/wt/ - Watch Thread: CUTEST AMBASADORESS edition

[Anonymous No.14825910]

This thread is about the appreciation of Seiko Original Officially Certified CUTEST AMBASADORESS Misty Copeland and other watch wearing qts with hairy arms

Required viewing for new people:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gPqLhBPO44 [Embed] [Embed]

Guides:

> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
> Guide for poorfag plebs: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK

Should I buy this fashion brand watch?

> Scroll through this album first:
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Seiko watch?

> No.

"Suggest a watch for me."

> Don't spend more than 1/10000th of your anal income (after jizya) on a watch

Previous:

>>14818112

[Anonymous No.14825915]

First for gay ass arm hair

[Anonymous No.14825971]

Is there a modern version of this? It's from the 90s, and it looks amazing.

[Anonymous No.14826043]

>>14825214
strap discussion pls
opinions?

[Anonymous No.14826045]

New tropic strap on the Nacken, still not excited for 40+ degree Ozzy heat

[Anonymous No.14826060]

>>14826043
Black leather.

[Anonymous No.14826125]

>>14826045
Where in aus?
I find that bracelets do me better in the heat desu

[Anonymous No.14826209]

>>14825971
Take the Fortis pill.

[Anonymous No.14826213]

>>14825910

[Anonymous No.14826217]

>>14826043
Orange lizard leather

[Anonymous No.14826380]

>>14825910
ugh Disgusting

[Anonymous No.14826404]

>>14825971
While it's theoretically possible for that to be a 90's watch it's more likely to be from the 2000's
If I liked the look of that particular watch I'd buy that exact watch of yahoo or ebay or whatever.
Modern seiko chronos use the 8R family of movements which are modular. This is a less impressive, less interesting way of making a chronograph as they're just adding a chronograph module on top of an existing movement.
The older 6S family are superior in the sense that it was designed as a chronograpgh from the start and the chrono features are integrated into the movement.

[Anonymous No.14826409]

>>14826404
Another way of summarizing the differences between the 6s and 8r are the display backs.
From the back, the 8r chronos look exactly like a normal watch since the chrono module is hidden from view on top of the normal movement.
With a 6s family movement the chronograph parts are visible from the back

[Anonymous No.14826422]

[Anonymous No.14826426]

booooring

[Anonymous No.14826428]

Slightly less boring

[Anonymous No.14826431]

>>14826426
Who cares what a movement looks like?

[Anonymous No.14826435]

>>14826431
Most people who pay more than a few hundred bucks for a watch.

[Anonymous No.14826441]

>>14826435
That's like being concerned what the engine in your car looks like. I'd care more about performance and durability.

[Anonymous No.14826461]

So basically, speaking from experience, Modern seiko chronos with the 8R movement should probably be avoided. They're super thick, they look boring from the back. they're kinda soulless with their chrono module slapped on top of a normal movement etc.

This is very unfortunate because the seiko chrono with the best looks (imo) has an 8R family movment, albeit a rare upgraded one with a grand seiko escapement. It's just lipstick on a pig. A modular movement like the 8R is never going to have the soul of a 6S. One is a cost cutting corporate product and the other was built form the start with a purpose
>>14826441
You're pushing shit uphill with that argument. Wearing a watch is already niche. Spending more than a few hundred bucks on a mechanical watch is even more niche. If you want to attempt to split hairs at that level go ahead.

[Anonymous No.14826476]

>>14825910
hairy arms and choice of shitters aside, she's super cute and has a gorgeous smile.

10/10 would wife

[Anonymous No.14826478]

>>14826476
>gorgeous smile.
Nigger that smile belongs on a comic book villain not someone you'd want to marry.

[Anonymous No.14826490]

>>14826478
post pic of your future wife then

also post pic of watch

[Anonymous No.14826500]

>>14826490
>future wife
>future

[Anonymous No.14826504]

>>14826500

still waiting bro

[Anonymous No.14826531]

>>14825910
Seiko is so cheap they hired a model with hairy arms so she can model men's watches too

[Anonymous No.14826535]

If I wanted a chronograph watch (non vintage) what are some good options to buy?

[Anonymous No.14826542]

>>14826531
I have no counterargument to this. Seikos decision to hire a woman/chiimpanzee hybrid is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.14826590]

Skelatonization is the process of cutting away the dial and plate and decoratively engraving the plate and sometimes the parts. A watch with an open dial and no decorative engraving is NOT a skeleton, it's just an open faced watch.
That is what skeletonization means yes, it doesn't just mean an open dial watch. of course hamilton, oris etc have brought out open dial watches but they don't call them skeletons because of he lack of hand engraving, the lack of skeletonization.

t. Handengraver and wikipedia moderator.

Yours,
William Gordon Huntly.

[Anonymous No.14826597]

>>14826590
All wikipedia moderators are 100% pure human trash and their opinions should be ignored.

If they had any intergirty at all they wouldn't be wikipedia moderators.

[Anonymous No.14826640]

Do you like my engraved watch, /wt/?

[Anonymous No.14826654]

>>14826597
No. We've already established that you're wrong.

[Anonymous No.14826659]

>>14826654
Exactly what pure human trash trying to cover their ass would say

[Anonymous No.14826762]

>>14826640

[Anonymous No.14826808]

any decent nigger friday deals?

[Anonymous No.14826816]

>>14826404
>While it's theoretically possible for that to be a 90's watch it's more likely to be from the 2000's
Did I ask when it's from retard? I know exactly when it's from and what it is, why the fuck would you feel invited to "correct" me on literal facts? Reread the fucking post and stop spewing your misinformed "wisdom" if you don't have an answer to the actual question. And get a trip so no one else falls for your idiotic rants that have no basis in reality.

[Anonymous No.14826982]

>>14826125
Live in Melb, but will be spending time in Adelaide and Port Douglas.

[Anonymous No.14826987]

>>14826535
bump

[Anonymous No.14826997]

>>14826987
Is that yours? Very nice.
The standard amphibia handset is so fucking perfect.

[Anonymous No.14826999]

Mechanial Tuna!

[Anonymous No.14827007]

>>14826999
Mechanical* kek
Its been a bit over a month since I had these and all three are running and working great by the way.
Easily some of my favorite buys and I'll be wearing them for years to come.
Strange how just being mechanical makes me so much more attached to a watch, when I owned a quartz tuna I loved the case shape but the dial, handset and movement just didn't compel me to wear it like these do.

Anyone else feel this way about quartz? Watches with ticking hands or really smooth sweeps just seem soulless to me.

[Anonymous No.14827113]

bullhead chrono on bund is such a chad look

[Anonymous No.14827141]

>>14827113
Christ, look at the tasteful thickness of it

[Anonymous No.14827274]

Post thick watches

[Anonymous No.14827276]

>>14827113
I'd give margaret a ride

[Anonymous No.14827290]

>>14825910
literally literally too retard to reverse search, whom is this goddess?
I wear a Casio F95w to work and a Raymond Weil for play.

[Anonymous No.14827521]

>>14827274
I really thought about getting this but the lug to lug (55mm) is just to big for me (7 inch wrist) I love the watch tho!

[Anonymous No.14827655]

Sup, dead general.
I fucked up a guy good in the ass last summer. How do you guys keep said cunts in line eryday?

[Anonymous No.14827788]

>>14827113
What film is that from?

[Anonymous No.14827886]

>>14827788
OUATIH.

[Anonymous No.14827966]

>want to buy my first watch
>maybe i will just start cheap and get a shitter seiko
>if i pay a bit extra i can get a seiko sarb033
>if i spend a bit more i can shop in the $1k bracket
>rather than spend $1k on something i only kinda want i should rather spend $2k on something i will really like
>if i spend just a little more i can get a vintage rolex datejust or a vintage universal geneve polerouter or vintage omega seamaster
>i could spend $3k on that or just save till $5k and get a new tudor or a used speedy.
>if im going to spend $5k on a shitter i might as well save and go all out and get something that i will enjoy forever like a rolex explorer or a no date sub.
>end up buying nothing

>repeat

[Anonymous No.14828025]

[Anonymous No.14828064]

[Anonymous No.14828080]

>>14828064
I can't believe how cheap and shitty some of these look.

[Anonymous No.14828085]

[Anonymous No.14828094]

>>14828080
The cream dial and lumed font is based upon a vintage inspired design. It's the most casual looking perpetual calendar Patek have made in many years. Hell it could be worn as a daily and no one would glance twice at it unless they were a watch nerd.

[Anonymous No.14828322]

>>14826441
Lol the only reason people by a watch is because they look sweet and the engineering is cool. A nice looking movement addels to that. Spergs like you should stick with casios

[Anonymous No.14828365]

Anyone recognizes what watch he’s wearing?

[Anonymous No.14828434]

>>14827966
Haha I like it when people get stuck in this loop and cant break it. So stupid

[Anonymous No.14828472]

>>14827655
In the UK we just stab cunts

[Anonymous No.14828482]

Sweeeet

[Anonymous No.14828553]

>>14827966
Any particular watch you like at $2k?
Depending on how hard it is for you to save up, I'd buy some cheap but nice classic watch in the $500-1K range, like the sarb033. Or a used higher end brand like omega or Breitling for ~$2k. Avoid overpriced ETA shitters in the +$1k-3k like sinn, TAG, Oris etc.
And start save up for a rolex if you really want one, in worst case you ended up with a lot of saved extra cash.

[Anonymous No.14828602]

>>14827966
Get a Citizen eco-drive or an Orient. Don't waste 5k when you don't even know what you want, idiot.

[Anonymous No.14828656]

>>14828482
Isn't this the shitter 80hr powermatic movement swatch is putting into tissots, longines and midos that is full of "plastic" parts and is for the most part unregulatable and ultimately disposable?

[Anonymous No.14828738]

>>14828656
Nope, no plastic in this. Also fully able to regulate. This does less than + 2spd, in every position, or on the wrist.

[Anonymous No.14828763]

>>14828472
You got a loicence for that time-telling machine ?

[Anonymous No.14828778]

>>14828025
Ironic.
How bourgeoisie.

[Anonymous No.14828839]

>>14828094
>no one would glance twice
No shit, it looks like a Timex.

[Anonymous No.14828840]

is there a vostok amphibian that's about the same size and weight as the new seiko turtles?

[Anonymous No.14828846]

>>14828840
710 case maybe?

[Anonymous No.14828857]

>>14828846
ya, was looking at that or the 090 but would really like to see a side-by-side comparison with the seiko or hear from someone who has both

[Anonymous No.14828867]

>>14828857
Different anon, i do have both a turtle and a 710.

I'll post a picture later on.

[Anonymous No.14828888]

>>14828867
sweet, thanks mang

[Anonymous No.14828899]

>>14827966
take the vostok pill

[Anonymous No.14828901]

>>14827788
Once upon a time in Hollywood, Tarantino, came out this summer.

[Anonymous No.14828908]

>>14828738
>he doesn't know
stupid faggots like you ruined watches

[Anonymous No.14828914]

>>14828656
But anon, only omeeega is allowed to have higher beatrates. If hamilton shitters run at a higher BR than the cuck-axials how can swatch ever achieve proper market segmentation??!

[Anonymous No.14828918]

>>14828840
710 and 150

[Anonymous No.14828936]

>>14828472
>Hasty transportable wrist bong check m8, today I'm wearing a fokkin' Longines.

[Anonymous No.14828957]

>>14828888
>dem quads

You're getting a couple more pics.

[Anonymous No.14828961]

>>14828957
The 710 is smaller in all regards, however is slightly taller by 1mm because of the crystal.

[Anonymous No.14828962]

>>14828961
However the main difference between the 710 and 090 is that the case is more THICC that the 710 but still overall not as wide as the Turtle. (Same goes to the 150, which is the 090 but without the hooded lugs)

[Anonymous No.14828969]

Thinking of getting one of these. Opinions?

[Anonymous No.14829016]

The Cognitive dissonance that enables people to buy a 3K IWC/Tudor/Breitling ETA watch while scoffing at grand quartz watches where they literally grow their own quartz, seal the movements and allow for regulation meaning it will last 50+ years. The concept of value in the luxury watch market is retarded.

[Anonymous No.14829057]

>>14829016
If I was paying for technical features I'd buy a smartphone retard?

[Anonymous No.14829074]

MVMT?

[Anonymous No.14829078]

>>14829074

[Anonymous No.14829091]

>>14829078
well.
ok

[Anonymous No.14829116]

>>14829057
Ah yes, completely disregard the dial work and finishing. You are a little turd. A significant amount of workmanship can go into a quartz movement. Enjoy your 2824 No.8371923941 you little cuck.

[Anonymous No.14829132]

>>14829116
>Ah yes, completely disregard the dial work and finishing.
Alright post some good looking Jap quartz shitters that are in the league of Sinn, Speedy, or Fortis, design-wise and don't just look like shiny mall shitters for soulless Jap bugmen.

[Anonymous No.14829139]

>>14828957
>>14828961
>>14828962
nice, thanks anon. DAMN I like the Amphibias a lot but I'd like them so much better if they were shaped just a little bit more like the Turtles.

[Anonymous No.14829154]

>>14829139
I'd recommend either the 670, 420 or 090 case as those are the most unique in comparison with some of the other cases.

But honestly that's up to you, i've seen some mad lads do nice stuff by brushing either the 710 or 090 cases and giving them a brushed SS bezel for some great results. Also can slap an aftermarket bracelet.

[Anonymous No.14829183]

rolexcucks btfo

[Anonymous No.14829190]

haha cool spring anon

[Anonymous No.14829191]

>>14829183
>not much of a difference
>completely different everything
wat

[Anonymous No.14829193]

>>14829132
Same price as a mid tier sinn and a thousand cheaper than a made in china plastic filled speed“ master”

[Anonymous No.14829216]

>>14829193
Except that it looks like a mall shitter Rolex ripoff, you can't wear that with anything if you're a normal person and not a Jap salaryman.

[Anonymous No.14829286]

>>14828908
Does it look like that watch has a chronograph retard?

[Anonymous No.14829309]

>>14827966
The answer is F-91W

[Anonymous No.14829331]

>>14827966
>maybe I will just start cheap and get a shitter
You already have the answer you seek

[Anonymous No.14829338]

Copped this one on sale for 38€, I fucking love Casios

[Anonymous No.14829354]

>>14829286
Where do you think the 80 hr PR is coming from you fucking monkey?
It's a "synthetic" escapement.
swatchniggers need to be put down already.

[Anonymous No.14829368]

>>14829354
The non COSC version does have a plastic escapement, but that has nothing to do with the power reserve. The increased pr comes from slowing the beat rate.

[Anonymous No.14829382]

>>14829183
The movement on the right literally says miyota on it, it's not even remotely trying to be a copy. If instead you're asserting that there's no functional difference then look up the performance specs of any rolex movement vs that fucking 8215 you mouth breather
>>14829216
>Rolex ripoff
The mental gymnastics on both sides are fucking baffling.

[Anonymous No.14829395]

>>14829193
>full super penis dial
absolutely based

[Anonymous No.14829401]

>>14829368
I've read that the synthetic or composite or whatever the fuck escapement helps with friction or some shit? Wouldn't that help pr in some way?
Wait so the virtually any basic 2824 could double their PR of you just magically slowed the beat? Is that all there is to it?

Someone on WUS once sent a message to Mido to ask about their implementation of this 80 hour movement and the rep replied that none of mido's watches with these moments "use plastic parts".
Now whether that's just a bold faced lie or just BS spewed by the typically clueless CS agents of any brand or just them answering with regards to a technicality ("oh it's not *plastic* per se so..."), who can say.

But Mido has always felt discernably less shitty than Tissot to me in regards to the swatch totempole. Certina is bottom, just above swatch itself, then Tissot. Maybe Longines edges past Mido but not by much imo. Anyway, I'd think it possible that different brands in the group utilize different kinds of movements in different ways so though Tissot say plastic in all but cosc, despite my misgivings with the swetch group in general, it wouldn't surprise me if Mido used no plastic at all in any iteration if these new movements.
But who can attest to the truth anyway?
Want to buy a Mido and strip it to bits?
I've always been fond of the classic commander model.

[Anonymous No.14829469]

jade dial

[Anonymous No.14829491]

>>14829309
this unironically

[Anonymous No.14829512]

beautiful

[Anonymous No.14829584]

>>14829512
is this the Godzilla Grand Seiko?

[Anonymous No.14829619]

>>14828553
What's the hamilton one in the pic called?

[Anonymous No.14829633]

late night shitposting commences

[Anonymous No.14829662]

Rolex collaboration watches are my grail

[Anonymous No.14829681]

>>14829633
How does it feel to own the second best dato?

[Anonymous No.14829688]

>>14829662

[Anonymous No.14829696]

Have a great weekend, flaming nomos.

[Anonymous No.14829718]

>>14829681
I don't like platinum watches in general (yet)
I always go for rose gold on all of my watches because I feel like it's more youthful while platinum is more sophisticated.
So I might switch preferences when I get older.
Also the 403.032 I own is a few thousand bucks cheaper than the 403.035 which made the choice extra easy for me.

[Anonymous No.14829732]

>>14829718
Rose gold works better with light faces imo, and you're missing out on the panda dial, but it's still a god tier watch
If I had one in pink gold it'd be the 1815 with silver dial (still my all time holy grail) but then again I can't afford either so why bother living

[Anonymous No.14829780]

>>14829732
Was drawn to the 1815 in that configuration first but
>it was more expensive
>it was bigger
>it had more prominent lugs
>I felt the panorama date was a must on a Lange

[Anonymous No.14829870]

>>14829696
based ugly hamilton poster

[Anonymous No.14829975]

Is this the closest I can get to a Tudor BB GMT?
I have enough for it but I can think of 10 better things to do with 4k than spend it on a watch
Sadly the only GMTs in the under 1k range are ETA shitters, quartz, chink trash and vostoks (probably my favorite watches)
Not my pic obviously

[Anonymous No.14829989]

>>14829975
Chinese do decent BB clones. Search Corguet. You can get it with their gay brand name or with a sterile (no logo) dial. Or you can even get a BB replica for less than 100buckz, search for 'aaa luxury' on aliexpress.

[Anonymous No.14830002]

>>14829870
Thanks, you to.

[Anonymous No.14830008]

>>14829989
I looked into that, it uses a shitty DG movement. If I'm paying money for something I'd like to actually use it as a watch.
Also a hoemajie that close is basically a rep, it would always feel like cheap shit to me.
The 'stock is its own thing, and if I swap the bezel out it, I think it would scratch that itch while also being a watch I can appreciate.

[Anonymous No.14830104]

which is the chad wrist to wear your watch?

[Anonymous No.14830126]

What is a nice womens watch for around $2-$3 thousand?

[Anonymous No.14830132]

>>14830126
Some sort of quartz cartier maybe?

[Anonymous No.14830142]

>>14830126
cartier, chanelle, tom ford

[Anonymous No.14830168]

https://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/sinn-103-speedmaster-4382978.html

I have this same dilemma, what do you think /wt/? Speedy is nice but it seems like such a generic reddit option. And I probably won't be building a massive watch collection, I just want 2-3 watches max.

[Anonymous No.14830171]

>>14830168
I went with another chronograph personally. Has a lemania 1873 which is what the (modern) speedy movement is based on anyway.

[Anonymous No.14830495]

I liek shinny watchs

[Anonymous No.14830549]

>>14830171
dope

[Anonymous No.14830581]

>>14830171
Can you make a photo of it next to some generic item for size reference? Ive read they are 34-36mm, hard to imagine.

[Anonymous No.14830601]

>>14829401
The synthetic escapement is because its self lubricating so doesn't require oiling.
Think about it logically, the power reserve it based on it beating a certain amount of times, if you reduce the amount that happens the power will last longer. That's why the VC Twin Beat can be switched to 1.2hz (8640 bph), that way it gets 65 days of PR to keep the perpetual calendar going.

[Anonymous No.14830605]

>>14830581
It's 36mm, the proportions are nigh identical to the 1960s original. In case you happen to have a sega saturn controller handy, here.

[Anonymous No.14830614]

>>14830126
pls suck my dick

[Anonymous No.14830621]

>>14830171

Love that dial. Am afraid the lugs would be a little long for me, sadly. Very nice.

[Anonymous No.14830624]

>>14829975

Don't buy the BB if you're hesitant. As an alternative, maybe look at Chris Ward?

[Anonymous No.14830629]

>>14829633

Hnnnnggg. Very very based.

[Anonymous No.14830630]

>>14830621
Lug to lug is about 43mm, not that long really.

[Anonymous No.14830631]

Anyone here with 5-5.5 inch wrists wearing womens watches? Even 38mm seems kinda big for my wrists

[Anonymous No.14830652]

Wist watch check phuckers I'm wearing a MANNN ON THE FFF- noooo.. a Speemaster Board Arrow

[Anonymous No.14830667]

>>14829975
I agree with this guy >>14830624 the C65 GMT is pretty cool.

[Anonymous No.14830693]

>>14830171
>>14830581
>>14830605
These look so much nicer. Never liked the speedy but did not understand why. After experience with small watches i see exactly why the speedmaster looks so off to me. Proportions are very important and bigger watches look silly. Even on a big wrist a 36mm watch won't look silly.

[Anonymous No.14830703]

>>14830693
Speedy literally has perfect proportions for a chrono with a bezel though.

[Anonymous No.14830712]

>>14828365
It's some old ana-digi seiko/citizen.
You can get the casio aq230 in gold with a black dial and put a leather strap on it.

[Anonymous No.14830717]

[Anonymous No.14830719]

>>14830717

[Anonymous No.14830725]

It's so heavy and big
I love it

[Anonymous No.14830772]

>>14830693
The slim bezel is what makes it.

[Anonymous No.14830774]

>>14830719
soul

>>14830717
soulless

[Anonymous No.14830787]

>>14829469
>Those gigantic numerals

Is this a watch for old people with those Jitterbug-sized numbers?

[Anonymous No.14830813]

Daily reminder that watch collecting is serious mental disorder and you should all seek help.

[Anonymous No.14830823]

>>14829469
Full jade for soviet buff.

[Anonymous No.14830830]

>>14830813
Collecting is fine as long as you don't make it the main interesting point of your personality. Or feel like an elitist because you paid for a certain watch.
But when i see shit like people on YT talking about the rolex waitlist and other dumb marketing they fall for, then i can't deny your point. Or when people start arguing that mechanical watches are the only true thing or that they will get pussy with a certain brand.

[Anonymous No.14830836]

>>14830667
christopher faggot are worn by people that look like this.
Literal reddit watch, no thanks.

[Anonymous No.14830837]

>>14830813
That Bill Gates. A real fashion icon ...

[Anonymous No.14830840]

>>14829469
>>14830823
Honestly looks like someone froze some vomit and used it for a dial.

[Anonymous No.14830852]

>>14830631
Yes, 34mm fits just fine.

[Anonymous No.14830857]

>>14830840
Yep, jade can look great but under a certain light. And i never understood the appeal of it. Maybe some tradition from times when it was more popular among women.

[Anonymous No.14830874]

>>14830126
Please ask somewhere else, this thread is mad retarded. I would still suggest Omega De Ville (without the blood and diamonds).

[Anonymous No.14830879]

>>14830631
I have a bigger wrists, about 16,5-17 cm circumference but i still wear small watches and they look great.
Wearing the MTP-1094Q-7B1 very often, also have a MQ-24 and a small, field watch from MWC. All of them around 32 mm.
I respect that you go for smaller watches and don't care about them being female models. People with smaller wrists that go for the big watches, that always looks a bit strange.

[Anonymous No.14830895]

>>14830836
Whatever, get the Tudor then faggot.

[Anonymous No.14830906]

>>14825910
I don't know why I've always found woman with hair on their body attractive, but I assume its my latent homosexuality.

[Anonymous No.14830924]

>>14830906
no it just means you are a virgin. all women have hair on their body.

[Anonymous No.14830953]

Can /wt/ recommend a dive watch that is modern themed? All I see are faux-vintage dive watches.

Something like the CW trident but without the shitty logo. Or the Omega Planet Ocean but not so huge

[Anonymous No.14830974]

>>14830953
> All I see are faux-vintage dive watches.
Then just buy a real vintage watch.

[Anonymous No.14830986]

>>14830974
I don't want somebody's old watch

[Anonymous No.14831014]

>>14830953
What would a 'modern theme' even consist of??

[Anonymous No.14831026]

>>14830953
You could just get the 39,5mm Planet Ocean.

[Anonymous No.14831033]

>>14831014
I mean one that doesn't have fake patina, old fashioned font, fake riveted bracelet etc.

>>14831026
It's still really thick because of the co-axial movement

[Anonymous No.14831114]

>>14830874
Looks like a 10-20 buck watch you can get from any and all bijou shops. Womens watches are a meme.

[Anonymous No.14831125]

>>14830953

[Anonymous No.14831133]

Love the way this recent cop reflects sunlight

[Anonymous No.14831136]

>>14830953
See >14831133

[Anonymous No.14831141]

>>14831136
See
>>14831133
>(Sorry, phonefag here)

[Anonymous No.14831153]

>>14831125
this has to be a joke.

[Anonymous No.14831159]

>>14830717
no

[Anonymous No.14831186]

What do you think lads. Hammie khaki field with eta 2801 for $285. Yay or any?

[Anonymous No.14831223]

>>14831186
>take movement that grinds itself to dust when hand wound
>make it hand wind only
You tell me retard

[Anonymous No.14831280]

>>14831223
>being that retarded and not reading that those specific issues are only with the 2824, which uses a different winding mechanism

[Anonymous No.14831285]

>>14831280
2081 is the same movement with the rotor removed.
The issue never got properly solved. It's "fixed" on the selita version 1-2 but I wouldn't trust that either.
It's a shit designed movement like everything else that came out of swatch since '95

[Anonymous No.14831307]

>>14831285
>2801* is the same movement with the rotor removed.

Not exactly. They're both based on the same platform but just saying "hurr durr it's a the same shitty movement without a rotor" is just showing how retarded you are.

The ETA 2824 has two issues with handwinding, first in the weaker keyless works as the crown wheel is more delicate as it has a lot more teeth on the gear and they are smaller while the 2801 has less and larger teeth on said gear. The second issue is that the reversing wheels have very delicate pawls in them that have a tendency to break/wear over time, and only in the automatic winding mechanism that's only found on the 2824

[Anonymous No.14831355]

>>14830725
That’s what she said

[Anonymous No.14831388]

>>14831307
the keyless works are still fucked, it s a basic design problem. They're made to have fixable weak points to force you to service your watch.
https://forums.watchuseek.com/f357/hamilton-hand-winding-eta-2801-crown-1-5-position-4859979.html
It's also a shitty case with basically 0 WR.
Buy the low end swatch shitter, I really don't care.

[Anonymous No.14831402]

Shitter reporting in.

[Anonymous No.14831471]

>>14831402
old world time looked cleaner imo

[Anonymous No.14831483]

>>14831186
Great looking watch, would get it. But if you are unsure due to the arguments here>>14831307
>>14831388, you could just get a quartz shitter.
Google for MWC desert. 34mm, domed plastic glass. I paid 42€ last year. Nice watch and looks lovely in 34mm and with the sand coating. The khaki also has too long lugs so this will be a pain when you put a strap on it.

[Anonymous No.14831494]

>>14831483
But this person
>>14831223
>>14831285
>>14831388
clearly has no idea what they're talking about, so >>14831186 should disregard them

[Anonymous No.14831498]

>>14831494
I've heard about the grinding problem too, but not sure if it also is a thing in the hamiltons movement. Best thing would be he does some research to be sure. This movement surely went into a lot of other watches so there is def. data on this topic.

[Anonymous No.14831511]

>>14831498
All the documented issues with handwinding are on the ETA 2824, and only when not properly serviced, as a basic google would show. That anon clearly forgot that it didn't apply to the 280x and is trying to damage control by linking some one random forum post from one person whose keyless works didn't click perfectly.

[Anonymous No.14831545]

>>14831511
>and only when not properly serviced
on all of them. Also, who the fuck services an ETA? Are you retarded?
>one person
at least 3 people fell for the youtube shilling just in that thread and have the same issue.
I don't care if you buy it, just fuck off with the ignorance on swatches judaism

[Anonymous No.14831596]

>>14831545
For the record, I asked about the watch and none of the other posts were mine. What would you suggest instead? I'm def still considering the hamilton because I like handwinding and I dont have a field watch

[Anonymous No.14831601]

>>14831596
The Hamilton 280x are the best value mechanical watch in that price range by a significant amount.

[Anonymous No.14831605]

Should I spend $2000 on magic cards or a new watch?

[Anonymous No.14831607]

>>14831605
probably not, no

[Anonymous No.14831611]

>>14831605
might as well send me the money

[Anonymous No.14831614]

>>14831605
The cards are magic? I always thought it was the guy doing the tricks?

[Anonymous No.14831622]

>>14830953
There aren't any good looking ones imo

[Anonymous No.14831624]

>>14830953
Just get a Promaster eco-drive

[Anonymous No.14831626]

>>14831596
komandirskie

[Anonymous No.14831644]

>>14831307
>an original discussion over movements
Based

[Anonymous No.14831649]

Thoughts on the Valjoux 7750?

[Anonymous No.14831651]

>quartz is more accurate
>watch fanboys hate it

why

[Anonymous No.14831662]

To any of you with valuable watch collections or pieces, I have to ask. What is your home security system like? Where do you keep your watches? Do you live with anyone else? Do you keep a gun under your bed? Is anyone else at your home while you work?

[Anonymous No.14831669]

>>14831662
STOP TRYING TO BREAK INTO MY HOUSE AND ROB ME, NIGGER

[Anonymous No.14831713]

chinks are apeing fucking vostok now kek

[Anonymous No.14831718]

>>14831601
>Hamilton
>best anything
a fool and his money etc etc

[Anonymous No.14831723]

>>14831494
>>14831644
I thought i made it rather clear the guy is talking out of his ass.

It's part of the design since the idea is that the autowind mechanism engaged with the crown wheel as well. The autowind gear train is basically the rotor gear connected to the two reversing wheels and two reduction gears one after the other which in the end connect to the crownwheel.

And as the autowind is supposed to charge a lot less per turn than a handwind to put less stress on the movement so it makes sense. Is it a good design choice? Not necessarily but it's still better to have an option to handwind it a bit rather than go the simpler approach like Seiko at the time (1970's) with the 61XX cal and 7XXX cal movements not having handwinding. Albeit the Seiko's having a more sophisticated/better/simpler autowind mechanism a la magic finger (And also the 83XX cal movements from the late 60's with reversing gears).

[Anonymous No.14831749]

>>14831649
say the name out loud and that should tip you off

[Anonymous No.14831760]

>>14831723
And I said that eventually the winding will start to slip because the keyless works are garbage on ETAs.
if a fucking vostok can have a fully jeweled powertrain with proper handwinding and reversing gear bi-directional rotor winding theres no fucking excuse for this horseshit.

[Anonymous No.14831826]

>>14831760
>And I said that eventually the winding will start to slip because the keyless works are garbage on ETAs.
Maybe, I've had and sold ETA 27XX's and 2472's that were well worn but still worked well as they were serviced and weren't beat to shit.

The 2824-2 is so well documented because they've been sticking it in every low to mid end automatic for years, and it's this specific movement that has the gear train issue with the crown wheel. (IIRC isn't even considered part of the keyless works as it's a gear)

>if a fucking vostok can have a fully jeweled powertrain with proper handwinding and reversing gear bi-directional rotor winding theres no fucking excuse for this horseshit.

Yet a Vostok has no hacking, no quicksetting, much lesser performance OOB and is generally much more crudely made/finished. And i've seen Vostoks that have had some very wonky winding over the years, mostly from wear and abuse like any other watch. They are also rather easy to work on. (Except that seconds hand spring with the small annoying screw)

And though the automatic gear train is similar in general layout but on a Vostok 2416 instead of two reduction gears and and it being connected to the crown wheel it has a reduction wheel and a part that reminds me of chronograph clutch of a Seiko 613X chrono and connects directly to the mainspring ratchet (IIRC called a pinion). However that makes the movement overall taller.

t. somebody who had at least 10 Vostoks and worked on some of them

[Anonymous No.14831874]

>>14831749
Kek

[Anonymous No.14831932]

Vostoks are ugly, and only ugly people wear them.

[Anonymous No.14831972]

>>14831932
swatchlet cope.

[Anonymous No.14831989]

What watches do lawyers, especially corporate lawyers, wear?

[Anonymous No.14831998]

>>14829074
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH

Holy shit, good one.

[Anonymous No.14832006]

>>14831989
Dress watches from respectable brands, such as the big 3 or JLC. The only acceptable sports watch would be a chrono, and even that would need to be tasteful.

[Anonymous No.14832013]

>>14830171
>I went with another chronograph personally. Has a lemania 1873 which is what the (modern) speedy movement is based on anyway.
It doesn't even have a bezel.

[Anonymous No.14832018]

What's a good quality aesthetic watch to wear when you don't want to appear too rich in a third world country? So it has to be something below Omega/Rolex.

[Anonymous No.14832019]

>>14832013
No but it does have a decimeter.

[Anonymous No.14832024]

>>14832018
Choose a type (diver, chrono, field, dress, etc.), and i’ll rec you some watches.

[Anonymous No.14832049]

>>14831989
A ton of Apple watches, Rolex Datejusts.
If they are actually successful they will wear PP Calatrava, Lange Saxonia, AP classic ultra thin, VC Historiques.

[Anonymous No.14832050]

>>14832024
Anything that can be worn with poor people clothes, so chrono/diver/field, and nothing over 44mm because that looks ridiculous, 40-42 would be ideal.

I thought of getting something like a vintage Heuer or some shit like that, that literally no one would know about in the first place, but it seems stupid to waste money on that, would be better to buy a Speedmaster + one poorfag watch instead for the price.

[Anonymous No.14832056]

>>14832049
>If they are actually successful they will wear PP Calatrava, Lange Saxonia, AP classic ultra thin, VC Historiques.
So when they become successful their brains turn to mush and they start liking retarded generic looking shit?

[Anonymous No.14832067]

Thoughts? Really thinking I want to buy this for myself as a graduation present

[Anonymous No.14832081]

>>14832067
Don't buy a blue dial. And how big is it? Looks like a dinner plate.

[Anonymous No.14832085]

>>14832050
A speedmaster will still attract attention from some people, and retard third worlders will probably think every diver with a polished steel case and a dark dial is a Rolex. The vintage Heuer is actually not a bad call, but nu-TAG has an air of shitterness that might eventually poison your opinion of it.

Field watches would probably be the safest bet if you can find one you like. Hamiltons are popular choices, or you could look at fliegers from Laco and Stowa and such.

If you want a chrono, I’d look at the Poljot Aviator.

[Anonymous No.14832087]

Aight fags, recommend me a watch that looks decent and its under 30usd

[Anonymous No.14832089]

>>14832067
The Petit Prince model owns. It really is fuckhuge though, not only in diameter, but thickness too (for the chrono).

[Anonymous No.14832091]

>>14832087
Just sharpie one onto your wrist like Patrick Star y

[Anonymous No.14832113]

>>14832081
43mm which is pretty normal I feel for a chrono pilot watch.
Any other good alternatives in the 40mm range that you know of I'd love to hear about

[Anonymous No.14832119]

I love my little air king. One of my favorite watches but for those who perhaps are a bit put off by smaller sizes, try silver or white dials. In many instances like this it helps it to visually blend in with the case to get a bit of a larger visual footprint. Darker dials would disappear.

[Anonymous No.14832123]

>>14832087
I would go for one of the square retro styled casios. Always classically styled and can give a modern retro vibe. Also feels like a purposeful choice rather than just budget option.

[Anonymous No.14832127]

>>14832087

[Anonymous No.14832141]

>>14832087

[Anonymous No.14832144]

Here’s a gem I adore. Steinhart Explorer 39. First yes it is a homage to explorer dial subs but differed in a few ways. The case profile is actually more similar to an Oris divers 65 than a submariner which while normally I prefer the oyster case, this choice really helps push home the vintage inspired aesthetic. A bit cheeky on the dial doing a two line setup with 100m for vintage touch but it’s still rated to 300m so is still a great functional piece. Bezel is aluminum helping to keep to the vintage feel and the slightly domed sapphire while contributing a bit to thickness does the same. It’s not a thick watch by any means and slips well under the cuff of a sweater but specs and practical dimensions don’t line up here. The dial is done with a subdued aged look and thankfully the logo is as well unlike with the OVM. This lets it fade into the background and let it feel function driven. Also the bracelet is a dream, wears a lot like my real oysters but better clasp than my vintage Rolex’s. Also the articulating mid link means it wears even on my tiny wrists. And with an Elaboré grade eta movement (mine is getting +4 s/d) it’s a reliable tank. Yes a bit homage esc but it’s more in line with the inspired rather than copy, that and pulls from basically unobtainum references that I wouldn’t want to beat up even if I had one.

[Anonymous No.14832149]

>>14832087
double your budget and get an amphibia

[Anonymous No.14832153]

>>14832144
stopped reading at steinshart

[Anonymous No.14832160]

>>14832153
Thats fair. I avoided the brand for a while until my curiosity got the better of me and I wanted to actually make opinions based on experience rather than bias.

[Anonymous No.14832168]

[Anonymous No.14832182]

Is there a single better watch to wear while enjoying a $150 Michelin-starred meal consisting of a mayo marinated chicken breast wrapped in a corn tortilla, pommes de terre frites with delicious aioli garlic accoutrements, medium-rare breaded chicken piccatas with freshly ground black pepper and a selection of honey and buttermilk fried buffalo wings?

When I made my selection the waiter not only complimented me on my fine taste in luxury cuisine, but also my fine taste in haute horology.

[Anonymous No.14832191]

>>14832182
Its not bad, its a gorgeous watch but its not Haute horology. At best it could be considered 'strong' horology. Looks good but yea, there are terms for a reason lol.

[Anonymous No.14832193]

>>14832191
Breitling is undeniably haute horology, they are on equal footing with Patek and JLC.

[Anonymous No.14832194]

>>14832182
I hope you didn't really pay $150 for those greasy chips

[Anonymous No.14832202]

>>14832168
make one but sub vs amphibia

[Anonymous No.14832205]

>>14832182
nigga shut the fuck up and eat your tendies

[Anonymous No.14832206]

>>14832194
I paid $150 for the meal and left a $50 tip.

[Anonymous No.14832207]

>>14832193
Patek and JLC aren't Haute Horology either lol. They are up there and you could consider some of their top models in Haute horology but their average watches very much are not.
I encourage you to pursue more sources of information for your future readings. Heck if you want a good place to start try the yearly Wrist Watch Annual books. Although they don't always dive into the esoteric nature of true Haute Horology.

[Anonymous No.14832231]

>>14832206
Was the blow job from the waiter really that good?

[Anonymous No.14832274]

>>14832085
>A speedmaster will still attract attention from some people
Did you even read my post?
>retard third worlders will probably think every diver with a polished steel case and a dark dial is a Rolex
Yeah not reading the rest of the post, you've got some shit in your head you need to sort out first.

[Anonymous No.14832277]

>>14832182
Do Americans really pay $150 for nuggets and chips?

[Anonymous No.14832282]

>>14832182
Is your boipussy as smooth as your arm?

[Anonymous No.14832287]

Is a strap like this on a Speedmaster /fa/?

[Anonymous No.14832316]

>>14832287
No, looks like some steampunk LARP shit.

[Anonymous No.14832318]

>>14832287
yea, round holes look better... these could have looked ok smaller but this just feels, off

[Anonymous No.14832375]

>>14831402
thoughts on this shitter?

[Anonymous No.14832376]

>>14832287
It’s called a rally strap, and it’s not gonna look as cool irl as you intend.

[Anonymous No.14832381]

>>14832375
Deus Ex called, it wants its EMP grenade back.

[Anonymous No.14832387]

>>14832067
get the black dial

[Anonymous No.14832400]

>>14832182
Meanwhile at the seamaster table, I'd like the superocean if they didn't fuck the bezel up so hard.

[Anonymous No.14832426]

>>14832400
That doesn't look anywhere near as delicious or sophisticated.

[Anonymous No.14832440]

>>14832426
You don't like crumpets and clotted cream?

[Anonymous No.14832444]

>>14832440
Crumpets don't go with sugar and cream.

[Anonymous No.14832468]

>>14832426
>>14832440
>>14832444

souffle pancakes, you degenerates.

[Anonymous No.14832474]

>>14832426
>>14832440
>>14832444

Just turn you phone.

[Anonymous No.14832478]

>>14832468
they look like english muffins

[Anonymous No.14832500]

>>14832478
God I need to start doing wrist shots with my meals. Google them.

[Anonymous No.14832596]

>>14832089
>>14832067
The Spitfire is 41mm.

[Anonymous No.14832604]

>>14832596
mah pic

[Anonymous No.14832783]

>>14832596
Damn, I didn't know that. The Spitfire is now my number one watch I'm interested in. Thanks anon for bringing that to my attention.

>>14832604
I like it in steel more. Personal preference.

[Anonymous No.14833031]

>>14832119
That's almost overhanging your wrist and it's probably 34mm.

[Anonymous No.14833162]

Picture of my 1960's chooder from yesterday. It's fucking freezing here in the UK right now.

[Anonymous No.14833190]

>>14832783
Nice cut 11 and 10.

[Anonymous No.14833237]

Vacheron is going to announce a new Patrimony later this week. It's 36mm in Rosegold/Blue.

Do they think people will actually buy this ugly watch?

[Anonymous No.14833243]

>>14833237
The manual wind traditionelles have better proportions and the have a better design too.

[Anonymous No.14833303]

>>14832500
Unironically love this concept and will start doing it from now on, shitters on the wrist with expensive meals.

[Anonymous No.14833325]

Any cool minute repeater watches like the one in drive?

[Anonymous No.14833341]

>>14826816
>>14825971

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00189VBL4/
This is the one I got my dad for his birthday. Looks kinda similar.

[Anonymous No.14833353]

>>14833237
lmao this brand is fucked, absolutely in no way is it part of the holy trinity.

[Anonymous No.14833364]

>>14833353
AP is undeserving too.
There is no holy trinity.
It's a concept that's no longer relevant today, if it ever was at all by the time some fag on a watch forum 25 years ago came up with it.

[Anonymous No.14833367]

>>14825910
Dios mio

[Anonymous No.14833432]

>>14833364
Also holy trinity is a puritan faggot name. Currently there are two kings: rolex and patek

[Anonymous No.14833438]

>>14828969
aesthetically I quite like it although I don't like that the only numerals are 3 and 9, I think you need the 6 but it's blocked by the date window

[Anonymous No.14833441]

>>14829696
this thing is ugly as sin

[Anonymous No.14833467]

>>14833190
He did it everyone
He posted it again

[Anonymous No.14833494]

>>14829696
I have a bad eyesight and thought this was going to be a real cat, I'm disappointed.

[Anonymous No.14833497]

>>14828899
>>14829512
>>14829633
Those are way too big for your small wrists, Jesus do you also wear clown shoes?

[Anonymous No.14833646]

>>14832119
literally the poorfags rolex
fuck off, you're retarded if you go below a sub

[Anonymous No.14833692]

>>14833646
Post your sub

[Anonymous No.14833700]

>>14833497
Not sure what you mean. They look fine to me.

[Anonymous No.14833881]

>budget
1.6k
>Movement
auto
>Style
Not dressy, I have a dress watch already
>Size
40mm and under

Rec me shit you faggots

[Anonymous No.14833921]

>>14833881
Oris Aquis, Longines Heritage, Festina titanium, G-Shock gold square[Q], Longines Hydroconquest, Hamilton Khaki field, Seiko SRPB, Certina diver, Bulova moon watch[Q], Rado captain cook, Brietling aerospace (used)[Q], Rolex oysterdate gold plated (used), Citizen Nighthawk[Q], Christopher Ward GMT, Meccaniche Veneziane Redentore, Tissot Visodate, Seiko Penis, Apple Watch Series 4 in Steel[D], Casio Ediface premium model[Q], Vintage Omega seamaster, omega speedmaster reduced (used), Timex S1, Ingersoll Bateman, Seiko Samurai, Seiko Turtle, Longines Legend Diver (used), Oris Big Crown Pointer, Hamilton GMT World Time, Montblanc World Time, Seagull Marine Star, Steinhart Ocean One.

[Anonymous No.14833947]

Why don't people like Tag Heuer? I think as a 41mm sports watch this looks nice.

[Anonymous No.14833959]

>>14833947
mallcore.

[Anonymous No.14833980]

>>14833646

Lol no. This is the rich man's everyday Rolex.

[Anonymous No.14834024]

Best chronograph movement under 2000usd? If not the le jew 7750

[Anonymous No.14834034]

>>14834024
Something with a lemania 5100 in it.

[Anonymous No.14834035]

Made a friend some stuff and got this Squale GMT in return, I love the faded lume and gray bezel. I've only ever had sub $300 automatics, my nicest watch up til now was a Pepsi so this is a substantial step up.

[Anonymous No.14834039]

>>14825971

[Anonymous No.14834059]

>>14834034
But anon! Nobody makes lemania 5100's anymore and vintage prices are way too fuckin high

[Anonymous No.14834065]

>>14834035
That's pretty nice, what did you make him?

Check the daily accuracy using WatchCheck app - it should be doing about 5spd gained or lost

[Anonymous No.14834072]

>>14834059
I'm sure you'll be able to find one under $2k. One anon got a lemania 5100 speedmaster for around $500 give or take.

[Anonymous No.14834073]

>>14834065
Thanks dude- one of my hobbies is leatherworking, I made him a toiletry bag, a wallet, and some other odds and ends.

[Anonymous No.14834083]

>>14833980
thats not a date just though wristlet

[Anonymous No.14834147]

>>14833881
>1.6k$
Buy something cheap.
Buy something less than 300$.
Every single new mechanical between 300 (less, ideally, >150) and at least about 4000 is a waste of money and provides nothing substantial for the coin. You're better off saving rather than blowing your load early on an unsatisfying ripoff.
Generic steel cases, bracelets, movements, all made in China, no matter whether it says "Swiss" or "Japan" on the dial, no matter the brand.
A case could be made for some German brands that actually make things in Germany and produce mainly tool watches that attempt to make up for things with advanced tech (eg. Damasko) and maybe Nomos if you can stomach the style (they look better in pics than in person, if at all), but you have to be into that shit and damasko has horrendous CS and are pretty fucking boring.

Buy cheap or buy expensive when it comes to mechs.
That middling ground of mediocrity is imo a waste of cash.

[Anonymous No.14834158]

>>14834035
Squale is an excrement brand and the Squale GMT is an excrement piece.

[Anonymous No.14834161]

>>14834158
Cool, I'll be enjoying it regardless haha

[Anonymous No.14834189]

>>14833947
Is that the one with a Seiko movement?

[Anonymous No.14834219]

>>14834083

Joke's on you, it's not even my watch.

[Anonymous No.14834231]

>>14834189
It's their caliber 16 movement. Not sure about their movements, so you tell me.

[Anonymous No.14834236]

>>14834147
Pretty good advice. I'll just get a sarb then.

[Anonymous No.14834369]

>>14833980
Not my style but its fun how it pisses people here off. Rolex as a brand deserves some hate (waitlist, artificial shortage, false exclusivity). But there is no point in hating on anons who have a rolex already. So enjoy your watch, even if its not yours. I like that its smaller and well proportioned. Fits well.

[Anonymous No.14834420]

this there a more aesthetic 'stock than this?

[Anonymous No.14834429]

>>14834369
I own watches better than Rolex.

They're shit. Only people who want to pretend to be rich by them.

[Anonymous No.14834444]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.14834449]

yes yes, communism is effay but are there any vintage fashy watches?

[Anonymous No.14834455]

>>14833947
Because they think a watch has to be ugly to be "classy" or whatever.

[Anonymous No.14834460]

>>14834073
That looks like it's going to burst open with maggots.

[Anonymous No.14834463]

>>14834147
>and at least about 4000 is a waste of money
So Speedy, Sinn, etc. don't exist?

[Anonymous No.14834492]

>>14834463
Speedy is okay if you're okay with a made in china meme watch from a failed brand, sinn has gimmicks rather than actually good innovations but it I'd rather ay sinn over any modern omega.

[Anonymous No.14834497]

>>14834449
Not many survived.
Closets you can get is a german pilot watch. A flieger b-uhr is good enough.

[Anonymous No.14834499]

lole

[Anonymous No.14834566]

>>14834460
In a good way?

[Anonymous No.14834764]

Is tudor the future /wt/?

[Anonymous No.14834802]

>>14834566
The leather looks tense

[Anonymous No.14834806]

>>14834566
In a bloated corpse way.

[Anonymous No.14834808]

>>14834764
Yeah for poorfag retards, in 10 years no one will even remember the brand.

[Anonymous No.14834926]

am i effay yet guise

[Anonymous No.14834953]

>>14834926
Shitter watch.

[Anonymous No.14834957]

>>14834953
u hurt my feerings

[Anonymous No.14834966]

>>14834926
Way too big, isn't there a smaller version?

[Anonymous No.14835000]

>>14834966
There is a 36

[Anonymous No.14835004]

>>14834966
I think they're only 39mm. He must have twink wrists.

[Anonymous No.14835011]

>>14835004
>I think they're only 39mm
I thought so too but this looks absolutely huge, I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.14835016]

>>14835004
>twink wrists
You say that like it's a bad thing

[Anonymous No.14835510]

>>14835508
>>14835508
>>14835508
>>NEW THREAD