?

[Anonymous No.15473657]

>>15473612
hes not talking about regulation. The watch is not supposed to stop after a few hours. Something is jammed or loose inside.
>>15473525
you can either attempt to ticker or try a good local watchermaker or totalwatchrepair if you are usa(they will fix but will cost you).

replacement of entire movement can be done yourself for cheaper but depends on how attached you are to the watch, its not the same.

[Anonymous No.15473724]

>yes, i only own one watch, why?

[Anonymous No.15473731]

>>15473724
I hope it’s one of those big gold Invictas

[Anonymous No.15473742]

Taking votes on next purchase:
- Yema Flygraf M1
- Hamilton Pilot Day/Date
- Seiko SARX035

[Anonymous No.15473743]

>>15473377
>a few mm thinner
Take a look at the autodromo group b.

[Anonymous No.15473750]

>>15473742

[Anonymous No.15473762]

>>15473750
Guessing that's a vote for Yema? Already have too many divers but the Superman is cool.

[Anonymous No.15473771]

>>15473743
Damn, I’ve always quickly skipped past them when I’ve seen them before. Absolutely not what I’m looking for in my next watch (100m+ WR and high quality in-house movement) and yet I suddenly feel like I absolutely need one.

[Anonymous No.15473772]

Fuck bois, i want a new skx so badly but theyre all over 300 dollars and from sketchy 3rd world countries, and the ones from not sketchy sellers are all 400+. Why the FUCK did seiko discontinue such a /fa/ watch?

[Anonymous No.15473774]

>>15473772
Life is suffering my man. If it's really the apple of your eye, spend a little extra and get it. The extra $100 will mean little if you end up wearing it for decades.

[Anonymous No.15473778]

>>15473772
>>15473774
>paying $400 for a 7s26
bruh...

[Anonymous No.15473787]

>>15473563
>Ive heard of stories where vintage vostoks got fucked up due to local guy not knowing how to do a vostok

Yeah, i can imagine that happening, this is a niche thing after all.

>>15473612
I know about this but as other anon said, i don't think that it is regulation fault. I can best describe it as a watch that doesn't completely unwind ie. it goes from 100% to 90% and stops (i've noticed that the force to wind it is significantly higher, unlike before when there was practically no resistance when it was unwound)

>>15473644
>Does it run differently depending on the position?

Eh, it's kinda hard to tell but dial down position seems to be the worst. On the side or dial up seems fine as i can tell but the end result is the same.

>You might as well learn to take it apart and reassemble it, what better than an absolutely dirt cheap and fairly robust movement.

I was kinda leaning towards this as well because of the same reasons. Time for some ebay tool shopping i guess.

Anyway, thx for the replies guys!

[Anonymous No.15473788]

At that place now where I need to decide if I should continue buying buying “fun” €500-€1000 watches or just focus on one expensive watch, expensive but within my means being something like an Explorer.

Did anyone else go through that phase and what was the result and are you happy with the road you chose?

[Anonymous No.15473797]

>>15473788
Get the one nice watch, you'll appreciate it more

[Anonymous No.15473807]

>>15473482
Glashutte Panomatic

[Anonymous No.15473812]

>>15473771
The miyota in it is a decent movement anyway. Of the three that I've had all of them were within a few seconds per day deviation. Where all the effort has gone with the group b is the external finishing & the dial. Combination of bead blasting, brushing, polished edges, a chamfered crystal, lots of details in the dial too.

[Anonymous No.15473814]

What do you guys think?i have a snsx79 on the way btw

[Anonymous No.15473817]

How do you guys check time deviation? Those things cost like 180 bucks

[Anonymous No.15473824]

>>15473778
Didn't say it was great bang for buck, but if the buyer REALLY wants it, anything under $500 can be justified if it will bring happiness and get decades of wear. Alternatively he buys something else for less and finds himself wishing he was wearing the 007 every time he looks at his wrist. What's the price on that level of eternal disappointment?

[Anonymous No.15473829]

>>15473797
>>15473788
we all know rolexes are extremely overvalued due to hype and low supply. In a vacuum they are as nice as watches costing 3k. Might as well get a GS

[Anonymous No.15473833]

>>15473772
Just get an islander skx clone from that long island watch place. At least you will be getting some value for your $300. if it really bothers you you can buy a seiko dail and have it swapped in.

[Anonymous No.15473842]

>>15473824
you can buy the alpinist for $500 lool
yes what you said is true but ill feel ripped off af

[Anonymous No.15473843]

Got a little bit of spare change laying around lads, should I cop?

[Anonymous No.15473845]

>>15472950
papeena

[Anonymous No.15473846]

>>15472003
Pimping ain't easy.

[Anonymous No.15473854]

>>15473812
Not scared of a movement like that, latest purchase has an NH35 which has been -3 seconds per day which I can’t really complain about.
It sure looks nice!

[Anonymous No.15473892]

>>15473482
fuck off heroin addicts

[Anonymous No.15473906]

>>15473829
GS are just pure yawn-o-ramas to me, sorry.
Rolex is certainly not the apex in their price classes, but the equivalent watches from other brands always end up having something wrong with them too, like the Aqua Terra having a shit clasp and being thick compared to the Explorer despite having a great movement.

[Anonymous No.15473908]

>>15473843
No

[Anonymous No.15473988]

why dont more watches do diamond indices......

[Anonymous No.15473991]

>>15471536
BUT I PAID FOR IT

[Anonymous No.15473997]

Patek is losing their edge
>tries to innovate in 2020
>fails miserably
why is VC the only hyper-luxury brand that can successfully innovate?

[Anonymous No.15473998]

what watch to get my boomer dad? he likes traditional styles but hes modest and doesnt want anything flashy. <2k

[Anonymous No.15474004]

>>15473998
grey market/used omega Aqua Terra

[Anonymous No.15474020]

>>15473824

>yfw

[Anonymous No.15474032]

>>15473817

you can get a used weishi for half the price if you keep your eye on ebay.

there are also apps for your phone that get time from various sources like NIST and/or your phones GPS system. are you on ios or android?

[Anonymous No.15474033]

>>15473988
Haha they skipped the 4 because they think it's bad luck. Hahaa they also think trees are all haunted lololol

[Anonymous No.15474044]

>>15474033
? the 4 is there

also that watch is all sold out eons ago :sadface: :(

[Anonymous No.15474052]

>>15474032
Android. Can an app do that?

[Anonymous No.15474060]

>>15474020
A handsome man of taste I see

[Anonymous No.15474088]

These came back into stock just now, so I pulled the trigger.

[Anonymous No.15474090]

>>15473998
oris big crown pointer date
very traditional looking cathedral hands
old style coin bezel
great visibility
available in all sorts of colours

[Anonymous No.15474096]

>>15474088

[Anonymous No.15474105]

>>15474096
unironically looks better than the rolex sub

[Anonymous No.15474108]

>>15474096
this looks like a clown watch
>omega dial
>omega indices
>bathyscaphe hands
>cheap looking logo
>boring bezel
>BLUE ORANGE CONTRAST DUDE!!!

[Anonymous No.15474121]

>>15474096
>>15474088
Looks good but should have gone with the meteorite dial for uniqueness points.

[Anonymous No.15474124]

>>15474004
looks great anon, not sure if i can get one at that price point though.
>>15474090
i want to like it...but the cathedral hands and coin edge bezel dont do it for me...thanks though anon.

[Anonymous No.15474125]

>>15474096
looks like a turd from my ass

[Anonymous No.15474127]

>>15474108
>O-ONLY TTHOSE WATCHES CAN USE THOSE STYLES!! 1

get a grip on your seethe

[Anonymous No.15474129]

>>15474125
Can you shit on my hand then? Would like two, thanks.

[Anonymous No.15474131]

>>15474124
>dont do it for me
are you buying a watch for yourself or your dad
maybe ask him?

[Anonymous No.15474132]

>>15474108
I agree.. it's a fugly watch

[Anonymous No.15474134]

>>15474132
it looks great what are you smoking
the orange and blue really makes it pop

[Anonymous No.15474135]

>>15474134
yeah, it looks great if you're 14...

[Anonymous No.15474137]

>>15474127
no, you troglodyte. there's a reason that those watches use those style elements, and that's because they put actual thought into their implementation and design.
if you took random elements from 5 different sportscars, you won't get something cohesive and attractive. you'd get the car version of this watch.

it's clear they put no thought into the design when you look at the bezel. look how lazy that thing is. their whole design philosophy is "what can we yoink from better designs?"

[Anonymous No.15474140]

>>15474134
>the orange and blue really makes it pop
anon, you're on a fashion board. stop embarrassing yousrelf

[Anonymous No.15474143]

>>15474096
let me know when you get it
i really like the look
i love that theres no date window
>>15474140
blue and orange is constantly used in design
maybe educate yourself

[Anonymous No.15474146]

How blind do you have to be to call this illegible? Just how bad is your eyesight that you can't read this? Fucking eyelets.

[Anonymous No.15474147]

>>15474143
>maybe educate yourself
yes, it's used in shitty consumer design because it's the laziest way to attract attention. it's not fashionable, it's literally the lowest-common-denominator color palette

[Anonymous No.15474160]

>>15474147
DUH, it is used because it works
just because its popular doesnt mean its bad, thats just being a stupid hipster contrarian
if something works it would be replicated

it works better than other primary complementary comboes like red+green or yellow+purple

[Anonymous No.15474161]

>>15474147
By definition, the laziest method to attract attention would be just one bold color. 2 colors that compliment each other isn't lazy and requires work to achieve a good balance.

[Anonymous No.15474171]

>>15474146
I don't get the appeal of this watch and why it's so popular?

[Anonymous No.15474174]

>>15474171
its a round gshock that isnt fat and is actually wearable

also, MUH ANALOG

[Anonymous No.15474179]

>>15474171
It has AP RO vibes. You can even get a metal bezel for it for extra RO vibes

[Anonymous No.15474182]

>>15474174
>trying this hard to fit in and being this wrong
Stop posting redditor, lurk moar.

[Anonymous No.15474183]

>>15474147
overworked interns short on time produced those posters

why would they care anyway, those are all shit movies that dont deserve anything better

[Anonymous No.15474188]

>>15474183
yeah and the watch looks the same way. "how can we design a watch in the least amount of time/effort and still sell it?"

[Anonymous No.15474191]

>>15473742
Yema, just because is not a really well known brand and their watches looks nice.

[Anonymous No.15474192]

>>15474182
its a 12mm thick gshock.
find me a round gshock that is that thin
do you even into specs

[Anonymous No.15474201]

>>15474188
it actually looks good so you are wrong
great reviews + good watch + making snobs seethe all day

[Anonymous No.15474203]

>>15474201
it's okay anon, you're allowed to like shit. that doesn't mean it's going to be winning any design awards

[Anonymous No.15474205]

Found the gspot

[Anonymous No.15474208]

>>15474203
you didn't win all design awards either but your mother still loves you and that is enough

also
>(((design awards)))
aka who paid us the most money
just like the oscars

[Anonymous No.15474215]

>>15474147
>shitty consumer design
>it's literally the lowest-common-denominator color palette

[Anonymous No.15474217]

>>15474208
I used that as a saying in the same vein as
>nothing to write home about
>isn't going to be winning any ribbons
not literally you autist

[Anonymous No.15474220]

>>15474215
>posting the denver donkeys
are you trying to prove my point or what?

[Anonymous No.15474221]

>>15474217
>orange and blue is ba--

[Anonymous No.15474242]

>>15474221
there's a reason this watch looks dated, anon :)

[Anonymous No.15474243]

even omega did it

[Anonymous No.15474249]

>>15471688
Post more nodate

[Anonymous No.15474250]

shit, IWC too?? oh no

[Anonymous No.15474259]

ok these are all shit brands anyway. Theres no way a REAL HAUTE HOROLOGERIE brand would do such a thi-

[Anonymous No.15474272]

Day 47 of waiting my Vostok to be delivered

[Anonymous No.15474273]

>>15474272
>giving the russian government a free 3 month loan

[Anonymous No.15474274]

>>15474220
yep

[Anonymous No.15474275]

>>15474250
what an awful looking watch, I won't even look for its price.

[Anonymous No.15474277]

[Anonymous No.15474290]

>>15473998
there's Eberhard's 8 jours, conservative design but technologically interesting stuff (it seems to be the 42mm Grand Taille version, wonder if the 39mm version is available discounted somewhere): https://www.jomashop.com/eberhard-and-co-8-jours-watch-210275co.html
you could also check the Tazio Nuvolari line if he's into vintage racing stuff.
there's Ball's Engineer and Trainmaster line, boomers like Americana: https://www.jomashop.com/ball-watches.html?dir=desc&order=savingsoff#202345
there's the Hamilton Intra-Matic re-edition, retro done well: https://www.jomashop.com/hamilton-watch-h38416541.html
Ollech & Wajs if he likes military stuff, the Ocean Graph is a thing of beauty: https://ow-watch.ch
the Glycine Chief if he's into old aviation: https://www.jomashop.com/glycine-airman-vintage-the-chief-gmt-automatic-black-dial-mens-watch-gl0246.html
the Bulova Lunar Pilot if he likes space exploration stuff (it's a cheap quartz but he might like it, and that's what ultimately matters): https://www.jomashop.com/bulova-watch-96b251.html
Oris' higher end Artelier line has the Greenwich Mean Time limited edition: https://www.jomashop.com/oris-artelier-watch-690-7690-4081ls2.html https://www.jomashop.com/oris-watch-690-7690-4081ls.html

[Anonymous No.15474291]

>>15474259
ok FUCK fp journe, seriously. Shit brand with a stupid name, /spit

we all know the only brand that ever mattered is Patek Philippe, THE grand daddy of all watc-

[Anonymous No.15474293]

Just copped this.
Did I do good?

[Anonymous No.15474300]

>>15474272
B Aмepикe вpeмя лeтит нeзaмeтнo.
B coвeтcкoй Poccии вpeмя тepяeтcя нa тaмoжнe

[Anonymous No.15474304]

>>15474293
Looks good.
How much was it

[Anonymous No.15474307]

You guys weren't kidding...just cleared out six shitters on the r/watchexchange in less than an hour of posting. I guess reddit IS good for something afterall.

[Anonymous No.15474308]

>>15474290
thanks pal

[Anonymous No.15474310]

>>15474307
what did you sell

[Anonymous No.15474311]

>>15474304
€370

[Anonymous No.15474317]

>>15474310
Mix of Casio and Seiko mostly. All old stuff that doesn't get worn these days...good $150 and less budget watches though. Told myself I would do that before I justify buying a couple new above-shitter grade watches.

[Anonymous No.15474322]

>>15473364
its a great watch
i even dressed it down, no pun intended haha

[Anonymous No.15474328]

>>15474311
Yeah, you did alright

[Anonymous No.15474330]

>>15471668
The solution to this is to give them a watch while they're young. My dad gave me my first watch when I was 10.

[Anonymous No.15474342]

>>15474221
>>15474243
>>15474250
>>15474259
>>15474291
fucking based

[Anonymous No.15474350]

>>15471668
he'll make amends for his youthful folly by buying back his dad's Patek at a Geneva auction for an exorbitant price when he becomes a grown man with a son of his own: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HOFlei9V9k
Patek's marketing dept. thought of every scenario
>>15474342
I like how the blue and orange Mumbai Special aesthetics found its way into haute horology

[Anonymous No.15474367]

>>15474350
blue and orange is just the colours of the working class
fuck Mumbai, they were cooler when they were called Bombay

[Anonymous No.15474379]

Shit I feel like I am losing my mind. There was a ~$300 microbrand dive watch just announced within the last couple of months and I can't remember which brand it was. It was kind of a fifty fathoms ripoff, similar vibe to the Baltic Aquascaphe. I feel like it was a pretty big microbrand too. Anyone know?

[Anonymous No.15474384]

>>15474328
Cheers, mate

[Anonymous No.15474391]

>>15474379
this...?

[Anonymous No.15474398]

>>15474307
What is this watch

[Anonymous No.15474401]

>>15474379

[Anonymous No.15474435]

>cheap chinese amazon shitter automatic came today
I expected nothing but I'm kind of impressed for 25 dollars

[Anonymous No.15474439]

>>15474435
Jesus christ...

[Anonymous No.15474447]

>>15474435
does the chronograph work?

[Anonymous No.15474450]

do you guys watch any watch youtubers

[Anonymous No.15474455]

>>15474450
Archie, Austin Daniels, Mark Goldberg, sometimes TGV or Federico.

[Anonymous No.15474458]

>>15474450
i only watch repair channels nowadays
learn a lot more and its less "youtubey"

[Anonymous No.15474466]

>>15474435
Link us to the amazon page
Is it quartz or automatic?
What's it feel like weight and build quality?

[Anonymous No.15474476]

>>15474398
Gen 1 SST Maratac SR-35.

[Anonymous No.15474478]

>>15474272

Democratically elected President of the Russian peoples himself, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, inspects each Vostok to ensure Russian export is of the highest quality. The wait is worth it.

[Anonymous No.15474490]

>>15474466
>Is it quartz or automatic?
you literally see the balance spring at 6 oclock, imitating a tourbillon

which also means to regulate the watch you would have to take the whole movement out kek

[Anonymous No.15474497]

>>15474447
>>15474466
https://www.amazon.ca/Forsining-Automatic-Tourbillon-Complete-JAG034M4T1/dp/B01DU8AU08
The right chronograph is functional but the left seems like it's static. It's indeed not quartz and the power reserve lasts roughly 24 hours. The stock bracelet feels like shit but I replaced it with a better one. The actual watch feels pretty nice for cheap shit and the slide rule is pretty damn smooth. Overall it looks really nice but its internals are probably cheap shit.

[Anonymous No.15474506]

blu/yellow or black/red nighthawk

[Anonymous No.15474507]

>>15474506
Black red, unless you can find a blue yellow without the cheesy blue angels emblem.

[Anonymous No.15474511]

>>15474497
for that price is just nice it has some internal parts.

[Anonymous No.15474512]

What's the best g shock to buy and how do you spot the fakes on ebay

[Anonymous No.15474519]

>>15474512
5600 if you don't have massive wrists

[Anonymous No.15474525]

>>15474512
You can buy my GD-400 black/red with aftermarket strap for $40 shipped. Otherwise the dw5600e is the shit.

[Anonymous No.15474531]

>>15474512

GW-S5600-1JF is pretty good

[Anonymous No.15474532]

>>15474506
neither
hunt down the rare white chapter rings
>>15474512
fakes are obvious (poor edges) unless its a cartoony gshock
also, if its too good to be true..

[Anonymous No.15474544]

>>15474401
>>15474391
Thanks but no, neither of these. Man there are shitloads of dive watches. Well, either I'll come across it again, or I won't.

[Anonymous No.15474550]

>>15474450
Watch Advisor has an fun channel, Alex is a bro and he responds to damn near every single comment personally which I love

[Anonymous No.15474566]

>>15474564
>>15474564
>>15474564
>>15474564

[Anonymous No.15474572]

>>15474532
What watch is this?

[Anonymous No.15474589]

>>15474572
citizen nighthawk euro exclusive

this is the usa exclusive and near impossible to find now ( for real)

[Anonymous No.15475017]

>>15472282
Diver: Seiko SRP777

EL CLASSICO BASADO

[Anonymous No.15475021]

>>15472456
Enjoy your plebagos.

Regards, Seiko Gang

[Anonymous No.15475573]

>>15474205
Based colorway

[Anonymous No.15475667]

>>15472155
mate, your crystal is fucked big time

[Anonymous No.15475708]

>>15475021
The seething of jelly söykos is always entertaining. I mean, i would not pay for any swiss luxury watch. But the hate for tudor is always based on dumbass reasons. Like where people pretend that THEY would have never bought one and rather go for every other model for that price or pay 1K more for another watch.

Have these tards ever considered that the guy who buys tudor actually really likes tudor and their design and everything else? And that the guy would not like any other watch, because it does not look like the one he really likes.